Home Videos Photos

Headline Of The Week Weak

| Filed under: Headline of the WeekAnglophiliaWacky, Tacky & True

siamesetwins1.jpg

"Unknowing twins marry each other
A set of British twins who were separated at birth went on to marry each other without realizing they were related, the UK Press Association reported Friday.

Ewww! CLICK HERE to read the article accompanying this headline.

Unknowing twins marry each other

A set of British twins who were separated at birth went on to marry each other without realizing they were related, the UK Press Association reported Friday.

The brother and sister, who were adopted by separate parents, were given an annulment after a High Court judge ruled that the marriage had never been valid.

Their identities and details of their relationship have been kept secret, but the Press Association reported that the duo did not find out that they were blood relatives until after they were married.

David Alton, a member of the House of Lords, revealed their situation as a way of highlighting perceived shortcomings in the Human Embryology and Tissues Bill which is now going through Britain's Parliament.

He first heard of the twins' marriage in a conversation with a High Court judge, and initially raised the case in a House of Lords debate on December 10.

Alton said: "(The brother and sister) met later in life and felt an inevitable attraction, and the judge had to deal with the consequences of the marriage that they entered into and all the issues of their separation.

"I suspect that it will be a matter of litigation in the future if we do not make information of this kind available to children who have been donor-conceived."

Alton is concerned that the new bill would allow the biological identity of one parent to be removed from the birth certificate, PA reported, and that there would be no way for the child to know if they had been donor-conceived.

He told PA on Friday: "The state is colluding in a deception. We are opening the door to more cases like this one. One of the most fundamental things of all is to know who you are. The issue here is about human rights.

"A birth certificate that omits any mention of your true origin falsifies your history in a very significant way."

MTV Video Music Awards' Worst Dressed Of ALL Time!
10 Amazing Sports That Should Seriously Be Considered For The 2016 Olympics!
Naya Rivera IS The New Kim Kardashian And We Have 10 Photos To Prove It!
Prince George's 12 Best Memes In Honor Of His First Birthday!
20 Times Jaden Smith Proved He's The Weirdest (And Kinda Coolest) Teen In Hollywood
90s Heartthrobs: Where Are They Now?!
Email this  »

724 comments to “Headline Of The Week Weak”

More comments: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 »

  1. Rebecca says – reply to this


    1

    entirely gross

  2. Jesus says – reply to this


    2

    Poo sandwiches for dinner tonight everyone! Poo sandwiches for dinner!! Trust me. Sprinkle garlic salt on them for extra flavor.

  3. what? says – reply to this


    3

    Take that picture of those poor babies off…jeez!

  4. Sheesh says – reply to this


    4

    It didn't say they were conjoined twins, ya ninny.

  5. Leah says – reply to this


    5

    FIRST!

  6. me says – reply to this


    6

    first?

  7. jackie says – reply to this


    7

    thats really sad.

  8. myl says – reply to this


    8

    Thats just gross.

  9. Emily says – reply to this


    9

    dude…why the picture? gross

  10. Jenna says – reply to this


    10

    That is tooo weird

    First?

  11. AMIR says – reply to this


    11

    OH NO!!! POOR THINGS, THAT IS SOOOO HORRIBLE! CAN U IMAGINE THE TRAUMA THEY ARE EXPERIENCING! HORROR!!!!!!!

  12. Kristjan says – reply to this


    12

    YEA H !

  13. p DiDDy says – reply to this


    13

    10th???

  14. runnergal says – reply to this


    14

    And both of them didn't have visable scars?

  15. LOVES BRIT BRIT says – reply to this


    15

    DIDN'T THEY NOTICE THEY LOOKED ALIKE? SOUNDS LIKE THEIR HEADED TO SPRINGER! OH FIRST!!

  16. lolli says – reply to this


    16

    1st.gross.

  17. Karma says – reply to this


    17

    That picture it offensive and not fair to those babies who look dead. Dead baby pictures? Not funny.

  18. Boyce says – reply to this


    18

    Maybe near 1st? Quite sad this story, quite gross also…thinkin' they'll need some kind of therapy….forever!

  19. angela says – reply to this


    19

    first!!!

  20. maryann says – reply to this


    20

    Wow, that's so strange… the twins never met before and they had an attraction. Nature works in weird ways.

  21. PSO Brazil says – reply to this


    21

    OMFG
    thats so weird…

    HELLO PEREZZZ

    WE BRAZILIANS LOVE YAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

  22. lizliz says – reply to this


    22

    that picture is fuckin sick! hahahahahah!

  23. Carmen says – reply to this


    23

    Nice picture.

  24. di says – reply to this


    24

    that picture makes me vomit in my mouth a little bit.. you should take that down

  25. becky says – reply to this


    25

    Take that picture down now. It's very inappropriate and disrespectful to those poor babies.

  26. Am-Y says – reply to this


    26

    Weeeeeeird!

  27. babydoll says – reply to this


    27

    I really feel badly for this 'couple'. Imagine thinking you've found your 'soulmate' but then only to discover that they are your sibling!?!?!?! Let's hope to God that they were 'old-fashioned' (like what would the chances of that be in this day & age) & didn't believe in sex b4 marriage! EEEEEWWWW just the thought of it all makes me feel really sick but also very sad for them! These 2 are going 2 need alot of therapy & I think whomever or what ever agency concealed this information has a responsiblity to pay for it!

  28. Phillie says – reply to this


    28

    Joined twins generally stem from the same egg so are of the same sex
    So probably a false story

  29. MSM says – reply to this


    29

    FIRST!!!!!!

  30. xtina says – reply to this


    30

    Re: Karma

    I agree 100%!!

  31. michelle LL says – reply to this


    31

    You are weird today Perez.

  32. Dana says – reply to this


    32

    groosseee, is that rumer?

  33. Kristi says – reply to this


    33

    That's unreal!

  34. rex says – reply to this


    34

    This photo is terrible insensitive…. these were somebody's children.

  35. jayne says – reply to this


    35

    first

  36. WTF???? says – reply to this


    36

    Scat porn and deformed babies???? WTF??? You're as crazy as Britney.

  37. grossed out says – reply to this


    37

    what's with the picture? gross!!

  38. Carolyn says – reply to this


    38

    ugh, not cool pic

  39. Casem says – reply to this


    39

    WOW

  40. Asha says – reply to this


    40

    Sucks to be them!

  41. campbell says – reply to this


    41

    that picture is awful

  42. nana says – reply to this


    42

    OMG! What a horrible picture! Why would you put that up?

  43. danny says – reply to this


    43

    weird l:

  44. thecurelauren says – reply to this


    44

    5th

  45. Littleoldme says – reply to this


    45

    They were not conjoined, you moron. Seperated at birth, meaning to different sets of parents. Get your facts right.

  46. erin says – reply to this


    46

    omg.

  47. me says – reply to this


    47

    Perez,
    Informative article but the picture has to go. I love you, love your site and think most things you post are a-okay. However, coming from someone who has lost a baby shortly after birth, this picture is very graphic and disturbing. Please remove it asap!

  48. Cara says – reply to this


    48

    Perez, you tell us about that nasty video, you know we'll search for, and then you show us pics of dead babies…are you trying to make us puke on purpose?

  49. OMG says – reply to this


    49

    THAT IS CRAZZZY & FIRST

  50. m says – reply to this


    50

    1st

  51. melanie says – reply to this


    51

    This is exactly why twins should never be separated in the first place, but if it is unable to be that way the parents and that child should be required by law to know of all siblings they have to keep this from happening. I feel really sorry for them cuz it has to be gross knowing that you not only fell in love with your twin but obviously slept with them too, and now youre supposed to form some sort of brother-sister relationship, that sucks!!!

  52. courtneysue says – reply to this


    52

    Must be a slow gossip day Perez. You've sunk to a new low with this one!

  53. Heather says – reply to this


    53

    FREAKY!!

  54. mirna says – reply to this


    54

    Hey Perez,

    Couldn't you paste a better picture to this entry?

    and about the entry… EEEWWW

    Muah Love ya!!!

  55. RitaPita says – reply to this


    55

    icky poo poo!

  56. Lindsay says – reply to this


    56

    That is every adoptive child's worst nightmare, right there.

  57. Knasty says – reply to this


    57

    Ew

  58. nana says – reply to this


    58

    totally tasteless. Take it down!

  59. eh says – reply to this


    59

    as if…

  60. english rose says – reply to this


    60

    That's an upsetting picture, Perez :(

  61. jennnnnnyyyyyyyy says – reply to this


    61

    oh no thats really bad, but i bet they dont even get divorced!

  62. Holly says – reply to this


    62

    Ew! Gross!
    1st.

  63. Lolo says – reply to this


    63

    first

  64. cdub says – reply to this


    64

    Welcome to Science 101. Conjoined twins can only be of the same sex. They are identical — ALWAYS. So, unless one of these folks (in the picture, they both look like girls) had a sex change, they didn't get married or are lying, or something even weirder.

  65. cdub says – reply to this


    65

    Welcome to Science 101. Conjoined twins can only be of the same sex. They are identical — ALWAYS. So, unless one of these folks (in the picture, they both look like girls) had a sex change, they didn't get married or are lying, or something even weirder.

  66. K says – reply to this


    66

    omg that's gross. what if they've already had sex??!!!?! EWWWWWWW. that's grosser than 4 girls finger painting. lmao.

  67. Queen says – reply to this


    67

    What would possess you to exploit a picture of these babies who have nothing to do with the article? You should be ashamed of yourself. It is one thing to exploit adult celebrities who know what they are getting themselves into but not innocent children. You should take this picture down and issue an apology. This is your lowest point ever. I would be embarassed to be your mother.

  68. first says – reply to this


    68

    first.

  69. rufus says – reply to this


    69

    first

  70. TEAM AMERICA says – reply to this


    70

    FIRST…..MAYBE……YUCK

  71. bvbz says – reply to this


    71

    first!

  72. Jasmine says – reply to this


    72

    OMG, how gross is that picture??!! You just put me off my dinner!!

  73. Jennie says – reply to this


    73

    My God Perez! That should have a warning you shouldn't have that as the first photo that loads on your page. It's offensive and disrespectful to those poor babies that never got a chance in life at all. Take it down!

  74. kiss my mangina says – reply to this


    74

    it was me.

  75. Laura- Australia says – reply to this


    75

    i doubt it. such a fake story!

  76. Boricua Girl says – reply to this


    76

    Disgusting

  77. Kelli says – reply to this


    77

    Perez! What is the significance of the photo you posted with that story? I hope you didn't go looking for it. That's really awful and unnecessary.

  78. ranish says – reply to this


    78

    come on Perez. Take that picture down, it is disgusting and in bad taste. I love to come here and read, but you got to draw the line somewhere, and you just crossed it.

  79. kat says – reply to this


    79

    firsttt

  80. Monica says – reply to this


    80

    wow….gross!!!! they had sex!!

  81. Awww-Man says – reply to this


    81

    Awww - that's just so wrong - on so many levels. Could you imagine?

  82. jessica says – reply to this


    82

    first?

  83. asswipe says – reply to this


    83

    fuck off.

  84. Bill Brasky says – reply to this


    84

    Picture is distasteful.

  85. k.c. says – reply to this


    85

    Oh Geez…..and the british always talking bad about "You americans" on this site!!!! Ha Ha!!! ♥ "You britains…….."

  86. Jess says – reply to this


    86

    Dude.. Perez… dead babies? not cool. :(

  87. PEREZ says – reply to this


    87

    FIRST

  88. Hev says – reply to this


    88

    Grooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosss

  89. Is this a Ripley's piece? says – reply to this


    89

    AmI first?

  90. rosie says – reply to this


    90

    that's impossible, because only identical twins (come from the same egg) can be siamese and identical twins are ALWAYS the same sex. duh.

  91. Gail says – reply to this


    91

    Now this is a crazy story…….. first

  92. SHUT UP says – reply to this


    92

    THE STORY ISN'T AS DISTURBING AS THE DAMN PICTURE DUDE!!! IT'S GROSS AND SO WRONG. TAKE IT OFF PRONTO. I'M SURE YOU HaVE PLENTY PICTURES IN YOUR ARCHIVE OF A MORE DESERVING BRO/SIS DUO FROM HOLLY-DIPSHIT-WOOD THAT YOU COULD USE FOR THIS STORY.

  93. SAM says – reply to this


    93

    1ST

  94. KRS says – reply to this


    94

    uhhh… really gross

  95. ShequitaJonze says – reply to this


    95

    yikes!!! bring on th 8 headed babies!!!

  96. What's up with the picture? says – reply to this


    96

    They weren't conjoined twins dummy. They were fraternal twins.

  97. Sherry says – reply to this


    97

    That is a disgusting pic. Obviously not pic of twins in the article. Completely tasteless…

  98. Tha Dawg says – reply to this


    98

    Little known fact - many North American sets of Siamese twins vacation in England - so the other guy can drive for a change! ahahahahaha

  99. Michael Bolton says – reply to this


    99

    I usually do not have a problem with anything you guys show, actually I find humor in most, except the picture about the UK twins seperated at birth. That is one of the most horrific pictures I have seen to date.

    I would have been able to still get the point without the pic.

    Thanks! I really enjoy the gossip.

    P.s. That fuck'n Brittney is a trainwreck. It is relative to a 6oo lbs. person, you don't want to stare, but you can't help it.

  100. margie says – reply to this


    100

    whyyy!

More comments: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 »