Welcome to PerezHilton.com
Welcome to PerezHilton.com - Hollywood's Most-Hated Web Site!
Celebrity Scoop Goes Here
E-mail Perez@PerezHilton.com

Report technical problems.
Perez Posse signup FAQ

Contact us to advertise on PerezHilton.com



Wear it, share it, give it, get it! Represent!

Jump to your favorite celebrity

Articles by date

Defending Heigl

Filed under: TV News > Awardz > Katherine Heigl

katieh.jpg

Gray's Anatomy star Chandra Wilson spoke out about the Emmy bruhaha that surrounded co-star Katherine Heigl and her decision not to put her name into consideration for an award this year.

Says Wilson:

"All actors have to do that exactly same thing every year. The public at large doesn't understand it's not about your body of works. It can't be something in the middle. You can have a great seasonal arc, but if you don't have that show that's your show, then it's not the right thing for the category. It was amazing to me the way it got blown out of proportion. Some years I submit, some years I don't."

Does this change your mind about Heigl?

Ingrate or not?

[Image via WENN.]



131 comments to “Defending Heigl”

More comments: [1] 2 »

  1. T says – reply to this
    1

    Lover her!!!

  2. FIRST says – reply to this
    2

    FIRST

  3. Tom says – reply to this
    3

    first

  4. MIU says – reply to this
    4

    wow shes stunning and im sooooo a FIRST!!!!

  5. MIU says – reply to this
    5

    wow shes stunning and im soooooooooooooo a FIRST!!!!!!!!!!

  6. 6

    We still hate her.

  7. sylv says – reply to this
    7

    I still love katherine as an actress..she's awesome…so whatever…fukk off…jk..im not that bad to take up for her but that's just my opinion…i still think she's awesome…lol

  8. kriss says – reply to this
    8

    blaaaaaaaa

  9. D says – reply to this
    9

    No ingrate at all. Talented and real (apart from ridiculously beautiful).

  10. T says – reply to this
    10

    I still think that she should stick with movies. She was awesome in Knocked Up! She clearly hates working on Gray's, and, let's face it, no one watches that show anymore anyway! Go team Kathy!

  11. Rhian says – reply to this
    11

    Im number 10!!!!!!

  12. Amand says – reply to this
    12

    Does it really matter?

  13. Mo says – reply to this
    13

    Don't give a crap about the Emmys but I love her because she became an awesome movie actress from the shittiest TV show ever! And she has boobs and an ass unlike most actresses her age!

  14. BUFFY says – reply to this
    14

    first

  15. thad says – reply to this
    15

    LOve Her DamNit….Don'T geT too Carried with this shyt..has nothing to do with you..or would u like to think?

  16. Eva says – reply to this
    16

    Heigl rocks. Perez does nothing but look for a reason to dis this girl. So she smokes! It sucks, at least its not drugs, drink or some kind of eating disorder! She was honest about her profession, just like any one in ANY profession wouldn't want to put ourselves up for a prestigious category when we know we weren't given the projects/material/work to actually do our best and show our best in. Jealousy is not worn well on Perez.

  17. Adri says – reply to this
    17

    It was Katherine Heigl's choice to not submit her name and I respect that but why the need to voice her reasons to the press ?

  18. Sandr says – reply to this
    18

    She is a stuck up cunt! What a bitch! Actors are the least talented part of the show. This whore can't string a sentence together without it be written for her. Two decent movies and she thinks her shit don't stink! Wait till those movies start going straight to DVD then this whore will be more humble. I FUCKING HATE THIS TWAT!!!!

  19. Sarah says – reply to this
    19

    still an ingrate, she should be appreciative of the role she's given and the salary she is paid to do that role. how much of quality material does she think she is going to get with izzie. i mean look at all of the characters she's played in the past. they aren't exactly hard-hitting, difficult roles…

  20. marie says – reply to this
    20

    not

  21. BUFFY says – reply to this
    21

    Ok most actors/actresses take their name out of the Emmy's race if they dont feel they deserve to be there that year but they dont go about saying the writers of the show weren't as good as the previous years.She should learn not to bite the hand that feeds you!

  22. Galic says – reply to this
    22

    she's a goddess!! beautiful, talented and down to earth

  23. Ricky says – reply to this
    23

    IMO I think she doesn't HAVE to submit her name if she doesn't feel like it. She probably believes someone did a better job at acting than she did and she wants them to win because they deserve it.

    BUT when she said that she didn't get any worthy material, that was kinda fucked up and ungrateful.

  24. ingra says – reply to this
    24

    ingrate

  25. Nikki says – reply to this
    25

    She's a total ingrate! It's one thing to silently remove yourself from contention, it's a whole other thing to diss the writers and everyone else who works on the show with her passive-agressive complaint about lack of material. She would have had better material if she hadn't needed so much time off to work on her "film" career. Ungrateful bee-otch!

  26. TLC says – reply to this
    26

    I am happy when an actor doesn't embrace the narcissistic pat-on-the-back. I think there are far too many awards out there for them. They need incessant validation. Kudos to Ms. Heigel! She is a self-confident woman who does not need solicited praise.

  27. So Wh says – reply to this
    27

    She was an ingrate for speaking ill of the writers on the show - mind you, a show that put her on the map.

  28. Jenn says – reply to this
    28

    She's a great actress. So what if she pulls her name. She gets a lot of crap just because she's outspoken and confident in herself. I think we all need to cut her a bunch of slack. She's a breath of fresh air compared to some of the other starlets out there.

  29. 29

    If her costar is sticking up for her… then she's not really dissing the show, right? Like if she's being backed by G.A. than why should we be tripping? Idk I really don't like her character on G.A.! I hated her until I saw knocked up and 27 dresses. She's a good actress, but yeah… if I was her… I wouldn't have submitted either. Her character was soo whiny this season… and a home wrecker.

  30. vgrrl says – reply to this
    30

    Who cares. She can do what she wants, and have an opinion as well. Perish the thought to have an opinion in hollywood the land of the lemming. THis is boring anyway. NEXT!

  31. mauim says – reply to this
    31

    she's still an ingrate, it was fine for her to take her name out, but to diss the writers, she would need to watch her back. the writers can turn her into anything they want, including a strung out crack whore if they feel like it. she needs to watch who she talks smack about if she likes that cushy paycheck.

  32. Netty says – reply to this
    32

    I didn't think that it was big deal to begin - I actually praise Katherine for being honest to herself, her career, and her colleagues in the crazy and scary world of celebrity-ism (don't think that's an actual word, but whatever)!!!!!!!!!!

  33. sourd says – reply to this
    33

    So pretty much it occurs from time to time. Meh, seriously this doesn't bother me other than the fact that it shouldn't have been out in public.

  34. gina says – reply to this
    34

    It doesn't sound like much of a defense to me but either way; Katherine is still a whiny biatch!

  35. phoeb says – reply to this
    35

    doesn't change my mind at all (although I do love Chandra)

    Heigl's nothing but a petty, supremely ungrateful bitch

  36. 36

    I never saw the whole thing as a slam against the GA writers. I understood her from the get go. Just another lovely example how the media creates conflict. I think she's great (except for her smoking habit).

  37. GREYS says – reply to this
    37

    its Grey's Anatomy not Gray's Anatomy….Gray's is how the book is spelled not the show.

  38. drewb says – reply to this
    38

    I say leave her alone! I think she's misunderstood and people blow up at the smallest thing! Quit picking on her because she's a shining star!

    Also, I love her as an actress but I agree that this season wasn't her best as far as material. The strike has a lot to do with that. The whole season sucked until the very end.

  39. S says – reply to this
    39

    Ingrate. There's a reason why this is a big deal–actors don't usually make big public announcements like this–Heigl made it into a big deal. Most actors quietly go about their business, and choose to submit or not. Heigl obviously is not as confident as some of the posters think, as it seems likely that the reason that she was so vocal about withdrawing her name is that when the Emmys rolled around, she didn't want people to think she wasn't good enough to get nominated. She wanted her public to know that she's not a bad actress, she was so "noble" that she chose to withdraw due to a lack of material worthy of her acting "skills." So that's clearly all about ego…
    Also, methinks she is trying to distance herself from the low-class taint of the small screen. She is a movie star, dammit, not two-bit a prime-time soap actress…
    FYI - While others may celebrate her curvy figure, she has spoken about not being comfortable with it. Being slightly meatier doesn't automatically make her down to earth.

  40. M says – reply to this
    40

    I like her as an actress but I think she needs some meat on her bones. You can see her hip bones sticking out through that dress.

  41. Clair says – reply to this
    41

    I never thought it was a big deal in the first place. I think she made the right choice. She didn't have a lot to do this past year on the show, nothing worthy of an Emmy in my opinion anyway. That's not knocking the writers or Katherine, both do a great job but they can't write scripts/scenes for every character/actor that will lead to an Emmy worthy performance every year. Each season juggles what characters it will focus most on, give the heavy/difficult storylines to etc etc This wasn't her year, she made the right choice. In Season 2 (especially the last few episodes) she had lots of stuff to do and was tested because of her character's storyline (Denny's death etc), an Emmy made sense then, it doesn't now. Like Chandra says it's not about your 'body of work', it's about the past year. So blown out of scale!

  42. 4:20 says – reply to this
    42

    Not a HG fan - and never will be. But it's her decision and media needs to shut the fuck up about it and MOVE ON!!

  43. nittf says – reply to this
    43

    Nope, still an ungrateful bitch. See, not submitting is one thing…but making a public, definitely flaming speech about how the WRITING wasn't there….It's not an nod for writing. It's for ACTING.

  44. Renee says – reply to this
    44

    You know alot of others think this way. It really shouldn't be a big deal. She did what was best for her. So she didn't have a camera in her face making a big deal if she lost. Or stealing it from someone who deserved it more.

  45. marya says – reply to this
    45

    i can not stand her anymore!!! they need to fire her, its not like shes a good actress!!! greys anatomy has become sooo boring and stupid!!!! thank God for tivo so i can fastforward all the boring parts!

  46. musig says – reply to this
    46

    Katie is the best! Her acting and persona are so lively. This whole story did get out of hand! Go Katie Go….

  47. pugs says – reply to this
    47

    ok. i am so sick of perez saying how she is so stylish. she dresses waaaay too old for someone her age and picks things that are so boooring (not to mention ugly). um, can i also say that she ALWAYS has a bad 80's hairstyle. um. yeah. not much of a fan of her. she is waaaaaaaay to full of herself.

  48. donna says – reply to this
    48

    enough of her please she is so stupid

  49. Reece says – reply to this
    49

    This doesn't change my mind at all because I have NO IDEA what the hell it means???

  50. Sam says – reply to this
    50

    I never cared for this cunt anyway. That show's fucking retarded and horribly written so it's good she didn't put her name in the mix. Some of the most painful moments in my life recently involve being forced to watch that damn show with my girlfriend.

  51. Beth says – reply to this
    51

    I suspect her original statement was taken the wrong way. (Although it is easy to see how it was misconstrued.) Nobody is dumb enough to publicly insult their writers.

  52. Jerse says – reply to this
    52

    Like her but she's putting on weight–those hips are getting big. Time to hit the gym. She should be looking more like the perfect Ellen Pompeo.

  53. 53

    I still think its a slap to the face of all the writers their

  54. emily says – reply to this
    54

    not! her character this season SUCKED

  55. Julia says – reply to this
    55

    Why is it you support back stabbing, no talent, anorexic, home wreckers(Angelina Jolie) , and hate on talented, genuine and beautiful woman( Katherine Heigl, Jennifer Anniston)? I dont get you sometimes Perez.

  56. maria says – reply to this
    56

    why is no one talking about the new look that she seems to have??? does anyone else notice that it looks like she has had her nose done???? someone is looking too pretty these days…what gives perez?

  57. Not a says – reply to this
    57

    She is an ingrate. If Chandra chooses not to submit her performance, fine. If Katherine choose not to submit her performance, fine but then STFU! Don't call out the writers. My only hope is that they have her fall down an elevator shaft. p.s. I hate her movies too! Knocked Up Sucked!

  58. nash says – reply to this
    58

    NO!!! This over-rated actor shouldn't have kept her mouth shut and only said what chandra did - she was out of line to blame it on the writers, blah, blah, blah. cry me a river, izzie stevens! she sucks, perez - another one that i don't understand your obsession with…

  59. kate says – reply to this
    59

    Is she going to blame on the writers for her pityful acting in 27 dresses??? I watched the movie hoping to see someone fresh and fun but it was a big yawn thanks to her stupid ass face! I can't believe how ungrateful she is and how selfish, she did this obviously to be in the newspapers…. she should be kissing a writers ass instead of dissin on them, but what can you expect from an ashtray mouth like her????

  60. Hope says – reply to this
    60

    I really hate her, but I would SO do her! LOL

  61. Coco says – reply to this
    61

    I think everyone should be applauding Heigl. How many times have we seen undeserving actresses who've won year after year? She did the right thing in my book. And, I don't think she refused to submit because the writing was bad–she just didn't have the good scenes like she did the year before. They take turns doing that people.

  62. ME! says – reply to this
    62

    Hell no!
    Isn't this the same chick who was in "Bride of Chucky"??!
    Come on!
    She's soooo full of herself.
    Smoke another cancer stick sweetheart.

  63. Solar says – reply to this
    63

    I don't see what it is about Heigl that gets under people's skin. I like her; she says what she thinks, she defends her friends, she seems pretty down to earth, she's pretty but not all starved looking, she has the 'Old Hollywood' glamour and she's talented. She reminds me a bit of Lucille Ball, right down to the ubiquitous cigarette. I didn't blame her one bit for not submitting an Emmy bid; her character's role on GA last season was a joke. If my character morphed from an understandbly flawed character into a wildly annoying, unlikeable, incompetent, neurotic mess I wouldn't want to submit a bid either.

  64. GMMR says – reply to this
    64

    I think the big difference was in the way Heigl chose to make a public statement about why she was not submitting. Chandra Wilson may not submit on a given year but does she make a statement that passive aggressively insults the writers? Nope. Heigl needs to realize that while some people think she's a hot shit now she's nothing more than a flash in the pan. She was a nobody before Grey's and she owes everything to that show.

  65. swimm says – reply to this
    65

    i love katherine heigl. go her! she's the reason i watch grey's anatomy…not because of mcdreamy not because of mcsteamy…well, yes mcsteamy.

  66. 66

    Heigl's mom/manager got her where she is. Saw her on Oprah a few months ago. Wish she'd give up cigs or she'll die of lord knows how many diseases. But, ultimately it's her life. Quitting cigs is damn hard. I should know…

  67. klc12 says – reply to this
    67

    Who cares but I love, love, love that dress. Any clue who the designer is and where I can get my hands on it?

  68. janeb says – reply to this
    68

    It wasn't the fact that she withdrew her name, it was the fact that she put this big statement out attacking the writers. That was classless and ungrateful and very wrong on her part. People may withdraw their name all the time but do any of them put out this big press release statement about it condemning the writers? No. SHE made it into this big deal by doing that. She needs to learn to keep her mouth shut and stop biting the hands that feed her. This bitch was one of the main ones defending the writers during the strike! She's just being an asshole, let's keep it real.

  69. Jack says – reply to this
    69

    Re: klc12 – Put your hand down my pants and you will get a hold of it!

  70. brand says – reply to this
    70

    Katherine Heigl is nothing but an arrogant bitch who didn't need to say anything about the writers. She is just a Charlize Theron wannabe, she even copied her Oscar look for the Emmy's one year. Get over yourself!