Welcome to PerezHilton.com
Welcome to PerezHilton.com - Hollywood's Most-Hated Web Site!
Celebrity Scoop Goes Here
E-mail Perez@PerezHilton.com

Report technical problems.
Perez Posse signup FAQ

Contact us to advertise on PerezHilton.com



Wear it, share it, give it, get it! Represent!

Jump to your favorite celebrity

Articles by date

Barack Is Not Happy

Filed under: Media Minute > Politik > Barack Obama

obamanewyorker.jpg

Look! It's the New Yorker gone Fox News!

Yes, that's a real New Yorker cover.

Doing controversial shit just to get attention and sell magazines - smart or desperate?????

According to reports, the illustrator, artist Barry Blitt, "satirizes the use of scare tactics and misinformation in the Presidential election to derail Barack Obama’s campaign.”

We think it's adding fuel to the fire, though. There are some people out there who will think that it's Michelle and Barack who are being satirized.

It just seems to reinforce the inaccurate shizz that's always attributed to the Obamas.

Obama spokesperson Bill Burton said in a statement, “The New Yorker may think, as one of their staff explained to us, that their cover is a satirical lampoon of the caricature Senator Obama's right-wing critics have tried to create. But most readers will see it as tasteless and offensive. And we agree."

A McCain mouthpiece said, “We completely agree with the Obama campaign, it’s tasteless and offensive.”

We bet the Republicans are LOVING this, though!

To make things fair we think the New Yorker should feature a McCain 'satire' on the cover too.



656 comments to “Barack Is Not Happy”

More comments: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »

  1. sheil says – reply to this
    1

    hjahah

  2. sunny says – reply to this
    2

    not funny..tasteless….

  3. Dani says – reply to this
    3

    Too bad most people don't understand satire, and then end up taking something seriously that should not be.

    Poor in the New Yorker's part to expect people to understand this concept.

  4. marvi says – reply to this
    4

    Why is it that we can make fun of everyone except Obama. Get over it people he is not the second christ or Kennedy or what ever god mantra you want to put on him. He is a political oprative just like everyone else. If you think this man is going to change the world get your head out of the sand.

  5. Frank says – reply to this
    5

    I agree, it would have been a better cover if it showed a satire of both candidates. It would have sent a better message about the state of American politics and presidential campaign wars.

  6. Linds says – reply to this
    6

    Since when do you care about making things fair, especially in politics!!

  7. sheil says – reply to this
    7

    I WAS NUMBER ONE!!!
    look everyoneeeee
    and this is the same grl
    i have been waiting so long for this

  8. Melis says – reply to this
    8

    Who cares??? It is funny, it is about time that the press start treating Obama with the same disrepect that they treat every other candidate. He is not above this, he new running for President would not be easy, he knew what he was getting himself involved in. The press makes nasty comments about George Bush all the time. Obama better grow some thick skin if he does become President because this is only the beginning. He should asked President Bush how he handles all the bad press and still manages not to cave into political pressure and stand firm in his beliefs.

  9. REN says – reply to this
    9

    HAHAHA OUCHHHH THAT HURTS. I AM A REPUBLCAN BUT IF I WAS A DDEMOCRAT, I'D BE PISSED!

  10. Lynn says – reply to this
    10

    This really is a tasteless cover , but you know, they are all attention whores.
    Just last week, Obama hired Bernie Mac to warm up an audience - only to be "shocked" by some of the jokes he said. Bernie Mac was blatantly set up by Obama's camp.
    They are all sleezy in this game.

  11. comme says – reply to this
    11

    Don't be afraid of black power/

  12. camer says – reply to this
    12

    Perez, You need to take this down. Stuff like this is counterproductive to getting Barack elected, which is of course what you hope happens! People who don't know better will see this and use it to bash Obama.

  13. taste says – reply to this
    13

    disgusting.

  14. mimi says – reply to this
    14

    the reporter who said that idiotic remark apparently got severley demoted, which she deserved, bitch shoulda been fired

  15. 15

    I seem to remember someone here taking a lie detector test after accusing John Mayer of being a tad bit gay. That wasn't a desperate attempt of being controversial, was it?

  16. 16

    THIS ID OLD NEWS! THOUGH TACKY IT DOES SHOW HOW RUMOURS THAT COME FROM THE MEDIA CAN BE RIDICULOUSLY OUTRAGEOUS!

  17. al's says – reply to this
    17

    not first, but who cares…..I am so glad perez mentioned about this piece of crap cover. I think its SHAMEFUL to see such blatant racism on the cover of a nationally distributed publication!!!!!! Most educated people know that the so called "truths" about who Barrack Obama is are nothing but fabrications of people who are not ready to see a "minority" in control of this country. THey don't give a crap as long as its some white wasp, even if its a clueless wonder like George Bush….this election is going to bring out the UGLY of this country…..VOTE BARRACK…ITS TIME FOR A CHANGE PEOPLE!!!!!!

  18. faber says – reply to this
    18

    Obama! NOT a terrorist.

  19. dijhi says – reply to this
    19

    Perez, you DOUCHEBAG, please tell me how this is inaccurate. He has muslim roots, he does hate america, and his wife hates "whitey". He does not salute the flag, he does not cover his heart during our national song…..he only recently started to as he is in the spotlight. Do your research moron.

    Like I always say DOUCHEBAG, your mind has the capacity of a tick-tack !

    PS Teddy does not like it when you put your finger in his ass.

  20. 20

    Re: Melis – WTF! DUMBASS HILLBILLY!

  21. LIV says – reply to this
    21

    A HX REPUBLICANS POINT OF VIEW —- THE FLAG BURNING ON THE FIRE PLACE IS DEF. OFFENSIVE. OTHER THAN THAT, ITS PRETTY HILAR. BUT LOOKS LIKE A JUNIOR HIGH KID THOUGHT OF THE IDEA….SLIGHTLY IMMATURE.

  22. BEN says – reply to this
    22

    EM…WHY IS BARACK WHITE IN THIS PHOTO?? AHAHHA

  23. carri says – reply to this
    23

    im cancelling my supscription asap

  24. LIV says – reply to this
    24

    A HXC REPUBLICANS POINT OF VIEW —- THE FLAG BURNING ON THE FIRE PLACE IS DEF. OFFENSIVE. OTHER THAN THAT, ITS PRETTY HILAR. BUT LOOKS LIKE A JUNIOR HIGH KID THOUGHT OF THE IDEA….SLIGHTLY IMMATURE.

  25. 25

    Re: dijhi – JUST PROVES HOW DUMB YOU ARE, WHITEY!

  26. Melis says – reply to this
    26

    Ha! That's the picture of the future if they get into office.

  27. Morga says – reply to this
    27

    WOW …. I may not like the guy or agree with all his stuff but this is totally out of hand to and uncalled for. I hope there will be some type of suit that can be brought again the man who is behind all of that. … Morgan / Dallas, TX

  28. **LG* says – reply to this
    28

    .
    .
    LeonA'$ GHO$T, yep, back and BETTER THAN EVER, biyatches!!! sez…
    .
    .
    EVEN IF THIS WERE TRUE THEY'RE STILL BETTER FOR THE COUNTRY THAN JOHN "CRASH" MCSTAIN AND HIS TWO-BAGGER ADULTERER WIFE SIN-DEE!
    .
    .
    .
    .

  29. C. Ba says – reply to this
    29

    Re: Dani

    Agreed. When you have to explain a satire or a joke, it does not work. I know that it has to be a satire, because that is too far-out to be serious.

  30. s says – reply to this
    30

    Re: dijhi – being a muslim doesnt mean ur a terrorist…

  31. Mandy says – reply to this
    31

    Perez, jeez!
    It's SATIRE! Have you EVER read the New Yorker before, or even glanced at its cover? They're MAKING FUN of Fox News and the people that still insist that Obama is a Muslim and/or a terrorist!
    Do you remember a couple years ago the New Yorker did a cover titled "New Yorkistan"?
    Same thing. Humor. Satire. Look it up!

  32. gavin says – reply to this
    32

    bhhahahhahha love this….Obama u suck

  33. mike says – reply to this
    33

    This picture is fitting for Obama, he is definately in bed with the terrorists, they are probably the ones giving him the money to run. If this man wins, this is exactly what we are going to get.

  34. Megan says – reply to this
    34

    tasteless and offensive - yep that pretty much sums it up!

  35. Beaut says – reply to this
    35

    this is disgusting and absolutely offensive…these people should get stabbed in the heart!!

  36. David says – reply to this
    36

    This is really disappointing. I always thought that the New Yorker was a good, insightful, somewhat impartial media outlet, but I guess not. Since our country is filled with some many naive, uninformed people who will believe a silly illustration before doing actual research or reading a history book, this picture will probably have a lot of influence over people. And it would be one thing to highlight John McCain's age, because that is an indisputable fact. Barack Obama is not a terrorist, and I find the above illustration offensive and irrelevant. I bet the New Yorker is going to issue an apology soon, and I think the whole publication should be ashamed of themselves for perpetuating such a stupid, irrelevant stereotype.

  37. Oh Pl says – reply to this
    37

    Not only is irony lost on Americans but apparently so is satire… you sad sanctimonious hypocrites… Grow the fuck up Perez… it's not offensive at all… posting pictures of an under age Myley Cyrus IS though you stupid man… you are gay and should know better when it comes to humor dumb dumb!

  38. macez says – reply to this
    38

    Re: marvi – This is an example of the difference between making fun of someone and tastlessness. Barack himself is able to be made fun of, but this is too far (especially considering the amount of racism already facing him).

  39. cafeh says – reply to this
    39

    what chance does obama have when so-called established intellectual mags choose to lose their common sense? it's absolutely irresponsible and false to play the satirical card.

  40. Beast says – reply to this
    40

    Well, it may be satire, but there's a lot of truth in there. The Obama's may not be true haters of America (although indeed they may be), but a lot of the people they've associated with for decades truly are. Both Obama and McCain are airheads in many areas, but at least McCain can't be said to hate our country.

  41. aat says – reply to this
    41

    Sick.

  42. lore says – reply to this
    42

    WOW that is NOT satire. Too many people are naive (ignorant, stupid, in denial, whatever) and will believe what is on that cover. Barack is a Christian in case that hasn't already been clearly stated a million times. This cover just completely crosses the line! Does the New Yorker have a McCain 'satire' set to go as a cover as well??

  43. whoca says – reply to this
    43

    Obama's such a crybaby. Whines about everything. Where does he get off telling us we should all speak Spanish? I thought the President of the United States worked for us and not vice-versa. Man preaching "change" yet he's done more flip-flopping than any candidate I've ever seen. If his undies are gonna get in awry because of some simple cartoon or something that was deservingly said about his wife after that snotty remark she made how is the hell is he going to be able to handle the pressure of the Oval Office?

  44. Maria says – reply to this
    44

    OH MY GOD - THAT'S A TERRIBLE PICTURE OF MICHELLE !!

  45. Zikie says – reply to this
    45

    Finally, we get to "satirize" a Democrat, and not a Republican! What? Does it upset, offend, humiliate? Is it not okay? Whatever happened to free speech, freedom of the press? Get over it, grow up, or grow some testicles.

    Oh, and by the way, the cover is absolutely hilarious, of not ON-TARGET.

  46. m says – reply to this
    46

    Say what you want- it's still a good magazine.

  47. silly says – reply to this
    47

    Oh, my God. Is Obama a Muslim? And, his wife is a, um black militant. I had no idea. I'm not going to vote for him after all. I'm going to go and vote for John McCain right away. If it weren't for this New Yorker article, I would have never known. I also than New Yorker for the cover they did showing Hillary and Barack in bed together. I never the two of them were having an affairs. Thank you again, New Yorker!

  48. Omar says – reply to this
    48

    It's just not a good idea to elect Barack because it will be opening a door that can never be closed again!!!

  49. Agree says – reply to this
    49

    Re: camer – I agree!

  50. AJ says – reply to this
    50

    FAIR??? OMFG how about the Rolling Stone cartoon of McCain in a cage in Vietnam? Or Condi Rice CONSTANTLY being negatively portrayed in cartoons (like the Ted Rall crap, the Jeff Danzinger, Pat Oliphant, etc), or the Bush being assassinated postage stamp crap, as well as all the other "kill Bush" artwork out there, or the book bashing Laura Bush… I could go on and on, but my point is that Barack and his supporters ned to GROW A PAIR and realize that if they want o dish it out, they gotta be able to take it. This is just another GLARING example of the liberal hypocracy out here.

  51. trish says – reply to this
    51

    loooooooooveeee it

  52. 52

    I also think they should do a McCain satire to be fair! There are a lot of ignorant people out there who really do believe Obama is an unpatriotic Muslim terrorist supporter and this cover is not helping Obama's cause. People always judge a book by its cover and don't take the time to read any articles accompanying some images. Images are powerful! The New Yorker is desperate to sell.

  53. NO! says – reply to this
    53

    Not funny!

  54. Maria says – reply to this
    54

    OH MY GOD - THAT'S A TERRIBLE PICTURE OF MICHELLE.
    Her hair is a mess, the outfit sucks and she isn't wearing her pearls !!
    Who wouldn't be offended?

  55. VOXIE says – reply to this
    55

    There's an amendment somewhere that says this is ok. Leave it alone.

    Secondly, it's when we dumb-assed Drama Democrats make a big o'deal over this FOX news-inspired utter bullshit, that it becomes news worthly and controversial. Just ignore it!! Besides, I think we have it in the bag if we don't fuck THIS one up. When I say "THIS one", I mean had the Republicans not stolen the elections in Florida the last time, we also would have clinched it back then too - That was totally out of our control. OK, then…

  56. dijhi says – reply to this
    56

    Re: LettyB – Try You Tube idiot since you dont read

  57. eh? says – reply to this
    57

    yes, i do think to make it fair you should have a satire cover of McCain; but you should also have all the other magazines publishing McCain, too. to make it fair. rolling stone published a huge spread on Obama including a cover, full interview, and extra multipage ariticles supporting him. this is seen in other magazines too. the New Yorker is one of the first i've seen goign against Obama. why don't we make it fair and have McCain get the unbiased articles he disserves. but this is a U.S. election and along with the rigth to vote is the rigth of speech. this includes publishing what you want. i don't think it will every be "fair"

  58. Kamil says – reply to this
    58

    This is a satire and that is all it is. But there are sooo many IGNORANT people in America that will follow suit to this and make images or post images (like black face, which someone just posted right now) which is truly offensive and uncalled for.

  59. dijhi says – reply to this
    59

    Re: s – Obama is not wearing the gun jackass.

    Not all muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are muslim !

  60. al's says – reply to this
    60

    Re: dijhi – I guess YOU and MELISSA have done your research… your idiocy is laughable..and as I say this now, I am sure your confederate flag is waving proudly from your dodge pick up truck…..or your trailer

  61. youra says – reply to this
    61

    Fair? Why should they do a McCain cover- you and the rest of the media do a fine job giving the hussein-obama clan their fair due. Equality means both sides - and someone has to do it. I agree the cover is off - but 2 wrongs don't make a right - you wouldn't understand that though. Give it up!

  62. Kami says – reply to this
    62

    This is a satire and that is all it is. But there are sooo many IGNORANT people in America that will follow suit to this and make images or post images (like black face, which someone just posted right now) which is truly offensive and uncalled for.

    ps. i feel the racist commentors will be filing in pretty soon… very sad
    OBAMA 08' lets make these racist cringe when they see Obama inaugurated! :)

  63. Obama says – reply to this
    63

    IT IS FUNNY AND IT IS CALLED FREEDOM OF SPEECH. AND IF ANY OF YOU HAD A BRAIN…IT IS POKING FUN AT ALL THE IGNORANT AMERICANS WHO SEE OBAMA AS THIS. BESIDES OBAMA SUCKS. TYPICAL POLITICAIN FLIP FLOPPING ON EVERYTHING HE HAS SAID BEFORE AND IT'S JUST BUSINESS AS USUAL FOR HIM.

  64. DaWiz says – reply to this
    64

    Fair? Fair? Since when has any of the Media been fair with Republicans. Don't you know we cause wars, eat babies, bomb the innocent, and raised the price of gas? We ALL know that the Democrats are so perfect that there shit does not stink and their cigars are only used for not having sexual relations with that woman. Why, Obama should be made our King forever right now. Matters not that he has no experience whatsoever, and is flip-flopping like a fish brought onto a boat.
    Yes, if Perez is angy about this, then we should all give up right now and admit that the Democrats have the solution for every ill that life ever brings.

    Except that they don't. Obama in a turban, tough shit, he's as much a Christian as the Pope is a Satanist. He's muslim and the muslims want to kill all of us. Get with it you frigging idiots!

  65. billi says – reply to this
    65

    Why is it freedom of the press when stuff is in print about Republicans but considered inappropriate if it is in print about a Democrat?

  66. Cayce says – reply to this
    66

    Perez you are telling The New Yorker to be politically fair when you NEVER are. How many positive things have you reported in regards to John McCain? You don’t actually care about the reporting of fair and accurate politics because if you did, you too would participate.

  67. cyn says – reply to this
    67

    oh, now the liberals want coverage to be fair? Welcome to the conservative world of the liberal bias media. He's a wolf in sheep's clothing! Wake up America!

  68. STFU says –