Sued!

Filed under: Britney Spears > Legal Matters

She just can't get a break these days!

Britney Spears was sued by Louis Vuitton in a court in Paris for bastardizing their logo and tarnishing the company image.

And she lost!

[Image via WENN.]

Posted: Nov 19, 2007 at 4:25 pm / Email this »

See All 325 Comments

325 comments to “Sued!”

More comments: [1] 2 3 4 »

gsfdgsdfg says – reply to this

1

HAHAHHAH WEIRDO!
Shay says – reply to this

2

how did she do that exactly?
Sarah says – reply to this

3

hahaha..bitchney
gsfdgsdfg says – reply to this

4

i feel bad for the doggy!
jen n says – reply to this

5

eww enough of her. 1st
chanel girl says – reply to this

6

Dont fuck with Louis Vuitton bitch!
hahaha says – reply to this

7

second!! lol this is fun
brittany says – reply to this

8

first bitches!
rachel says – reply to this

9

why is this filed under avril lavigne?
ahaha says – reply to this

10

FIRST
chanel girl says – reply to this

11

btw, why is this under avril levigne?
ML says – reply to this

12

First? HA HA!
Justin says – reply to this

13

first!
dianeeeeee says – reply to this

14

first oh jez
dianeeeeee says – reply to this

15

first oh jez
Emilio says – reply to this

16

No she actually didnt lose anything. Mtv and a couple others lost! Get your story straight fraud!
GiGi says – reply to this

17

haha that's awesome. classy designers should be reserved for classy people, not trashy hoes.
West Coast Bitch says – reply to this

18

You dumb*ass!!! She wasn't sued! Sony was….and they lost. Britney wasn't even named in the lawsuit - nor did any money have to come from her. She was NOT a defendant. Do your research!!!!
jj says – reply to this

19

she wasnt sued the music company was, idiota!!…..its not her fault the director is an ass
yay says – reply to this

20

first
cici says – reply to this

21

shocking…
Abby says – reply to this

22

first–whore
Justin says – reply to this

23

This is stupid….it's like they were looking for something to sue her for…this video is old as hell…doesn't Louis Vuitton make enough money as it is? fuck them and fuck Perez
Trisha says – reply to this

24

Such an old video, Poor Brit, everyone wants a piece of her.
BAHAHAHA says – reply to this

25

BRITNEY IS RETARDED
monica says – reply to this

26

gimme a break - show me proof - and if it were the case; why wouldn't they sue all those gangster rappers????

LEAVE BRIT ALONE ALREADY
maria says – reply to this

27

According to Forbes.com:

In the video, Spears appears in a car upholstered with Louis Vuitton fabric. The tribunal found the director of the video had clearly emphasized the Louis Vuitton brand, the report said.

The tribunal ruled that responsibility for the unauthorized use of the Louis Vuitton brand lay with Sony (nyse: SNE - news - people ) BMG and its subsidiary Zomba as well as MTV Online, and not the singer herself.

>>>>

PEREZ YOU ARE AN IDIOT! She wasn't sued. tsk tsk..
jenny_ says – reply to this

28

first????
Alaina says – reply to this

29

first?
whiterabbit says – reply to this

30

first
Candice says – reply to this

31

She wasn't sued herself, Sony was sued. Get it right.
pat says – reply to this

32

dumbass
What?? says – reply to this

33

Filed under AVRIL LAVIGNE???

What is up with you and getting this so wrong today??
Jenn says – reply to this

34

HAHAHAHA
Panda says – reply to this

35

Why is this filed under Avril Lavigne??
Jen says – reply to this

36

That is just stupid! The things people sue over these days
SHE DIDN'T LOSE, SONY AND ZOMBA DID says – reply to this

37

You sure bend the truth for your own sensationalism…. She is not guilty. The tribunal found that Sony and Zomba were.
me says – reply to this

38

Ummm..can you NOT READ Perez??? The Article said that SONY and MTV online was held respondsible NOT BRITNEY!!!
leaf says – reply to this

39

what video did she wear the lv clothes. she just cant seem to get a break can she. i know people say fuck her, shes a celebrity. but i dunno. were all human. how would you like to be followed around by 100 people. can even see 5 feet ahead of you because everyone is blocking you and blinding you with a million flashes. ah well. who cares.
FIRSSSST says – reply to this

40

FIRSSSSSSSSSSSSST! shes a fucking loser
Jonathan says – reply to this

41

1st
Sara says – reply to this

42

never heard about this
FIrst says – reply to this

43

She is losing everything!!!! What a waste of space
JD says – reply to this

44

Well if you read the article it was Sony and BMG and Zomba who were handed the bill . . . this is a little too spun even for you Mario.
Brittany says – reply to this

45

I'd sue the bitch too!!
Sammy says – reply to this

46

Damn!
k says – reply to this

47

It was SONY not Spears that was sued- read the attached article!!!!
vanessaRaCHELlE says – reply to this

48

what the fuck is that!! oMg!! thats like saying if a girl from the hood saved up all her dollars to get a nice purse or something they wouldnt like that..cuz its tarnishing there rep. ok……… assholes… sorry if you only want stank ass bitched wearen your shit>>.how could someone actually sue for that!!!….
ele says – reply to this

49

primeraaaaaa!!
Amanda says – reply to this

50

LOL!! That is so funny…. I can't believe it!
Dollface says – reply to this

51

It says the tribunal ruled that responsibility for the unauthorised use of the Louis Vuitton brand lay with Sony BMG and its subsidiary Zomba as well as MTV Online, and not the singer herself. BRITNEY WASN'T SUED PEREZ!
atoz says – reply to this

52

ACTUALLY…..it clearly says Britney herself was not sued….BMG, Sony, MTV Online….NOT THE SINGER HERSELF!!!!!!

read what you post fucker
jen says – reply to this

53

1st…..hahaha…good for her
Reality says – reply to this

54

Good. If I was SONY, I would take that money out her goofy ass
Reality says – reply to this

55

Good. If I was SONY, I would take that money out her goofy ass
H4L says – reply to this

56

GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT MORON - SHE WASN'T SUED!!!

The tribunal ruled that responsibility for the unauthorised use of the Louis Vuitton brand lay with Sony (nyse: SNE - news - people ) BMG and its subsidiary Zomba as well as MTV Online, and not the singer herself.
kikabit says – reply to this

57

WHO CARES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
kikabit says – reply to this

58

WHO CARES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
kikabit says – reply to this

59

WHO CARES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
matt says – reply to this

60

hey fatass

if you actually read the article, it specifically states that britney herself has not been sued

go eat another whole turkey for breakfast you cow
Go Ask Alice says – reply to this

61

hahahah…they even let ghetto folks use their image in their videos. Brit is just tacky white trash! GET YOURSELF TOGETHER TACKY TRASH!!
Perez is stupiddddd says – reply to this

62

SONY lost, not Brit, dumbass Perez!
c0d3w12 says – reply to this

63

Get the facts stright Perez, don't mislead:

The tribunal ruled that responsibility for the unauthorised use of the Louis Vuitton brand lay with Sony (nyse: SNE) BMG and its subsidiary Zomba as well as MTV Online, and not the singer herself.
sarah says – reply to this

64

why is this filed under avril lavigne?
Chris says – reply to this

65

Ummm…it wasn't Britney that got sued or lost! You are using some misleading headlines in your posts….Getting tired of getting the wrong impression.
bheard says – reply to this

66

watch this be the one court ruling that gets her life back on track…
wcf says – reply to this

67

she looks like jessica alba
ItsMe says – reply to this

68

under Avril?? Not again.
JD says – reply to this

69

ZOMBA AND SONY were found guilty not brit brit . . . you really are twisting this one.
Susan says – reply to this

70

Can Perez actually read basic wording ?
SHE DIDN'T LOOSE YOU MORON. She wasn't even found liable you dumb fuck. READ THE ARTICLE FIRST before you post anything like this. This guy is such a douche, honestly.
The tribunal ruled that responsibility for the unauthorised use of the Louis Vuitton brand lay with Sony (nyse: SNE - news - people ) BMG and its subsidiary Zomba as well as MTV Online, and not the singer herself.
Martin says – reply to this

71

Filed under: Avril Lavigne ??
Jenkins says – reply to this

72

#38- Those companies BECAUSE SHE IS A DUMBASS. Yea they lost money, but IT WAS BECAUSE HER LIVING LIKE A COMPLETE MORON. I wouldn't want that bitch wearing anything I made either.
Dumass Perez says – reply to this

73

YOU'RE A DUMBASS PEREZ…READ THE SHIT YOU PRINT. NO FAULT LIES ON THE SINGER HERSELF.

LOSER
DHoyos says – reply to this

74

whAtchA gonnA d0 whEn da cr0wd g0Es EH-OH??!!
Atomica says – reply to this

75

Gosh, I guess you must have missed this part of the article. "The tribunal ruled that responsibility for the unauthorised use of the Louis Vuitton brand lay with Sony (nyse: SNE - news - people ) BMG and its subsidiary Zomba as well as MTV Online, and not the singer herself."
loren says – reply to this

76

lolz. shes done.
M says – reply to this

77

Perez you're a fucking moron. If you're going to try to report something, report the truth. Your credibility goes downhill every time you post something new about Britney Spears.
Get Yer Facts Straight says – reply to this

78

Not that I'm a loser Brit ney fan… but really! Did you not read the very article you linked to???

"The tribunal ruled that responsibility for the unauthorised use of the Louis Vuitton brand lay with Sony BMG and its subsidiary Zomba as well as MTV Online, and not the singer herself."

She should sue YOU for libel.
Perez Lies says – reply to this

79

The tribunal ruled that responsibility for the unauthorised use of the Louis Vuitton brand lay with Sony.
jon says – reply to this

80

what video was this for??
Leah says – reply to this

81

Great example on how you can mold a news story into something negative and false. Britney Spears herself was not being sued by LV. Sony BMG, Zomba, and MTV online were the ones being sued due to the fact that they used the LV logo in Britney's "Do Somethin'" video without the proper copyright. To read the real story behind this false post on this site, follow the link below the story.

The fat bitch (meaning Perez) is just jealous because he's a fag that will burn in hell.
rosie Peaches says – reply to this

82

Hey Fat Fuck,

You read the article. It states that Sony, BMG and
MTV online were sued. It has nothing to do with Britney.
Read the shit before you post it asshole.
rosie Peaches says – reply to this

83

Hey Fat Fuck,

You read the article. It states that Sony, BMG and
MTV online were sued. It has nothing to do with Britney.
Read the shit before you post it asshole.
rosie Peaches says – reply to this

84

Hey Fat Fuck,

You read the article. It states that Sony, BMG and
MTV online were sued. It has nothing to do with Britney.
Read the shit before you post it asshole.
rosie Peaches says – reply to this

85

Hey Fat Fuck,

You read the article. It states that Sony, BMG and
MTV online were sued. It has nothing to do with Britney.
Read the shit before you post it asshole.
rosie Peaches says – reply to this

86

Hey Fat Fuck,

You read the article. It states that Sony, BMG and
MTV online were sued. It has nothing to do with Britney.
Read the shit before you post it asshole.
rosie Peaches says – reply to this

87

Hey Fat Fuck,

You read the article. It states that Sony, BMG and
MTV online were sued. It has nothing to do with Britney.
Read the shit before you post it asshole.
Felix636 says – reply to this

88

youre wrong. britney was not sued. the director of the video and some of the higher ups were sued.
i think its all fine and dandy that you talk shit about britney cuz she is quite a train wreck but, when you post shit like this that isnt even true it kinda makes you (perez) look like a douche.
dont be such a tool box and get your facts straight
Jessica says – reply to this

89

You can't sell products and then sue people who buy them for being idiots.
insider says – reply to this

90

Britney herself was not sued or found guilty it was her record label .. give the girl a break….
ass says – reply to this

91

she wasnt herself sued idiot she was in no way held liable nice try
ass says – reply to this

92

she wasnt herself sued idiot she was in no way held liable nice try
jeezlouise says – reply to this

93

NEWSFLASH! CASTRO IS ALIVE AND BRITNEY ISNT LIABLE DUMBFUCK!
Leah says – reply to this

94

Great example on how you can mold a news story into something negative and false. Britney Spears herself was not being sued by LV. Sony BMG, Zomba, and MTV online were the ones being sued due to the fact that they used the LV logo in Britney's "Do Somethin'" video without the proper copyright. To read the real story behind this false post on this site, follow the link below the story.

Funny because Perez is messing everything up on the site today with all his typos - if anyone else would do that… it would obviously mean they were on drugs… Perez your dumb
K says – reply to this

95

OKay, she wasn't sued, Sony was…………….The tribunal ruled that responsibility for the unauthorised use of the Louis Vuitton brand lay with Sony (nyse: SNE - news - people ) BMG and its subsidiary Zomba as well as MTV Online, and not the singer herself.
pauperbabe says – reply to this

96

eeps
no she wasnt sued

her company was

she didnt loose any money

so HAH!
Michelle. says – reply to this

97

What about all the minks wearing/carrying knock off LV gear?
I guess it wouldn't be worth trying to sue them since they aren't filthy rich.
Nice! Kicking someone when they are down Louis Vitton!!
Nobody even really knew that she wore your shit but this wasn't very clever since a lawsuit has only drawn attention to the fact!!! Now thousands of people will know.
Fucking idiot cunts.
lou lou belle says – reply to this

98

did you even read the article? it's like, three paragraphs long and it says the lawsuit wasn't even against brit. stop being so irresponsible! people read you and believe what you say. you're the one advocating for "the truth" by outing people and humiliating people. at least get the facts straight!
FATASS says – reply to this

99

Atually DUMBASS read up on the full details before you post fake shit…SHE herself was not sued.. SONY, BMG, and other labels were sued.. in just about every article you most likely get your fucking stories from it says she herself has nothing to do with it.. your such a fucking bitch perez serioulsy get over what ever fucking deal you have with her.. GET UP. GET OVER IT and GO WORK OUT AND LOSE WIEGHT
honeydoo says – reply to this

100

good for the Vuitton people
Vuitton is a prestigious name that has been around way before that thrash's parents were alive;why should they sit and watch their stuff being dragged down in mud by trash like Spears?
Go team Vuitton!