Home Videos Photos

Not Pimping Out Her Baby

| Filed under: Baby BlabberMedia MinuteNicole KidmanKeith Urban

kidman.jpg

Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban have reportedly turned down multi-million dollar offers for the first pics of their little lady, Sunday Rose Roast.

The Australian media claims they are undecided whether to release a photograph of the newborn, but if they do, it will be for free!

Baby pictures for free????

That's unheard of in Hollywoodland!

Who do they think they are?

A source says, "They don't think it's appropriate to make deals. They are still deciding how they feel about (it) - if and when they will release a photo at all. But they realise there is enormous interest from the public and they are grateful and appreciative of that."

How rude!

Nicole just deprived a 'charity' of millions of dollars.

Is her baby photo even worth millions???

[Image via Getty Images.]

Email this  »
The BEST Witches In Movies And Television!
35 Stars Who Got Pregnant Before Marriage!
Celeb Siblings! The Lesser-Known Brothers And Sisters Of Our Fave Celebs!
Thinking About Getting Botox? These Celeb Quotes May Help You With Your Decision!
Happy Birthday Gwen Stefani! She Sure Doesn't Age -- Just Like These OTHER Celebs!
Celebrities Taking The Ice Bucket Challenge!

294 comments to “Not Pimping Out Her Baby”

More comments: « 1 2 [3]

  1. ! says – reply to this


    201

    All the people who say she doesn't have to give to charity, it's her choice. But if she's in the position to be able to, she should. It's like you guys are saying kudos to…say…a boy who has the IQ of Einstein but it's his prerogative to sit at home and play video games all day, not contributing to the world.
    This celeb culture has twisted your thinking. She'd be WHORING OUT her baby if she decides to keep the profits. To just be the middle man in directing that money where it should go is NOT WHORING OUT a baby.

  2. Path says – reply to this


    202

    It's a very narrow-minded thing to pawn out your kid for charity… Nic has morals and respect for her child's innocence. Angelina is grossly immature and under the delusion that she is 'holier than thou'.

  3. audre says – reply to this


    203

    are you seriously calling them rude for opting not to pimp their children? wow perez…wow. what a selfish thing to say.

  4. China says – reply to this


    204

    Angelina is the Michael Jackson of the future. She will fuck her kids up big time.

  5. Annie says – reply to this


    205

    GOOD! They are a shining example that so many in the joke that is Hollywood should follow. Those two and I believe it was Usher and his wife who also did theirs for free, refusing to sell out their own child.

    And I don't give a rats ass if some do claim to give it to charity…if those homewrecking harlots care so much, they would have sent a few mil of their own cash instead of flipping it around on some overpriced French chateau and auctioning off a good deed to the highest media bidder

  6. lynn says – reply to this


    206

    i agree with flo, she was never pregnant, she hired someone, she couldnt admit she could not have a baby after tom did. she married tom for the fame, she is not a victim, she used him for the exposure, and she is such a class act that is why she is abandoning her two adopted kids, when does she spend time with them? she already proved what kind of mother she is. i feel sorry for keith, he is awesome. angelina is a great mom, hands on mom and she is always with all of her kids , she is not a homewrecker, jennifer was a selfish bitch and blew it with brad, brad is happier than ever, jennifer has no one to blame but herself, she wanted to be big movie star, now she will be alone, give angelina a break, she is always photographed being a mom, or helping others, jennifer is photographed laying out. nicole, we don't buy it your not selling the pics , cuz the baby does not look like you, class act far from it. she is so phony. keith is genuine too good for her.

  7. Secre says – reply to this


    207

    Good for her not selling her baby out! And what about them fucken Brangelinas?! Are they even giving it to a charity that will help kids in our country???!!!

  8. keigh says – reply to this


    208

    Her baby is propbably as deformed looking as she is and no one has offered them a dime. I'd rather see brad and angies kids. At least Angie was proud to be pregnant and put on a few pounds. Nicole should have thought of the health of baby and not her bony ass! How could she give birth to a healthy baby when it looks like she gorged herself on a burrito with that "bump"

  9. skept says – reply to this


    209

    And that way she won't have to give out any pesky details like how the baby was delivered, the hospital, etc.  Nicole has more to lose because there is genuine skepticism that she actually carried her baby.  And psst, Nicole, if you want people to believe that you actually had a baby you may want to avoid going out to lunch four days after giving birth it will make it more believable. 



  10. 210

    If she whored her kid out you'd moan about her just as much as if she didn't. You don't like her so she wouldn't do right or wrong by you at anyway. dickhead. really starting to despise your double standards these days……

  11. sher says – reply to this


    211

    Good for them. Pimping out your child's pics for "charity" is not a good thing IMO. Pimping is still pimping - no matter how you try to color it.



  12. 212

    By the way, I think I'd much rather see her baby pix than brangelinas: this baby has been desperately wanted by her for years (not some spunkbubble to go with the rest of the pikey brood)….

  13. littl says – reply to this


    213

    you can kind of see Nicole's point - people have children every day and arnt getting paid millions for baby photos, its a bit unreasonable to put a worth on a child! Also you have to consider that by selling a baby photo or 2 she's falling into the fame trap. what better way to say "i'm normal" then to not sell your baby photos for obscene amounts of cash, yes she could give the money to charity but thats ussually so publically done, and why should she be given access to a way to donate that none of us can use? she can still give money away - it will probably just hurt the pocket that little bit more, and lets hope she gives it away quietly

  14. jones says – reply to this


    214

    It's not "rude", you numskull. It's decent and classy. You're such tabloid trash sometimes.

  15. Ugh says – reply to this


    215

    Have we gone through the looking glass here? Let me explain this. Women have babies every single day. Every time I see a damn celebrity cover with the freshly pushed out spooger (they all look the same right after they are born) I marvel, "Isn't it so wonderful that celebrities have babies? It's like they are gods!" Just because St Slut Angelina of the sisterhood of Opiates pimps out her kids for charity doesn't mean everyone else has to. Some people can keep their lives private. It really is a good thing to try to maintain some damn privacy.

  16. allyw says – reply to this


    216

    Good for them for not whoring out their baby…those of you thinking she faked her pregnancy need to get a life. Were all the people at the hospital in on it? The reporter she let touch her stomach? The paps who snapped her with her shirt up while working out?

  17. Misso says – reply to this


    217

    Love that. Suck on that Brangelina.

  18. Pimpi says – reply to this


    218

    Re: Annie – Amen! A while back, before this last litter of kids, Angelina was emaciated. Everyone was so worried she was anorexic. Her brother explained that she feels guilty eating because she sees so many starving kids. Not exactly healthy but reasonable.
    A few weeks later, there she is with Zahara in a magazine or two. They had matching designer purses that were over $1000 a piece. Perhaps if Angie ate, then donated the difference to charity she would be walking the talk a little more.

  19. auggi says – reply to this


    219

    Make up your mind perez. If they accept money they are whoring out their kids. If they don't they are selfish.

  20. charm says – reply to this


    220

    I hate you PEREZ! MEAN, EVIL, IDIOTIC ASSHOLE! Stop calling the poor baby "Sunday Roast."
    You know what's your problem Perez? You have an undeniably LOW SELF-ESTEEM! And it sorts of pleases you to make fun of others coz it makes you feel good. You don't even spare an innocent baby.
    The world will be a better place without ppl like you PEREZ!

  21. ColeM says – reply to this


    221

    Re: Daryl

    God Bless You. Excellent Post. =D

  22. Quinn says – reply to this


    222

    WOW! You mean they aren't whoring their kid right out of the gate, and all in the name of "charity" as opposed to the true ulterior motive of gaining media attention which is really why celebrities do anything and everything? Kudos to these two.

  23. faker says – reply to this


    223

    That's because she faked her pregnancy. She didn't want to give up Botox and anorexia. Her career is dead so she might as well pimp it out.

  24. greed says – reply to this


    224

    She's probably just saying that so she'll get more money.

  25. boo says – reply to this


    225

    The baby she bought doesn't resemble her as much as she would have liked it to.

  26. Salty says – reply to this


    226

    Of course she doesnt care about giving this money to help a charity…she does not even care about her adopted children. When do you ever see her with them.
    Who cares anyway about seeing her baby, I know I dont.

  27. Mia says – reply to this


    227

    Ok this just goes to show that Perez you hate Nicole Kidman & you want to slap her down every chance you get.
    If she did sell her baby pictures you'd say she was "whoring her child out" but she has decided not to and give media outlets a piocture for free, but that's not good enough for you is it?….you still want to bag her out. She's dammed if she does and she's dammed if she dosen't.
    If Angelina gave away a pic for free you'd be praising her till you were blue in the face.
    It's disgusting the way you make such horrible and untrue comments I used to enjoy your site now its nothing more than a hateful load of garbage. Do something good with your life.

  28. asi says – reply to this


    228

    I WATCHED THE MISS UNIVERSE PAGAENT LAST NIGHT AND WHEN THE AMERICAN ENTRANT CAME OUT HER TITS WERE LIKE 2 HARD ROCKS ON HER CHEST. ALL THE OTHER ENTRANTS' TITS WERE BOUNCING NICELY IN THEIR BIKINIS AND THEN MISS AMERICA WALKED ON STAGE. LMFAO. FOOLISH VICTIM OF HER SOCIETY - SHE HAD NO HOPE.

  29. ella says – reply to this


    229

    personally i think that there is nothing wrong with selling yur babies pictures..especially if its for a good cause, for example angelina jolie and brad pitt and donating the money to charity..

  30. madge says – reply to this


    230

    Perez ….:Sunday Roast ne Rose"…..typical gay self hatred. Stop your self hatred and be happy for the couple and thir child. Stop being so hatefull and bitter. It is obvious to the point of sadness. I think you are good inside…….."make it work!!!! Don't bore Nina!"

  31. whore says – reply to this


    231

    its NOT RUDE…ITS REFRESHING!

  32. kit says – reply to this


    232

    Their decision shows integrity. I'm sure they donate to charity Perez so relax.

  33. chann says – reply to this


    233

    RUDE? NOT WHORING YOUR BABY IS NOW RUDE? Perez you live in the land of whores and pimps. If Brad and Angelina wanted to give to charity, they should give from their own money, not from exposing their own small children. And yu don't know if they really give the whole money to charity.- So please expe

  34. mari says – reply to this


    234

    if she choose to take the money
    if she choose not to take it it's wrong
    :S

  35. gosh says – reply to this


    235

    ONLY A RETARDED AMERICAN WUD SAY IT IS BAD NOT TO WHORE OUT A BABY TO MAGAZINES



  36. 236

    No, she didn't "deprive a charity" of millions. She chose not to whore her baby out. Which is pretty a fucking thumbs up move to me.

  37. Miche says – reply to this


    237

    Perez is seriously fucked in the head. Your way of thinking makes no sense whatsoever. Except for your precious Angelina who treats kids like collectibles and lets the paps know where she will be so we can see her drag her kids to a different place every other week, most other celebs are damned if they do or damned if they don't. I think perez needs a 5150 hold.

  38. kate says – reply to this


    238

    You are such an ass Perez… how dare you call her baby Sunday Roast??? Have some respect!!! It's just a lil baby and Nicole is a respected Hollywood girl who is making things right! Why you are not makin fun of Angelina's babies names??? That stupid homewrecker gave them horrible names and I don't see you commentin on that or makin fun of them and of how they are pimpin out their kids… so unfair… Nicole is way better and talented than that stupid Angelina.



  39. 239

    I really hope that you're beng sarcastic, but I'm afraid you're not. I'm pretty impressed that they aren't selling the pictures, it shows that they have some class! Unlke others who are negotiating multi-mllion dollar deals before the babies are even out of the womb. It's HER baby, she has absolutely NO obligation to sell the pictures to the highest bidder just because she's a celebrity.
    I won't buy a magazine featuring celeb babies. First of all, they jack the price up so that it isn't the magazine itself paying for the pics, it's the people who buy the magazines. Secondly, how do we know how much, if any, of this money really does go to charity? Not a whole lot would be my guess.
    Good for you, Nicole, enjoy motherhood and concentrate on what's really important, your baby. You have waited long enough for a baby of your very own, congratulations!



  40. 240

    It's not rude! Selling baby pictures no matter what reason is still pimping. They give money to charity anyway.

  41. Presh says – reply to this


    241

    Does anyone even believe that "celebs" give the money to charity?

  42. Russ says – reply to this


    242

    Pierce Cruise presents Reality Bedroom.

  43. true- says – reply to this


    243

    Good on you Nicole and Keith shows that you both have true class.

  44. Douch says – reply to this


    244

    It's realize, not realise!



  45. 245

    Hey everybody it's me! I'm just cruisin in my "Porn display on wheels", my good ol '89 lincoln full of nasty shit! It has everything a sexual deviant could ever ask for - porn dvds & mags, the naked barbie, explicit music, dildos and what not! I'm hungry - let's see whats on the menu - Oh, it's "Panties on a platter"! Yumm… I'm also wearin lip gloss. Oh, also, i will soon set off my "Porn Mobile Tour 2008 - Porn on wheels" - coming to a city near you, bitches ! To the porn mobile!!!!

  46. wtf p says – reply to this


    246

    perey stop being haters

    it's her baby, she has right to do it

    and her baby worth more than millions

    if you have baby, do you think ppl will pay 100 $ to see him/her



  47. 247

    oh shut up perez, just cos she doesnt want 2 exploit her fuckin child….she cn donate money if she wants to without having to sell fotos of her fuckin kid.

  48. STAR- says – reply to this


    248

    i dun think is rude AT ALL. =.=

  49. Tulip says – reply to this


    249

    Finally, a star with class. These singers and actresses should take lessons.

  50. Marky says – reply to this


    250

    So now you've gone as low as to pick on new born babies? You're a disgrace Mario.

  51. Europ says – reply to this


    251

    You only say it's rude because your head is so far up Brangelinas ass. Nicole has class.

  52. nell says – reply to this


    252

    Why, why, why not leave the babies (roast?) alone? That's decent.

  53. sizzi says – reply to this


    253

    Re: lynn – DUMB and STUPID is your last name right?

  54. sizzi says – reply to this


    254

    Nicole and Keith=Class
    Brangelina=NOT

    For all those saying Brangelina is wonderfull donating all that cash:
    1. Many, many other celebrities donate more cash than Brangelina ever would, theyre just more respectfull about it.
    2. All that cash is going to their Jolie-Pitt foundation, and only small amounts comes OUT.

  55. sizzi says – reply to this


    255

    Nicole=class
    Brangelina=NOT

  56. dsf says – reply to this


    256

    oh shut up u disgusting telly tubby. when did someon have to sell their soul, or their baby's privacy so that a money hungry charity can get money. wat a stupid thing to say u idiot

  57. maria says – reply to this


    257

    "Nicole just deprived a 'charity' of millions of dollars."

    You're a FUCKING MORON Perez.

    It's her baby. She's not obligated to anyone except her baby. I'm sure she's given a lot of her own money to charity.

    SO fucking what now. If you're a celebrity you're suppose to do what other celebrities do if not you're a fucking bad person. That's what bad about this whole baby picture selling shit. YOU (who are no one) have to put pressure for someone to do something with their baby.

    When they decided to make a baby and birth the baby…pictures don't come with that.

    YOU'RE a complete ASS!!!

  58. tashi says – reply to this


    258

    It pisses me off that you would change and make fun of the baby's name. Pathetic…

  59. v says – reply to this


    259

    OMG SO WHAT IF SHE DOES NOT WANT TO GET MONEY FOR HER BABY PICS! I WOULD UNDERSTAND Y SHE WOULD NOT WANT TO I WOULD NOT SELL MY BABY PICS ITS LIKE ALMOST TAKING ADVANTAGE OF YOUR CHILD. PEREZ U CONFUSE ME 1ST YOU SAY THAT STARS ARE PIMPING OUT THEIR BABY'S BUT WHEN THEY DONT WANT TO SELL THEIR BABY PICS U CALL THEM RUDE. YOU NEED TO GET YOUR THOUGHTS TOGETHER!

  60. ME says – reply to this


    260

    Good for them! I think it's sickening how other celebs sell their baby photos to the highest bidder. I'm sure Nicole and Keith give plenty of money to charitable causes without pimping out their newborn.

  61. haha says – reply to this


    261

    haha… they both realize photos of their baby will never fetch the $$$ and public's interest that Brangelina's brats will. Nicole is probably really pissed that their kids were born the same week. So instead, they are using their sour grapes to take a swipe at Brangelina, making them appear to lack morals…transparent, but clever.

  62. erin says – reply to this


    262

    spending MILLIONS of dollars on a baby/babies pictures is absurd, especially during a recession and the hoop-lah surrounding oil- which mags use to print.
    even more importantly, THESE BABIES ARE PEOPLE WHOSE PARENTS PROFIT FROM THEM. it's crazy. it bloats their parents heads, bloats the media craze for babies, etc.
    it's a shame that people like brad and angelina feel okay doing this. it just more confirms that their quest to take over the world is continuing.
    THESE PEOPLE ARE FAKE, THEY DO NOT KNOW YOU, NEVER WILL AND WANT YOUR MONEY. WHY DO YOU THINK THEY ACT SO CRAZY AND STAGE LIKE ON CAMERA?
    good for nicole and keith, a baby is a gift to the family not a $$ maker.

  63. jan says – reply to this


    263

    Let's get something straight here, shall we? Celebs, including Brangelina, don't pimp out their babies for "charity". It's called P-U-B-L-I-C-I-T-Y. If you are really so concerned that some charity is getting shortchanged because Kidman is showing some restraint, why not encourage your readers to go a week without a tabloid and donate the money instead? It's too bad kids and babies aren't off limits to the tabloids - that would put a stop to this disgusting trend.

  64. tina says – reply to this


    264

    Re: lynn – You need help. Or at least a hobby. Good luck with that.

  65. The Z says – reply to this


    265

    COMMON SENSE 101………..Her baby is her most important asset. Why in the hell would she sell it…..They are definitely not Media Whores, like the rest…….

  66. Reshm says – reply to this


    266

    You're such a hypocrite Perez Hilton. You shit on celebrities for "Pimpin'" out their babies but you think it's rude that NK doesn't want to make a deal? What's wrong with you?

  67. John says – reply to this


    267

    Don't pick on Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban, they are both class acts. It is so refreshing to see actors keep their private lives for themselves, rather than doing whatever it takes for a paycheck. They deserve praise.



  68. 268

    It's prob Fugly and deformed!

  69. rober says – reply to this


    269

    Nicole Kidman had her baby, here in the USA and refuse to sell her pictures. Angelina and Brad refuse to have american babies, but act like greaty capitalists selling their babies pictures.

    My respect to Nicole, once again she is showing class and moderation, while Angelina keep being the whore that she always was.-

  70. erin says – reply to this


    270

    i'd like to see brad and angelina adopt from one of the inner cities in america. ha, it will NEVER happen.

  71. Erin says – reply to this


    271

    Good for them. I don't think that the other 'celebs' should be selling the photos at all. Sure it's nice to give the money to charity, but why don't they give their OWN money to charity???

  72. Make says – reply to this


    272

    Make up your mind Perez! If a star sells pics they are whoring their kids and if they don't they aren't worth it?!

    Nic knows she could get top dollar for the pic but by actually having morals she is being slammed? Charity my ass! Do Angelina n Brad actually give all the money to charity? Have you looked at their finances? I doubt it and also doubt all that $15 million is going to 100% to a charity. Now that's where the bullshit is! Go chase that and leave people that are being real alone!

  73. mizzm says – reply to this


    273

    oh geez perez u dumbass no dat's not being rude!
    IF u ever have children u'll understand why she has to thnk about thngs like dat. Maybe it's to protect her child. who knows?

  74. micha says – reply to this


    274
  75. micha says – reply to this


    275

    Re: pleas

    why are you having two kids if youre broke and starving? now youre gonna be on welfare ruining my paycheck too. thanks for nothing

  76. ANNA says – reply to this


    276

    Perez once again that's bullshit.like the money from the photos of Jolie-Pitt's NEW bastards will all go to charities.are u just so naive or an asshole to believe crap like that?the Jolie -Pit are the worst PIMPS of the world.

  77. BABAB says – reply to this


    277

    GOOD FOR HER….

    I highly doubt Angelina Whorelie gave the money to charity…she is to self centered for that…..



  78. 278

    you should donate all the fat you lost! im sure its worth 20 dollars!

  79. Jos says – reply to this


    279

    PEREZ, Get a clue!

    IF JOLIE-PITT REALLY CARED, THEY WOULD NEVER EVEN ACCEPT THE MONEY IN THEIR HANDS. THEY WOULD TELL THE COMPANY TO DONATE THE PROCEEDES IN THEIR NAME!

    KUDOS TO KIDMAN. JOLIE SHOULD TAKE SOME CLASS LESSONS FROM HER.

  80. onthe says – reply to this


    280

    Not that I really care but I think the REAL $$$ shot here is not a photo of the baby ~ the real $$$ shot is a photo of Nicole Kidman where she actually looks PREGNANT! How sad that she will now have to maintain her charade indefinitely.

  81. diane says – reply to this


    281

    Did anyone think maqybe there is something wrong with it or that is funny looking

  82. paige says – reply to this


    282

    You're so blinded by your bizarre obsession with Brangelina that you've obviously lost any ability for independent thought. It is SICK for these Hollywood stars to sell baby pictures, regardless of where the money ultimately goes. Babies are not capable of refusing or consenting. What happens when they grow up and don't want everybody in the world to be able to look at their baby pics? And there's no doubt that selling these pictures invites the media and papparazzi to continue photographing the child; they are now in some sense "public property" like they're celebrity parents. The difference is they had no choice in their status as a "famous celebrity".

  83. HMWSa says – reply to this


    283

    If you're in a position where you're being offered millions for your child's first photos and you don't take that money and donate it to charity - then you're far worse than those who do take the dough. Face it, you're famous and whether they should or shouldn't - people obviously want to see the pics or the mags wouldn't offer the money in the first place. It just seems very ungrateful to me. If you don't like fame and what comes with it, get out of the biz. Besides - what's the last sucessful movie that Nicole has even been in? Take the damn money, donate it and stop trying to be so sanctimonious about it. There are a lot of people who could be helped with that photo money. Austrailian ingrates!

  84. Proph says – reply to this


    284

    Good for them. Children aren´t a piece of merchandise.

  85. HmwSa says – reply to this


    285

    Re: BABAB – Whatever. Angelina and Brad (they are still two different people!) have donated MILLIONS of dollars out of their own pockets to multiple charities over the last few years. If someone is willing to pay them millions for the photos there is no reason not to take the money and donate it. Plus, contracting with a magazine for the photos helps cut down on the paparazzi madness that could ensue if they HADN't sold the photos to one magazine. Can you imagine what a coup it would be for the photo agency/magazine that snapped the first candid pics? Selling the photos helps protect the safety of the entire family in the long run.

  86. Celeb says – reply to this


    286

    There is no baby!

    The reasons that there are no bids for Nichole's baby pics is because "she" didn't "have" the baby. She adopted one. Want proof! First, in December of 2007 she denied being 3 months pregnent, then anounced her pregnancy in the beginging of January. The ONLY pregnent looking picture is the ONE that is from the CMA's in May 2008 where she claims she's 7 months. You do the math? Then if you go back in time to when her and Tom Cruise where together, she had a very hard time keeping the pregnancy. (one miss carriage before their divorce, and an ectopic pregnancy in 1990) She had a 15% chance of being able to carry a baby to full term! This baby, while a wonderful gift for the both of them, was either born from a surrogate mother or she adopted again! She was just spotted out having lunch 4 days after giving birth……..yeah right! Where's the newborn? Shouldn't she be home bonding and breast feeding? SHE did not have the baby!

    tell me what you think?

  87. oi_au says – reply to this


    287

    Re: Celeb – Lol - are you for real? I suppose you have the legal documents to back this up? Like birth certificates of the baby in its so called 'biological' mother's name and the adoption papers for the baby that you state Nicole Kidman did not biologically have? Well that must be worth million's for you to sell to the tabloids. Nicole Kidman was pregnant, did give birth and now has her first biological child with Keith Urban. Maybe that is a fact that for whatever reason you find hard to accept, but it happened. As Nicole Kidman has adopted in the past, she would have no qualms about doing it again or if she had of hired a surrogate that would also have been released it to the public. If Nicole Kidman had of 'faked' her pregnancy like you are trying to say, why would she be in the USA of all places? The reporters would have 'exposed' it straight away. Nicole would have 'slipped' off to a overseas country to maintain her so called illusion of pregnancy. Some people should think carefully about their comments before they open up their mouths, showing the rest of us the lack of intelligence and insight they have. DUH!!!!

  88. Celeb says – reply to this


    288

    yEAH, YOU CAN LOL ALL YOU WANT. LEGAL DOCUMENTS? IM SORRY ARE YOU THE DOCTOR THAT DELIVERED THE CHILD OR JUST A GOSSIP SWALLOWER? UNLIKE MR. SMARTY PANTS HERE THINKS, IN THE USA IT IS VERY EASY TO HIDE FROM THE RATZI'S AND CONSEAL ANY LEGAL DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO ADOPTION AND SURROGACY ITS CALLED CONFIDENTIALITY(THERE ARE LOTS OF CELEBS THAT AVOID TABLIODS). fyi I AM A PARALEGAL. ANYWAY YOU HAD NO EVIDENCE TO BACK YOUR STATEMENT UNLIKE ALL THE EXAMPLES I GAVE IN MY COMMENT. SO WHY DONT YOU KEEP YOUR STUPIDITY TO YOURSELF!

  89. c says – reply to this


    289

    The dates do match up. her publicist denied her being pregnant in December because she didn't know. Nicole hadn't told her and her publicist admitted that. She wanted to wait til she was 3 months along which was in January when they confirmed it. Therefore in May that would make her 7 months and in July that would make her full term. As far as size some people just carry small. As so THERE WAS A PREGNANCY.
    By the way kudos to them for not pimping out their child!

  90. Celeb says – reply to this


    290

    hhmmm math, 3+5=7 ?

    anyway - we are all waiting for the "new born" pics.

  91. madje says – reply to this


    291

    I don't believe she was even pregnant ! She neevr showed at all & suddenly had a VERY phony looking bump!!! She's such a FFFRRREEEAAAKKKK!!

  92. nancy says – reply to this


    292

    To nancy and Nancy…stop using my name.

  93. Nancy says – reply to this


    293

    Re: nancy – YA! stop using my name too!

  94. WELL says – reply to this


    294

    Re: lynn – WELL SAID!

More comments: « 1 2 [3]