A Great Read

story.jpg

Hey Potter maniacs!

Click here to read a fabulous article from Salon.com about the significance of J.K. Rowling "outing" Dumbledore.

    Posted: Oct 23, 2007 at 1:19 pm / Email this  »

    99 comments to “A Great Read”

    1. YO says – reply to this


      1

      1st ?
      ..Top 10 atleast ?

    2. leah says – reply to this


      2

      WHO CARES, HARRY POTTER SUUUUCKS!

    3. MrFantastic says – reply to this


      3

      Who cares if he's gay or not, it has no effect on the story itself. She's just sad that the movies are done and no one cares about her anymore…

    4. Me says – reply to this


      4

      2nd. I think she outed him for publicity.

    5. havoc448 says – reply to this


      5

      second?

    6. Kevin says – reply to this


      6

      So what am I? Second?

    7. Kathy says – reply to this


      7

      thats pretty funny. but i kinda had a feeling he was gay lol

    8. Andrew Tyler says – reply to this


      8

      i'm not gonna lie, i would make out with him

    9. stupid shit says – reply to this


      9

      FUCKING BULLSHIT I WILL KILL MYSELF NOW!

    10. Jenny says – reply to this


      10

      Do you ever watch E News? It seems like you are a day behind.

    11. biatch says – reply to this


      11

      2nd

    12. kaitlin says – reply to this


      12

      Re: Me – i agree. what's the point?

    13. Kathy says – reply to this


      13

      lol thats pretty funny. i had a feeling he was even before she annouced it.

    14. Markie says – reply to this


      14

      hahahahahahaha…..stoooooooooopid!!!!!!

    15. Chesley says – reply to this


      15

      I'm sorry, but I think "outing" a fictional character whose sexual orientation has absolutely NOTHING to do with any of the story lines whatsoever is just a lame attempt at added publicity. I think it's stupid. For all of those ready to attack, I'm not calling homosexuality stupid - I just think its stupid to create this publicity stunt totally out of context and waaaaay after the fact.

    16. dreds says – reply to this


      16

      Who cares! Cant wait for Britney, Spice girls suck, and a new Friday the 13th will Kick ass;)

    17. cheynne says – reply to this


      17

      She is a publicity hound and needed to restir her pot. Get the juices flowing again. She never intended to make him a homo, it just sounded good a the moment.

    18. Lauren says – reply to this


      18

      5th

      HARRY POTTER IS FUCKING AMAZING. I WANNA RAPE RONALD

    19. Nora says – reply to this


      19

      Ofcourse she outed him for publicity. And also, who cares if he's gay or not, it hasn't anything to do with the story itself.

    20. Rash Manly says – reply to this


      20

      We do not have
      actual 'closets' as such in the castle,
      so the issue had never come up before,
      really, as there was nothing to
      come out of.
      It was all just assumed."

    21. Heidi says – reply to this


      21

      There was no story need for that. Who cares about a fictional caracter sexual orientation? Lame attempt for publicity. Perez, you should be ashamed of yourself! Where is the story here? You are lost your touch!

    22. Gia Jolie says – reply to this


      22

      Rowling is brilliant CRAZY!

      I love it!

    23. Britney Spears for President says – reply to this


      23

      I don't care, I'm voting for Britney!

    24. Frats says – reply to this


      24

      Good for her. Just the fact the whole world is buzzin' about it makes for communication and hopefully communication leads to progress.

    25. Sofie says – reply to this


      25

      This is not written into the book so why should anyone care? Rowling's comment demonstrates either her latent homophobia or a desperate need for publicity. Why would she come out, post Potter series, with the "revelation" that Dumbledore is gay? She would never stand in front of a group of people and announce he was hetero. If she felt Dumbledore's sexual orientation was so fucking important to the books, then why was she too chicken shit to write it in?

    26. Jack says – reply to this


      26

      HOTTEST BLOG ON THE NET NOW IS:
      VENTARAMA by JEZ GLOBAL PEOPLE..get with the program and shake this country!
      HOTTEST BLOG ON THE NET NOW IS:
      VENTARAMA by JEZ GLOBAL PEOPLE..get with the program and shake this country!
      HOTTEST BLOG ON THE NET NOW IS:
      VENTARAMA by JEZ GLOBAL PEOPLE..get with the program and shake this country!
      HOTTEST BLOG ON THE NET NOW IS:
      VENTARAMA by JEZ GLOBAL PEOPLE..get with the program and shake this country!
      HOTTEST BLOG ON THE NET NOW IS:
      VENTARAMA by JEZ GLOBAL PEOPLE..get with the program and shake this country!
      HOTTEST BLOG ON THE NET NOW IS:
      VENTARAMA by JEZ GLOBAL PEOPLE..get with the program and shake this country!
      HOTTEST BLOG ON THE NET NOW IS:
      VENTARAMA by JEZ GLOBAL PEOPLE..get with the program and shake this country!

    27. Beer Me says – reply to this


      27

      Of Course he is Gay…. one of the largest segments of the Harry Potter fan base is Gay Men. Funny how she waited til after all the books had been published.

    28. Jason says – reply to this


      28

      I shouldn't be surprised about this- our society today is so ingrained with sex that I should expect a sex subplot in a children's series. I wish she'd come out with it at the start though- a lot of parents have read these books to their young children, and they should have had a choice in how to teach about homosexuality. Now their kids are going to hear, "Dumbledore is gay!" and they'll have to explain whether their child is ready for it or not. I'm one who has read the books to my daughter. She's young enough that she doesn't even know how babies are made yet- yet now she might be asking me about what it is to be gay. I just wish JK would have done this all differently. I don't think Dumbledore being gay adds to the story. The plot's the same whether his love for Grindlewold is platonic or otherwise. Now this great series is going to turn into a gay rights political battle. How sad a good story can't just be a good story anymore.

    29. cj08 says – reply to this


      29

      i dont think it's publicity, a kid just asked him abt dumbledore's love interest and she just answered the kid's question.

    30. cj08 says – reply to this


      30

      i dont think it's publicity, a kid just asked him abt dumbledore's love interest and she just answered the kid's question.

    31. harry potter is awesome says – reply to this


      31

      haha mrfantastic.. the movies are not done.. are you retarded? there are still 2 more movies to be made… people are going to see him differently in the movie.. and prob look for signs of him "being gay"…. i think its cool she did this… it pretty much shows that anyone could be gay.. even a great wizard

      harry potter is the shit

      love you perez

    32. lesann says – reply to this


      32

      #16 I couldn't have said it better myself. Why in the world has she done this, and why is this significant.

    33. Mary says – reply to this


      33

      THis is such a joke the homosexual segment of our society should be furious. It is such a ploy to get more books sold not to mention it is all FICTION so how can GAY exist in FICTION!

    34. I'mGay says – reply to this


      34

      Re: Jason

      Jason, saying someone is gay has nothing to do with sex, anymore than your child seeing a man and woman holding hands together. It's getting pretty sad that people always equate "gay" with "sex". I'm gay and I'm not getting any! lol

    35. why? says – reply to this


      35

      There is no good reason to sexualize characters in a childrens book.

    36. SA says – reply to this


      36

      Of course this is for publicity! It is entertainment biz. You know, gay is cool. Gay is the "in thing". It she was soooo brave to put a gay man in this very popular children's book series, why not make it more obvious up front. Why wait until the book series is over? This is just one more event of liberals "desensitizing" the public to the gay issue. Sad.

    37. 9 Inches of Pain says – reply to this


      37

      So let me get this straight… she outed a character that exists actually in her own mind, and whom she is no longer going to write about? Hmm I wonder if they're trying to give the last book a bit more of a boost as the cash cow is gone forever.Lame

    38. RIDONKULOUS says – reply to this


      38

      This is Ridiculous. These are CHILDREN'S BOOKS. Totally disgusting to have to label Dumbledore as Gay. Sick. Rowling obviously needs publicity.

    39. jntypie says – reply to this


      39

      I'm sorry but thats the stupidest think J.K. Rowling has ever done. If he wanted to speak about it he could have. =| What a bitch!

    40. Flynn says – reply to this


      40

      Re: Mary – Are you serious? A character in fiction can be gay the same way a character in fiction can be straight. Come on now.

    41. SHITTY BEEF says – reply to this


      41

      *****ATTENTION******

      DICK BALLS PUSSY FLAP
      RYAN HAS SAND IN HIS VAGINA, BOB SAGET PISSES IN HIS MOUTH WHILE GENE SHALIT BUTTERS HIS NIPPLES!!!!!
      ……..THAT IS ALL

    42. Suffering Fools says – reply to this


      42

      Re: SA – "Gay is cool. Gay is the in thing."

      Oh, yeah? Then why are do so many haters think it's sick and not something children should hear of but heterosexual characters smooching are just fine? Don't be naive.

    43. PACA says – reply to this


      43

      this is digusting. maybe she should have had him admit he was a robber , rapist . murderer or child molester as well. honestly doesnt he have the typical child molesters role. a guy who takes a jog where he is around peoples kids so he can bugger then hell out of them as soon as the parents drop them off?

    44. PACA says – reply to this


      44

      DONT BE FOOLED PEOPLE!! JUST BECAUSE A SEGMENT OF THE POPULATION DOES SOMETHING DOESNT MAKE IS "NATURAL". HOMOSEXUALITY ISNT "NATURAL" ANYMORE THAN ROBBERY, RAPE, SERIAL KILLING OR CHILD MOLESTING. IT IS CAUSED BY ABUSE, JUST LIKE CANCER IS CAUSED BY SMOKING, AND IT IS CERTAINLY NOT SOMETHING THAT OUGHT TO BE ACCEPTED OR REVERED. BE CAREFUL FOLKS, THE MEDIA IS TRYING TO INDOCTRINATE YOU! IF THERE IS A DUMBDALORE IN YOUR LIFE GET YOUR KIDS THE HELL AWAY FROM HIM BEFORE HE MOLESTS THEN AND RUINS THEIR LIFE. DONT BELIVE THE MEDIA PROPAGHANDA ABOUT HOMOSEXUALITY!!!!

    45. Beez says – reply to this


      45

      Re: PACA – She didn't say he was a pedophile, you idiot, she said he was gay. See you in the Darwin Award list soon.

    46. Sigmund says – reply to this


      46

      Re: PACA – See a shrink. Soon.

    47. PACA says – reply to this


      47

      Re: Beez

      YOU STUPID MORON WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU THINK A HOMOSEXUAL IS? WHY DO YOU THINK HOMOS TAKE JOBS AS CAMP COUNSELORS, TEACHERS, WIZARDS AND LIBRARIANS. SO THEY CAN BE NEAR YOUR KIDS SO THEY CAN BUGGER THEM

    48. PACA says – reply to this


      48

      Re: Beez

      YEAH AND THE REST OF THE WORLD CAN SEE YOUR KIDS AT COUSELING WHEN THEY HAVE TO GO BECAUSE A BASTARD LIKE THAT MOLESTED THEM UNTIL THIER BRAINS ARE FRIED.

      DONT BE FOOLED BY THE PROPAGHANDA. HOMOSEXUALITY IS CAUSED BY ABUSE JUST LIKE CANCER IS CAUSED BY SMOKING AND NOBODY THINKS SMOKING IS A GOOD THING

    49. Rowling rhymes with Bowling- or bitch says – reply to this


      49

      Nice of her to OUT him AFTER she has made her billion dollars and can safely say that in order to make herself look liberal. Bitch should have done it in book one rather than announce it to an audience of little kids who don't give a crap about sexuality yet. Why the hell did she try to drag little kids into this? He's a damn wizard. Not a Backstreet Boy or blue haired guy. She certainly took that out of parent's hands. Mommy, what's a pillow biter? Who DOES that? Isn't anything innocent left for children?

    50. Sigmund says – reply to this


      50

      Re: PACA – Most child molesters are heterosexual. Obviously you have been hurt but you need to stop typing in all caps and see a professional.

    51. NK says – reply to this


      51

      Amazing article… thanks for the link.

    52. liz says – reply to this


      52

      I AM SOOO XCITED that the whole gay is contagiouse is almost over I am straight and have gay loved ones but am GLAD that he is gay @home and in the film SHOUT IT OUT LOUD GAY GAY GAY WOOO HAA

    53. PACA says – reply to this


      53

      Re: Sigmund

      THAT MAY BE TRUE BUT ONLY BECAUSE THERE ARE MORE HETEROSEXUALS. HOWEVER THAT VAST MAJORITY OF HETEROSEXUALS ARE NOT MOLESTERS WHEREAS VIRTUALLY 100% OF HOMOSEXUALS ARE BECASUE OF THE ORIGIN OF HOMOSEXUALITY WHICH IS CHILD ABUSE

    54. gwen_master says – reply to this


      54

      Im glad she did it.

      If youve read the book, it makes perfect sense. There were so many little hints, that confirming it now puts shame to the little nancies who would just dismiss the fact he was gay.

      I think it was perfect that Jo did that. Nuff said.

    55. LIZSISTER says – reply to this


      55

      I AM SOOO XCITED that the whole CHILD MOLESTER is contagiouse is almost over I am straight and have CHILD MOLESTING loved ones but am GLAD that he is A CHILD MOLESTER @home and in the film SHOUT IT OUT LOUD PEDOPHILE PEDOPHILE PDEOPHILE WOOO HAA

    56. jean says – reply to this


      56

      I've never had a problem with homosexuality but I do have a problem with this. I think that this has nothing to do with furthering a story but a cause instead. If that's the case, she was cowardice about it by waiting until all the books have been released and 3 months since book 7. It's not going to turn me off to the books, but I know it will affect others. Especially future readers.

    57. Heather says – reply to this


      57

      All you people saying she saying it for the publicity — Why on earth does she need anymore publicity. She's richer than the Queen of England for heaven sakes, her books are sold in almost every language, she has five sucessful movies that give her royalties etc. JKR doesn't need the publicity.
      All this woman did was answer a question honestly. The book series is over with — she doesn't need to be worried about sales anymore. Besides Grindlewald was a bit important to the plot which is why she didn't say so before.
      She said that she always imagined him as gay — so just because she didn't say in the books explicity he was makes it all false and untrue?
      It had little if any baring on the main plot line. The books are called Harry Potter not Albus Dumbledore's Sexual Exploits.

    58. iloveturtles says – reply to this


      58

      She did for the publicity and he is not real…

    59. Karen says – reply to this


      59

      wow, that was a great article. Thanks for showing it to us Perez! I, too, wondered why Rowling was dishing out so many of the secrets that she claims happen after book 7. I mean, if it doesn't happen in the book then why say it happened at all? I will continue to fantasize about what i think happens in Harry's Ron's and Hermione's future rather than waiting for her too fill in the holes.

    60. iloveturtles says – reply to this


      60

      Re: Heather – She is not richer than the queen of england. you don't need to lie SAVE JERICHO

    61. Me says – reply to this


      61

      as put by Scott in my english class
      "DUMBLEDORE IS NOT GAY SHUT UP! DONT SAY THAT "
      he also said something about hogwarts being real…

      BUT if in fact dumbledore IS gay(highly unbelievable because there is NO proof of this at all), I find it a little creepy that he was so close to Harry all those years… ha

    62. iloveturtles says – reply to this


      62

      Re: Jason – I agree with you jason you are a repressed homosexual

    63. guiltypleasure says – reply to this


      63

      there's an even better article about this @ Time

    64. iloveturtles says – reply to this


      64

      Re: Frats – I agree with you i also think that hogwarts is real….Spread the Word…hogwarts is real…SAVE JERICHO

    65. Anichka says – reply to this


      65

      How does the characters sexuality have anything to do with the story? This was said for publicity. If she didn't mention it, no one would be talking about her or the book. Now the news is spread, the whole world is back to discussing Harry Potter. :) It is all for publicity :)

    66. Carrie says – reply to this


      66

      He looks just like my ski teacher in germany.

    67. KATE says – reply to this


      67

      i knew that since i was like 9! I'm SO HAPPY SHE MADE IT CANON!!!!!!!

    68. wtf says – reply to this


      68

      wtf why does it matter … everyone makes suchhh a big deal of it … i think everyone here is aganstt gay ppl :( and what the hell is with the first second thirdd ??? huhhh

    69. GEEZ LOUISE says – reply to this


      69

      PACA & THE DONKEY: CHAPTER 1-ONCE UPON A TIME THERE WAS AN EVIL QUEEN NAMED PACA. SHE LIVED IN A BIG CLOSET WITH A CAPTIVE DONKEY AND HER NASTY MAGIC WAND. WELL, IT WASN'T REALLY MAGIC BUT SHE LIKED TO STROKE IT ANYWAY! SHE TRIED TO CAST HER EVIL SPELL ON THE FAIRYLAND OF PEREZ BUT EVERYONE SAW THROUGH HER RANT AS SHE TRIED TO PRETEND SHE WASN'T THE BIG OLD QUEER SHE REALLY WAS! ONE DAY A GOOD WIZARD RELEASED THE DONKEY AND HE STUCK HIS MASSIVE COCK SO FAR UP THE EVIL PACA'S ASS , SHE EXPLODED WITH JIZZ AND EVERYONE LIVED HAPPILY EVER AFTER!
      THE END

    70. Hayley says – reply to this


      70

      In Book 6 as Dumbledore is going to meet Tom Riddle for the first time, the description of him is"with his auburn hair tied back and wearing a beautifully cut suit of plum velvet"…..hmmmm…

    71. Reality Check says – reply to this


      71

      Re: iloveturtles – Yeah, she is richer than the Queen of England. She's one of the richest women in the world. Deal with it.

    72. Sigmund says – reply to this


      72

      Re: PACA – No, the vast majority of homosexuals are not child molesters. See a qualified professional, please.

    73. postwatcher says – reply to this


      73

      PUBLICITY STUNT ALERT! She was asked by one young fan whether Dumbledore finds "true love."

      "Dumbledore is gay," the author responded to gasps and applause.

      I wish everyone would realize how homophobic JK Rowlings answer is! How is sexuality an answer to the question about Dumbledore finding true love? The question was if Dumbledore was ever in love. The answer should have been a yes or a no.

      Is JK Rowling saying that Gay people don't have a real love?

      Wake up everyone! JK Rowling is a homophobe trying to sell more books!

    74. postwatcher says – reply to this


      74

      PUBLICITY STUNT ALERT! She was asked by one young fan whether Dumbledore finds "true love."

      "Dumbledore is gay," the author responded to gasps and applause. I wish everyone would realize how homophobic JK Rowlings answer is! How is sexuality an answer to the question about Dumbledore finding true love? The question was if Dumbledore was ever in love. The answer should have been a yes or a no. Is JK Rowling saying that Gay people don't have a real love? Wake up everyone! JK Rowling is a homophobe trying to sell more books!

    75. lisa says – reply to this


      75

      She did what everyone with undeserved success does,,, sold her soul to satan.,,, guess she thinks, its cool for little kiddies to be dealing with it. God will deal with her.

    76. Straight but not narrow says – reply to this


      76

      Oh, please… if people have thought there weren't sexual overtones in children's stories before this perhaps need to spend more time reading some literary analysis. I freaking love how people object to a character being gay (when it wasn't a major topic of discussion IN the book), BUT don't object to the violence in book - ever read the real fairy tales?
      As for "it was a yes or no question" - POSTWATCHER, get real. The audience was full of RABID fans. If she had just answered "yes" someone would have definitely said "OMG, WHO was he in love with?" Actually, you need to read the complete transcript. She goes into detail as to who he fell into love with -
      I'm not sure if I am that thrilled with the article, and I certainly don't agree. Every author discusses background details of a book (heck, the article mentioned by Neil Gaiman, where Gaiman slams JKR for revealing so much, is very hypocritical… Gaiman slips in a number of background details of his own about a number of his books. The difference is that JKR hasn't been able to gradually discuss her books as each came out - for fear of giving away anything. She has said how unusual it has been, and indeed how "freeing" it is for her to be able to talk about the books to people without fear (unless they haven't finished them yet)

    77. Hukt on Fonnix says – reply to this


      77

      Re: Heather – The word is BEARING not baring. God. Get an education.

    78. Hello Kitty says – reply to this


      78

      She did not do it while the HP story was still going, so I don't see him as being gay.

    79. casey says – reply to this


      79

      if you don't want to know shit - get off the internet. End of.

    80. nancy says – reply to this


      80

      Re: Hello Kitty – Maybe you should read the books again. It's kinda blatant.

    81. ella says – reply to this


      81

      Re: Me – Oh my god! Just because he's gay does NOT make him a paedophile!!!

    82. foolsonline says – reply to this


      82

      People, get over it. Someone asked her a question - she answered it. For JKR to have written so many books with so much information, she would need to know her characters back to front. And bitch don't need to sell any more books or gain any more publicity. She'll be getting bucks for years to come.

    83. Sherry says – reply to this


      83

      Re: Chesley – I see your point, but it wasn't a publicity stunt. J.K. Rowling was ASKED by a student whether or not Albus Dumbledore ever had a romantic life, or if he was ever in love with somebody, and it was only THEN that J.K. mentioned that the character was a gay man. Obviously she didn't put that fact in the story, or make a big deal about it beforehand… because it *wasn't* a big deal, or central to Harry's struggles, and therefore not really worth mentioning until now (that she was asked). Besides, why the hell would J.K. Rowling need the publicity?? She's already richer than the Queen of England for pete's sakes, and even though all of the books are done now, there are still more movies to be made, there's going to be a theme park in Florida, and she's going to write an Encyclopedia of the wizarding world in a few years. She didn't "need" to reveal that Dumbledore is gay for publicity!

    84. missy says – reply to this


      84

      Yawn… JK really sorry of you to have to out a man in a childrens books, Aren;t they exposed to enough without putting the sex out there, gay or straight. It has no effect on the story or movie just a little pathetic publicity.

    85. Sherry says – reply to this


      85

      Re: iloveturtles – Yes she is!! Where have you been? Everyone knows J.K. Rowling is richer than the queen of England! She's worthe like 1.6 BILLION dollars (and counting)!! The Queen's estate (her personal wealth) is only estimated at about 536 million- a far cry from Rowling is worth. At least know your facts before you start running your mouth off about her "needing the publicity", or claiming that she isn't worth as much as what she is.

    86. liz.. dont hate says – reply to this


      86

      Re: LIZSISTER – child molesters and gays R 2 VERY different things but I cant xpect any of u damn homophobes 2 get it automaticly ur a child molester if your gay congrats U R the reason our gay loved ones cant do it out loud gay basher

    87. SA says – reply to this


      87

      Re: Sigmund – You would have to back that up with facts.

      mosexuals account for only 1-2% of our population based on current surveys. The National Opinion Research Center in 1992 found that 2.8% of men and 1.4% of women identified themselves as “homosexual” or “bisexual. A 1995 survey of 18-49-year-old men published by the Journal of Sex Research indicated that 2.6% of them had engaged in homosexual sex within the prior 12 months; 4% had had homosexual sex within the past five years. In other words, at least 98-99% of our population is heterosexual in orientation.

      Homosexual activists routinely claim that most child molesters are “heterosexual” males, thus shifting the focus away from their own very high rates of molestation. Since 98-99% of the population is heterosexual, it is technically correct to say that most molestations are done by heterosexuals. However, statistics indicate that homosexuals pose a far more serious threat to children than do heterosexuals.

    88. SA says – reply to this


      88

      Homosexuals account for only 1-2% of our population based on current surveys. The National Opinion Research Center in 1992 found that 2.8% of men and 1.4% of women identified themselves as “homosexual” or “bisexual. A 1995 survey of 18-49-year-old men published by the Journal of Sex Research indicated that 2.6% of them had engaged in homosexual sex within the prior 12 months; 4% had had homosexual sex within the past five years. In other words, at least 98-99% of our population is heterosexual in orientation.

      Homosexual activists routinely claim that most child molesters are “heterosexual” males, thus shifting the focus away from their own very high rates of molestation. Since 98-99% of the population is heterosexual, it is technically correct to say that most molestations are done by heterosexuals. However, statistics indicate that homosexuals pose a far more serious threat to children than do heterosexuals.

    89. SA says – reply to this


      89

      So sorry for the double post, the site was slow.

    90. delphantom says – reply to this


      90

      Fuckin' ruins the books for me and other normal people.

    91. Debbie Does Dumbledore says – reply to this


      91

      delphantom-Well that's GOOD! Since you're not "NORMAL" anyway! I hope you've spent your life savings on the books, ASSHOLE!

    92. Glendora says – reply to this


      92

      SA-That MUST mean Hitler's SA! No matter what a SURVEY says, most gay people ARE reluctant to out themselves even if it's anonymous. Mostly due to fucking bigots like YOU! Your so-called "statistics" are as phony as you are, even if you are trying to be a subtle homophobe. A KNIFE IN THE BACK BY ANY OTHER NAME!

    93. issie says – reply to this


      93

      sooooooooooo what go out and buy the britney spears new albummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm the blackout is off the hookkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk

    94. chester says – reply to this


      94

      Incloseto Putbacko!

    95. greg says – reply to this


      95

      omfg all of u stfu she couldnt say all this shit int he books because of her contract but this was not reveled to kids this event was adressed to an older crowd i was there i got my book im 15 my sis is 18 we know that there is "gay people" but she created him as a scorned person in love but he still beleves in love but it was devestating to him for his "love" to turn evil perez did the right thing posting this about dumbledore this is to help strive for gay tolerance and acceptance which the whole damn series is fucking about damn why cant yall just say fuck it and move on wit ure lives and say hey gay people have rights too im straight but i have gay firends this isnt for publicity either she gets money for the movies to dumb asses or else she woulda waited til after the fucking 7th movie it was just an on the spot thing she said im surprised ive never been asked about his sexuality before and her fucking fan base is more than little kids go to any highschool over 60% of them would say yea i love hp so fuck off

    96. mAyA says – reply to this


      96

      PUBLICITY STUNT, PATHETIC

    97. sowatifheisgayitsamerica22 says – reply to this


      97

      so what if dumbledore is gay now people wont let there kids read it i mean honestly u live in america and there are so many people and everyone is different parents should teach there kids that there are many different relationships other than the traditional male and female i am straight but i dont believe in ppl acting all homophobic its wrong

    98. e says – reply to this


      98

      love you perez

    99. JANIE says – reply to this


      99

      OKAY HARRY POTTER RULES BUT SOME LAZY ASSES ARE JUST TO STUPID TO PICK UP A BOOK AND READ AND SHES JUST SAYING THT DUMBLEDORE IS GAY FOR MORE PUBLICITY THERE WAS NO POINT IN THE BOOK THT GAVE INDICATION THT DUMBLEDORE WAS GAY