Home Videos Photos
Home >> Media Minute >> R.I.P.

R.I.P.

Filed under: Media Minute

Layoffs are 'expected' at The New York Times.

About ONE HUNDRED people will be getting the axe.

Ouch!

    Posted: Apr 16, 2008 at 4:00 pm / Email this  »
    « Previous story
    Separated At Birth
    Next story »
    The Hoff Has No Game
    See All 31 Comments

    31 comments to “R.I.P.”

    1. anonym says – reply to this


      1

      first!

    2. susie says – reply to this


      2

      1st!!

    3. brian says – reply to this


      3

      aww

    4. S0BERSTAHH says – reply to this


      4

      BOOOOOOOOO KILL BUSH!!!!1

    5. Samwise says – reply to this


      5

      how many people work there in the first place? still sucks though :(

    6. blah says – reply to this


      6

      sshhaaammeeeeeeeee

    7. ding dong says – reply to this


      7

      damn shame that the internet is where we get our news. papers are obsolete. I feel for those people.

    8. rodzilla says – reply to this


      8

      hello: Perez porfa hace algo para que voten por christian de la fuente, es el unico latino del concurso dancing with the star, por fa que voten por el

    9. L says – reply to this


      9

      Third!

    10. caca says – reply to this


      10

      loco moco

    11. Jackie Puppet says – reply to this


      11

      Good for them! Its a rag that isn't worthy to wrap a rotten fish!

    12. John says – reply to this


      12

      good, thats what those bitches get FOR TALKING SHIT ABOUT HILLARY clinton

    13. enGAYge.com says – reply to this


      13

      Newspapers are so primitive. Such a waste of paper!

    14. Kim says – reply to this


      14

      So sad. At this point, is there any positive future for journalism and journalists? So many people including me aspire to become journalists in the future and hearing this news is very discouraging. We need journalists, weather they write for newspapers, magazines, OR the internet. Hopefully this is just a transitional period and things improve.

    15. PhilMcCrackin says – reply to this


      15

      That newspaper's best days are LONG gone. It's a bunch of liberal truth bending hacks who have fabricated more stories than Ray Bradbury.
      FUCK 'EM!

    16. LOB says – reply to this


      16

      What about Newline Perez? We gave you enough SATC material… a little tear drop on little nicky's face or some shit…

    17. seth baldacchinio (london) says – reply to this


      17

      dont pretend you care, fatass.

      http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/ZachRaizman/

    18. sdk.hgdf says – reply to this


      18

      good maybe theyll start fact checking articles before irresponsibly publishing them. I hope the NY times rots in hell.

    19. Christina says – reply to this


      19

      Good. Now maybe they can focus more on writing unbiased news stories.

    20. tom says – reply to this


      20

      why do they need that many people anyways, they make up most of the stories

    21. Boohoo says – reply to this


      21

      No one wants to read their liberal bullshit anyway…good riddance!!!!!!

    22. Six dollars an inch says – reply to this


      22

      I've got a suggestion for the NYT's - layoff the ultra liberal editors first. Great start.

    23. Bella says – reply to this


      23

      Liberals laying-off liberals…such a shame…tsk tsk…

    24. Michelle says – reply to this


      24

      Oh boo freaking hoo. Maybe if they actually researched their shit instead of printing bullshit. NYT isn't the paper it used to be that's for damn sure.

    25. anonymous says – reply to this


      25

      Good.

    26. j says – reply to this


      26

      GOOD!!

    27. whatev says – reply to this


      27

      What % of their staff is that? My sucky employeer is bending over for the investors and promising more than 10%….makes for over 8000 affected. sucks.

    28. PETA says – reply to this


      28

      Do people only read what's on the internet now?

      That's not good. There's lot of bad grammar on the internet and people can't tell.

    29. edt says – reply to this


      29

      Thank goodness they're going under! Now if only the LA Times would bite the dust … the real news might be disseminated.

    30. Spellcheck says – reply to this


      30

      Re: Kim – We also need journalists that can spell. It's whether not weather - unless you want to report on the weather…

    31. NYTimes says – reply to this


      31

      Hmm, well, let's take a look at the numbers shall we? Because it's all about money, isn't it? Maybe - just maybe - people are tired of the completely biased liberal bs the NY Times spews and their circulation is down. I say good riddance to the NY Times. I don't see the Wall Street Journal having any similar problems. It's journalistic darwinism. I love it!