Home Videos Photos Shop
PerezHilton CocoPerez Housewives Kim K. Drake Trump PerezTV

Not Pimping Out Her Baby

| Filed under: Baby BlabberMedia MinuteNicole KidmanKeith Urban


Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban have reportedly turned down multi-million dollar offers for the first pics of their little lady, Sunday Rose Roast.

The Australian media claims they are undecided whether to release a photograph of the newborn, but if they do, it will be for free!

Baby pictures for free????

That's unheard of in Hollywoodland!

Who do they think they are?

A source says, "They don't think it's appropriate to make deals. They are still deciding how they feel about (it) - if and when they will release a photo at all. But they realise there is enormous interest from the public and they are grateful and appreciative of that."

How rude!

Nicole just deprived a 'charity' of millions of dollars.

Is her baby photo even worth millions???

[Image via Getty Images.]

Golden Globes 2018: ALL The Red Carpet Pics!
All The Celeb Babies Expected In 2018!
How Celebs Spent NYE 2K18!
Trump's 10 Worst Tweets Of 2017!
Khloé Kardashian Is Going To Be The BEST Mom -- & Here's Why!
American Music Awards 2017: The Worst Dressed List

294 comments to “Not Pimping Out Her Baby”

More comments: « 1 [2] 3 »

  1. aussi says – reply to this


    How rude? how rude of you, Perez! You whinge about celebs pimping out their children for money, then you complain when one of them actually is classy enough not to? I think that its great that they aren't sellign the pictures, shows that the Urbans have self-respect and class and don't need tp pimp out their kids for attention

  2. SJ says – reply to this


    She's got my respect.

  3. Daryl says – reply to this


    Hmmm….let's think about Perez's dumb ass commentary for a minute…When did it become a REQUIREMENT for any celebrity to sell photos of their baby? Would Perez (if, God forbid, he became a parent) want to pimp out his newborn's photos for money? Last time I checked, a parent has the right to share their baby's photos with whomever they like. I think that its great that Brad and Angelina donate the money from their babies photos to charity. But, its THEIR call to do that. Don't knock Kidman and Urban for doing something for FREE. You know, if just might be that they are happy and want to share their happiness with everyone. Wow, what a novel idea…giving and not expecting monetary gain from it.

    And as for the snotty remarks made here by people who are apparently so good looking they feel they can take shots at an actress like Nicole…put your photos out there and let Perez and the rest of the world critique you. Then I wonder how long it would take before you are hiding in your apartment, binging on twinkies and whining about life being unfair! Its easy to call some one a troll or ridicule their looks when your big fat ass is sitting securely at home behind your monitor.

  4. patri says – reply to this



    I say, good for her.

  5. 105

    Nicole Kidman has whats called class. I applaud her and Kieth for this decision. I'm sure they have enough money that they can donate to charity without needing to exploit their children.

    Go Nicole!

  6. oscrc says – reply to this


    fuck the charities, I'm glad she's not pimping out her daughter

  7. Nancy says – reply to this


    You know PNasty, just because she doesn't advertise how much she gives to donation, doesn't mean she doesn't give.

    I have to agree with her on this one. It's been rumored that Jolie & Pitt, put the money in their donation pool. It's not like they tell whoever pays to give it all to a charity.

    When you think about it, it's actually hypocritical to take money from a media outlet that you claim to dislike. Giving France the news first is further proof.

  8. andie says – reply to this


    Good for them! they showed up that they do not like to make a circus with their baby girl. They are the kind of people that do not have to sell the first pics of a baby for charity purposes, they have the enough money to do that without exposing a little one to be the point of critics and $$$ for the magazines!

    EXCELENT for them!

  9. crick says – reply to this


    The photo's not worth anything if the poor kid is unlucky enough to look like her.Nasty Frozen faced skank.

  10. emily says – reply to this


    ugh who wants to see pics of her child

  11. Sarah says – reply to this


    Good for them, who cares what they look like, eventually you will see them, how dare anyone think their baby pics are worth millions…what a waste of money!

  12. 112


  13. 113

    Re: Emma – OK, NO NOT REALLY!

  14. She says – reply to this


    What right do you have to comment on a family's decisions for their child?

  15. BLAH says – reply to this



  16. GG says – reply to this


    woow, tht preety PATHETIC

  17. Julie says – reply to this


    The paps should just take a picture of a pillow or fake baby bump. She was never preggers to begin with. Why fake something like that instead of adopting, or did she miscarry again after announcing too soon? Anyway, that was never a real pregnancy, and any baby pics would surely show a disconnect between the baby's supposed age and the reality.

  18. steph says – reply to this


    Just because Nicole wants to be a normal parent isn't a reason for you to be insulting her. It's the rest of Hollywood that's warped! All those ppl suck.

  19. nonon says – reply to this


    Great decision. There was a report in the news about the reality behind charities and how much actually makes it to those in need. Nicole did not need to make charity organizers richer.

  20. hoora says – reply to this


    my opinion of Nicole Kidman has just gone up several notches!!!
    Take THAT Brangelina and all the Brangeloonies!!

    There are STILL some real caring mothers left in the entertainment industry that do not feel the need to pimp out their babies for MILLIONS and then use a small fraction of that money to donate to charity so they can make themselves look good!

  21. Jane says – reply to this


    It's very tasteful for them to not do the usual thing and sell their baby pictures to the highest bidder. It may have "deprived a charity" but I'd rather have that happen that someone else use their kids for profit. Get a life, Perez.

  22. oi_au says – reply to this


    Nothing makes you happy does it Perez? Nicole and Keith unlike the TomKat's and Brangelina's of the world have class and choose to keep their private moments just that - PRIVATE! As you are well aware Nicole raises millions of dollars for charity and also donates her own money and time for charity. Her wedding photo was released on condition the media donated to charity - which the majority failed to do. So why would she allow her daughter be sold to the highest bidder when most media fail to donate the amount allocated to nominated charities? If Brangelina wishes to have children and sell photo's of them in order to donate to charity - that is their choice. By the way Perez this was reported in the Australian newspaper's day's ago so it appears you are far behind the times and have merely used old news to attack Nicole Kidman. Maybe you are hoping for Nicole Kidman to contact you and do the big 'suck' job, however it isn't going to happen buddy as she doesn't need you to promote her like Angelina Jolie does. Oh yes you must have forgotten Angelina Jolie has let me see broken up firstly Billy Bob Thornton and Laura Dern's engagement and then of course Brad Pitt's and Jennifer Aniston's marriage. Yes Angelina Jolie is really a angel isn't she Perez?

  23. 123

    UNLIKE the case of Angelina Jolie, in any sentence containing the name Nicole Kidman the words Beauty, Virtue, Class, Kindness, Sincerity, Intellect,
    and Artist—among other words—can also be used nonestly and freely.

  24. russ says – reply to this



  25. Deann says – reply to this


    Re: Julie – I agree. I have no opinion of Nicole good or bad, but that pregnancy was faked for sure. Even when she was asked about it her answer was very odd. She wanted to prove to the world that she was fertile, especially after Tom had a supposed biological kid.

  26. give says – reply to this


    She could give the money to charity. Selfish witch. Just think how much good that money could do for a childrens charity.

  27. slut says – reply to this


    I personally don't give a shit about what celebrities babies look like. I think it's nice that some people give the money to charity and all but I think it's great that nicole doesn't want to pimp out her baby for money. I don't think anyone cares either lol

  28. ha says – reply to this


    She was not pregnant. She used a surrogant. She is a phony bitch.

  29. Jaye says – reply to this


    even if they release a picture for FREE, unless they stay locked in their house with the baby SOMEONE will get a picture and make money on it. I think that is the point of the Jolie-Pitts at lease giving the money to charity. Sooner or later SOMEONE will get it, might as well be people who need it.

  30. maddi says – reply to this


    Good for her! If you love Nicole Kidman, check out kwanzoo.com for celebrity trivia!

  31. plum says – reply to this


    perez when are you going to say nice things about nicole?

  32. 132

    Nicole = a sophisticated lady.
    Angelina = a mediawhore, homewrecking tramp, who'll do anything if the price is right.

  33. fido says – reply to this


    good for her. if i were famous i wouldn't even consider making a few extra bucks that way. to me its sleazy.

    to each their own.

  34. lili says – reply to this


    Perezito~They may feel it's weird to put a "price" on their baby. I know I'd think that's disgusting…

  35. 135

    I'm glad they're not pimping out their kid, and I don't think they're being rude at all.

  36. perez says – reply to this


    rude? maybe she just wants to keep her daughter out of the limelight and not pimp her out. that's not rude, that's being a protective parent. you're just a nosey, fat fuck.

  37. elle says – reply to this


    i can respect that…celebrities are not entitled to share their baby's pics with the whole world…most just do it for the money and the publicity…if she doesn't want to make a profit of her own child then i think that she should be applauded not criticized…

  38. Amy! says – reply to this


    you kidding me?!
    that baby will probably
    be gorgeous, i'm sure she
    won't be "brangelina" magnificent,
    but nicole's stunning, and keith's handsome,
    they both have beautiful eyes, you know?

    Sunday Rose is going to be a stunner, don't
    chu worry~

  39. Jimmy says – reply to this


    Good for her! I hope she and Urban stick to their guns here. Nothing disgusts me more than celebrities who whore out their babies for huge million dollar deals. Even if it all goes to charity there's something disgusting about it. How can these people complain about no privacy when they're shilling pictures of their children?

  40. Mike says – reply to this


    She's being rude because she won't whore out her baby?? You are a pathetic human being.

  41. frank says – reply to this


    i respect the fact that nicole is hesistant about selling her baby's pics…but to those out there who are bashing on brad and angelina for doing so, headline they actually donate the proceeds to charity unlike people like jamie lynn spears,jennifer lopez,nicole richie,christina aguilera, etc.

  42. monna says – reply to this


    if she had "pimped out" her baby you would have criticized her for not being worth how much whatever magazine would have offered her. you are a hypocrite and a sexist. Mathew McConaughey decides he wants to "shop" around for the best price for his baby pictures and you act like he is trashy as hell for selling his baby photos. Nicole is way more A list than McConaughey fool face. if a young female celebrity messes up you call her a slut and a whore, but if a young male commits a similar offense you call him a bad boy and easily allow his mistakes to subside.

  43. heath says – reply to this


    Thank God!

    How could anyone think it is a "good" thing to pimp out a baby….I don't give a shit if the money is for charity or not - it's still a baby!

  44. oi_au says – reply to this


    Hmmm Perez you attack Nicole Kidman, Russell Crowe, Debra Lee Furness, Heath Ledger and many other aussies. You appear to forget that aussies stick together and have a no no nonense manner. Stars and some aussies alike still have not forgiven you for your attack on the late Heath Ledger and their opinion of you is fairly low. I don't think that Nicole Kidman, Russell Crowe, Hugh Jackman, Cate Blanchett, Kylie Minogue, Dannii Minogue consider you to be a 'friend' they need in the media. So continue attacking one of the aussie stars and you will find that many doors and opportunities will be closed to you. Its nice to get money for working on radio in Australia and making appearances, so don't bite the hand that feeds you Perez. You appear to forget that media magnate Rupert Murdoch is Australian and a very good family friend to Nicole Kidman as well as being friends with Russell Crowe, Hugh Jackman, Baz Luhrman to name a few. Continue attacking classy people like Nicole Kidman and I think you will find how quickly fortunes can be reversed in life.

  45. Hyde says – reply to this


    "Rude"?? I say good for them!!

  46. Mary says – reply to this


    Finally, a couple with class. To me, that makes Baby Sunday Rose worth so much more than the other children….and I'm not just talking money here. What a talented person this baby will be.

  47. mary says – reply to this


    Re: Mike – i'm sure all perez meant
    was, if somebody offers you $5 million for a single
    photo-spread of your baby, you should do it, even
    if you don't want the money; you could ATLEAST give it to a deserving charity~

  48. Me says – reply to this


    Ok, so they will let the magazines make money off of it, but they won't even take money to donate any money to charity??? Makes no sense.

  49. 149


    And I agree, they should sell the photo and give the money to charity.

  50. Kitte says – reply to this


    Ok, so because she doesn't want to exploit her childs image she's depriving a chairty?? I'm sure without press or being asked she contributes money on her own so stop trying to make her look selfish.

    And I'm pretty sure her pictures are indeed worth lots if Jamie Spears and Jessica Albas are.

  51. Lucy says – reply to this


    Nicole already donates plenty of time and money to charity from money she has earnt WORKING.
    Whether she gave the money to charity or not - it is still PIMPING out images of her child. Perez, you just HATE Nicole, if she did accept a deal you would be critisising her for that!
    I think it's about time someone said NO to the media moguls! The whole baby… How much will you get for a shot - is pretty disgusting and Hollywood has sunk to a low… people like Jamie Lynn Spears who have the deal done before the baby's even arrived are revolting.

  52. shurf says – reply to this


    Bravo and hallelujah! Finally, someone with an ounce of CLASS!!!!!!

  53. Marya says – reply to this


    Like many others above, i agree. You're being real stupid critisizing all these clebrities and calling them rude. What about you? You ought to be called the rudest of them all.
    So what if she's not giving pictures of her baby out? Would you like your child's first moments splashed all over the front page of a magazine? Hmm?

  54. yeah says – reply to this


    I think it's wrong to sell pictures of your baby for money. Celebs. always try to find a way to get easy money. They don't know how hard it is for us working class people. And on top of that, you're basically putting a price on your kid. Kids are priceless! That show The Baby Borrowers, people are complaining that parents shouldn't lend their kids out just for a TV show. Well how about not selling pictures of your kids for money! At least one Celeb., Nicole Kidman, has some sense in Hollywood!

  55. WTF? says – reply to this


    Perez, what's up with the "Roast" thing? Maybe we can start calling you Porkez Hulkton, or Mobyo LaCOWiera? You are such an asshole, sometimes I actually feel sorry for you. I can't believe you aren't embarassed by some of the lame shit you put out there. GET YOUR GROSS TEETH FIXED PORKEZ

  56. Go Ni says – reply to this


    Pah! In 'Charity' (with inverted commas) do you mean their private coffers?

  57. bohrx says – reply to this


    Good, she shouldnt pimp out her babe, anyone notice thats what ALL the stars do, this year during the mini hollywood baby boom ALL the stars pimped out their babes except for halle berry GOOD FOR HER :)

  58. La La says – reply to this


    Charity is not only money it could be time the time you spend helping, but anyways when you are willing to help others not all the world has to know that.

    In my town the people who show everything they do good or bad we call them SHOW OFF!!!! OR IN THESE CASE ANGELINA JOLIE…

  59. 159

    finally!! i'm tired of all the celebs who sell their babies photos for money anyway… they all just use the "charity" as a right off on taxes!

    and you people need to stop making fun of her baby… karma is a mother you know….

  60. 160

    Re: yay
    amen to that!

  61. 161

    Yeah, Nicole has class unlike your superheroes, Brangie, who cannot donate a dime of their own money. Rather, "Let's pimp our kids out, and sell shit on ebay".. And you want to tell me the first four kids are well adjusted?? Highly doubtful…6 kids aged 6 and under…NO ONE has time to make each kid feel special..Thesed kids are going to grow up with the cutest mugshots..I, personally cannot wait…

  62. dante says – reply to this


    Good for them! I think that they are smart for thinking of the childs best interest. They are not ummm…….. what do you call it….. oh yea " FUCKIN' SELL OUTS"!

  63. La La says – reply to this


    Re: Go Ni

    Yea is for their own cause; we haven't see what they did with the money they got when Shiloh was born.

    In spanish we say AVARICIOSOS, INETERSADOS their lives are rule by the money they don't have feelings they adopt children only to sell the exclusive and as well they only have children to sell the exclusive…

    everything is money for them!!!! I used to respect Brad Pitt but no more, shame on you Brad !!! I hate you Angelina you changed Brad …

  64. Nicky says – reply to this


    Good on them I say. It's absolutely ridiculous how much these celebs even Z list ones get paid to pawn their children. It's really no one elses business.

  65. HJ says – reply to this


    I feel like Nicole Kidman has already proven that she is a very private parent. It makes me wonder if she's the one who didn't want her adoptive children with Tom Cruise seen by the public. Now that they are divorced, we see both of them out and about all the time with Tom and Katie and Suri, but you never saw pics of them with Nicole Kidman. While it does fuel the fire that she was never really pregnant, though I doubt she'd fake her pregnancy; I think she is someone who wants very much to keep her family away from the spotlight. I was not surprised to read that she and Keith Urban opted not to sell the photos of their baby…But, I think that could change if they decide to donate the money to charity.

  66. nbloo says – reply to this


    Perez…..Ur such a DICK…..Lay off…..what fucking right do you have to expect them to sell their pics for charity….its a free country and they are exercising thier right not to sell them…..Perez get over your fucking self!

  67. Jupej says – reply to this


    What has that woman done to her face??? She used to be pretty… now she has rubber lips and expressionless eyes.

  68. Hypo says – reply to this


    Nicole Kidman went through her whole pregnancy with class. She kept it the intensely private affair that having a baby is. She chose to give birth in a hospital close to where she and her husband have made their home. Her reluctance to pimp out photos of her daughter is understandable from a mother who puts the interests of her child first. As for the charity remark, Ms Kidman gives to and works for charities in the same understated, quiet manner. Since when has having photos of your newborn baby taken for rag mags in the name of charity been a requisite? As has been mentioned, most of people who do get paid for photo shoots of their new offspring keep the money for themselves. Good on you, Nicole, and protect that baby from the media as much as possible.

  69. chach says – reply to this


    if it all goes to charity,, wouldnt that be considered a good cause?
    I mean, no ones getting hurt and kids are being helped, so why not ?
    its pretty smart,, nicole is just too stuck up,, she has a chance to help out a charity and she decides not to? thats weirder than brad and angie getting millions for their kids pics and giving the cash away! if people are stupid enuf to pay that kind of money,, why not take it ! Think about it , MILLIONS OF DOLLARS WILL HELP A LOT OF CHARITIES/ kids, that otherwise would not have money!
    I say Nicole is passing up an opportunity for the common good, paps are gonna be trying to secretly be snapping anyway,, why not be smart about i!

  70. lb says – reply to this


    Good for her!!
    I think it's a good thing stop using your kid for $$$ and your reputation (hello Brangelina).

  71. Mandy says – reply to this


    Perez, I think it's time to retract your ridiculous comments. You are only making yourself look like an ass….
    And to all you idiots who still think she faked her pregnancy….Grow a brain. There are photos of her pregnant working out and her stomach is fully showing! What more proof do you need! Some of you people on here are so disgusting and insensitive! And just plain dumb.
    And Perez, what is so great about Angelina anyway?

  72. hape2 says – reply to this


    She cant win can she with you Perez. If she DID sell the photos you'd call her a money Whore.

  73. Maria says – reply to this


    Good for them for not stooping as low as the others. I respect them for this.

  74. Nicki says – reply to this


    Back off Perez, not everyone wants to exploit their kids. Some people are just happy to have a baby and show it to the world. THey don't have to show off and pretend that they are making a deal for charity in order to look good in the eye of society. SO BACK OFF!!!!!!

  75. Susan says – reply to this


    Perez, you are mean. I don't think it would matter WHAT Nicole Kidman did, you'd find some way to insult her. I think it shows a lot of character to pass up millions of dollars for baby pictures. This is their CHILD, not a cash cow.

  76. Appla says – reply to this


    I applaud Nicole and Keith for not whoring out their baby like the other so called celebrities do. It is sick how these people think their babies are worth all of this money and then have the audacity to CLAIM that the money is going to charity that is being paid for the pics. I am so sick of that Hoochie Angelina who thinks she is so hot she can break up marriages and Brad had best get his brain in the other head. As for Tom Cruise and his robot wife–GO AWAY NOBODY WANTS TO HEAR YOUR HALF-BAKED IDEAS ABOUT PSYCH MEDS!!!!!! Tom you are showing everone that you need some meds for being hyper! Nicole and Keith, raise your daughter with love and please don't make her a constant photo opportunity like the others do. She 's a blessing from God!

  77. Izzy says – reply to this


    Good for Nicole and Keith! It's about time someone doesnt do something for the money. As far as charity reasons, sh*t if they wanted to donate they dont need money from photos they have enough and besides that's they're own personal decision and it should be up to them and no one else's business.

    Has your a** donated millions of dollars to charity, Perez? Since you know, you're such a big "celebrity" now. You should be raking in that dough to share! So you can do more then just advertising stuff on the site for free! *rolls eyes.

  78. unoni says – reply to this


    Of course its ok to not get money for the kid. The baby's not a hooker. Do your thing Nicole, its your first natural birth and treat it like one like the rest of the billions giving birth.

    Finally a human who just happens to be in Hollywood. Like Kate B.

  79. Spell says – reply to this


    It's realize you dumb shit!

  80. gg says – reply to this


    Why call your child Sunday? Really,why. You can call a dog sunday,but not your child.

  81. bibi says – reply to this


    You have serious issues my friend, your notion of what's good and what's not is really messed up!! Whoring out your baby is good, but wanting some privacy is not?
    Check with a psychiatrist.. soon!

  82. Laura says – reply to this


    The dress she is wearing in that picture is divine…WOW. The colour is perfect for her.

  83. FIBBR says – reply to this


    Guess what? She might be choosing to ENTIRELY keep her baby out of the public eye. It's one way not to be hounded. Brad and Angelina are whipping up a frenzy around their children that is not going to end with the purchase of photographs. It's going to end in a Diana style tragedy if they are not careful.

    I, for one, think it is a class act. Also, why show the infant for free, take it out of the public eye, and then around the 90 day mark when they're cute, THEN sell the photos. I hate Tomkat, but they did it right!

  84. cc says – reply to this


    Celebs such as Brangelina who give their children's pictures for $$$ are disgusting they say it's because paparazzis will get the pics anyway but it's not true we didn't really see Shiloh's pictures when she was a baby because her parents hided her we saw the pics they sold.
    I think Angelina is a psycho she craves the attention because she had daddy's issues Brad is just dumb.They use their children to become more famous and appreciated.You know the cute factor..
    I say good for Nicole and Keith.They don't see their child as a cash/fame cow.
    They are both private people who don't alert the press each time they give 1$.

  85. L says – reply to this


    I don't know how I feel about this one. On the one hand, it's good that they want to FREELY share their joy with the world…BUT they could be helping the less fortunate with the $ that the corporate world would NOT otherwise share so FREELY.
    I personally would donate…

  86. stefi says – reply to this


    Perez, you need to look up rude in your dictionary. You obviously don't know the meaning. I think in fact they are behaving in a dignified manner as to not make their baby a part of media circus that those transparent media whores Pitt and Jolie have done. I understand that money can be given to charity with pictures, but charitable acts should be done discreetly so as to not take away the dignity of those who are receiving. Pitt-Jolie let the world know that they are helping those less fortunate all the time. It clearly shows how self serving they are and what their true motives are. Bravo Nicole and Keith!

  87. cc says – reply to this


    Celebs such as Brangelina who give their children's pictures for $$$ are disgusting they say it's because paparazzis will get the pics anyway but it's not true we didn't really see Shiloh's pictures when she was a baby because her parents hided her we saw the pics they sold.
    I think Angelina is a psycho she craves the attention because she has daddy's issues Brad is just dumb.They use their children to become more famous and appreciated.You know the cute factor..
    I say good for Nicole and Keith.They don't see their child as a cash/fame cow.
    They are both private people who don't alert the press each time they give 1$.

  88. g says – reply to this


    Re: Laura

    I think it's YSL.Yeah nice dress but she looks fake.

  89. Kiss says – reply to this


    She should take the gortex implant out of her upper lip already. Duckie.

  90. scar2 says – reply to this


    I heard different. It's been reported that she'll release a photo & she wants the media who use it donate the fee to a hospital for sick children she's been supporting for years.

  91. Heath says – reply to this


    Kudos to them. It's refreshing that they don't want to sell out their baby. I'm so tired of hearing about Angelina and Brad - it's time to move on. The media keeps this couple's fuel burning-no one else seems to care.

  92. lil says – reply to this


    I hope you're being sarcastic or you're just kidding or something. I think it's wonderful that she doesn't want to pimp out her baby. I also think it's wonderful that Angelina wants to give all of the money to charity. I think selling baby pics is tacky if you're keeping the money for yourself. But as many people on this thread have pointed out, how they choose to introduce their little girl to the world is her business and no one else's.

    And for the record, yes, their baby pics would be worth millions.


  93. Carol says – reply to this


    Kudos!!! They haven't invented a cure for aids. They are people like every single one of us!

  94. Robin says – reply to this


    How is privacy and respecting the dignity of your child rude? You're a MORON

  95. CULTU says – reply to this


    Re: Spell
    You're the DUMB SHIT… England, Australia, and other countries spell words that end with "ZE" like REALIZE with an "SE"…

  96. WTF says – reply to this


    They won't release the pictures because the baby is ugly and they don't want people to make fun of her

  97. auds says – reply to this


    how is it rude??? it's her own fucking kid perez!! come on, get real, she doesn't have to release pictures to anyone, much less be giving money away to charity. get over yourself!!

  98. 198

    And herein, on the simple subject of infants and photographs, lies the difference between a classy lady and an emotionally unstable/unpredictable multi-tattooed adulterous mediawhore and $kank.

  99. linda says – reply to this


    Good for Nicole! It is NOT NORMAL to pimp out your newborn! Pitt & Holie disgust me the way they sell out their kids & then make it look like they're doing a great thing. They are so rich that they could donate the money without selling newborn pictures. Good for Nicole.

  100. Em says – reply to this




More comments: « 1 [2] 3 »