R.I.P.
Filed under: Media MinuteLayoffs are 'expected' at The New York Times.
About ONE HUNDRED people will be getting the axe.
Ouch!
Posted: April 16, 2008 at 4:00 pm
|
|||
 |
31 comments to “R.I.P.” (RSS feed) |
||
first!
1st!!
aww
BOOOOOOOOO KILL BUSH!!!!1
how many people work there in the first place? still sucks though
sshhaaammeeeeeeeee
damn shame that the internet is where we get our news. papers are obsolete. I feel for those people.
hello: Perez porfa hace algo para que voten por christian de la fuente, es el unico latino del concurso dancing with the star, por fa que voten por el
Third!
loco moco
Good for them! Its a rag that isn't worthy to wrap a rotten fish!
good, thats what those bitches get FOR TALKING SHIT ABOUT HILLARY clinton
Newspapers are so primitive. Such a waste of paper!
So sad. At this point, is there any positive future for journalism and journalists? So many people including me aspire to become journalists in the future and hearing this news is very discouraging. We need journalists, weather they write for newspapers, magazines, OR the internet. Hopefully this is just a transitional period and things improve.
That newspaper's best days are LONG gone. It's a bunch of liberal truth bending hacks who have fabricated more stories than Ray Bradbury.
FUCK 'EM!
What about Newline Perez? We gave you enough SATC material… a little tear drop on little nicky's face or some shit…
dont pretend you care, fatass.
http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/ZachRaizman/
good maybe theyll start fact checking articles before irresponsibly publishing them. I hope the NY times rots in hell.
Good. Now maybe they can focus more on writing unbiased news stories.
why do they need that many people anyways, they make up most of the stories
No one wants to read their liberal bullshit anyway…good riddance!!!!!!
I've got a suggestion for the NYT's - layoff the ultra liberal editors first. Great start.
Liberals laying-off liberals…such a shame…tsk tsk…
Oh boo freaking hoo. Maybe if they actually researched their shit instead of printing bullshit. NYT isn't the paper it used to be that's for damn sure.
Good.
GOOD!!
What % of their staff is that? My sucky employeer is bending over for the investors and promising more than 10%….makes for over 8000 affected. sucks.
Do people only read what's on the internet now?
That's not good. There's lot of bad grammar on the internet and people can't tell.
Thank goodness they're going under! Now if only the LA Times would bite the dust … the real news might be disseminated.
Re: Kim – We also need journalists that can spell. It's whether not weather - unless you want to report on the weather…
Hmm, well, let's take a look at the numbers shall we? Because it's all about money, isn't it? Maybe - just maybe - people are tired of the completely biased liberal bs the NY Times spews and their circulation is down. I say good riddance to the NY Times. I don't see the Wall Street Journal having any similar problems. It's journalistic darwinism. I love it!