Home Videos Photos
Home >> Legal Matters , R. Kelly >> If the Mole Doesn't Fit, You Must Acquit!

If the Mole Doesn't Fit, You Must Acquit!

Filed under: Legal Matters > R. Kelly

rkellycloseup.jpg

His freedom depends on…excess skin???

According to reports, a mole could set R. Kelly free!

Opening statements for Robert's child porn trial kicked off yesterday, and Kelly's lawyer presented a doozy!

The defense claimed that the singer couldn't possibly be the man in the videotape central to the trial. Kelly reportedly has a "significant" mole on his lower middle back, one that's been there since childhood, said his lawyer.

And, the man seen performing sex acts in the video does NOT have a mole on his back, allegedly.

The lawyer added, "Robert Kelly is not on that tape. … Not a single witness can tell you that is him on the tape."

The defense also claimed the girl on the tape is not the same person prosecutors have identified as the victim. Kelly's team says the person on the tape is a prostitute.

"The woman on that tape [is] paid with money. When the tape was played for the jury, it showed a man handing a female money at the beginning of their encounter and leaving more at the end, " said Kelly's lead lawyer to the jury.

Kelly's supposed sex partner (who was between 13 and 15 at the time) also denies she's on the video.

It's just getting started and there's already crazy drama!

We can't wait to see what's up next!

    Posted: May 21, 2008 at 11:15 am / Email this  »
    « Previous story
    Welcome To The Neighborhood
    Next story »
    Completely Gratuitous
    See All 57 Comments

    57 comments to “If the Mole Doesn't Fit, You Must Acquit!”

    1. hello says – reply to this


      1

      first. it's called concealer bitches

    2. sex says – reply to this


      2

      Ha Ha

    3. Pedphile will live in jail says – reply to this


      3

      Have fun in the slammer Pervert!

    4. 2nd says – reply to this


      4

      id fuck r kelly

    5. Brandon says – reply to this


      5

      First

    6. chirag says – reply to this


      6

      2nd?

    7. genevieve says – reply to this


      7

      FREE KELLS

    8. y says – reply to this


      8

      yea.. i am in top 10.lol

    9. ding dong says – reply to this


      9

      if he was accused by a liar, the liar should be put to death for putting him through this.

    10. Meme says – reply to this


      10

      3rd. oh my

    11. Nicole says – reply to this


      11

      That's some shit

    12. Reddesires says – reply to this


      12

      What another guilty ni99er will walk free

    13. poo says – reply to this


      13

      gross go to jail!!!!!!!

    14. Rebecca says – reply to this


      14

      FIRST BITCHES

    15. ay mami! says – reply to this


      15

      Let this guy go free and you'll see in no time they'll find him having sex with young girls. How is this case any different from those child-molesting priests?

    16. sexsquire says – reply to this


      16

      Is this the same tape that the defense was trying to have REMOVED??? If so, why are they using that as a platform to dismiss the case?

    17. deedee says – reply to this


      17

      This is every mans worst nightmare. If this man is innocent then these accusers should be prosecuted. They have cost R Kelly his reputation and there is nothing that can be done to get it back.
      People will always believe that it may be true. Mud sticks
      This is pure evil.

    18. Alicia says – reply to this


      18

      Re: hello –

      What kind of guy puts concealer on a mole on his back, dumb bitch.

    19. Pink says – reply to this


      19

      Oh Perez.
      As if your obese ass would have a chance.

    20. mjcp says – reply to this


      20

      If this is true, why wouldn't he have brought up the mole YEARS ago and stopped all this? Between his legall fees and the loss to his reputation, he's lost MILLIONS over this.

    21. amy says – reply to this


      21

      they need to turn this crap into a lifetime movie

    22. s says – reply to this


      22

      then why isnt this a child rape trial instead of a child pornography trial?
      if the girl says its not her on the tape, how is it relevant to the trial? its bullshit. child molesters and rapists should just be put down like rabid dogs.

    23. people believe anything says – reply to this


      23

      Re: deedee – um yea, except for the fact that he is a known child rapist… this aint the first time the accusation has come up. get real.

    24. vancouvervanity.com says – reply to this


      24

      shut the FRONT DOOR..

      they just noticed this now?

    25. confused says – reply to this


      25

      Is it me, or does anyone else remember that he MARRIED ALIYAH when she was A MINOR….14 OR 15 YRS OLD…

    26. Obnoxious Joe says – reply to this


      26

      I think he will be aquitted. This might end up as an embarrasing case for the prosecution.

    27. Daniella Simon says – reply to this


      27

      What reputation? R Kelly has settled at least 3 lawsuits involving sex acts with children and has been investigated by the police regarding the girl in the video. It is well known in the black community that R kelly goes after young girls, so more likely than not, it is him on the tape.

    28. Cassie says – reply to this


      28

      If I were a juror, I would be kicking back with a bowl of popcorn, watching that shit–ha, ha. :)

    29. wtf says – reply to this


      29

      This piece of shit married Aliyah (don't know if that's the right spelling) when she was only 15….doesn't matter if it's him in this video or not…the pig likes little girls and what goes around cums around….

    30. bill says – reply to this


      30

      Someonew told me she saw her on "c e l e b m i n g l e . c o m" lastweek. I am wondering what kind of relationship he is looking for on that site.

    31. Jary says – reply to this


      31

      Re: sexsquire – Because it wasn't removed so now they have to exploit every possible flaw in the tape to prove he is innocent. That is how it works. Isn't the same girl that accused him now saying she is not he girl on the tape?

    32. neenster says – reply to this


      32

      yes, just what i always needed to know. that R Kelly has a gigantic nubbin on his back. BARFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

    33. Babs says – reply to this


      33

      How do we know that R. Kelly didn't have the mole removed in the last several years he has been waiting for this trial to start? He has seen the tape before, he knows what needed to be done to be exonerated!

    34. Die you F'n Ahole says – reply to this


      34

      Re: bill – Nobody wants to go on your stupid site!

    35. 9 is the new eleventeen says – reply to this


      35

      no boobs no pubes;; hi i,m r kelly

    36. angela_lushious says – reply to this


      36

      If all of these assertions by the DEFENSE were true, then "riddle me this" . . .

      How did they get the indictment past the grand jury?

      : |

    37. Tanfrah says – reply to this


      37

      MOLES CAN BE REMOVED!

    38. noimsaayin says – reply to this


      38

      yo yo dat sumin gat ta fromin noimsaayin kells fajizzle noimsaayin

    39. AZ says says – reply to this


      39

      Dumb asses yeah a mole can be removed but in the article it clearly states he still has it, and the man in the video did not have one. Not the other way around idiots.

    40. Lebron says – reply to this


      40

      I think we have found out the truth finally that this racist witch hunt is all false. Its funny how all evidence points to him being innocent yet whitey wants him lockd up. Is maybe cause most know that with that playa kells on the street they got no shot at a hoe. If he wanted yo woman he would be pounding that shit right now and she wouldnt even remember your name. Bottom line is case is about whitey tryn lock a playa up and jealous hoes that want kells dick but know they aint got no shot. Free Kells play on playa

    41. symbolize wisdom says – reply to this


      41

      i believe they said that the mole is on r kelly and not on the person in the tape and also another fact for those who think someone accused r kelly of rape someone turned in a tape to a writer for the newspaper in chicago he then turned it over to the police the girl and her parents have always said its not her. but her aunt (sparkle) and others have said it is her. the fbi had the tape and said hat they could say for a fact that that was r kelly, but if you remember some yrs ago they found some tapes in florida but they could not be used b/c of the way they were found…….. and this he is nasty he has had 3 out of court settlements

    42. Amazing T! says – reply to this


      42

      R.Kelly pees on little girls- Real Talk.

    43. symbolize wisdom says – reply to this


      43

      sorry i meant to say the fbi could NOT say for a fact that it was him.

    44. Hayworth Honey says – reply to this


      44

      Well if the whole damn defense rested on whether there is or isn't a mole, why didn't they just take it to trial 6 years ago?

    45. EVAN says – reply to this


      45

      IT IS R KELLY …HE IS A CHILD MOLESTER …HE WAS MARRIED TO AALIYA H WHEN SHE WAS 15 !! GO DOWNLOAD THE VIDEO …HE IS NOT AN INNOCENT MAN ..HE PAID OFF THE GIRL

      WAKE UP ….ARE YOU THAT DUMB ???

    46. EVAN says – reply to this


      46

      IT IS HIM IN THE VIDEO ..HE IS A CHILD MOLESTER ….HE WAS MARRIED TO AALIYAH WHEN SHE WAS ONLY 15…..HE IS GUILTY AS HELL …

    47. Lola says – reply to this


      47

      Amen!!!!!

    48. Leo says – reply to this


      48

      Re: Tanfrah – Yeah but they can't be put back!!!

    49. mary says – reply to this


      49

      For ALL OF YOU that dont no, the girl says its not ther because kelly has been takein care of her and her mom for years, they both live with him RIGHT NOW!!!! please people get your facts in order

    50. pam says – reply to this


      50

      OMG YALLLL ARE SOO FUCKIN STUPID!! My mom hve some moles now that she didnt hve 6DAMN YRS AGO!!!!! r.kelly is old damn near 40. if he isnt already. His body is changein we dont no when that damn mole form

    51. Robin Quivers says – reply to this


      51

      "If there's a no mole, he didn't fill the hole." -Robin Quivers from this monring's Howard Sten Show

    52. Doc Hollywood says – reply to this


      52

      This loser has had YEARS to have that mole lasered off. Puh-leez, that is no defense. He should fry.

    53. hesguilty says – reply to this


      53

      The same house that this sex video was shot in is the same house that was used as a location to film the R. Kelly video for his song "Fiesta". He used to own that house. So, i don't know how he's going to be able to say it's not him in the video. PLUS, if he in fact had a mole on his back, and the man in the video does not, this case would have never made it trial since that's an easy thing to investigate. PLUS, he married Aliyah when she was 15! So clearly he likes young girls!

    54. ash says – reply to this


      54

      EVERYONE KNOWS THATS YOU KELLY. HIS FCUKIN SOUL TRAIN AWARD IS RIGHT THERE IN THE BACKGROUND OF THE TAPE.

      BEST MALE R&B 97?? THATS YOU JACKASS.

    55. KC says – reply to this


      55

      Since you've watched the tape, you're just as guilty as him.

    56. Luscious says – reply to this


      56

      Check for cosmetic surgery records! Moles can be removed. The man is guilty

    57. amber says – reply to this


      57

      lol hes creepy !