Welcome to PerezHilton.com
Welcome to PerezHilton.com - Hollywood's Most-Hated Web Site!
Celebrity Scoop Goes Here
E-mail Perez@PerezHilton.com

Report technical problems.
Perez Posse signup FAQ

Contact us to advertise on PerezHilton.com



Wear it, share it, give it, get it! Represent!

Jump to your favorite celebrity

Articles by date

Angelina Has NOT Given Birth???

Filed under: Baby Blabber > Angelina Jolie > Francophilia

81097373__opt2.jpg

Oh, boy. Here we go again!

In Touch Weekly claimed that Angelina Jolie gave birth on Saturday, but now, a rep for the hospital is denying that report.

TV's Extra has confirmed that Angelina did NOT given birth to her twins yet.

In an emailed statement regarding the reports, spokesperson for the Lenval Hospital in Nice, France, Nadine Bauer, says, “It is wrong information.”

Bauer also said that all information regarding Jolie would be posted on Lenval’s official website.

And there you have it.

[Photo via Getty Images.]



193 comments to “Angelina Has NOT Given Birth???”

More comments: [1] 2 »

  1. Erica says – reply to this
    1

    uh oh!

  2. marty says – reply to this
    2

    first!

  3. First says – reply to this
    3

    FIRST?!

  4. char says – reply to this
    4

    FFS! FIRST

  5. carli says – reply to this
    5

    first
    I sometimes hate perz ….

    jahjh

  6. nad says – reply to this
    6

    not first boo

  7. Debbi says – reply to this
    7

    the plot thickens….

  8. Scoob says – reply to this
    8

    Ro Ro!

  9. lucy says – reply to this
    9

    this is ridiculous.

    honestly, we wish them well, but who gives a sh**!

  10. yep says – reply to this
    10

    oh gosh

  11. gfdf says – reply to this
    11

    hmm?

  12. ivan says – reply to this
    12

    first baby

  13. mel says – reply to this
    13

    FIRST

  14. kay says – reply to this
    14

    first!

  15. Chann says – reply to this
    15

    oh then when?1

  16. cdawg says – reply to this
    16

    boring

  17. cryst says – reply to this
    17

    bummer

  18. Angie says – reply to this
    18

    how hard is this to report? either she had the kids or not?

  19. KIKI says – reply to this
    19

    is this a joke? get the facts straightttttttttt

  20. Sól says – reply to this
    20

    I've started to think she's not even pregnant XD just really really fat =P

  21. metal says – reply to this
    21

    FAIL!

    Perez you've done this several times already. You fucking suck!!

  22. britt says – reply to this
    22

    FIRST

  23. 23

    CMON GET IT RIGHT!!!!

  24. cee says – reply to this
    24

    no one else has reported it yet….Did you actually make a mistake? Now, I have to call everyone, and I lost my voice from singing kumbya, dig the candles out of the garbage, get more champagne and recycle the 30 bottles we drank in celebraton….this is Satan's doing (or billy bob thortan, one of them.)

  25. GIGI says – reply to this
    25

    ppl need to stop making up stuff about them and leave them alone
    just let her have her babies in peace!!!!

  26. K says – reply to this
    26

    yippee she supposedly finally gave birth and within 48 hrs she will probably be relocating her family ….. AGAIN. Pluck those babies out and let's get them on the jet !!!!!

  27. Foo says – reply to this
    27

    This is news???

  28. jesus says – reply to this
    28

    didn't anyone honestly believe it in the first place?
    get your facts straight, moron.

  29. erica says – reply to this
    29

    omg…deets p!

  30. 30

    HMM!

  31. me says – reply to this
    31

    first

  32. cara says – reply to this
    32

    who cares!!!!
    first

  33. en says – reply to this
    33

    epic failure.

  34. ana says – reply to this
    34

    first!

  35. mree says – reply to this
    35

    JOAQUIN PHOENIX is soooooooooo HOT he is my future husband

  36. nico says – reply to this
    36

    I don't understand the obsession with american folks and celebrity babies. who cares?

  37. Sundu says – reply to this
    37

    whatt…

  38. jas70 says – reply to this
    38

    ISLA MARCHELINE and AMELIE JANE STILL UNBORN

  39. Megan says – reply to this
    39

    well i am stunned - STUNNED - to hear this.

  40. jas 7 says – reply to this
    40

    ISLA MARCHELINE and AMELIE JANE STILL UNBORN

  41. V-rO says – reply to this
    41

    LIES… ALL LIES… PLEASE SAY IT ISN'T SO!!!!!!!!!!!

  42. BS says – reply to this
    42

    I call "BULLSHIT" on this whole thing. First, NOBODY goes into the hospital for bedrest - for WEEKS prior to their due date - unless something is SERIOUSLY wrong. My take is that these fame-whores had the babies last week and wanted to make sure all the other "famous babies" were born this wk. Saturday isn't a good "newsday". They'll announce the "official birth" on MONDAY, so we can gag all week long about it. Finally, enough with the bs-posts about the births. THe facts aren't even right to begin with - nobody has twins c-section, 15 min apart. Idiots.

  43. mree says – reply to this
    43

    Joaquin Phoenix is my future husband!

  44. swat says – reply to this
    44

    No, she did NOT give birth, the little aliens burst forth from her abdomen
    and killed her.
    Then they ate Brad.

  45. Jamie says – reply to this
    45

    Duh. Babies born by c-section are never 15 mins apart but usually only 1 minute apart. As soon as i read they were 15 mins apart i knew it was bu***hit.

  46. Perez says – reply to this
    46

    Don't you feel stupid. This is what happens when you steal your info from second-hand sources. BTW, I thought she was supposed to go under the knife on Tuesday.

  47. faith says – reply to this
    47

    14th?

  48. #57 says – reply to this
    48

    PEREZ WHY AREN'T YOU REPORTING THAT MADONNA'S AWFUL CD HARD CANDY HAS FALLEN TO A MISERABLE #57.

    WHY ARE YOU HOLDING BACK? THIS SEEMS LIKE A PRETTY BIG STORY ABOUT "THE QUEEN" DON'T YOU THINK??

    MADONNA REALLY HAS FALLEN OUT OF FAVOR. IT'S LIKE SHE'S COMPLETELY UNWANTED AT THIS POINT!

  49. Duh! says – reply to this
    49

    Re: BS – Umm, yes they do, especially in high-risk pregnancies and multiple births, and espcially when money is not an issue. You obviously don't have any children, so stop talking like you know everything about having them.

  50. Rhond says – reply to this
    50

    Wow, the suspense grows, we are all holding our breath, have the BABIES arrived yet, THE WORLD WAITS!

  51. JN says – reply to this
    51

    MARIO LAVENDARIA'S PARENTS DID NOT DO A GOOD JOB EDUCATING HIM. "Angelina did not given birth…" Did not GIVEN birth?!? AGAIN, PEREZ HILTON IS AN ILLITERATE MORON.

  52. Jen says – reply to this
    52

    I love how pregnant women "glow" like they do. This is by far the most beautiful picture I've ever seen of her.

  53. gal says – reply to this
    53

    So does this mean they are ready to go shopping for more orphans?

  54. LUNNA says – reply to this
    54

    NOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!! THAT CAN BE HAPPENING, I ALREDY CALL ALL OF MY FRIEDS……..

  55. nash says – reply to this
    55

    Re: nico – AGREED! (yes, i'm an american folk). and wgf what the kids look like to pay them millions to take pics.

  56. Suz says – reply to this
    56

    in touch weekly is your source???lol

    there's your problem right there.

  57. no says – reply to this
    57

    Mark my words=
    she will give birth on monday 7/14 It's French national holiday.
    Because she is soooooo proud of her French roots.

  58. 58

    Looks like another over-reaction from the gossip media leeches. Accuracy is not important, just report it before getting the facts. Gotta get the dirt out to the masses so it looks like I'm on top of everything. Amateurs. Hey Porkez, any doubt now why fat, gay gossip queens aren't on the A list?

  59. Cindy says – reply to this
    59

    Tell me!!!!? Who in the FUCK cares!!!!!????

  60. hater says – reply to this
    60

    who gives a fuck they are boring anyways!!!!

  61. Anony says – reply to this
    61

    Mother Superior(Par1)
    Powerhouse actress Angelina Jolie proves to be more intriguing off-screen
    By Rachel Giese
    Mercy among the children: Angelina Jolie meets children at the Tham Hin refugee camp on the Thai-Burma border on May 19, 2002. Photo Sukree Sukplang/AFP/Getty Images.
    As you may have heard, Tom Cruise and his fiancée, Katie Holmes, recently had a baby — an event Cruise marked by loud whooping every time he was in the vicinity of a camera. But the media dervish surrounding the hatching of baby Suri was soon surpassed by the only celebrity event that could outmatch it: the arrival of Shiloh Nouvel Jolie-Pitt, the long-awaited addition to “the world’s most beautiful family.” Little Shiloh is, of course, the product of the inhumanly hot coupling of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt — the first relationship of Pitt’s in which he’s the homely one. He’s also the less interesting of the two; like Holmes, Pitt’s role is strictly a supporting one.

    The couple’s prenatal stay in Namibia was likely Jolie’s idea — her work as the goodwill ambassador for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees brought her frequently to the continent, as did the adoption of her Ethiopian daughter, Zahara. No doubt Jolie, too, was behind the ingenious scheme to auction the first photos of Shiloh to the highest bidder — People magazine — and donate all the money to charity.

  62. LkAtU says – reply to this
    62

    So why did you post and unsubstantuated report. You are such a dumb ass fuck

  63. Anony says – reply to this
    63

    Mother Superior(Part 2)
    For mere mortals, accepting bids on baby pics seems kind of crass, but in the universe where paparazzi orbit the planet Brangelina, the rules are a little different. Someone stood to earn a fortune from the first images of Shiloh, so why not make an end run around the media, generate several million dollars for a good cause and embarrass your critics into silence? (Because really, when Britney Spears treats her baby like an airbag, who’s going to snark about Brangelina exploiting the public’s fascination to raise money for charity?)
    Like Tom Cruise, Jolie’s personal life has eclipsed her on-screen work. But while Cruise’s madman grin and “spontaneous” euphoria feels choreographed down to the last couch-jump, Jolie is entirely uncalculated and seemingly oblivious to the opinions of others. Uninterested in polishing her image, she refuses to employ a publicist. She’s rarely spotted on the red carpet and doesn’t follow fashion trends. Off-the-cuff comments in past interviews, along with some unbridled public antics, have contributed to Jolie’s reputation as a brother-kissing, blood-loving, bisexual vamp. She is almost universally lusted after, but doesn’t fit easily into contemporary celebrity culture. She is too gorgeous, too weird, too unconventional.

  64. yomam says – reply to this
    64

    what the fuck? are those holy twins setting up shop in her womb or what?

  65. NOFUK says – reply to this
    65

    LOVELY COUPLE….I SHOULD BE ON THE OTHERSIDE OF BRAD…COT DAMM HES FINE!

  66. Anony says – reply to this
    66

    Mother Superior( part 3)
    Powerhouse actress Angelina Jolie proves to be more intriguing off-screen
    By Rachel Giese
    .

    The new face of diplomacy: Jolie, trailed by beau Brad Pitt, at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland in January 2006. Photo Fabrice Coffrini/AFP/Getty Images.Despite a wild past and a spotty film career, Jolie has emerged as the most intriguing and substantial woman in Hollywood. A survivor of celebrity parentage — Nicole Richie, honey, please take note — Angelina has overcome a serious drug flirtation and endured two divorces. She’s staring down the vicissitudes of aging in the entertainment industry without the benefit of botox, kabbalah or an extreme workout regime. Her charity work is of the hands-on sort — no rehearsed appearances at a Hurricane Katrina benefit followed by a weepy kaffeeklatsch with Oprah. Since 2001, Jolie has slept in tents in refugee camps, assisted with the distribution of food and medicine and taken on the very unsexy cause of education for girls in the Third World. Try to picture any other actress her age attending a session called “Getting the Millennium Development Goals Back on Track” at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. In fact, stack her up against Pitt’s previous flames and one imagines a very one-sided lunch at which Jolie brings Juliette Lewis up to speed on debt relief, convinces Jennifer Aniston to forgive and forget and afterwards picks her teeth with Gwyneth Paltrow.

  67. Anony says – reply to this
    67

    Mother Superior(part4)
    Powerhouse actress Angelina Jolie proves to be more intriguing off-screen
    By Rachel Giese

    Rachel Giese writes about the arts for CBC.ca.

    CBC does not endorse and is not responsible for the content of external sites - links will open in new window.

    Letters
    Your article on Angelina Jolie was so well written, it put into clear words what opinion I was trying to form about her. I did not like her and did not know why. Perhaps it's because she is so complex as a person that she is hard to pin down and somewhat scary. Perhaps it's that she is so perfect. I now realize that she is a force to be recognized with, a fiercely independent woman who doesn't care what others think, a blend between Mother Theresa (heart, hard working), Audrey Hepburn (beauty, grace under pressure, unselfishness) and a rock star (unconventional, fearless, brash). All in one package. Not bad.

  68. ~~&~~ says – reply to this
    68

    Boycott tabloids
    Boycott tabloids
    Boycott tabloids
    Boycott tabloids
    Boycott tabloids
    Boycott tabloids

  69. Chloe says – reply to this
    69

    Don't rely on a tabloid next time, okay? You do this all the time. Learn from your mistakes.

  70. gnome says – reply to this
    70

    man
    I hope she was never even pregnant. That would make for the greatest episode of Punk'd ever.

  71. Danie says – reply to this
    71

    jesus will she just have the little brats already?

  72. WTF says – reply to this
    72

    I hope everything goes alright for her…..men don't know it but giving birth is the next thing to death…those babies will come out when it's their time unless she gets a c-section

  73. Revel says – reply to this
    73

    I LOVE THIS SHIT! The world is collectively so sick of these fucking twins and their homewrecking "mother", by the time she hawks the baby pictures to some rag NO ONE WILL EVEN BUY IT!!!! Give this bitch no attention whatsoever-it's the ONLY way she will disappear.

  74. Rana says – reply to this
    74

    Nobody (as usual) believed you in the first place. These gossip web sites have little credibility anymore. You cry wolf too many times.

  75. Truth says – reply to this
    75

    Re: Angie – Well, when you are dealing with two media-manipulating, compulsively lying, fak