Welcome to PerezHilton.com
Welcome to PerezHilton.com - Hollywood's Most-Hated Web Site!
Celebrity Scoop Goes Here
E-mail Perez@PerezHilton.com

Report technical problems.
Perez Posse signup FAQ

Contact us to advertise on PerezHilton.com



Wear it, share it, give it, get it! Represent!

Jump to your favorite celebrity

Articles by date

Angelina Has NOT Given Birth???

Filed under: Baby Blabber > Angelina Jolie > Francophilia

81097373__opt2.jpg

Oh, boy. Here we go again!

In Touch Weekly claimed that Angelina Jolie gave birth on Saturday, but now, a rep for the hospital is denying that report.

TV's Extra has confirmed that Angelina did NOT given birth to her twins yet.

In an emailed statement regarding the reports, spokesperson for the Lenval Hospital in Nice, France, Nadine Bauer, says, “It is wrong information.”

Bauer also said that all information regarding Jolie would be posted on Lenval’s official website.

And there you have it.

[Photo via Getty Images.]

193 comments to “Angelina Has NOT Given Birth???”

More comments: [1] 2 »

  1. Erica says – reply to this


    1

    uh oh!

  2. marty says – reply to this


    2

    first!

  3. First says – reply to this


    3

    FIRST?!

  4. char says – reply to this


    4

    FFS! FIRST

  5. carli says – reply to this


    5

    first
    I sometimes hate perz ….

    jahjh

  6. nad says – reply to this


    6

    not first boo

  7. Debbi says – reply to this


    7

    the plot thickens….

  8. Scoob says – reply to this


    8

    Ro Ro!

  9. lucy says – reply to this


    9

    this is ridiculous.

    honestly, we wish them well, but who gives a sh**!

  10. yep says – reply to this


    10

    oh gosh

  11. gfdf says – reply to this


    11

    hmm?

  12. ivan says – reply to this


    12

    first baby

  13. mel says – reply to this


    13

    FIRST

  14. kay says – reply to this


    14

    first!

  15. Chann says – reply to this


    15

    oh then when?1

  16. cdawg says – reply to this


    16

    boring

  17. cryst says – reply to this


    17

    bummer

  18. Angie says – reply to this


    18

    how hard is this to report? either she had the kids or not?

  19. KIKI says – reply to this


    19

    is this a joke? get the facts straightttttttttt

  20. Sól says – reply to this


    20

    I've started to think she's not even pregnant XD just really really fat =P

  21. metal says – reply to this


    21

    FAIL!

    Perez you've done this several times already. You fucking suck!!

  22. britt says – reply to this


    22

    FIRST



  23. 23

    CMON GET IT RIGHT!!!!

  24. cee says – reply to this


    24

    no one else has reported it yet….Did you actually make a mistake? Now, I have to call everyone, and I lost my voice from singing kumbya, dig the candles out of the garbage, get more champagne and recycle the 30 bottles we drank in celebraton….this is Satan's doing (or billy bob thortan, one of them.)

  25. GIGI says – reply to this


    25

    ppl need to stop making up stuff about them and leave them alone
    just let her have her babies in peace!!!!

  26. K says – reply to this


    26

    yippee she supposedly finally gave birth and within 48 hrs she will probably be relocating her family ….. AGAIN. Pluck those babies out and let's get them on the jet !!!!!

  27. Foo says – reply to this


    27

    This is news???

  28. jesus says – reply to this


    28

    didn't anyone honestly believe it in the first place?
    get your facts straight, moron.

  29. erica says – reply to this


    29

    omg…deets p!



  30. 30

    HMM!

  31. me says – reply to this


    31

    first

  32. cara says – reply to this


    32

    who cares!!!!
    first

  33. en says – reply to this


    33

    epic failure.

  34. ana says – reply to this


    34

    first!

  35. mree says – reply to this


    35

    JOAQUIN PHOENIX is soooooooooo HOT he is my future husband

  36. nico says – reply to this


    36

    I don't understand the obsession with american folks and celebrity babies. who cares?

  37. Sundu says – reply to this


    37

    whatt…

  38. jas70 says – reply to this


    38

    ISLA MARCHELINE and AMELIE JANE STILL UNBORN

  39. Megan says – reply to this


    39

    well i am stunned - STUNNED - to hear this.

  40. jas 7 says – reply to this


    40

    ISLA MARCHELINE and AMELIE JANE STILL UNBORN

  41. V-rO says – reply to this


    41

    LIES… ALL LIES… PLEASE SAY IT ISN'T SO!!!!!!!!!!!

  42. BS says – reply to this


    42

    I call "BULLSHIT" on this whole thing. First, NOBODY goes into the hospital for bedrest - for WEEKS prior to their due date - unless something is SERIOUSLY wrong. My take is that these fame-whores had the babies last week and wanted to make sure all the other "famous babies" were born this wk. Saturday isn't a good "newsday". They'll announce the "official birth" on MONDAY, so we can gag all week long about it. Finally, enough with the bs-posts about the births. THe facts aren't even right to begin with - nobody has twins c-section, 15 min apart. Idiots.

  43. mree says – reply to this


    43

    Joaquin Phoenix is my future husband!

  44. swat says – reply to this


    44

    No, she did NOT give birth, the little aliens burst forth from her abdomen
    and killed her.
    Then they ate Brad.

  45. Jamie says – reply to this


    45

    Duh. Babies born by c-section are never 15 mins apart but usually only 1 minute apart. As soon as i read they were 15 mins apart i knew it was bu***hit.

  46. Perez says – reply to this


    46

    Don't you feel stupid. This is what happens when you steal your info from second-hand sources. BTW, I thought she was supposed to go under the knife on Tuesday.

  47. faith says – reply to this


    47

    14th?

  48. #57 says – reply to this


    48

    PEREZ WHY AREN'T YOU REPORTING THAT MADONNA'S AWFUL CD HARD CANDY HAS FALLEN TO A MISERABLE #57.

    WHY ARE YOU HOLDING BACK? THIS SEEMS LIKE A PRETTY BIG STORY ABOUT "THE QUEEN" DON'T YOU THINK??

    MADONNA REALLY HAS FALLEN OUT OF FAVOR. IT'S LIKE SHE'S COMPLETELY UNWANTED AT THIS POINT!

  49. Duh! says – reply to this


    49

    Re: BS – Umm, yes they do, especially in high-risk pregnancies and multiple births, and espcially when money is not an issue. You obviously don't have any children, so stop talking like you know everything about having them.

  50. Rhond says – reply to this


    50

    Wow, the suspense grows, we are all holding our breath, have the BABIES arrived yet, THE WORLD WAITS!

  51. JN says – reply to this


    51

    MARIO LAVENDARIA'S PARENTS DID NOT DO A GOOD JOB EDUCATING HIM. "Angelina did not given birth…" Did not GIVEN birth?!? AGAIN, PEREZ HILTON IS AN ILLITERATE MORON.

  52. Jen says – reply to this


    52

    I love how pregnant women "glow" like they do. This is by far the most beautiful picture I've ever seen of her.

  53. gal says – reply to this


    53

    So does this mean they are ready to go shopping for more orphans?

  54. LUNNA says – reply to this


    54

    NOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!! THAT CAN BE HAPPENING, I ALREDY CALL ALL OF MY FRIEDS……..

  55. nash says – reply to this


    55

    Re: nico – AGREED! (yes, i'm an american folk). and wgf what the kids look like to pay them millions to take pics.

  56. Suz says – reply to this


    56

    in touch weekly is your source???lol

    there's your problem right there.

  57. no says – reply to this


    57

    Mark my words=
    she will give birth on monday 7/14 It's French national holiday.
    Because she is soooooo proud of her French roots.



  58. 58

    Looks like another over-reaction from the gossip media leeches. Accuracy is not important, just report it before getting the facts. Gotta get the dirt out to the masses so it looks like I'm on top of everything. Amateurs. Hey Porkez, any doubt now why fat, gay gossip queens aren't on the A list?

  59. Cindy says – reply to this


    59

    Tell me!!!!? Who in the FUCK cares!!!!!????

  60. hater says – reply to this


    60

    who gives a fuck they are boring anyways!!!!

  61. Anony says – reply to this


    61

    Mother Superior(Par1)
    Powerhouse actress Angelina Jolie proves to be more intriguing off-screen
    By Rachel Giese
    Mercy among the children: Angelina Jolie meets children at the Tham Hin refugee camp on the Thai-Burma border on May 19, 2002. Photo Sukree Sukplang/AFP/Getty Images.
    As you may have heard, Tom Cruise and his fiancée, Katie Holmes, recently had a baby — an event Cruise marked by loud whooping every time he was in the vicinity of a camera. But the media dervish surrounding the hatching of baby Suri was soon surpassed by the only celebrity event that could outmatch it: the arrival of Shiloh Nouvel Jolie-Pitt, the long-awaited addition to “the world’s most beautiful family.” Little Shiloh is, of course, the product of the inhumanly hot coupling of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt — the first relationship of Pitt’s in which he’s the homely one. He’s also the less interesting of the two; like Holmes, Pitt’s role is strictly a supporting one.

    The couple’s prenatal stay in Namibia was likely Jolie’s idea — her work as the goodwill ambassador for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees brought her frequently to the continent, as did the adoption of her Ethiopian daughter, Zahara. No doubt Jolie, too, was behind the ingenious scheme to auction the first photos of Shiloh to the highest bidder — People magazine — and donate all the money to charity.

  62. LkAtU says – reply to this


    62

    So why did you post and unsubstantuated report. You are such a dumb ass fuck

  63. Anony says – reply to this


    63

    Mother Superior(Part 2)
    For mere mortals, accepting bids on baby pics seems kind of crass, but in the universe where paparazzi orbit the planet Brangelina, the rules are a little different. Someone stood to earn a fortune from the first images of Shiloh, so why not make an end run around the media, generate several million dollars for a good cause and embarrass your critics into silence? (Because really, when Britney Spears treats her baby like an airbag, who’s going to snark about Brangelina exploiting the public’s fascination to raise money for charity?)
    Like Tom Cruise, Jolie’s personal life has eclipsed her on-screen work. But while Cruise’s madman grin and “spontaneous” euphoria feels choreographed down to the last couch-jump, Jolie is entirely uncalculated and seemingly oblivious to the opinions of others. Uninterested in polishing her image, she refuses to employ a publicist. She’s rarely spotted on the red carpet and doesn’t follow fashion trends. Off-the-cuff comments in past interviews, along with some unbridled public antics, have contributed to Jolie’s reputation as a brother-kissing, blood-loving, bisexual vamp. She is almost universally lusted after, but doesn’t fit easily into contemporary celebrity culture. She is too gorgeous, too weird, too unconventional.

  64. yomam says – reply to this


    64

    what the fuck? are those holy twins setting up shop in her womb or what?

  65. NOFUK says – reply to this


    65

    LOVELY COUPLE….I SHOULD BE ON THE OTHERSIDE OF BRAD…COT DAMM HES FINE!

  66. Anony says – reply to this


    66

    Mother Superior( part 3)
    Powerhouse actress Angelina Jolie proves to be more intriguing off-screen
    By Rachel Giese
    .

    The new face of diplomacy: Jolie, trailed by beau Brad Pitt, at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland in January 2006. Photo Fabrice Coffrini/AFP/Getty Images.Despite a wild past and a spotty film career, Jolie has emerged as the most intriguing and substantial woman in Hollywood. A survivor of celebrity parentage — Nicole Richie, honey, please take note — Angelina has overcome a serious drug flirtation and endured two divorces. She’s staring down the vicissitudes of aging in the entertainment industry without the benefit of botox, kabbalah or an extreme workout regime. Her charity work is of the hands-on sort — no rehearsed appearances at a Hurricane Katrina benefit followed by a weepy kaffeeklatsch with Oprah. Since 2001, Jolie has slept in tents in refugee camps, assisted with the distribution of food and medicine and taken on the very unsexy cause of education for girls in the Third World. Try to picture any other actress her age attending a session called “Getting the Millennium Development Goals Back on Track” at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. In fact, stack her up against Pitt’s previous flames and one imagines a very one-sided lunch at which Jolie brings Juliette Lewis up to speed on debt relief, convinces Jennifer Aniston to forgive and forget and afterwards picks her teeth with Gwyneth Paltrow.

  67. Anony says – reply to this


    67

    Mother Superior(part4)
    Powerhouse actress Angelina Jolie proves to be more intriguing off-screen
    By Rachel Giese

    Rachel Giese writes about the arts for CBC.ca.

    CBC does not endorse and is not responsible for the content of external sites - links will open in new window.

    Letters
    Your article on Angelina Jolie was so well written, it put into clear words what opinion I was trying to form about her. I did not like her and did not know why. Perhaps it's because she is so complex as a person that she is hard to pin down and somewhat scary. Perhaps it's that she is so perfect. I now realize that she is a force to be recognized with, a fiercely independent woman who doesn't care what others think, a blend between Mother Theresa (heart, hard working), Audrey Hepburn (beauty, grace under pressure, unselfishness) and a rock star (unconventional, fearless, brash). All in one package. Not bad.

  68. ~~&~~ says – reply to this


    68

    Boycott tabloids
    Boycott tabloids
    Boycott tabloids
    Boycott tabloids
    Boycott tabloids
    Boycott tabloids

  69. Chloe says – reply to this


    69

    Don't rely on a tabloid next time, okay? You do this all the time. Learn from your mistakes.

  70. gnome says – reply to this


    70

    man
    I hope she was never even pregnant. That would make for the greatest episode of Punk'd ever.

  71. Danie says – reply to this


    71

    jesus will she just have the little brats already?

  72. WTF says – reply to this


    72

    I hope everything goes alright for her…..men don't know it but giving birth is the next thing to death…those babies will come out when it's their time unless she gets a c-section

  73. Revel says – reply to this


    73

    I LOVE THIS SHIT! The world is collectively so sick of these fucking twins and their homewrecking "mother", by the time she hawks the baby pictures to some rag NO ONE WILL EVEN BUY IT!!!! Give this bitch no attention whatsoever-it's the ONLY way she will disappear.

  74. Rana says – reply to this


    74

    Nobody (as usual) believed you in the first place. These gossip web sites have little credibility anymore. You cry wolf too many times.

  75. Truth says – reply to this


    75

    Re: Angie – Well, when you are dealing with two media-manipulating, compulsively lying, fake, vapid, attention whores, (OH! AND IMPOSTERS!) it can be very difficult to get to the truth. For example, if you recall, this is the "couple" who got famous based off of a scandalous, adulterous affair that is still denied by Trampalina to this day yet, these two assholes owe their entire relevance AND career to it. They're just so mysterious.

  76. RUBI says – reply to this


    76

    FUCKING MAGS!!!!! BLESS ANGIE AND FAMILY.

  77. Love says – reply to this


    77

    Another fake alarm

  78. Lara says – reply to this


    78

    Jennifer Anniston had no interest in having children. There were no kids so why do people still mouth off about something that didn't happen several years ago. Angelina is NOT a homewrecker.

  79. Anony says – reply to this


    79

    TABLOIDS SHOULD REALLY BE ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES

  80. Anony says – reply to this


    80

    TABLOIDS SHOULD REALLY BE ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES.

  81. WRONG says – reply to this


    81

    Okay… the first clue that the story was bogus is that a c-section does not take 15 minutes between births of twins. A man without kids or a teenager started that rumor!!

    A REGULAR c-section has a newborn out in 5 minutes max. Once the abdomen is open it's sorta bing bang boom, so to speak.

    Stupid.

  82. la la says – reply to this


    82

    since when do we take what In Touch magazine has to say for fact?

  83. sf says – reply to this


    83

    they are hot!! those children are going to be gorgeous



  84. 84

    GIVE US THE RIGHT INFO!!!!!!!!!!

  85. Perez says – reply to this


    85

    Stop posting stories unless you have a reliable confirmation. You have once again made a complete ass out of yourself.

    You're really losing your touch, and are NOT a good source of reliable information anymore. Anything that I read on your site will now be taken with a "grain of salt".

  86. Rhond says – reply to this


    86

    Re: Anony – Good job, when you write your first book, let us know, I will buy a copy for sure! Thanks

  87. Mimi says – reply to this


    87

    The Lenval sites says the twins were born Saturday, check again Perez>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

  88. Lana says – reply to this


    88

    Her two new "coordinate tattoos" are going to look so fucking stupid. She should have thought of that before she opted for IVF.

  89. de says – reply to this


    89

    Rumors in the Silicon Valley is that Dr Rand Pink is in France assisting Dr Sussman and he plans to take a picture of the twins with his new iphone 2.0 The endorsement deal is worth $30M.Our sources at Apple told us that Apple was upset that the dlivery wasn't the same day as the phone's introduction this last Friday.A hospital spokesman hasa also noted that an arrest of a nurse has occured in the maternity wing where Jolie is sequestered.The nurse was is in discussions with a powerful criminal ring regarding the sale of the afterbirth. People in Japan are said to be willing to pay up to $4M for celebrity afterbirth. It is a black market that is just now being exposed. A special report will be airing on Nighline in August.

  90. kat says – reply to this


    90

    poor Shiloh….you thought she was lost in that crowd of kids - just wait ’till the Jesus twins arrive!

  91. Enoug says – reply to this


    91

    Another day- another publicity stunt from Brangelina.
    .
    She has already given birth weeks ago.
    .
    Do you honestly believe that a hospital would allow a women stay for weeks BEFORE giving birth?
    .
    She is so obsessed with looking thin that she is in hiding for a month now. How pathetic.

  92. me says – reply to this


    92

    perez…not cool…it looks so stupid to have it say " angie gave birth" on one page and the next it says " angie DIDNT give birth"…hmmm…unproffesh!

  93. NOFUK says – reply to this


    93

    Re: kat – LOL

  94. alpha says – reply to this


    94

    'actrice américaine Angelina Jolie a accouché samedi soir à Nice de jumeaux, un garçon et une fille, qui se portent bien, a indiqué leur gynécologue, Michel Sussmann, cité dans l'édition dominicale du quotidien Nice-Matin.
    L'actrice américaine, âgée de 33 ans, a accouché dans la clinique Santa-Maria de la Fondation Lenval, sur la Promenade des Anglais, le front de mer de la ville.
    La porte-parole de la Fondation Lenval n'était pas joignable, peu après minuit, pour confirmer l'information.

  95. opini says – reply to this


    95

    Oh FUCK here we go again I knew this wasn't true because it would have been all the news. and yes 15 minutes apart is intrue usually muliple births are done C-Section and it takes about 3 to 5 minutes max to get the babies out. I hate to say this but aren't we alittle tired of Perez giving information before checking more sources and didn't someone the births were scheduled for Tuesday. WHAT THE FUCK………..

  96. canad says – reply to this


    96

    HA!!! Way to go on reporting false items AGAIN Perez!!! Boy, I really think you need another job!! The only reason I come here anymore is to laugh at you.
    I knew it wasn't true when you reported it the first time. Why would they tell In Touch?? And you fell for it!! LOL Plus if you had known anything about anything babies by c-section are never that far apart in time!!
    LAME PEREZ!!!

  97. alpha says – reply to this


    97

    And for those who can't decipher French media (Quote from Le Monde = most serious stuff in France), the short article informs that AJ has given birth to 1 girl AND 1 boy on Sat. evening.

  98. Jess says – reply to this


    98

    It doesn't really matter to me whether she has given birth or not..BUT with that said if she has given birth then they had to have gotten the times wrong on the deliveries mentioned in the other article.I am a labor and delivery nurse and with a csection it is impossible for their delivery times to be that far apart.

  99. jjjj says – reply to this


    99

    Who cares……she gives birth or purchases another kid everytime he's about to bail out on her a@@!

  100. HJ says – reply to this


    100

    Thankfully, I didn't drink the kool-aid you offered up in your first post and questioned the reliability of a source like In Touch. I went to the hospital web-site and in French it basically says that on July 2 she was admitted to the hospital for observation because she had a caesarean during her first pregnancy and is currently pregnant with twins which places her in a high risk category. It had not been updated with a press release about a birth. Hopefully everything is progressing well and all remain healthy in utero.

More comments: [1] 2 »