Welcome to PerezHilton.com
Welcome to PerezHilton.com - Hollywood's Most-Hated Web Site!
Celebrity Scoop Goes Here
E-mail Perez@PerezHilton.com

Report technical problems.
Perez Posse signup FAQ

Contact us to advertise on PerezHilton.com



Wear it, share it, give it, get it! Represent!

Jump to your favorite celebrity

Articles by date

Sued!

Filed under: Britney Spears > Legal Matters

wenn5056180.jpg

She just can't get a break these days!

Britney Spears was sued by Louis Vuitton in a court in Paris for bastardizing their logo and tarnishing the company image.

And she lost!

[Image via WENN.]

325 comments to “Sued!”

More comments: [1] 2 3 4 »

  1. gsfdgsdfg says – reply to this


    1

    HAHAHHAH WEIRDO!

  2. Shay says – reply to this


    2

    how did she do that exactly?

  3. Sarah says – reply to this


    3

    hahaha..bitchney

  4. gsfdgsdfg says – reply to this


    4

    i feel bad for the doggy!

  5. jen n says – reply to this


    5

    eww enough of her. 1st

  6. chanel girl says – reply to this


    6

    Dont fuck with Louis Vuitton bitch!

  7. hahaha says – reply to this


    7

    second!! lol this is fun

  8. brittany says – reply to this


    8

    first bitches!

  9. rachel says – reply to this


    9

    why is this filed under avril lavigne?

  10. ahaha says – reply to this


    10

    FIRST

  11. chanel girl says – reply to this


    11

    btw, why is this under avril levigne?

  12. ML says – reply to this


    12

    First? HA HA!

  13. Justin says – reply to this


    13

    first!

  14. dianeeeeee says – reply to this


    14

    first oh jez

  15. dianeeeeee says – reply to this


    15

    first oh jez

  16. Emilio says – reply to this


    16

    No she actually didnt lose anything. Mtv and a couple others lost! Get your story straight fraud!

  17. GiGi says – reply to this


    17

    haha that's awesome. classy designers should be reserved for classy people, not trashy hoes.

  18. West Coast Bitch says – reply to this


    18

    You dumb*ass!!! She wasn't sued! Sony was….and they lost. Britney wasn't even named in the lawsuit - nor did any money have to come from her. She was NOT a defendant. Do your research!!!!

  19. jj says – reply to this


    19

    she wasnt sued the music company was, idiota!!…..its not her fault the director is an ass

  20. yay says – reply to this


    20

    first

  21. cici says – reply to this


    21

    shocking…

  22. Abby says – reply to this


    22

    first–whore

  23. Justin says – reply to this


    23

    This is stupid….it's like they were looking for something to sue her for…this video is old as hell…doesn't Louis Vuitton make enough money as it is? fuck them and fuck Perez :D

  24. Trisha says – reply to this


    24

    Such an old video, Poor Brit, everyone wants a piece of her.

  25. BAHAHAHA says – reply to this


    25

    BRITNEY IS RETARDED

  26. monica says – reply to this


    26

    gimme a break - show me proof - and if it were the case; why wouldn't they sue all those gangster rappers????

    LEAVE BRIT ALONE ALREADY

  27. maria says – reply to this


    27

    According to Forbes.com:

    In the video, Spears appears in a car upholstered with Louis Vuitton fabric. The tribunal found the director of the video had clearly emphasized the Louis Vuitton brand, the report said.

    The tribunal ruled that responsibility for the unauthorized use of the Louis Vuitton brand lay with Sony (nyse: SNE - news - people ) BMG and its subsidiary Zomba as well as MTV Online, and not the singer herself.

    >>>>

    PEREZ YOU ARE AN IDIOT! She wasn't sued. tsk tsk..

  28. jenny_ says – reply to this


    28

    first????

  29. Alaina says – reply to this


    29

    first?

  30. whiterabbit says – reply to this


    30

    first

  31. Candice says – reply to this


    31

    She wasn't sued herself, Sony was sued. Get it right.

  32. pat says – reply to this


    32

    dumbass

  33. What?? says – reply to this


    33

    Filed under AVRIL LAVIGNE???

    What is up with you and getting this so wrong today??

  34. Jenn says – reply to this


    34

    HAHAHAHA

  35. Panda says – reply to this


    35

    Why is this filed under Avril Lavigne??

  36. Jen says – reply to this


    36

    That is just stupid! The things people sue over these days

  37. SHE DIDN'T LOSE, SONY AND ZOMBA DID says – reply to this


    37

    You sure bend the truth for your own sensationalism…. She is not guilty. The tribunal found that Sony and Zomba were.

  38. me says – reply to this


    38

    Ummm..can you NOT READ Perez??? The Article said that SONY and MTV online was held respondsible NOT BRITNEY!!!

  39. leaf says – reply to this


    39

    what video did she wear the lv clothes. she just cant seem to get a break can she. i know people say fuck her, shes a celebrity. but i dunno. were all human. how would you like to be followed around by 100 people. can even see 5 feet ahead of you because everyone is blocking you and blinding you with a million flashes. ah well. who cares.

  40. FIRSSSST says – reply to this


    40

    FIRSSSSSSSSSSSSST! shes a fucking loser

  41. Jonathan says – reply to this


    41

    1st

  42. Sara says – reply to this


    42

    never heard about this

  43. FIrst says – reply to this


    43

    She is losing everything!!!! What a waste of space

  44. JD says – reply to this


    44

    Well if you read the article it was Sony and BMG and Zomba who were handed the bill . . . this is a little too spun even for you Mario.

  45. Brittany says – reply to this


    45

    I'd sue the bitch too!!

  46. Sammy says – reply to this


    46

    Damn!

  47. k says – reply to this


    47

    It was SONY not Spears that was sued- read the attached article!!!!

  48. vanessaRaCHELlE says – reply to this


    48

    what the fuck is that!! oMg!! thats like saying if a girl from the hood saved up all her dollars to get a nice purse or something they wouldnt like that..cuz its tarnishing there rep. ok……… assholes… sorry if you only want stank ass bitched wearen your shit>>.how could someone actually sue for that!!!….

  49. ele says – reply to this


    49

    primeraaaaaa!!

  50. Amanda says – reply to this


    50

    LOL!! That is so funny…. I can't believe it! :D

  51. Dollface says – reply to this


    51

    It says the tribunal ruled that responsibility for the unauthorised use of the Louis Vuitton brand lay with Sony BMG and its subsidiary Zomba as well as MTV Online, and not the singer herself. BRITNEY WASN'T SUED PEREZ!

  52. atoz says – reply to this


    52

    ACTUALLY…..it clearly says Britney herself was not sued….BMG, Sony, MTV Online….NOT THE SINGER HERSELF!!!!!!

    read what you post fucker

  53. jen says – reply to this


    53

    1st…..hahaha…good for her

  54. Reality says – reply to this


    54

    Good. If I was SONY, I would take that money out her goofy ass

  55. Reality says – reply to this


    55

    Good. If I was SONY, I would take that money out her goofy ass

  56. H4L says – reply to this


    56

    GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT MORON - SHE WASN'T SUED!!!

    The tribunal ruled that responsibility for the unauthorised use of the Louis Vuitton brand lay with Sony (nyse: SNE - news - people ) BMG and its subsidiary Zomba as well as MTV Online, and not the singer herself.

  57. kikabit says – reply to this


    57

    WHO CARES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  58. kikabit says – reply to this


    58

    WHO CARES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  59. kikabit says – reply to this


    59

    WHO CARES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  60. matt says – reply to this


    60

    hey fatass

    if you actually read the article, it specifically states that britney herself has not been sued

    go eat another whole turkey for breakfast you cow

  61. Go Ask Alice says – reply to this


    61

    hahahah…they even let ghetto folks use their image in their videos. Brit is just tacky white trash! GET YOURSELF TOGETHER TACKY TRASH!!

  62. Perez is stupiddddd says – reply to this


    62

    SONY lost, not Brit, dumbass Perez!

  63. c0d3w12 says – reply to this


    63

    Get the facts stright Perez, don't mislead:

    The tribunal ruled that responsibility for the unauthorised use of the Louis Vuitton brand lay with Sony (nyse: SNE) BMG and its subsidiary Zomba as well as MTV Online, and not the singer herself.

  64. sarah says – reply to this


    64

    why is this filed under avril lavigne?

  65. Chris says – reply to this


    65

    Ummm…it wasn't Britney that got sued or lost! You are using some misleading headlines in your posts….Getting tired of getting the wrong impression.

  66. bheard says – reply to this


    66

    watch this be the one court ruling that gets her life back on track…

  67. wcf says – reply to this


    67

    she looks like jessica alba

  68. ItsMe says – reply to this


    68

    under Avril?? Not again.

  69. JD says – reply to this


    69

    ZOMBA AND SONY were found guilty not brit brit . . . you really are twisting this one.

  70. Susan says – reply to this


    70

    Can Perez actually read basic wording ?
    SHE DIDN'T LOOSE YOU MORON. She wasn't even found liable you dumb fuck. READ THE ARTICLE FIRST before you post anything like this. This guy is such a douche, honestly.
    The tribunal ruled that responsibility for the unauthorised use of the Louis Vuitton brand lay with Sony (nyse: SNE - news - people ) BMG and its subsidiary Zomba as well as MTV Online, and not the singer herself.

  71. Martin says – reply to this


    71

    Filed under: Avril Lavigne ??

  72. Jenkins says – reply to this


    72

    #38- Those companies BECAUSE SHE IS A DUMBASS. Yea they lost money, but IT WAS BECAUSE HER LIVING LIKE A COMPLETE MORON. I wouldn't want that bitch wearing anything I made either.

  73. Dumass Perez says – reply to this


    73

    YOU'RE A DUMBASS PEREZ…READ THE SHIT YOU PRINT. NO FAULT LIES ON THE SINGER HERSELF.

    LOSER

  74. DHoyos says – reply to this


    74

    whAtchA gonnA d0 whEn da cr0wd g0Es EH-OH??!!

  75. Atomica says – reply to this


    75

    Gosh, I guess you must have missed this part of the article. "The tribunal ruled that responsibility for the unauthorised use of the Louis Vuitton brand lay with Sony (nyse: SNE - news - people ) BMG and its subsidiary Zomba as well as MTV Online, and not the singer herself."

  76. loren says – reply to this


    76

    lolz. shes done.

  77. M says – reply to this


    77

    Perez you're a fucking moron. If you're going to try to report something, report the truth. Your credibility goes downhill every time you post something new about Britney Spears.

  78. Get Yer Facts Straight says – reply to this


    78

    Not that I'm a loser Brit ney fan… but really! Did you not read the very article you linked to???

    "The tribunal ruled that responsibility for the unauthorised use of the Louis Vuitton brand lay with Sony BMG and its subsidiary Zomba as well as MTV Online, and not the singer herself."

    She should sue YOU for libel.

  79. Perez Lies says – reply to this


    79

    The tribunal ruled that responsibility for the unauthorised use of the Louis Vuitton brand lay with Sony.

  80. jon says – reply to this


    80

    what video was this for??

  81. Leah says – reply to this


    81

    Great example on how you can mold a news story into something negative and false. Britney Spears herself was not being sued by LV. Sony BMG, Zomba, and MTV online were the ones being sued due to the fact that they used the LV logo in Britney's "Do Somethin'" video without the proper copyright. To read the real story behind this false post on this site, follow the link below the story.

    The fat bitch (meaning Perez) is just jealous because he's a fag that will burn in hell.

  82. rosie Peaches says – reply to this


    82

    Hey Fat Fuck,

    You read the article. It states that Sony, BMG and
    MTV online were sued. It has nothing to do with Britney.
    Read the shit before you post it asshole.

  83. rosie Peaches says – reply to this


    83

    Hey Fat Fuck,

    You read the article. It states that Sony, BMG and
    MTV online were sued. It has nothing to do with Britney.
    Read the shit before you post it asshole.

  84. rosie Peaches says – reply to this


    84

    Hey Fat Fuck,

    You read the article. It states that Sony, BMG and
    MTV online were sued. It has nothing to do with Britney.
    Read the shit before you post it asshole.

  85. rosie Peaches says – reply to this


    85

    Hey Fat Fuck,

    You read the article. It states that Sony, BMG and
    MTV online were sued. It has nothing to do with Britney.
    Read the shit before you post it asshole.

  86. rosie Peaches says – reply to this


    86

    Hey Fat Fuck,

    You read the article. It states that Sony, BMG and
    MTV online were sued. It has nothing to do with Britney.
    Read the shit before you post it asshole.

  87. rosie Peaches says – reply to this


    87

    Hey Fat Fuck,

    You read the article. It states that Sony, BMG and
    MTV online were sued. It has nothing to do with Britney.
    Read the shit before you post it asshole.

  88. Felix636 says – reply to this


    88

    youre wrong. britney was not sued. the director of the video and some of the higher ups were sued.
    i think its all fine and dandy that you talk shit about britney cuz she is quite a train wreck but, when you post shit like this that isnt even true it kinda makes you (perez) look like a douche.
    dont be such a tool box and get your facts straight

  89. Jessica says – reply to this


    89

    You can't sell products and then sue people who buy them for being idiots.

  90. insider says – reply to this


    90

    Britney herself was not sued or found guilty it was her record label .. give the girl a break….

  91. ass says – reply to this


    91

    she wasnt herself sued idiot she was in no way held liable nice try

  92. ass says – reply to this


    92

    she wasnt herself sued idiot she was in no way held liable nice try

  93. jeezlouise says – reply to this


    93

    NEWSFLASH! CASTRO IS ALIVE AND BRITNEY ISNT LIABLE DUMBFUCK!

  94. Leah says – reply to this


    94

    Great example on how you can mold a news story into something negative and false. Britney Spears herself was not being sued by LV. Sony BMG, Zomba, and MTV online were the ones being sued due to the fact that they used the LV logo in Britney's "Do Somethin'" video without the proper copyright. To read the real story behind this false post on this site, follow the link below the story.

    Funny because Perez is messing everything up on the site today with all his typos - if anyone else would do that… it would obviously mean they were on drugs… Perez your dumb

  95. K says – reply to this


    95

    OKay, she wasn't sued, Sony was…………….The tribunal ruled that responsibility for the unauthorised use of the Louis Vuitton brand lay with Sony (nyse: SNE - news - people ) BMG and its subsidiary Zomba as well as MTV Online, and not the singer herself.

  96. pauperbabe says – reply to this


    96

    eeps
    no she wasnt sued

    her company was

    she didnt loose any money

    so HAH!

  97. Michelle. says – reply to this


    97

    What about all the minks wearing/carrying knock off LV gear?
    I guess it wouldn't be worth trying to sue them since they aren't filthy rich.
    Nice! Kicking someone when they are down Louis Vitton!!
    Nobody even really knew that she wore your shit but this wasn't very clever since a lawsuit has only drawn attention to the fact!!! Now thousands of people will know.
    Fucking idiot cunts.

  98. lou lou belle says – reply to this


    98

    did you even read the article? it's like, three paragraphs long and it says the lawsuit wasn't even against brit. stop being so irresponsible! people read you and believe what you say. you're the one advocating for "the truth" by outing people and humiliating people. at least get the facts straight!

  99. FATASS says – reply to this


    99

    Atually DUMBASS read up on the full details before you post fake shit…SHE herself was not sued.. SONY, BMG, and other labels were sued.. in just about every article you most likely get your fucking stories from it says she herself has nothing to do with it.. your such a fucking bitch perez serioulsy get over what ever fucking deal you have with her.. GET UP. GET OVER IT and GO WORK OUT AND LOSE WIEGHT

  100. honeydoo says – reply to this


    100

    good for the Vuitton people
    Vuitton is a prestigious name that has been around way before that thrash's parents were alive;why should they sit and watch their stuff being dragged down in mud by trash like Spears?
    Go team Vuitton!

More comments: [1] 2 3 4 »