Home Videos Photos
Home >> Royals Royce >> We Call Bullshit

We Call Bullshit

Filed under: Royals Royce

1506_burrell1_01.jpg

The British media is now reporting that Paul Burrell, the man who has repeated $old her out since her death, was more than just a butler to Princess Diana.

They claim he was also her "round-the-clock" sex slave and that she was "kinky" in bed!

Can't they let her rest in peace???

    Posted: Jun 15, 2008 at 12:33 am / Email this  »
    « Previous story
    Fill In The Blank
    Next story »
    A Worthwhile Cause
    See All 135 Comments

    135 comments to “We Call Bullshit”

    More comments: « 1 [2]

    1. kinky says – reply to this


      101

      It really pisses me off to no end when I see someone trashing Princess Diana's name. She was truly a one of a kind person, she had all the money and fame, along with wealth to her name. Only she did not partake in the ways of the royals, she did not care to"GET HER HANDS DIRTY" she was a true saint, and what more she actually cared about people, she did not just put on a persona for the cameras or to help make herself look better. She did not do any of this for the publicity or for any other matter than those that she helped. I hope that someday soon they will let her soul rest in peace.

    2. respe says – reply to this


      102

      why don't you call him a hobag? He sure looks and smells like one to me!
      Princess Diana R.I.P.

    3. Linda says – reply to this


      103

      The British media are horrible…..trust them to TRASH everything…..Some people are so sick. I don't believe a word of it.

    4. wtf says – reply to this


      104

      thats not true!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    5. mo says – reply to this


      105

      A-FUCKING-MEN!!! leave the woman be!

    6. eesh says – reply to this


      106

      for goodness sake, paul burrel is an absoulte creep. probably a rumour started by him, hes the height of idiocy
      princess Di was amazing. okay she wasnt perfect, but we loved her. she was our princess.
      and why its our media out of everyone who could report such bollocks is sickening, whether its true or not.
      thats not gossip people want to hear, it just turns stomachs.
      whats the betting the sun or the star thought this rubbish up.
      pathetic.

    7. psh says – reply to this


      107

      Re: Camil – you and 'swarm' can shut up n'all
      fucking have some respect you tossers
      the pair of you need your heads banging together
      doesnt have piss me off

    8. Cat says – reply to this


      108

      Noone what a truly lousy person would ever talk smack about our beloved Diana

    9. Yup. says – reply to this


      109

      I too, call bullshit. Wait for Burrell to take the media to court, where they can sh*t or get off the pot and show the judge their cards, or pay Burrell a five figured apology. Are they assuming they'll sell more papers from this possible fairy tale than they'll receive in fines if proof is found lacking? What a world. Hello, sewer.

    10. Eric5 says – reply to this


      110

      You know, I'd really like to meet Burrell

      So I could grab him by one of his monkey-ass ears and beat the piss out of him

    11. Leila says – reply to this


      111

      Diana was chosen to marry Charles because she was young, a virgin, fertile and of the right ancestry. She gave birth to two sons, therefore fulfilling her role of providing two heirs to the British throne. The British royal family has always behaved this way. The wife is of appropriate lineage and is there to reproduce, while the husband is free to continue with his philandering ways. One only needs to read a little of the history of the royal family to realize that Charles was only continuing a family tradition in having another relationship on the side the whole time. And now he's married to her! In a way, you have to feel sorry for Diana, who was a very young girl with stars in her eyes when she married her prince. She tried to create a purpose in life for herself through her boys and supporting various charities, but ended up a deeply unhappy person, prone to self-destructive behaviour, eg bulimia. I guess in the need to feel loved she had relationships with other men, but to think that this butler was one of them really is stretching the imagination. Guess she isn't here to defend herself, but she's away from it all now. It must hurt her sons, however. Guess this guy is trying to make some more money by whatever means he can…

    12. MISSH says – reply to this


      112

      I MISS PRINCESS DIANA.. SHE HAD SUCH A GOOD HEART.. YOU CANT FAKE KINDNESS AND COMPASSION. I DONT BELIEVE THAT GUY WAS HER SEX SLAVE.. ANYTHING TO SELL A BOOK.
      CANT A WOMAN HAVE A MALE FRIEND? I THINK THATS ALL HE WAS TO HER A FRIEND AND CONFIDANT.
      GOD BLESS HER SOUL. HOPE SHE IS FINALLY AT PEACE

    13. angry says – reply to this


      113

      FUCK PAUL BURRELL!

      Seriously what a bastard. That man has already published 2 books, made countless interviews, and still can't get enough ten years later. Princess Diana was a wonderful woman, and she did so much good. He is horrid to tarnish her memory with cunty false comments
      !!!



    14. 114

      You mean let her rest in peace they way you are doing Perez?

    15. Jane says – reply to this


      115

      Well, she was a slut, whether you like it or not. She pretended to be a people's princess but in fact, she hated anyone who was a non-aristocrat so most of you might as well shut up. I don't believe she would have shagged Burrell because he's a homo so that wouldn't quite work, would it?

    16. David says – reply to this


      116

      Your last line is…"Can't they let her rest in peace???"….
      Why do you than feel you have to mention it?
      You every bit a slug as those who put it out!

    17. BloMe says – reply to this


      117

      So what if she was bangin Paul, Tom, Dick or even Harry? A Princess got needs! I wonder who Perez is screwing? Pitty that poor ASSHOLE!

    18. Told says – reply to this


      118

      No, you can tell by the body lang that they've f'ed. What were her options really? The kinky is in every Brit soul. Believe that. I know it sounds mean but I am grateful not to look at her bug eyes & hook nose while at the market check out. Her face assaulted anyone who is decent looking, no mind, beautiful.

    19. europ says – reply to this


      119

      OMFG, separated at birth!!! Paul Burrel… that butler AND Tom Hanks!



    20. 120

      And so what if she liked a little kink in bed? Makes her more interesting.



    21. 121


    22. 122
    23. uBUGR says – reply to this


      123

      LOOKS WHO'S TALKING YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE. YOU ASK WHY THEY CAN'T LET HER REST IN PEACE, AND HERE YOU ARE SPREADING IT AROUND. WHY DIDN'T YOUR ASSHOLE MOTHER GET YOU SOME HELP BEFORE IT WAS TOO LATE? SPREAD THAT AROUND.

    24. uBUGR says – reply to this


      124

      Those with deep-seated homosexual tendencies are usually unwilling to examine the emotional conflicts that "caused" this tendency. Most of these men had painful adolescent experiences of significant loneliness and sadness, felt insecure in their masculinity, and had a poor body image. There is a much higher prevalence of psychiatric illness in those who identify themselves as homosexuals. Unfortunately, their denial, defensiveness and anger block their openness to seek help with their emotional and behavioral weaknesses. Male effeminacy is a clear sign of serious affective immaturity, usually where they failed in their childhood to identify sufficiently with their fathers and other male peers.
      YA - SPEND SOME OF THAT MONEY ON A PSYCHIATRIST - YOU NUT CASE - BEFORE YOUR 15 MINUTES OF SHAME ARE UP AND YOU ARE BACK ON WELFARE.

    25. ME! says – reply to this


      125

      OMG! Enough with the fame vultures! Let her rest in peace. and whatever she did in her private life was her business.

    26. Beth says – reply to this


      126

      Oh, honestly… first off, what's the point after this long? Second, even if she WAS kinky in bed, what's wrong with being a humanitarian and liking a little bondage every now and then? Sheesh!

    27. Queen says – reply to this


      127

      OFF WITH HIS HEAD!

    28. Britt says – reply to this


      128

      Let them burn in hell.

    29. Crazy says – reply to this


      129

      DIANA WAS DERANGED AND ALL THE PEOPLE WHO LOVED HER AND LOVE HER STILL ARE DERANGED. I WANT PEACE, SO NO MORE NEWS ON THAT FOOLISH DIANA, PRINCESS OF WHALES.

    30. lisa says – reply to this


      130

      considering that prince charles was frolicking with camilla deville, diana had to find solice elsewhere. why is that so hard for the Queen to understand? possibly she should have raised her son with better standards other than infidelity. Diana would have made an amazing Queen and that was the issue…

    31. Kelse says – reply to this


      131

      This is just pathetic, can they pleace just let Diana rest in peace? So what if she did stuff that we would consider "bad for the press"? Who are we to judge a dead princess??

    32. tori says – reply to this


      132

      How can anyone in their right mind believe this BS? And even if it was true WHY wait over 10 years almost 11? perez your one of them not letting her RIP by even writing and spreading this BS

    33. denis says – reply to this


      133

      its probabably true, and if so , big deal, im glad she had a bit of fun, she deserved it after all the heart break she went throgh, it doesnt take nothing away from her, i actually like her more hearing this, she was human and she ws loveley. person, paul burrel should get shot for what he has done to her though, not fare on her kids to hear this shit.

    34. Tom says – reply to this


      134

      That scum bag is such a celebrity whore, he appeared on a UK programme I am a celebrity get me out of here. He was saying how wonderful Diana was and how he thought highly of her??? Over the years he has tried to get his face in the tabloids even though he is just a Z lister. I wonder why he has all of a sudden changed his tune after all these years is for money???? I,ve got a name of a film he would be suited for LIAR LIAR.

    35. nick says – reply to this


      135

      Even if she was sleeping around, she was royalty you take that pounding and you shut it.

    More comments: « 1 [2]