Separated At Birth

aseparated-at-birth.jpg

Left: Brangelina at the Cannes Film Festival on Thursday. Right: Jan Van Eyck's The Arnolfini Wedding Portrait.

    Posted: May 16, 2008 at 10:00 am / Email this  »

    202 comments to “Separated At Birth”

    More comments: [1] 2 3 »

    1. emma says – reply to this


      1

      first? wow. that's wickedly similar. way to go perez. we can all use some art culture.

    2. It's me says – reply to this


      2

      Beautiful!

    3. t says – reply to this


      3

      wow

    4. mamajud says – reply to this


      4

      oh….your good

    5. d says – reply to this


      5

      hahahahahahaha. this art school student approves.

    6. sm says – reply to this


      6

      They are PERFECTION! Sigh

    7. Terri says – reply to this


      7

      this is the highlight of my day! hysterical!

    8. NYbitch says – reply to this


      8

      kudos!

    9. ozziebitch says – reply to this


      9

      Haha classic! But Brad's put on a bit of weight…

    10. Liz says – reply to this


      10

      Good matchup…but Brad forgot his hat

    11. Harmonia says – reply to this


      11

      I wonder if Angelina chose the dress based on the painting? It just looks to well planned out.

    12. ANGIE says – reply to this


      12

      lol

    13. http://questionoflust.skyrock.com says – reply to this


      13

      Second ? Yeeeeeeeeha

      Kisses from France Perez ♥

    14. alison says – reply to this


      14

      haha thank you. it it genius! i second emma!

    15. Xarnolfini says – reply to this


      15

      who thought you would be so cultivated ??? WOW

    16. alison says – reply to this


      16

      the woman in the portrait is not pregnant though.
      just so eveyone knows.
      go art students!

    17. Adriane says – reply to this


      17

      Hey, do you know that the women on the right picture, isn't pregnant though? The women back that then had to lean back because they were wearing so many layers of fabric if they stood straight up they would fall down. So, while leaning back it would, at least in this picture create the illusion that she is pregnant, although she is not.

    18. Dustin says – reply to this


      18

      haha too bad Arnolfini's new wife isn't pregnant yet. she is bunching up her dress to show she is ready to have children.

    19. katherine says – reply to this


      19

      hahahahhahahaha priceless.

    20. mrs. seehund says – reply to this


      20

      Amazing!

    21. s says – reply to this


      21

      hilarious!

    22. Dizzy says – reply to this


      22

      As an Art History graduate, that just made my day. Thank you!

    23. Janice says – reply to this


      23

      Way to go Perez one of your best "Separated at Birth" it's the modern "Arnolfini Wedding Portrait" (and yes I know the woman in the portrait is not really pregnant)

    24. ci says – reply to this


      24

      fantastic!!! nice one.

    25. mercury says – reply to this


      25

      BRILLIANT!!! : )

    26. Chymetyme says – reply to this


      26

      Perez!!! That's my favorite painting…look at you getting some culture!

    27. Big says – reply to this


      27

      Scary… and fantastic!

    28. Chloé says – reply to this


      28

      Hahaha that's funny! I've saw this painting in my art class many many times and when I saw the picture of brangelina yesterday, I really didn't tought about it! I'm really impress Perez!!!!

    29. lollerzz says – reply to this


      29

      nice one perez!

    30. hey hey says – reply to this


      30

      They are both glowing!!! Good pick perez

    31. katrina says – reply to this


      31

      OMG! one of my favorite pieces!
      I mean the painting, not wax lips and the adulterer.

    32. sarahsmith says – reply to this


      32

      wow!!! That is the best one yet perez!

    33. shakes head, rolls eyes says – reply to this


      33

      gosh looking pregnant and in a green dress, they could be twins………

    34. jen says – reply to this


      34

      i think ang is really pretty in that pic. they are so similar but ang is really glowing

    35. stoju says – reply to this


      35

      wow, lol, wtf, lmao. did they plan this or what! perez u make me laugh!

    36. Lulu83 says – reply to this


      36

      AHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! This is brilliant! You go Perez! Ahahahaha man that is gold!

      I cant stand either of them though. Dirty Arm Pitt and Night Crawler lips Jolie

    37. Wicked says – reply to this


      37

      good one Perez

    38. Aloney says – reply to this


      38

      in every fracking picture Angelina is holding her stomach. We know your pregnant bitch.. you don't need to keep reminding the world.

    39. Mark says – reply to this


      39

      It's a commonly accepted belief, though, that the woman in the painting is not pregnant. The painting, rather, is symbolic of the woman's fertility and ABILITY to produce children in the future.

    40. Dawn says – reply to this


      40

      LOLOL….Perez, I'm amazed at how you find these things…very similar!
      I can't wait to see the new Jolie-Pitts!…Love them!

    41. sparkles! says – reply to this


      41

      Ahh! Straight out of art history 101!!! LOVE IT!

    42. E. Romy says – reply to this


      42

      Thats brilliant! very intellectually humorous

    43. Team America says – reply to this


      43

      Angelina is a WHORE!!!!
      Angelina is a WHORE!!!!
      Angelina is a WHORE!!!!
      Angelina is a WHORE!!!!
      Angelina is a WHORE!!!!
      Angelina is a WHORE!!!!
      Angelina is a WHORE!!!!
      Angelina is a WHORE!!!!
      Angelina is a WHORE!!!!
      Angelina is a WHORE!!!!
      Angelina is a WHORE!!!!
      Angelina is a WHORE!!!!

    44. lena says – reply to this


      44

      hahaha this is the best seperated at birth that I have ever seen!

    45. Chelsea says – reply to this


      45

      Adriane is right - she's not actually pregnant in the picture its just the layers of fabric she's wearing.

    46. European says – reply to this


      46

      Finally some REAL culture on this website.

    47. sara says – reply to this


      47

      HAH awesome..
      I have studied that painting tons of times and am kinda surprised I didnt draw on the similarities..
      propss

    48. cat says – reply to this


      48

      something intellectual for once.

    49. Princess Kamilla says – reply to this


      49

      Truly stellar, Perez! Your best comparison yet……..

    50. HANNAH RAMOS says – reply to this


      50

      HILARIOUS.. HOW DO YOU COME UP WITH THIS SH-T!

    51. Ditte says – reply to this


      51

      Lol, laugh of the day, ty.

    52. nathasha! says – reply to this


      52

      hahaha! tht's really funny!

    53. sophie says – reply to this


      53

      hahaha us art history kids got a kick out of that…

    54. grace says – reply to this


      54

      She is so beautiful. Her blog and photos were found at —"c e l e b m i n g l e . c o m"—- last week. I am wondering what kind of relationship she is seeking on that site.

    55. Karen says – reply to this


      55

      I don't see any resemblance other than the dress.

    56. jasmine says – reply to this


      56

      Bravo Perez ur sep@ birth's r getting so funny love them. How ’bout 1 for that Chloe girl w/ her man face and glasses.

    57. MoKi says – reply to this


      57

      Funny, clever and unexpected. thanks for the laugh.

    58. savanna mae says – reply to this


      58

      wow Perez!! your good!! way 2 go

    59. Jasmine says – reply to this


      59

      Bravo Perez ur sep@ births r getting so funny. How about 1 for Chloe w/ her man glasses.

    60. ashley says – reply to this


      60

      clever perez…..but too bad that the woman in the painting isn't pregnant, she is just holding her dress and bunching it up! ive studied this painting in many art classes!

    61. non says – reply to this


      61

      I love that painting. You can see the artist in the mirror in the background.

    62. Kylee says – reply to this


      62

      Haha that is brilliant! Although, the other posters are right, she probably isn't pregnant. Although she is wearing many layers, it was also very popular at the time for women to stuff their stomachs. It gave the illusion of having a huge baby bump. Add to the idea that it is a wedding portrait and it is safe to say that she probably wasn't pregnant! I am a fashion major and learned this in my class on the history of clothing.

      Not to rain on your parade because quite honestly, I think this is the most amazing thing I have seen on your website! :)

    63. Mona says – reply to this


      63

      OM Goodness, This is Hilarious and oh so perfect.

      Way to go Perez!

    64. sandra says – reply to this


      64

      That is too funny!

    65. SammaJo says – reply to this


      65

      Beautiful reference to artwork.

    66. Tonx says – reply to this


      66

      LOL! I don't get why a lot of people on here absolutely love them or hate them. To the people that LOVE her, it's a bit overwhealming to glorify these two constantly. Plus, it adds more fuel to the haters. And to the haters who seem to feel sympathy for Aniston… SYMPATHY IS NOT LOVE… that's why he left her. Frankly, if they can afford to live the life they live… then let them be. She was a crazy ass bitch back then, who wasn't a crazy ass bitch back in the day? Well…not THAT crazy, but crazy non the less.

    67. Giovanna says – reply to this


      67

      This is your best comparison ever.

    68. angelina the husband stealer says – reply to this


      68

      ANGELINA IS AN ASSWHOLE……I REALLY REALLY WOULD LIKE TO SEE BRAD PITT WITH A LATINA……
      BUT LATINA WOMEN NEED REALLY MEN…..NOT PUSSIES LIKE BRAD PITT…

      I WISH THEM BOTH NOTHING BUT THE WORST AND KARMA IS A BITCH ANGELINA…..IN BRADS NEXT FILM HE WILL LEAVE HER FOR HIS CO STAR (OH PLEASE GOD LET HIM DO A MOVIE WITH JENNIFER LOPEZ OR EVA MENDES)

    69. DANIELLE says – reply to this


      69

      haha! i'm an art history major, and this is so funny!
      STAY FABULOUS!

    70. ANGELINA THE WHORE says – reply to this


      70

      Re: Team America

      YOU ARE ABSOLUTLEY RIGHT….ANGELINA IS A WHORE

      ANGELINA IS A WHORE
      ANGELINA IS A WHORE
      ANGELINA IS A WHORE
      ANGELINA IS A WHORE

    71. ttn says – reply to this


      71

      soooo true !
      well done perez!

    72. Marishka says – reply to this


      72

      OMG this is so clever !!! Perez you're ZE best :D

    73. MT Buckets says – reply to this


      73

      PEREZ KUDOS KUDOS!!!
      A great work of art I'm so proud that you noticed this. I just learned about this painting last semester in my art history class. GOOD JOB!!!
      More Please.

    74. MT Buckets says – reply to this


      74

      only the girl in the painting wasn't pressers. She was scrunching up her dress. Its true go look it up!

    75. MT Buckets says – reply to this


      75

      oops I meant preggers!!

    76. alicia la cubana says – reply to this


      76

      lmfao!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    77. HAH! says – reply to this


      77

      Read the title of that masterpiece. Has there been a wedding? Selfish sperm donor and his pregnant whore. Now there's an apt title.

    78. mila says – reply to this


      78

      She is a beautiful pregnant woman, but thats it. She is not a beauty and stop overrating her looks. She has aged so prematurely. Just wait to see her looks after those twins are born.

    79. JT says – reply to this


      79

      good lord—that is soooo gooood!

      Perez for the very first time—I'm impressed. great job

    80. Me says – reply to this


      80

      haha, so funny, perez

    81. Ashley says – reply to this


      81

      This was in my History of costume class. It was fashionable to wear a belly!

    82. KIMbo says – reply to this


      82

      Ha! Where do you come up with these comparisons? You are always spot on!

    83. ME says – reply to this


      83

      BEAUTIFUL!!!!!!!!! i heart both pics…..great job perez

    84. janell says – reply to this


      84

      Who comes up with these comparisons…they are genious!

    85. jenni says – reply to this


      85

      the name of the painting is actually, the arnolfini betrothal!!! its so funny cuz i have a final on this painting today!!

    86. Jason says – reply to this


      86

      Very clever…

    87. Maruchenga says – reply to this


      87

      Grandioso. Have you already seen La camisa negra de Juanes in english on youtube???

    88. Mikki says – reply to this


      88

      OMG!
      yesterday I was commenting about this and today it's in the blog. I like to think I had something to do with it. Thanks Perez, this is so cool! Puss (kiss in Swedish)

    89. Sue says – reply to this


      89

      Angie looks Beautiful as always:)

    90. Lisa says – reply to this


      90

      That's classic! Good one Perez!!

    91. kt says – reply to this


      91

      ummm that painting is not of a pregnant woman…she's is just holding her dress up because the material the dress is made of is so long…sorry to burst your bubble

    92. Mikki says – reply to this


      92

      Some info about the painting:
      ca 1434
      some power couple of that time
      green color - fertillity
      tabu for them to be in the bedroom, plus you see the slippers are of (ready for bed..?)
      the dog presents domestic bliss
      the male is blessing their marriage - they don't need the church
      Ellen D. mentioned that we'll look back on this day (gay marriage allowed in CA) and think that it was weird for gay people to not be able to get married, just as we today think about womens right to vote.
      Can you imagine this couple, 600 years ago (before Islam, discovery of america, all european revolutions, two world wars… ) and still people say that it is not acceptable with sex/children before marriage.

    93. Sarah420 says – reply to this


      93

      OMG! How many people are going to point out that the girl in the painting isn't pregnant? Good job learning that in art class…the two pictures are still crazy alike!

    94. kim says – reply to this


      94

      Re: Mark – true, and it is also believed that as the Arnolfini family were among the most established silk merchants of the day, that the voluminous mounds of fabric she held up in front of her were meant to reference her husbands successful trade.

    95. K. Selbz says – reply to this


      95

      Perez, as an art student I can appreciate this comparison.

      hahaha, this really made my day.

    96. Elenique says – reply to this


      96

      Excellent! Perez, vous etes magnifique!

    97. sourdoggie says – reply to this


      97

      lol, not bad, not bad of a comparison.

    98. jen says – reply to this


      98

      aHA! I knew it looked familiar

    99. Melissa says – reply to this


      99

      If only Angelina was as classy as that painting. She's a home-wrecker and an unmarried mother. He should be ashamed of himself too. The both make me sick!

    100. lb says – reply to this


      100

      Re: Mikki – Um, Mikki, Islam has been around way longer than 600 years. Idiot.

    More comments: [1] 2 3 »