Home Videos Photos Shop
PerezHilton CocoPerez Khloé Selena G. Meghan Markle T. Swift PerezTV

Not Pimping Out Her Baby

| Filed under: Baby BlabberMedia MinuteNicole KidmanKeith Urban


Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban have reportedly turned down multi-million dollar offers for the first pics of their little lady, Sunday Rose Roast.

The Australian media claims they are undecided whether to release a photograph of the newborn, but if they do, it will be for free!

Baby pictures for free????

That's unheard of in Hollywoodland!

Who do they think they are?

A source says, "They don't think it's appropriate to make deals. They are still deciding how they feel about (it) - if and when they will release a photo at all. But they realise there is enormous interest from the public and they are grateful and appreciative of that."

How rude!

Nicole just deprived a 'charity' of millions of dollars.

Is her baby photo even worth millions???

[Image via Getty Images.]

Katie Holmes & More Worst Dressed Celebs Of The Week!
ACM Awards 2018: All The Red Carpet Fashion!
This Week In Celebrity Twitpics & Instagrams!
Shows To Watch If You Like Big Little Lies!
Celebrities Who've Opened Up About Miscarriage
Oscars 2018: All The Red Carpet Fashion!

294 comments to “Not Pimping Out Her Baby”

More comments: [1] 2 3 »

  1. jenn says – reply to this



  2. Mike says – reply to this


    Not if the baby looks anything like her! Troll.

  3. missy says – reply to this



  4. Girl says – reply to this


    I know you think you're being funny by calling her Roast but you're really coming off as pathetic and immature. Let's see what can we call you: Perez pork pie?

  5. MrEfr says – reply to this


    It's her baby, she can do what she chooses. It's not required for her to do ANYTHING. furthermore, it's quite rude for you to berate their personal decision.

  6. tyler says – reply to this



  7. divaw says – reply to this


    good for them! not every celeb thinks that its worth all the big bucks. still hope she doesnt wait like her ex cruise did.

  8. Russ says – reply to this


    Good for her! Maybe this will be the start of something…. It gets out of hand with the amount of money spent… It needs to swing the other way now!!!

    Oh am I first?

  9. Emma says – reply to this


    Is no one else slightly suspicious that the baby may not even be real? :S

  10. 10

    Aww….come on! We gotta see if that baby is gonna be a future firecrotch!!!

  11. Elia! says – reply to this



  12. emili says – reply to this


    her baby is worth 100 bucks

  13. maris says – reply to this


    i hate her she didnt even look pregnent

  14. yay says – reply to this



  15. nicol says – reply to this


    i really dont care what her baby looks like all babies look the same at that age

  16. Kate says – reply to this


    First and does anyone even care about either of them? I dont.

  17. Erica says – reply to this



  18. Gwyne says – reply to this


    Good for her children are not a commodity. I am sure they have plenty of money they donate to charities regardless. I'm sure the Jolie-Pitts have plenty of money they could donate without using their children.

  19. fiirr says – reply to this


    FIRST bitches!!!!

  20. yay says – reply to this


    She is protecting her child, thats called being a GOOD mother something Angelina Jolie knows NOTHING about. Good for her.
    Angelina Jolie whores out baby photos to make herself look like a good person instead of the home wrecker that she is.

  21. dg says – reply to this


    There IS a big interest of her life….and yes, she should get paid for it…

    Don't do it for free!! Give it to charity if you don't need the $ or put it in a trust fund for the child…

    Who cares if she gets paid and shows us a pic, we want to see that cute baby.

  22. 22

    C'mon Perez baby, pick a platform and stick with it.. you either whore out your baby or you're a stingy jerk who won't donate to charity and probably aren't worth it…Cheers Nicole and Keith, grats :) I look forward to seeing your bundle of joy :)

  23. nancy says – reply to this


    goodness perez. its refreshing to actually see someone not go into this kind of thing.

  24. Brook says – reply to this


    not rude at ALL. They have CLASS!!!! Why sell out your child's anonymity? If you sell to the highest bidder.. then the paps hound you still to sell to the other tabloids..

    Sometimes I think you just razz people because you can… How about a day of 'nice play?'

  25. Shane says – reply to this


    If she sold the photos you would call her out for pimping out her baby, now that she has choosen not too, now you are saying she is depriving charity. She will do what she wants.

  26. Me says – reply to this


    Good for her! This baby pimping thing celebs are doing lately is just sickening. Yet they all moan about how they are in fear of stalkers, but they whore out their sprogs' pic? Disgusting! Hope Kidman sticks to her word and hopefully things can turn around.

  27. Aimee says – reply to this


    Good for her. At least she is not a whore like Angelina Jolie!

  28. click says – reply to this


    Re: yay – you are right about that

  29. Denis says – reply to this


    I think it shows tremendous class. But that isn't the full report. They said they are deciding how they feel but people are leaving out that if they do sell a photo it will go directly to charity. They are just showing allot of class. Pus she's waited so long for this let her have her time. We can wait. :o )

  30. shana says – reply to this


    hahahahaha sunday roast.

  31. Kate says – reply to this


    Re: yay – Angelina is way hotter and sorry to say it but you can't wreck a home that wasn't already on it's way out.

  32. raven says – reply to this


    You say rude, I say a class act. Good on you Nichole! You keep raising the bar for these other celebrities!

  33. pea says – reply to this


    jesus Perez, she can't win can she.

  34. Brook says – reply to this


    Re: Emma – Don't be an idiot…

  35. stfu says – reply to this


    Give her a break, she's not obligated to pimp our her baby for money or for anyone else's amusement.

  36. McPou says – reply to this


    I think it's great they are not taking money to pimp out their kid! Why do they have to get paid to have a picture published. I do think they need to put out a picture soon though or the stupid photogs are going to be on their ass 24-7…stupid photogs.

  37. Brook says – reply to this


    Re: Kate – You did enough to comment now, didn't ya? Yup..

  38. Suze says – reply to this


    Good for them. This mom has her head screwed on right. Right now, her main concern should be about this newborn…not about brokering deals.

  39. Lauri says – reply to this


    Good for them! I find it crass to charge for a picture. Stars are freaks. At least Keith and Nicole have some class.

  40. perez says – reply to this


    are u fucking kidding me u retard? no one should even be paid millions for baby pics fuck you youre stupid and an idiot YOURE PATHETIC AND FAT AND DISGUSTING AND NO ONE LIKES YOU i only read your shit to know whatsup not for your stupid fucking comments which half the time arent even true .. nice typo on the iphone post to you fuckface

  41. veron says – reply to this


    thats mean perez, honestly it is outrageous that some celebrities are getting paid millions of dollars of their new born infants- give nicole a break for wanting some privacy for her baby!!!

  42. VIVI says – reply to this



  43. Solar says – reply to this


    Dumb. Nobody's baby photos are worth millions. I can't believe this whole 'first exclusive baby photo' thing is really selling mags.

  44. cpt o says – reply to this


    Good for Nicole - way to be a good mother UNLIKE that whore jolie. some people believe in protecting their children and not whoring them out.

  45. what says – reply to this


    I don't understand why these magazines pay millions and millions of dollars for pictures of these babies. Do they honestly sell that many more issues. For instance Brad and Angie are getting paid more than 10 million (possibly 20 million) is it really worth it. I could give a fuck less what there kid looks like. Newborn babies pretty much all look the same anyway.

  46. justm says – reply to this


    A classy gesture from a classy lady! Not like the PimpoLinas Jolies.

  47. A MOM says – reply to this


    Good for them! I think the selling of baby photos has gotten ridiculous. I don't care if they give the money to charity or not, it's still pimping your baby.

  48. Ericc says – reply to this


    Nicole is just classier than most Hollywood A Listers and she does not want to profit from something that millions and millions of others do each day- have a child. How do we really know the other Hollywood people are actually donating that money they receive to charity? We don't and I doubt many do.

  49. kaka says – reply to this


    PIMP-Elina Jolie sucks major ass!

  50. lol says – reply to this


    That is because the kid is an alien or they weren't worth very much. I'd say 500,000 at the most

  51. Taco says – reply to this


    People are so fucking stupid. Why the hell does ANYBODY give two shits what a celebrity's baby looks likes? It looks like a fucking baby… not that exciting. Show me a picture of the kid in 16 years when it's in jail or rehab… MAYBE then I'd be semi-interested.

  52. pleas says – reply to this


    Please release the pics and send us the $! We are starving and just had 2 babies of our own, but nobody cares. And we need the $$$!!

  53. and says – reply to this


    wow..it really is damned if you do damned if you don't.

    people get criticized for pimping out their kids..and when they don't..they still do.


  54. Poop says – reply to this


    Cheers to Nicole and Keith for not being typical hollywood slime, selling their life to the higest bidder. Classy and refreshing.

  55. Ang71 says – reply to this


    OMG what a breath of fresh air. I am so sick of this bidding for babies and parents selling out their kids. Even though the charity thing was wonderful for Brangelina they started this mess because the others like JLO, are not donating it to charity. I wish folks would stop buying these magazines!!!

  56. CND says – reply to this


    Finally! A celebrity who doesn't try to pimp out her kid! It's getting crazy with how much money is being spent on these baby pictures. Seriously, all babies look the same when they are new born. I read an interview with a PR exec who said that celebs are now having kids simply to be on magazines and generate a lot of money "for charity." Terrible! Hope there's a backlash against these pimpin' celebs soon!

    If they want to give money to charity, they should give their own millions!

  57. joan says – reply to this


    Why give away the photos for free when you can take the tabloid's millions and give it to charity? It's a win-win-win, the public and gossip blogs get theirs, Mr and Mrs Kidman get carma points and some charity gets millions. What possible reasons could they have not to do this?

  58. HOT says – reply to this


    How refreshing! The baby picture bidding is out of control.

  59. Artur says – reply to this


    That's pretty narrow-minded. So just because they chose to not whore their baby out automatically means they won't donate to charity? Wouldn't they have enough to donate it themselves?

    You seem to trash for the wrong reasons these days… go eat a cupcake! It'll put you in a good mood.

  60. Carin says – reply to this



  61. km says – reply to this


    Re: cpt o – OK…ya'll think her selling these pictures now is just so above and beyond everybody else????? You have been hooked!!!! Exactly what she wants. The baby picutres will come out at some point in time and money will be made. Peroid! Unless she completely hides her out for as long as she can, which would be untill the next few years, what ever the time frame is….money will be made on these pictures. That is NOT going to happen because she needs this child for publicity sake…her career is riding on it! Some time soon…and some bull sh*t story will be planted that what ever money made is being donated to charity! BULLSH*T! She is a phoney as the nose on her face!

  62. Dicey says – reply to this


    You're a shitty person to say such things.

  63. sw says – reply to this


    He fucked my cousin when he was in rehab in a stairwell and their marriage wont lastzm I feel bad for her, he's scum, his music sucks and she should marry someone who doesnt cheat and do drugs. What a waste

  64. kimv says – reply to this


    Let them be. Why should anyone care so much about what they do. You'll see the child when you see it. I say leave them alone.

  65. Laure says – reply to this


    I love her and I think it's quite classy and protective of her. I'm sure she gives plenty of money to charity and doesn't need the money that OK or People would give her to continue her charitable works.

  66. cdnmo says – reply to this


    Good for Nicole & Keith. "Celebrities" are so overpaid as it is, do they really need to get paid for their baby's pictures, too?? And those of them who are so great, that they give a percentage of their salaries to charity…let's remember people, said actors make upwards of $20 million per picture, and are only donating 10%!! That's $2 million…pocket change to them.

    And, Perez, I love ya, but get off Nicole's case. She's one of the only true actors in Hollywood today.

  67. lola says – reply to this


    good for her!
    the only way I support this is if you are like jamie lynn spears and are too young to have a child and you have no career and the money would really help or if you're like Brangelina and donate the proceeds to charity!

  68. NOFUK says – reply to this



  69. Nicol says – reply to this



    Its called child exploitation Perez. Good for you Nicole be above all that bullshit.

    And yes based on what you said about multi million dollar offers, i guess the shots would be worth millions… dipshit.

  70. Mikki says – reply to this


    Kudos to her and Keith…..a baby is a private matter…..not a cash register.

  71. Rober says – reply to this


    The money Brad and Angie gets goes 100% to charity. A nobel thing in todays day and age.
    Do you think JLo sent all her money to charity? I think not !
    Brad and Angie and given millions to charity !
    As far as Nicole Kidmans baby goes, I would not spend a dime to see the picture. Frankly, I guess it would look Alien like she does.

  72. Beth says – reply to this


    It's better for her not to sell the photos or just do them for free. Donating the photo money to charity is incredibly self-serving - keeps the star's image out there in the best way possible while forcing the media to trip over themselves in order to get the photo. Win win. Not doing a photo does a total end-run around the media. Go Nicole.

  73. juani says – reply to this


    Good for them! Since when are children a commodity? Anyway they could just give the money without pimping out their kid! xx

  74. Liz says – reply to this


    i dont get it.you hate on celebrities for pimping out their children and then hate on celebrities who don't?oh and i bet if you ever had a child and were offered money for the pictures of the shiteous little thing, the last thing your desperate ass would do would be give it to charity you freak.

  75. La La says – reply to this


    I hope the baby pics were for free that will show Brangelina what is the definition of CLASSY!!!!

  76. c says – reply to this


    Soo glad shes not not pimping out her daughter for the tabloids.
    The highest bid thing is just ridiculous, for someone to get paid that much for baby pics.

  77. Flo says – reply to this


    She probably isn't selling them because she was never really pregnant and was strapping on a bump all this time. If she releases photos we might see there is no resemblence.

  78. Mandy says – reply to this


    Perez, YOU are the one who is rude.
    I can't believe that A) It took you this long to post this story, it's been out for 3 days….that B) You CONTINUE to call her Sunday Roast (it's stupid, unfunny, and UNORIGINAL - You ripped it off from an Australian article), and that C) You are criticizing Nic for NOT pimping out her child??? You made NOOOO sense. And how DARE you comment on her not taking the money to give to charity. She is a UNIFEM Goodwill ambassador, and doesn't go around expecting praise for it, unlike your precious Angelina, who makes sure everyone and their fucking dog is aware of her charity work. And Keith Urban has done countless charity acts and fundraisers, which is more than I can say for Brad Pitt, who thinks that narrating Design E Squared is actually making a difference? The man knows nothing about green architecture, he is a ridiculous puppet.
    Get a life Perez, and grow UP.

  79. Mich says – reply to this


    Good for Nicole! This business of exploiting your child to make money or even to make money to give to charity is stupid. I want to see someone give some of their hard-earned money to charity, not exploiting their children for charity. It's a big paradox.

  80. KELLY says – reply to this



  81. Ratio says – reply to this


    "How rude"? Seriously? These are pictures of HER children. I'm sick of celebrities whoring out their children for money-it's disgusting the way they treat their children as commodities. Good for Nicole for not selling out her children, like Christina Aguilera and many others perpetually do.

  82. NIKKI says – reply to this


    she was the SKINNEST pregnant woman Ive EVER seen. I think she starved herself, even while preggers :( bad Nicole

  83. POO says – reply to this


    Are they going to release pics of the surigate mother as well? Come on, she was never really pregnant. Everybody knows that Nicole can't carry a child.
    Well, at least she has class. Oh and all babies look the same!

  84. Bex says – reply to this


    She's a celebrity- not her baby. She has no obligation toward any charity. Celebrity families are allowed to have privacy. She may not, but her children have that right. It's her duty as a parent to protect that right. More power to them.

  85. Catha says – reply to this


    Perez you are disgusting. It is Nicole's child and her business. Why should she be thinking of magazine deals when she is at home with her first newborn biological child? Some people don't live for Hollywood you know…. She is not whoring out her child like everyone else and that should be respected. I didn't hear anything about Matthew McMoron giving his pay to charity… call him out for profiting off his child.

  86. abby says – reply to this


    Good for her. It is really sick how stars pimp their babies out.

  87. Roxy says – reply to this


    Whatev. It's THEIR child. THey should do as they please. I admire that they are making a decision that THEY feel right with. Perez, I know that you're a gossip columnist so you have no choice but to express an opinion on EVERYYYYTHING no matter how NOT your business it is. Anyhow, I hope that you are not nearly as judgemental as your blog suggests. I HOPE that your words are just spoken (or..more acurrately…typed) for the sake of keeping the business going!

  88. norm says – reply to this


    Good for them! They had a baby and so be it! Personally, who really buys People, Star,..etc… and all the other crap they have on check out lines? You can read it for free while waiting to get checked out! GARBAGE FOR SALE!

  89. deb says – reply to this


    Yep, leave it to the Aussie's to have some common sense at last!
    This celebrity baby pimping has gone on long enough.

  90. 90

    Re: Suze – Exactly!

  91. Dippy says – reply to this


    It pisses me off that all famous people are expected to donate shit loads of money to charity… Just coz Angelina "ass-lips" Jolie likes to make herself look good by pretending to care, doesn't mean everyone else does.

    Why not donate all of your HOT TOPIC money to charity Perez??? All twenty dollars of it.

  92. Sammy says – reply to this


    Who wants to see a picture of a botox baby anyway?

  93. Angel says – reply to this


    She has scruples and is elegant….good for her for maintaining a semblence of normalcy for herself.

  94. Katie says – reply to this


    Perez, seriously!!! You thought it was great when Ellen said she was going to do the same thing with her weddings pics. Pick a side and stick to it. I think it's admirable not to pimp out your newborn.

  95. Amand says – reply to this


    You are such an ass Perez. It is her child. Why does she need to release photos? Thankfully she isn't whoring out her child like Brangelina.

  96. Sarah says – reply to this


    Good for them for not pimping out photos of their kids! It is just shameful and low class of people to sell pictures of their babies to make money! Who cares if they claim it is for charity, then they shove it into their personal foundation! The Jolie-Pitts are disgusting for selling pictures of their natural-born children! You will note they didn't sell pics of their adopted kids. I guess they are second class citizens to them now.

  97. KB says – reply to this


    Re: yay – EXACTLY! She's being a classy mom….not many in Hollywood can comprehend that!

  98. tonic says – reply to this


    Shut up Perez. Pimping out your baby and withholding charity money are not the same thing. So if Nicole said no to posing nude for proceeds to go to charity that would be rude aswell? You need to open your eyes and start being smart - pinping is pimping.

    The real pimps are Brad and Angelina, how dare you sell pics of your baby for any cause….

  99. Congr says – reply to this


    Clearly she is not as needy as Angelina Jolie. Maybe because Nicole Kidman can actually act, so she doesnt need to be a whore and then have kids and sell their photos. Angelina Jolie plays ONE role over and over again.

    I love Nicole Kidman, she is classy. Angelina Jolie is trashy.

    Congrats to Nicole Kidman for having a baby and being a good mother.

  100. babyd says – reply to this


    Yeah, she doesn't want to show the baby off because it looks nothing like her thats why. She was never pregnant, that's why Tom Cruise left her when he did, cos she can't have kids. And faked a pregnancy with her new husband to make it look like she wasn't the problem with Tom.

More comments: [1] 2 3 »