Uh Oh!

a77057886__opt.jpg

The new Sex & The City film premiered in London on Monday night and…

The movie is getting mixed reviews. Not good!

The well-respected Times only gave the pic 2 out of 5 stars!

Here are some highlights of what their critic has to say:

- There may be a problem with a film when a narrator constantly tells you the meaning of what you have just seen, gift-wrapping each scene with a moral.

- There may be a problem with stretching Sex and the City into a two hour and twenty minute film - it can feel like a never ending dinner party: however pleasant the courses, after a while you can hardly eat another one.

It should be noted, however, that the reviewer was a guy.

We're assuming he wasn't gay!

[Photo via Getty Images.]

    Posted: May 12, 2008 at 9:15 pm / Email this  »

    126 comments to “Uh Oh!”

    More comments: [1] 2 »

    1. CoreyCarrier says – reply to this


      1

      First NON-SPAM!!!!!!! HorseFace.

    2. Mija says – reply to this


      2

      Perez………….now work your magic and get us some SPOILERS

    3. ham says – reply to this


      3

      1st

    4. dkgjdslhfgja says – reply to this


      4

      NOT FIRST!

    5. GRACE says – reply to this


      5

      I still love SATC!!

    6. lisa says – reply to this


      6

      second

    7. amy says – reply to this


      7

      ******************************
      .
      .
      .
      .
      whatever. i am sure it's fab. remember SITC was a 25 minute show once a week. when i did it on demand i am sure after 2 and a half hours some would be tired. fuck. i never was!!
      .
      .
      ..
      ***************************************

    8. kelly says – reply to this


      8

      That scares me. I really hope it is just because its a guy.
      and FIRST.

    9. yo says – reply to this


      9

      knew it…4th?

    10. slam says – reply to this


      10

      THERE RUDE ITS FINE

    11. dnny says – reply to this


      11

      slrdjk;jrw

    12. emily says – reply to this


      12

      aww, her dress makes me sad.

    13. peter says – reply to this


      13

      peter peterson

    14. amy says – reply to this


      14

      Re: amy

      SORRY. TYPO. SATC. my fingers got all fucked up getting all worked up!!

    15. Renee says – reply to this


      15

      "- There may be a problem with a film when a narrator constantly tells you the meaning of what you have just seen, gift-wrapping each scene with a moral."

      …. Um, has this critic not seen the show?

    16. silly billy says – reply to this


      16

      I think with all the anticipation & hype, this movie can only dissapoint. Sorry SJP.

    17. marina says – reply to this


      17

      Well, it's not like this is Speed Racer, with Sex & The Citie no matter how bad the reviews are, we are gonna watch the movie.

    18. manny_madness says – reply to this


      18

      ummm no kim catrall on the links up top?

    19. azprincess says – reply to this


      19

      ITS GONNA BE FUCKIN AWESOME!!!!!!!! CANT WAIT….LOVE, MRS. BIG

    20. Daniela says – reply to this


      20

      yikes that's not good at all :(

    21. Eric says – reply to this


      21

      Fuck him and fuck the Times. there's no gay sensitivity there. I'm gonna love that movie, and all the ladies looked stunning this evening in the premier

    22. mia says – reply to this


      22

      No surprise, it is a stinker.

    23. boogers says – reply to this


      23

      DUH! The tv show has narration too! Sounds just like the show. I still want to see it.

    24. Hoya says – reply to this


      24

      Is there one Man in existence that would admit going to see this hausfrau shitfest? I mean come on.

    25. Tiffany says – reply to this


      25

      Obviously he is a MALE and has NEVER watched Sex and the City! Also, SJP always has a voice over! Idiots! SATC is fabulous!

    26. charity case says – reply to this


      26

      i'm a huge Sex and the city fan, and have always supported SJP, however, now im starting to believe that she is extremely self centred. Several months ago, i sent a heart felt letter to her asking her to make my 16th birthday wish come true … I have horribly crooked teeth, and there is nothing in the world i want more than to have them fixed… unfortunately my parent's can't afford to fix them for me. I sent ehr pictures and everything. but nothing. i know 5,000 is a lot of money, but to her, it seems that, that would just be a designer bag. please let me know what you think… was it too much to ask for? be honest!

    27. Missy5404 says – reply to this


      27

      i can't wait to see this!!! been waiting for it for years!! the guy who reviewed it was obviously not gay… and if he is, he should be ashamed

    28. Samantha says – reply to this


      28

      Re: charity case – No comment

    29. kindathoughtso says – reply to this


      29

      yea fan of the show and all but i think the movie will such, like an overly long 28 minutes. hope i am wrong b/c i am paying to go see that shit. an whats up with Ms. Nixon with the cleav come she is a lesbo isnt kim supposed to be the slutty one. BTW the man cynthia left for her butch dike was actually my college professor.

    30. GoPerez says – reply to this


      30

      I have no idea. I don't trust critics. They say a movie is good and it turns out to be the most boring piece of shit there is. They say a movie is bad and it turns out to be kick ass.

    31. betty says – reply to this


      31

      I LOVE, LOVE THAT DRESS!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can't wait to see the movie!!!!!!!!

    32. Sarah Jessica Parker says – reply to this


      32

      I am a liberal, did you not know that?? Ask those evangelical Christians for money! Liberals only want to spend government money and call Republicans stingy. Get with it, snagglepuss!

    33. mr. ed says – reply to this


      33

      She's the ugliest hot chick ever.

    34. thisisbs says – reply to this


      34

      and why are YOU assuming he is not gay and why the hell does it matter? Only gay men watched SITC? Now, if this were speed racer, you would have printed the whole article and did about 10 posts. You are sooo prejudice against some things

    35. Not going to be a hit says – reply to this


      35

      Re: charity case – Your' crazy. First of all. Second to all you SITC fans. Reality is, just because a show was a hit on TV doesn't make it a hit on the big screen. It doesn't have a hardcore cult following, number one and two it doesn't appeal to everyone.

    36. Melissa says – reply to this


      36

      But, but, But Sex and the City always has the narrator! We love Carrie talking. If I were reviewing it having never seen the show . . . . I might not like it either!

    37. s diggity says – reply to this


      37

      SJP is the most beautiful woman in show business and i guarantee that critic is just getting the US all worked up in anticipation for the NYC premiere…. fuck you haters!!!

    38. areyouforreal? says – reply to this


      38

      re charity case-yes, you are immature and ignorant to think that a celebrity can send 5 grand to eveyone who asks. Try to help yourself. You can get braces at almost any age. If this post is even real, you are on line, find someone that will take payment plans OR wait until you work full time , find a place that offers dental insurance and pay yourself. Celebrities get tax deductions for real charity donations. sjp would be broke if she gave $5k to everyone who says they need it for something.

    39. Dog gone'it says – reply to this


      39

      SATC people will LOVE it………

    40. just wondering says – reply to this


      40

      Re: Sarah Jessica Parker
      SJP was that really you?!?!

    41. charityforme says – reply to this


      41

      charity case-are you for real? yes, it is asking to much. maybe Perez can make you the cause of the day. no, I am joking…. maybe I will ask Brad Pitt to pay my oil bills.

    42. mad joe says – reply to this


      42

      Two stars? He was generous.

    43. charity case says – reply to this


      43

      Re: areyouforreal?
      to all of you that read my previous comment, im sorry if i came off as arrogant and ignorant. that was the last thing that i wanted to do. its just that, if i had millions and millions of dollars, i would do so much to help those in need — all the while not worring if it would qualify for a tax write off! i did not mean to sound selfish and stupid, its just that, i am so self conscious about my smile, and i would do anything, even embarass myself, and admit to SJP that we are needy, and poor.

    44. Mama says – reply to this


      44

      Who the hell would send a guy to do a womans job??

    45. Peeps from the UK have bad taste and bad teeth says – reply to this


      45

      Who cares what the brits think? Let them keep their opinions about Sex and the City and Madonna over there!

    46. they dont call it a job for nothing!! says – reply to this


      46

      I NEED SPOILERS!!! I want to know everything thats gonna happen!!

      i dont care about reviews, SATC is awesome! I bet miley cyrus is gonna go see it! and then get laid!! hahahaha. skank!

    47. Matt says – reply to this


      47

      Gasp!! This bullshit doesn't work as a film!? Whatever will we do? How many people died in China, Perez? How many died today in Iraq? How about in your city? Please get some perspective people! Bad reviews won't prevent people from seeing it. This is fact.

    48. MEGGGAANNN says – reply to this


      48

      SATC= COP OUT

    49. last 1 says – reply to this


      49

      last?? lol

    50. my fav says – reply to this


      50

      my fav is charlotte! nebody agree??

    51. leila says – reply to this


      51

      2 hours and 20 minutes. That's a long film. I'd be getting fidgety by the end. The film will be a success regardless of what the critics have to say because of the loyal following of the fans of the TV series, and all the publicity hype. Still not sure if I'll see it. It's like when you read a book, love it, and then see the film, and it just doesn't measure up. I loved the TV series. Maybe it's best to leave it at that. As for gift-wrapping scenes with morals, that is an American tendency with both their films and TV offerings, and we are reading British critics here. A film should leave it up to the audience to make their moral judgements, and they will if the film is well-crafted. But they will be their own judgements, and not necessarily those of the film-maker.

    52. MB says – reply to this


      52

      Re: just wondering – That was her.

    53. dpg says – reply to this


      53

      Same paper (different reviewer gave IRON MAN 2 stars as well. The reviewer wrote that Robert Downey Jr. didn't "deliver the emotional truth of the character"… WTF does that mean?? So if SEX is as good as IRON MAN, according to the reviewers, it should be a fun night at the theater.

    54. Daniel S says – reply to this


      54

      This is typical Perex stirring up shiz! The review basically that everyone else in the theatre were loving it - crying and laughing…

      Have faith in Carrie & Co - the film will deliver…

    55. for richer or poorer says – reply to this


      55

      the way i see it, y'all should live by the golden rule. i want people to do stuff for those in need, so if you're rich and can do it, then why not? y'all need to get a little more generous. SJP is rich, why not give a measely 5,000 to that poor child. besides like he/she said, its probably just a hand-bag to her!

    56. Jake says – reply to this


      56

      SHUT UP SHUTSHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP

      SHUT UP

    57. canadian luv says – reply to this


      57

      luv u Perez!!

    58. Pretty_Princess says – reply to this


      58

      Big fucking deal. He sounds like an uptight pretencious ass who was forced to review the movie. Does he appreciate the following this show had and what it meant to so many women? And it's through that lense that this movie will be watched by the show's true fans, who have missed the 4 girls and can't wait to see them.

    59. jeepers!! says – reply to this


      59

      Re: Jake
      fuck you jake! y don't u shut up?!? huh??

    60. J says – reply to this


      60

      Hey, Perez. Whenever you wish to hire someone with a fair command of the English language and mad grammar skills, drop me a line. The the word 'was' has been annoyingly misused in this post. Other grammatical problems I let go, but today I am cranky. My mother-in-law is coming to town tomorrow.

      To say the reviewer 'was' a guy is to imply that he once wasn't a guy (or he died). Ditto with the phrase 'was not gay.' I think you meant he IS a guy and he ISN'T gay? I'm finished with my MFA in one more year…hang on.

    61. ali says – reply to this


      61

      Re: silly billy – i agreeeeee! i was just telling my hubby. stupid fcuk, that is what the wholee damn show was, and we all loved it!

    62. redsongia says – reply to this


      62

      Two and a half hours? Who the fuck directed, Oliver Stone?

    63. Alisa says – reply to this


      63

      we're also assuming he never even saw the show! Cariie narrates stuff. It's what she does. Geez. Don't review and movie bases on a show and you've never seen the show. Your opinion would thus be irrelevant to fans.

    64. slammer says – reply to this


      64

      Come on, this is terrible writing!
      She looks like an afghan hound just out of the rain!!!
      Iron Man blows this crap away!!

    65. Lixxygirl says – reply to this


      65

      Who the fock cares anymore??????????????????????????????

    66. gossip queen says – reply to this


      66

      canadian girl's love perez!

    67. STUPID FUCK! says – reply to this


      67

      Re: she

      FUCK YOU!
      FUCK YOU!
      FUCK YOU!
      FUCK YOU!
      FUCK YOU!
      FUCK YOU!
      FUCK YOU!

    68. M1 says – reply to this


      68

      The same Times reporter that gave SPEED RACER 4 out of 5… So fuck off, Mario… Save your time for the amphetamines.

    69. HEB says – reply to this


      69

      Re: Matt – Go read CNN. We come to perezhilton.com to escape from the bleakness for a few minutes.

    70. dr r pink says – reply to this


      70

      SJP gets pregnant but miscarriages so often that when a baby does arrive she names it Spot.Kristen Davis aquires OCD and cannot remove the mirror from her clit.Cynthia Nixon dies of blood clot after double dildoing with a female tug boat captain(Rosie lookalike) and Kim Catrell gets cancer causing warts after fucking The New York Nets.A Great Movie

    71. yami says – reply to this


      71

      any SATC fan knows that we would have loved for the show to be 2 hours long…of course this review had to be written by a guy, Carrie constantly narrating drives most guys i kno crazy.

    72. clafairy says – reply to this


      72

      hmmmm…..After reading his review, it really wasnt that strong on comments as to what was wrong with it. I dont it was actually even that critical and a poor effort review wise. I think to be honest he was just doing it to stir the pot a lil bit! and to get onto your website Perez! :-P

      Clafairy x

    73. wtfever says – reply to this


      73

      Wow. Does this really surprise anyone? I just saw the trailers and it made me laugh hysterically… at how screaming queer it was. Seriously… are they even trying? No wonder the old hags wanted so much money. I'm sure you homo lovers will find some redeeming quality in this mess. You folks like faggy stuff.

    74. badlydrawnbear says – reply to this


      74

      What? Did Darren Starr's check bounce Perez?

      Trying to revive you PR career?

    75. Jon says – reply to this


      75

      Fuck that review! I give the movie 10 stars!!! I havew been anticipating this movie for 4 freakin years and they finally made it!! The previews are phenomenal..

    76. duh... says – reply to this


      76

      SJP is OVER. she just doesn't know it yet because she can't see past her nose.
      SATC is so last millennium.

    77. notlivingthehighlife says – reply to this


      77

      re charity case: Celebrities rarely give large amounts of money to fans. They will give to a charity like Perez pushes our way. You are not the only one poor out there. Sarah would be out of money if she gave money to everyone of her fans that were needy. I know you are 16, so you probably don't realize that many people out there have high credit card balances, live pay check to pay check and are close, if not at the point, of losing their house. If you really need braces, why don't you see it you can work at a dentist office to 'pay' in work time for the braces. One of my friends did that so her daughter could get braces. If not, wait until you can work fulltime and see if you can work out a payment plan.

    78. kellyp says – reply to this


      78

      i have that clutch!

    79. Elijah says – reply to this


      79

      I'm tired of seeing this ugly hag-whore's face plastered everyone. She's even on the cover of NEW YORK magazine. Arggghhh!!!!

    80. Sadie says – reply to this


      80

      The critic just doesn't like Sex and the City! If you LIKE the show, you LIKE that Carrie "wraps" things up with a moral…. THAT IS PART OF THE SHOW!!! DUHHH!!!! Idiot critic. Of course, the movie is going to be like the show. SOUNDS GREAT TO ME!!!!!

    81. SAxlerod says – reply to this


      81

      Come on, did you really think that this was going to be a good movie? In their hayday, they should have jumped on this. This is like the faux-ho's of The Hills doing a movie when they're 80 years old. Only douches would want to see that! These Sex in the City women women have reached their expiration dates and no one, I repeat no one wants to see this train wreck of a movie, their twisted feet and aging personas.

    82. mra says – reply to this


      82

      PLEASE…. GET US SOME LONDON SPOILERS!!!!!

    83. moe says – reply to this


      83

      2 out of 5 stars…thats good! cuz im not gonna see this gay movie.

    84. MJM says – reply to this


      84

      Why no Hillary posts lately? Or political posts in general?

    85. barbara says – reply to this


      85

      Re: SAxlerod – lol you are sooo wrong and off base. satc has a large and strong fan base. lets just leave it at that.

    86. regan says – reply to this


      86

      The review is meaningless in the reviewer was British or a guy. He just didn't get it. I don't know why the hell they premieredit in London anyway. NYC must be PISSED!

    87. Erin says – reply to this


      87

      Re: charity case – It's not her job to fix your teeth. Pay for it yourself.

    88. Karissa says – reply to this


      88

      If you watch the show you you'll see that every episode is narrated and explained with a moral by Carrie that's just the way the show is! Can't wait!

    89. lola says – reply to this


      89

      i honestly don't give a shit what "well-respected Times" says… the movie's gonna be the best!!!

    90. fjfjglkdjfgldfkjglfdkjgalskjdgs says – reply to this


      90

      OF COURSE THE CRITIC WAS GAY….NO STRAIGHT MAN IS GOING TO GO AND SEE THAT MOVIE!!! DOPE!!!

    91. TO CHARITY CASE says – reply to this


      91

      GET OVER IT HONEY!! SHE DOES NOT OWE YOU ANYTHING. SHE PROBABLY DIDN'T EVEN SEE THE LETTER AND GETS THOUSANDS OF BEGGING LETTERS A WEEK. WHAT MAKES YOU THINK ANYBODY SHOULD PAY FOR YOUR BRACES YOU SPOILT, VAIN LITTLE DING-DONG. THERE ARE MUCH WORTHIER CAUSES OUT THERE THAT IM SURE SJP SUPPORTS, LIKE FLOOD VICTIMS, FAMININE VICTIMS, THE HOMELESS, NEED I GO ON????

      GET A PART TIME JOB AND SAVE UP FOR YOUR OWN TEETH TO BE FIXED AND STOP YOUR SELF CENTRED SNIVELLING!

    92. H says – reply to this


      92

      The Brits don't value SATC in the same light New York does– or for that matter, our generation of SATC viewers. Its simple, the reviewer wasn't in the target market for the film, for the show, for the lifestyle those 4 fabulous characters represent. There was no appreciation of neither the wit, style, background, and most importantly city that SATC acknowledges. After all, New York trumps London. It's the center of the universe. So nice, you say it twice. If you can't appreciate New York, you can't appreciate Sex and the City. As Kim Catrell says, "New York is really the fifth character." As for the narration of morals…"Later that day I got to thinking…[Is this critic serious?]" Its the premise of the whole show– figuring out the place of women in their mid 40's. Women still working, some single some married. Throwing out theories, morals, themes. Its what we do– try to wrap and find closure for an issue with some magnificently sexy line. A la Big's character.

      American critics have given rave reviews. Oprah says we wont be disappointed and Oprah is Jesus. Thus, leave it the Brits to underappreciate the genuine magnificence that is SATC. With that, I say suck it you wankers.

      xoxo H

    93. helen says – reply to this


      93

      "There may be a problem with stretching Sex and the City into a two hour and twenty minute film - it can feel like a never ending dinner party: however pleasant the courses, after a while you can hardly eat another one." - this will not be a problem for me. i have watched the DVD's for hours at a time - 2 hours 20 is nothing!! bring it on!!

    94. RUMORS ARE SWIRLING "PEREZ ARE YOU GETTING PAID TO BASH MOVIES?" says – reply to this


      94

      ANSWER YUP.
      PEREZ IS GETTING PAID BIG $$$ TO BASH MOVIES. LETS SEE NEXT WEEK WE'LL SEE A POST SAYING….OH YES…..YESS YESSSS PEREZZERS LOVE THEM SEX IN THE CITY!!!

      ANOTHER HUNDRED G'S JUST LANDED IN HIS BANK ACCOUNT

      NAME THE PRICE PEREZ. WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO MAKE YOU LOVE THE MOVIE???

      ENQUIRY MINDS WANNA KNOW!!

      EITHER WAY YOU ARE A FRAUD!!!

      QUEEN NOT TRULEY YOUR NEW FAMED PAID BLOG TRAMP BY CORPORATE AMERICA FUELED BY THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST IN GOSSIP.

    95. Simone Icough says – reply to this


      95

      Most films have mixed reviews and SATC girls have not had an easy time of it in the press for the last few years. I will still go and see the film and reckon I will love it too! :)

    96. derek says – reply to this


      96

      WHO THE FUCK DOESNT LIKE DINNER PARTIES AND GIFTWRAPPED PRESENTS??? FUCKING FOOL!!!!
      SATC+SJP=COUNT ME IN

    97. TruthHurts says – reply to this


      97

      I can't even fathom the thought as to why this show was a hit in the first place… Let alone make a movie about it. Four nasty sluts sleeping with everyone under the sun… Yeah, that's great entertainment!?! You people are hypocrites. Over here calling a child all kind of un- Godly names over a stupid dress but…. will sit watch a show about 4 ugly sluts, religiously and say " where are these kids morals today"

    98. Caz says – reply to this


      98

      The times never gives over three stars- so two isn't bad!!!!

    99. Delilah says – reply to this


      99

      Dribble. Can't wait for Batman and Indiana Jones & the Kingdom of the Crystal. Now that will be exciting.

    100. Emmylou says – reply to this


      100

      To be honest i read the times every week and their film critic very rarely gives more than three stars to anything!

    More comments: [1] 2 »