Not as Rich, Bitch

Filed under: Wacky, Tacky & True

leona.jpg

The late billionairess hotelier Leona Helmsley (also known as the 'Queen of Mean') left her doggie, Trouble, $12 million when she passed away recently. Yes, MILLION.

However, according to new reports, a NYC judge has quietly reduced the pooch's $12 million trust fund to $2 million and signed off on a deal to pay the late billionaire's two disinherited grandchildren $6 million amid allegations that Helmsley wasn't mentally competent when she signed her will.

The trustees of Helmsley's estate argued that Trouble doesn't need the full $12 million she was left.

The judge gave them permission to place $10 million of the dog's trust into Helmsley's multibillion-dollar charitable foundation.

Trouble is currently living in Florida with the general manager of the Helmsley Sandcastle Hotel.

The Queen of Mean's will had asked that either her brother or grandson care for the dog, but both passed cause the dog's a notorious biter!

How much did THEY get in the will???

In an affidavit filed by Trouble's care taker, he says $2 million is more than enough for the dog to live off of, "Two million dollars . . . would be enough money to pay for Trouble's maintenance and welfare at the highest standards of care for more than 10 years, which is more that twice her reasonably anticipated life expectancy."

The glorified dog sitter put her annual expenses at $190,000, which includes his $60,000 guardian fee, $100,000 for ’round-the-clock security, $8,000 for grooming, $3,000 for miscellaneous expenses, $1,200 for food and anywhere from $2,500 to $18,000 for medical care.

That pooch has it better than a lot of people we know!

[Image via WENN.]

    Posted: Jun 16, 2008 at 11:45 am / Email this  »

    67 comments to “Not as Rich, Bitch”

    1. haha says – reply to this


      1

      boo

    2. JENN says – reply to this


      2

      BRODY JENNER HAS A small DICK!!!4REAL

    3. Erin says – reply to this


      3

      (: i love joe

    4. gig says – reply to this


      4

      I'll take the job!

    5. dsf says – reply to this


      5

      Copied straight from TMZ!!!!
      I think I'm just gonna stick to their site!!!
      You're always copying everything from them anyway…..I'll just cut out the middle asshole……YOU!!!!
      DOUCHEBAG!!!

    6. atx says – reply to this


      6

      crazy byotch

    7. Dumb says – reply to this


      7

      What the fuck is the use of a will if assholes don't follow it. That dog should bite all their balls off and play with them.

    8. TEX says – reply to this


      8

      $2 million/ 10 years = $200,000/year

      That would put Trouble into the country's highest tax bracket!!! WHAT THE HELL?!?!

    9. D says – reply to this


      9

      Isn't she dead and burried in a shoe box yet-old fucking bat.

    10. elias says – reply to this


      10

      cccccccrrrrraaazzzzzzyyyyyy

    11. charl says – reply to this


      11

      what the fuck??? this woman was out of her mind!!

    12. m says – reply to this


      12

      People are stupid.

    13. Snooz says – reply to this


      13

      Perez, your site has gotten so boring! Ever since you stopped talking about all the Sony BMG artists (britney, christina, JLO, Leona…etc) you have nobody good to talk about left! instead you are writing about crap like this! Get over your little boycott thing and report the news that people actually want to hear about, while you still have any readers that come back!
      zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    14. twink says – reply to this


      14

      Shoot, that dog has it better than most Americans. $18,000 for medical care? What? Is it sick?

    15. sd says – reply to this


      15

      How can a judge basically change her will and give $$$ to the 2 grandkids that were left out?
      If she wanted them to have any of her $$$$…..SHE WOULD'VE LEFT THEM SOME!!!!
      It's like her final wishes were tossed aside!!!

    16. Grace says – reply to this


      16

      I'm sorry, but isn't 1,200 on food a little cheap?
      Can't we afford something better than pedigree

    17. swand says – reply to this


      17

      Glad to see that the grandkids are collecting something.

    18. Dana says – reply to this


      18

      Wills should not be tampered with. This is unlawful to go against the wishes of the deceased. It should be contested. It doesn't matter what a mean old bag Leona Helmsley was. The grandchildren should have waited until the dog died and then put in a claim for the money. This is downright scary and could set a precedent.

    19. eric says – reply to this


      19

      When Fatty Perez dies from obesity, and heart failure, due to his fattness.. he is planning on leaving his networth of $7,200 to his annoying, ugly pooch too.. he is such a sad fatass.

    20. tg says – reply to this


      20

      Children Starving here in this country and in other countries - even worse and the Selfish woman leaves her money to her dog.
      I'm so glad a Judge overturned the original will she made out. You have to be mentally ill to leave your dog your money and not your own grandchildren. I know people love their animals - but the dog can't spend the money on what he wants. So she's really not leaving the dog the money.



    21. 21

      It's sad that no matter how long or hard I work, I will never be as financially secure as a dog. Damn college education and being born on two legs…

    22. gtfg says – reply to this


      22

      so much for a legal will!!!
      Fuck that judge!!

    23. T-bag says – reply to this


      23

      Love is complicated,but good partner make it easier!!!!!!! Thousands of local, sexy adult online singles waiting to hook up online NOW! Find a great date, love, a committed relationship or even, intimate, erotic sex.!!! **** seekingtall. Com ****

    24. kym says – reply to this


      24

      um wow….so, since the dog inheirted so much money does it have to pay taxes. i bet the irs will find a way….

    25. James says – reply to this


      25

      Carribou over people - Enjoy the your high gas prices little liberals. You voted them in, you suffer the consequences.

    26. Pete says – reply to this


      26

      That's revolting. $12million for a dog, while people go hungry.

    27. Mark says – reply to this


      27

      Burn in HELL Leona!!! They should have given the money to all the people she abused over the years.

    28. JKJJ says – reply to this


      28

      And African children should die of hunger! This idiocy makes me sick….

    29. sensi says – reply to this


      29

      ROUGH ROUGH!!!!!

    30. John says – reply to this


      30

      I keep hearing of how mean Leona was, how rude Leona was, how selfish Leona was, what a bitch she was, the insane amount of money left to her dog, etc. BUT…. did you all read the part about where like 99% of her estate went to? The woman left it all to charity! She left BILLIONS of dollars to a trust that will be distributed to various charities. I guess she's not such a bitch after all…

    31. Annac says – reply to this


      31

      "he is planning on leaving his networth of $7,200"

      Perez makes that in a few minutes. $54,000 per ad per day. You do the math.

    32. jonat says – reply to this


      32

      perez i see they got to you! for giving me hints! its okay! you have given me enough hints! trust me there are no rich grandmothers that was a joke! dont worry though! its okay i know the amount of pressure by those in hollywood but dont worry its almost over now! thanx for what you did do! dont let them make you feel bad! seriously!

    33. cc says – reply to this


      33

      How dare this judge go against her wishes and give money to the disinherited grandchildren . They were disinherited for a reason. What's the point of anyone making a Will if judges are going to take it upon themself to decide for you. This judge needs to be removed from the bench.

    34. mslau says – reply to this


      34

      i hope she's having fun in hell!

    35. LkAtU says – reply to this


      35

      Leona Helmsley was one old mean ass bitch and sounds like her bitch dog is the same. Maybe her father should have kept his d*ck in his pants like she liked to tell her underpaid workers.



    36. 36

      what a whack job

    37. lovem says – reply to this


      37

      I would leave my $$$ to my dogs too…they give unconditional love and don't put grey hair on your head like your teenage kids would!

    38. serge says – reply to this


      38

      It is wrong to disinherit the dog. The dog provided her with more comfort and love than any disinherited relative. This decision she be reversed. I hope this little dog is given back his care money because he probably never did anything for her based on money. While her entire family did everything to her based on her funds. By the way the relative has no DICK!!!!!!!

    39. ANNA says – reply to this


      39

      i fucking love Trouble so much but $2million are a good amount to live in luxury for the rest of her life.as for the disinherited grandchildren i don't think they should take any money.the $6 million should be given to poor and sick people instead.Leona Helmsley didn't feel loved by her relatives and i believe that this is the real reason she left all her fortune to her dog.

    40. Chip says – reply to this


      40

      DAMN!

      I want to BE THAT F*cking DOG! ARRF, LOL

    41. Atika says – reply to this


      41

      This is more SAD than ridiculous! Why she didn't find some nice couple to take the dog in, give them reasonable amount for Trouble's care ($2 mil sounds too much anyway) and give the rest to the really needy. There is so many hungry people in the world, medical research that could use some donations and so many good projects to help them with extra cash….what a stupid stupid old bitch :-( (Karma's gonna get her anyway.)

    42. @v@ says – reply to this


      42

      Thank heaven common sense reigns. Each case has to be looked at on its own merit for justice to actually BE justice. She was a vindictive old woman who had as much responsibility to take care of her own human family as to a non-related dog. If her grandchildren weren't around her enough to merit a mention in the will, if you read her bio, you'd know exactly why. It was her will, but it was not what a sound person would do; disinherit your family and leave ALL of it to an animal. Oh, and SURE it takes $190,000.00 or approx. $16,000.00 a month to look after a little dog. Pssst. Wanna buy an igloo?

    43. Boggl says – reply to this


      43

      A lot of people may disagree with me here, but pets shouldn't be able to inherit anything (money, houses, cars, etc). They can't do anything with that stuff. That dog isn't going to stroll into the local Petco with a wad of his cash and go on a shopping spree. Pets don't get social security numbers. We can't claim them as dependents on our taxes (though I'm sure a group is trying to get that changed). They're not recognized when we're alive, but when we die it's a different ballgame? Just because it's in a Will their legal status changes and they become recognizable as dependents/heirs/whatever you want to call it and entitled to inherit whatever we designate to our dependents? And the pets can't write their own wills and stipulate who gets what at the time of their death. They aren't legally recognized in society as people/humans (taxes, court, no ssn), but if they're in a will that makes it all different? It boggles the mind.

    44. John says – reply to this


      44

      Have ANY of you read the entire story behind this? Leona left BILLIONS, yes BILLIONS of dollars to charity. The $12 million lef to this dog was chicken feed to her. I repeat, she left almost her ENTIRE BILLION dollar fortune to CHARITY.

    45. kalea says – reply to this


      45

      yeah i would be excited if i got $500.00, i cant imagine why a dog would need such expenditures. thats what rich people dont understand, $500.00 to someone who is poor is like they are rich for a day, it just would make life easier - if just for a day.

    46. prego says – reply to this


      46

      Jennifer Aniston is pregnant with John Mayer's baby!! Yeah!!!

    47. webte says – reply to this


      47

      Its funny that she would leave that all for her dog, I guess the only that understood her from what I've read. But what isn't so funny is that the law can determine that your will and final wishes aren't what they like, or what the money hungry relatives what so they can change it as they see fit.

    48. moron says – reply to this


      48

      Re: Atika – hey moron…do some homework…she left BILLIONS to charity. Yeah…thats omne selfish bitch.

    49. I R S says – reply to this


      49

      Does this dog have to pay taxes like everybody else or are his revenues extempt?

    50. I R S says – reply to this


      50

      We mean: are her revenues exempt ?

    51. Autum says – reply to this


      51

      Oh I am pissed you hear me!

    52. Mimi says – reply to this


      52

      I love my dogs; however, there is a limit to how much should spend on a dog when there are millions of children around the world starving to death!

      Shame on these self-centered wealthy people who seek nothing more than attention, even after death, when they leave ridiculous will. If you don't have people worth the money in your family, donate it to research, charities, schools, starving children, something more useful than paying a ridiculous salary to a "dog keeper."

    53. john says – reply to this


      53

      *
      *
      *
      * PAY ATTENTION PEOPLE!

      She left BILLIONS to charity. BILLIONS. BILLIONS with a B. That's not a selfish, who in the fuck cares she left her dog, which was like her child, a few million.

      She left BILLIONS to charity.

      *
      *
      *

    54. hilla says – reply to this


      54

      I think this is disgraceful!!! Leona Helmsley had a right to leave her money to anyone or thing she wanted! this was very unfair for this judge to change her will! SHe was FINE mentally - the grandkids just wanted her money and she knew that - that is why she left them out and said so! This is disgusting! I hope there is someone who can appeal it so her wishes are fullfilled. I can't believe that this can be done!

    55. jackb says – reply to this


      55

      Who the frig cares if its TOO much $$$ to leave to your dog - it was HER money to decide what she wanted to do! and it should of been left that way - not to those grandkid ingrates!

    56. gabe says – reply to this


      56

      blah blah blah…this dog is richer than mad people i know



    57. 57

      THis is ridiculous



    58. 58

      RIDICULOUS

    59. Nolan says – reply to this


      59

      She had a right to leave her money to her dog if she wanted to and the judge had no right to give it to the relatives she disinherited. If people do not treat you right while you are living, they should not expect to profit by your death.



    60. 60

      it is completely wrong for this judge to give money to the grandchildren. they shouldn't have messed with her will, if she wanted to give that much money to the pooch they should of left it that way, she is dead for gods sake! & besides, the pooch gave her more love than those 'grandchildren', therefor it deserves the money she left for it. this is all wrong.

    61. jenbu says – reply to this


      61

      enrich the dog, screw the kids. leona: still an evil bitch from beyond the grave!

    62. Mean says – reply to this


      62

      Anyone who leaves their fucking animal money is mentally incompetent. Animals are fucking lower life forms, donate your money to a charity that helps humans if you are that desparate.

    63. L says – reply to this


      63

      Let me explain to all the morons out there who are saying they should just give the money to poor needy people. BECAUSE SHE DID NOT WANT TO. SHE WANTED TO GIVE IT TO HER DOG. Rich people should not be punished for being rich. She left it to her dog. All of it. All 12 million. End of story. Get over it.

    64. Patri says – reply to this


      64

      This is very upsetting to me. Obviously Helmsley loved her beloved pet more than anything in the world. If she had wanted her grandchildren to have any of her fortune than she would have given it to them. This goes against all of her wishes, and a judge has no right to overturn them.

    65. Ryan says – reply to this


      65

      check this out!



    66. 66

      Mad.

    67. LOLA says – reply to this


      67

      I'll do that job
      but I need shopping money
      I swear I'll buy trouble a toy or something. he can chew on my ex's clothes.