Headline Of The Week Weak

siamesetwins1.jpg

"Unknowing twins marry each other
A set of British twins who were separated at birth went on to marry each other without realizing they were related, the UK Press Association reported Friday.

Ewww! CLICK HERE to read the article accompanying this headline.

Unknowing twins marry each other

A set of British twins who were separated at birth went on to marry each other without realizing they were related, the UK Press Association reported Friday.

The brother and sister, who were adopted by separate parents, were given an annulment after a High Court judge ruled that the marriage had never been valid.

Their identities and details of their relationship have been kept secret, but the Press Association reported that the duo did not find out that they were blood relatives until after they were married.

David Alton, a member of the House of Lords, revealed their situation as a way of highlighting perceived shortcomings in the Human Embryology and Tissues Bill which is now going through Britain's Parliament.

He first heard of the twins' marriage in a conversation with a High Court judge, and initially raised the case in a House of Lords debate on December 10.

Alton said: "(The brother and sister) met later in life and felt an inevitable attraction, and the judge had to deal with the consequences of the marriage that they entered into and all the issues of their separation.

"I suspect that it will be a matter of litigation in the future if we do not make information of this kind available to children who have been donor-conceived."

Alton is concerned that the new bill would allow the biological identity of one parent to be removed from the birth certificate, PA reported, and that there would be no way for the child to know if they had been donor-conceived.

He told PA on Friday: "The state is colluding in a deception. We are opening the door to more cases like this one. One of the most fundamental things of all is to know who you are. The issue here is about human rights.

"A birth certificate that omits any mention of your true origin falsifies your history in a very significant way."

    Posted: Jan 11, 2008 at 3:31 pm / Email this  »

    724 comments to “Headline Of The Week Weak”

    More comments: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 »

    1. Rebecca says – reply to this


      1

      entirely gross

    2. Jesus says – reply to this


      2

      Poo sandwiches for dinner tonight everyone! Poo sandwiches for dinner!! Trust me. Sprinkle garlic salt on them for extra flavor.

    3. what? says – reply to this


      3

      Take that picture of those poor babies off…jeez!

    4. Sheesh says – reply to this


      4

      It didn't say they were conjoined twins, ya ninny.

    5. Leah says – reply to this


      5

      FIRST!

    6. me says – reply to this


      6

      first?

    7. jackie says – reply to this


      7

      thats really sad.

    8. myl says – reply to this


      8

      Thats just gross.

    9. Emily says – reply to this


      9

      dude…why the picture? gross

    10. Jenna says – reply to this


      10

      That is tooo weird

      First?

    11. AMIR says – reply to this


      11

      OH NO!!! POOR THINGS, THAT IS SOOOO HORRIBLE! CAN U IMAGINE THE TRAUMA THEY ARE EXPERIENCING! HORROR!!!!!!!

    12. Kristjan says – reply to this


      12

      YEA H !

    13. p DiDDy says – reply to this


      13

      10th???

    14. runnergal says – reply to this


      14

      And both of them didn't have visable scars?

    15. LOVES BRIT BRIT says – reply to this


      15

      DIDN'T THEY NOTICE THEY LOOKED ALIKE? SOUNDS LIKE THEIR HEADED TO SPRINGER! OH FIRST!!

    16. lolli says – reply to this


      16

      1st.gross.

    17. Karma says – reply to this


      17

      That picture it offensive and not fair to those babies who look dead. Dead baby pictures? Not funny.

    18. Boyce says – reply to this


      18

      Maybe near 1st? Quite sad this story, quite gross also…thinkin' they'll need some kind of therapy….forever!

    19. angela says – reply to this


      19

      first!!!

    20. maryann says – reply to this


      20

      Wow, that's so strange… the twins never met before and they had an attraction. Nature works in weird ways.

    21. PSO Brazil says – reply to this


      21

      OMFG
      thats so weird…

      HELLO PEREZZZ

      WE BRAZILIANS LOVE YAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

    22. lizliz says – reply to this


      22

      that picture is fuckin sick! hahahahahah!

    23. Carmen says – reply to this


      23

      Nice picture.

    24. di says – reply to this


      24

      that picture makes me vomit in my mouth a little bit.. you should take that down

    25. becky says – reply to this


      25

      Take that picture down now. It's very inappropriate and disrespectful to those poor babies.

    26. Am-Y says – reply to this


      26

      Weeeeeeird!

    27. babydoll says – reply to this


      27

      I really feel badly for this 'couple'. Imagine thinking you've found your 'soulmate' but then only to discover that they are your sibling!?!?!?! Let's hope to God that they were 'old-fashioned' (like what would the chances of that be in this day & age) & didn't believe in sex b4 marriage! EEEEEWWWW just the thought of it all makes me feel really sick but also very sad for them! These 2 are going 2 need alot of therapy & I think whomever or what ever agency concealed this information has a responsiblity to pay for it!

    28. Phillie says – reply to this


      28

      Joined twins generally stem from the same egg so are of the same sex
      So probably a false story

    29. MSM says – reply to this


      29

      FIRST!!!!!!

    30. xtina says – reply to this


      30

      Re: Karma

      I agree 100%!!

    31. michelle LL says – reply to this


      31

      You are weird today Perez.

    32. Dana says – reply to this


      32

      groosseee, is that rumer?

    33. Kristi says – reply to this


      33

      That's unreal!

    34. rex says – reply to this


      34

      This photo is terrible insensitive…. these were somebody's children.

    35. jayne says – reply to this


      35

      first

    36. WTF???? says – reply to this


      36

      Scat porn and deformed babies???? WTF??? You're as crazy as Britney.

    37. grossed out says – reply to this


      37

      what's with the picture? gross!!

    38. Carolyn says – reply to this


      38

      ugh, not cool pic

    39. Casem says – reply to this


      39

      WOW

    40. Asha says – reply to this


      40

      Sucks to be them!

    41. campbell says – reply to this


      41

      that picture is awful

    42. nana says – reply to this


      42

      OMG! What a horrible picture! Why would you put that up?

    43. danny says – reply to this


      43

      weird l:

    44. thecurelauren says – reply to this


      44

      5th

    45. Littleoldme says – reply to this


      45

      They were not conjoined, you moron. Seperated at birth, meaning to different sets of parents. Get your facts right.

    46. erin says – reply to this


      46

      omg.

    47. me says – reply to this


      47

      Perez,
      Informative article but the picture has to go. I love you, love your site and think most things you post are a-okay. However, coming from someone who has lost a baby shortly after birth, this picture is very graphic and disturbing. Please remove it asap!

    48. Cara says – reply to this


      48

      Perez, you tell us about that nasty video, you know we'll search for, and then you show us pics of dead babies…are you trying to make us puke on purpose?

    49. OMG says – reply to this


      49

      THAT IS CRAZZZY & FIRST

    50. m says – reply to this


      50

      1st

    51. melanie says – reply to this


      51

      This is exactly why twins should never be separated in the first place, but if it is unable to be that way the parents and that child should be required by law to know of all siblings they have to keep this from happening. I feel really sorry for them cuz it has to be gross knowing that you not only fell in love with your twin but obviously slept with them too, and now youre supposed to form some sort of brother-sister relationship, that sucks!!!

    52. courtneysue says – reply to this


      52

      Must be a slow gossip day Perez. You've sunk to a new low with this one!

    53. Heather says – reply to this


      53

      FREAKY!!

    54. mirna says – reply to this


      54

      Hey Perez,

      Couldn't you paste a better picture to this entry?

      and about the entry… EEEWWW

      Muah Love ya!!!

    55. RitaPita says – reply to this


      55

      icky poo poo!

    56. Lindsay says – reply to this


      56

      That is every adoptive child's worst nightmare, right there.

    57. Knasty says – reply to this


      57

      Ew

    58. nana says – reply to this


      58

      totally tasteless. Take it down!

    59. eh says – reply to this


      59

      as if…

    60. english rose says – reply to this


      60

      That's an upsetting picture, Perez :(

    61. jennnnnnyyyyyyyy says – reply to this


      61

      oh no thats really bad, but i bet they dont even get divorced!

    62. Holly says – reply to this


      62

      Ew! Gross!
      1st.

    63. Lolo says – reply to this


      63

      first

    64. cdub says – reply to this


      64

      Welcome to Science 101. Conjoined twins can only be of the same sex. They are identical — ALWAYS. So, unless one of these folks (in the picture, they both look like girls) had a sex change, they didn't get married or are lying, or something even weirder.

    65. cdub says – reply to this


      65

      Welcome to Science 101. Conjoined twins can only be of the same sex. They are identical — ALWAYS. So, unless one of these folks (in the picture, they both look like girls) had a sex change, they didn't get married or are lying, or something even weirder.

    66. K says – reply to this


      66

      omg that's gross. what if they've already had sex??!!!?! EWWWWWWW. that's grosser than 4 girls finger painting. lmao.

    67. Queen says – reply to this


      67

      What would possess you to exploit a picture of these babies who have nothing to do with the article? You should be ashamed of yourself. It is one thing to exploit adult celebrities who know what they are getting themselves into but not innocent children. You should take this picture down and issue an apology. This is your lowest point ever. I would be embarassed to be your mother.

    68. first says – reply to this


      68

      first.

    69. rufus says – reply to this


      69

      first

    70. TEAM AMERICA says – reply to this


      70

      FIRST…..MAYBE……YUCK

    71. bvbz says – reply to this


      71

      first!

    72. Jasmine says – reply to this


      72

      OMG, how gross is that picture??!! You just put me off my dinner!!

    73. Jennie says – reply to this


      73

      My God Perez! That should have a warning you shouldn't have that as the first photo that loads on your page. It's offensive and disrespectful to those poor babies that never got a chance in life at all. Take it down!

    74. kiss my mangina says – reply to this


      74

      it was me.

    75. Laura- Australia says – reply to this


      75

      i doubt it. such a fake story!

    76. Boricua Girl says – reply to this


      76

      Disgusting

    77. Kelli says – reply to this


      77

      Perez! What is the significance of the photo you posted with that story? I hope you didn't go looking for it. That's really awful and unnecessary.

    78. ranish says – reply to this


      78

      come on Perez. Take that picture down, it is disgusting and in bad taste. I love to come here and read, but you got to draw the line somewhere, and you just crossed it.

    79. kat says – reply to this


      79

      firsttt

    80. Monica says – reply to this


      80

      wow….gross!!!! they had sex!!

    81. Awww-Man says – reply to this


      81

      Awww - that's just so wrong - on so many levels. Could you imagine?

    82. jessica says – reply to this


      82

      first?

    83. asswipe says – reply to this


      83

      fuck off.

    84. Bill Brasky says – reply to this


      84

      Picture is distasteful.

    85. k.c. says – reply to this


      85

      Oh Geez…..and the british always talking bad about "You americans" on this site!!!! Ha Ha!!! ♥ "You britains…….."

    86. Jess says – reply to this


      86

      Dude.. Perez… dead babies? not cool. :(

    87. PEREZ says – reply to this


      87

      FIRST

    88. Hev says – reply to this


      88

      Grooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosss

    89. Is this a Ripley's piece? says – reply to this


      89

      AmI first?

    90. rosie says – reply to this


      90

      that's impossible, because only identical twins (come from the same egg) can be siamese and identical twins are ALWAYS the same sex. duh.

    91. Gail says – reply to this


      91

      Now this is a crazy story…….. first

    92. SHUT UP says – reply to this


      92

      THE STORY ISN'T AS DISTURBING AS THE DAMN PICTURE DUDE!!! IT'S GROSS AND SO WRONG. TAKE IT OFF PRONTO. I'M SURE YOU HaVE PLENTY PICTURES IN YOUR ARCHIVE OF A MORE DESERVING BRO/SIS DUO FROM HOLLY-DIPSHIT-WOOD THAT YOU COULD USE FOR THIS STORY.

    93. SAM says – reply to this


      93

      1ST

    94. KRS says – reply to this


      94

      uhhh… really gross

    95. ShequitaJonze says – reply to this


      95

      yikes!!! bring on th 8 headed babies!!!

    96. What's up with the picture? says – reply to this


      96

      They weren't conjoined twins dummy. They were fraternal twins.

    97. Sherry says – reply to this


      97

      That is a disgusting pic. Obviously not pic of twins in the article. Completely tasteless…

    98. Tha Dawg says – reply to this


      98

      Little known fact - many North American sets of Siamese twins vacation in England - so the other guy can drive for a change! ahahahahaha

    99. Michael Bolton says – reply to this


      99

      I usually do not have a problem with anything you guys show, actually I find humor in most, except the picture about the UK twins seperated at birth. That is one of the most horrific pictures I have seen to date.

      I would have been able to still get the point without the pic.

      Thanks! I really enjoy the gossip.

      P.s. That fuck'n Brittney is a trainwreck. It is relative to a 6oo lbs. person, you don't want to stare, but you can't help it.

    100. margie says – reply to this


      100

      whyyy!

    More comments: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 »