Welcome to PerezHilton.com
Welcome to PerezHilton.com - Hollywood's Most-Hated Web Site!
Celebrity Scoop Goes Here
E-mail Perez@PerezHilton.com

Report technical problems.
Perez Posse signup FAQ

Contact us to advertise on PerezHilton.com



Wear it, share it, give it, get it! Represent!

Jump to your favorite celebrity

Articles by date

Ain't Nothing Wrong With A Little Titty

Filed under: Justin Timberlake > Janet Jackson > Legal Matters > Media Minute

mizjackson__opt1.jpg

Yay for freedom of speech and expression!

A federal appeals court has thrown out a $550,000 fine against CBS for the 2004 Super Bowl halftime show that ended with Janet Jackson's "wardrobe malfunction."

On Monday, a three-judge panel in Philadelphia ruled that the Federal Communications Commission "acted arbitrarily and capriciously" in issuing the fine for the fleeting image of nudity.

We think all the puritans freaked out for nothing.

Her nip was covered with a tassel!

We've seen "worse" on TV.

[Image via WENN.]



120 comments to “Ain't Nothing Wrong With A Little Titty”

More comments: [1] 2 »

  1. Presh says – reply to this
    1

    Yes, that was an unfortunate "Accident".

  2. 2

    1st

  3. jul says – reply to this
    3

    whatever

  4. carri says – reply to this
    4

    first

  5. jemms says – reply to this
    5

    a dating show about Jo and Slade??? R u kidding me??? whats next? apparently anyone can get a reality show…

  6. jemms says – reply to this
    6

    a dating show about Jo and Slade??? R u kidding me??? whats next? apparently anyone can get a reality show…

  7. 7

    I can't believe this thing is still going on. I'm sure there was no-one more embarrassed than her, if she did or did not mean to do tit….. I mean it lol, It's just a boob at the end of the day

  8. iamfa says – reply to this
    8

    I didn't even see it, but covered with a tassel?? That's nothing compared to French films.

  9. Yanke says – reply to this
    9

    WORD!

  10. stefa says – reply to this
    10

    freedon of speach fucking rules!!! GO PEREZ!!!

  11. alexa says – reply to this
    11

    first!

  12. stefa says – reply to this
    12

    freedom of speach fucking rules!!! GO PEREZ!!!

  13. far l says – reply to this
    13

    Awesome Mario, a little freedom of speech and expression and we will be able to witness gay guys giving blow jobs on street corners.

  14. missk says – reply to this
    14

    Well Well Well! Four years later and those self righteous bastards at the FCC finally get put in there place at least temporarily. WTF? Why didn't this come sooner? Fucking retardos all those self righteous pricks who think they are holier than thou they are the main ones doing some bogus ass ans sick shit. We all watch to catch a predator on Dateline!

  15. silli says – reply to this
    15

    I missed the halftime show, so I missed it live. Reshow it on national tv without the blur. While she's at it, take off her wig to reveal that she's been Michael Jackson all along.

  16. tasse says – reply to this
    16

    I dunno about the tassell? Where did that come from? I saw the whole thing on live TV and it looked like a bona-fide tassel-free nip to me……..that being said, it was just a nip. Inappropriate? Yes, but this is a member of the Wackson family we're talking about, so no surprises there. Basically what I'm saying, is nobody really cares any more but at least get the story straight……

  17. J says – reply to this
    17

    come one perez- you should have at least looked at the pics- she was NOT wearing a tassle. she did have some serious nipple jewelery on though =D

  18. 18

    WHO CARES. THIS HAPPENED IN 2004.

  19. Cayce says – reply to this
    19

    IT WAS NOT COVERED WITH A TASSEL!!!
    You could clearly see her nipple through a some ring.
    GOOGLE IT!!!!!

  20. b says – reply to this
    20

    it wasn't a tassle…. It was a piercing! A bar through her nipple that held a sun around it. The sun flames covered her areola, her exposed nipple was in the center.

  21. 16 says – reply to this
    21

    #16, it was a sunburst covering her nipple. ;)

  22. 22

    Re: tasse

    Sounds like you need to go to your opthalmologist. Cuz you can't see shit.

  23. Lala says – reply to this
    23

    BIG MISTAKE. Now opens door to more Porno!!!

  24. KIM says – reply to this
    24

    Not an accident-totally planned and they should Both pay! Lost all My respect!!

  25. 25

    Omg that was 2004 get over it.

  26. Conce says – reply to this
    26

    WTF. fuckin four years later and we are still hearing about this. It's over It was over the next day. Get over it fuckin FCC. This shit is just ridicilous.

  27. Jo says – reply to this
    27

    Could have been worse- Michael's chest! lol

  28. Stell says – reply to this
    28

    What's freedom of speech about showing off boobage?

    Seriously, how retarded. Go look at your first amendment again, mmkay?

  29. JC says – reply to this
    29

    Thank GOD! The way people freaked out over that whole incident was totally ridiculous. There is so much allowable violence on TV which religious right wing conservatives never protest. The continuing war in Iraq and all of that violence and death and destruction is consistently supported by those same moralilts. But we see a supersonic flash of a part of a boob, and a big deal was made over that!? Please people, get a life.

  30. leebe says – reply to this
    30

    actually, what she was wearing is called a "nipple shield"

  31. hipo says – reply to this
    31

    Of course the same people never complained about Prince or the Artist Formally Known As and his big ol' faliac symbol of a guitar the following year…….

  32. CHANN says – reply to this
    32

    Perez, even movies are rated. A football game is something kids and adults can watch together. The problem is Janet Jackson wanted puiblicity at any cost. Another self absorved celebrity that only think about themself and not about their audience.

  33. PoeEd says – reply to this
    33

    Re: Cayce
    Omigod, a nipple. Run for your lives … obviously, the world didn't stop turning on its axis, or anything.
    Now, can we please get on with much more important issues? No wonder America is currently broken-down. Once again, our priorities are soooo out of order!

  34. Dawo says – reply to this
    34

    thanks God:) stupit America

  35. PoeEd says – reply to this
    35

    4 and 1/2 years to decide what to do about a micro-second flash of a partial-breast?
    Unbelievable. No wonder we are in so much trouble as a nation .. we waste time, money and effort on trivial issues.
    Shouldn't our focus be economical improvement, male/female pay equity, gun violence & continuing school shootings, our dependence on foreign oil, the war in Iraq, the scary on-going developments in Iran, etc. etc. etc.
    Instead, we focus on Janet Jackson's boob-glimpse - - over 4 years ago. God help us all!

  36. Yak says – reply to this
    36

    It's about time somebody came to their senses. Can you imagine what was going through the moron's heads at the FCC when they decided that half a million dollars was an appropriate fine for showing a partially covered breast/nipple on TV for about 1 second?
    Good god. Nobody ever died or has been psychologically damaged from seeing a naked boob.
    Those idiots at the FCC should be forced to pay all of CBS's legal costs now. That'll make them think twice before laying down their ridiculous fines in the future.
    Funny that it's all right to show people getting beaten up, shot and worse on TV but you can't see a boob for 1 second. Get your fucking priorities straight you fuck-twits.

  37. 37

    Nice wig. She looks very Farrah Fawcett!

  38. Blkca says – reply to this
    38

    THANK GOD! NOW HOPEFULLY ALL THE UPTIGHT SHIT MUNCHERS WILL FINALLY GET OVER THIS. FUCK OFF CHANN & LALA

  39. hmm says – reply to this
    39

    she looks like a black version of paula abdul. but paula is still relevant, janet is not. janet Has to take her shirt off to get attention..

  40. Brian says – reply to this
    40

    Why is Janet Jackson the bad guy in this situation?? Just because of an accidental slip, she's considered a slut. Wasn't Justin Timberlake the one who caused the malfunction. Just sayin'.

  41. WTF says – reply to this
    41

    JANET DIDN'T MEAN FOR YALL TO SEE HER TIT….IT WAS AN ACCIDENT, JUSTIN DIDN'T MEAN TO DO THAT…I HAVE SEEN WAY MORE FUCKED UP SHIT THAN THAT ON TV……GIVE MS JACKSON A BREAK…SHE'S NOT A PORN STAR!

  42. dsumm says – reply to this
    42

    I can't believe people still wasting energy is such of thing. We got bigger problems to resolve than that !

  43. geez says – reply to this
    43

    tassle? I thought she was was wearing a sun burst earring…anyway it doesn't really matter. Didn't this happen several YEARS ago? All this drama over a nipple… and a semi covered one at that! :(

  44. 44

    She should be fined for such a pathetic grasp for attention. Lord knows her "talent" can't do it.

  45. LOL says – reply to this
    45

    She is a skank. Who the fuck cares about this wench!!!!!

  46. LOL says – reply to this
    46

    WHORE!!!! FAT COW!!!!

  47. Messy says – reply to this
    47

    The media made it a big deal by playing it over-and-over for weeks. I guess they needed a distraction to let their buddy follow through with his invasion of Iraq. The corporate media is destroying our country!

  48. Sophi says – reply to this
    48

    Sadly, the judges didn't actually side with CBS on anything important — all they said was that the FCC hadn't given enough warning on a new policy change (i.e. that a nip flash is too much). But if the FCC makes the rule and publishes it, the courts will let them censor whatever they want, especially as Our Dear Can't-Depart-Fast-Enough President keeps packing the federal courts with puritanical neo-cons who will be sitting there for years to come.

  49. Nancy says – reply to this
    49

    Re: Sophi – Well said! I don't think the average voter really knows what's at stake in November.

  50. FRACK says – reply to this
    50

    ?????>>>>>LOOKS LIKE JERAMINE IN DRAG!

  51. TM says – reply to this
    51

    That was nothing. David Caruso's butt has left me scarred…

  52. Blunt says – reply to this
    52

    If it had been a beautiful, natural breast like one of Halle Berry's that would have been one thing. Instead, we saw Janet Jackson's ugly, square, deformed implant. I think the fuss should be over the fact that implants like hers are ugly not that we saw a woman's breast on national television in prime time.

  53. nosho says – reply to this
    53

    This was no wardrobe malfunction, she obviously did it intentionally, she is a sick pervert just like all the jacksons.

  54. katie says – reply to this
    54

    It wasn't a tassel, it was a big, silver piercing.

  55. Alisa says – reply to this
    55

    Thta whole incident was such total garbage. It was *clearly* planned out ahead of time, as evinced by the fact she was even wearing a pastie under her top. Really kinda hard to pretend something's an coincidental "accident" when you're totally prepared for it.

  56. Tish says – reply to this
    56

    Quick turn on FOX News! White girl missing! LOL

  57. zeke says – reply to this
    57

    If there's nothing wrong with one why don't you ever suck on one?

  58. Gil G says – reply to this
    58

    three for three…e'tas perro pinche hilton….janet jackson..ms. jackson is fine, fine, fine…please leave your black midget and come home to a brown midget mami!!!!!chiaooooooo

  59. tiff says – reply to this
    59

    too bad she cant get her career back. showly that nip cost her her entire career.

  60. jeff says – reply to this
    60

    Freedom of speech and expression my ass! Freedom of speech with a ten second delay and the FCC fining everyone under the sun like Howard Stern for expressing themselves.There is freedom of speech alright,until one or two people get their undies in a twist over a word or a nipple.There is more freedom in alot of other countries than in the United States.

  61. Germa says – reply to this
    61

    You Americans must overcome this "nipple obsession" of yours! It s just RIDICULOUS… *g*

  62. Shuyi says – reply to this
    62

    Seriously, what the hell is up with the Janet Jackson boob thing?! It's just a friggin boob! Half the worlds got them! and the other half don't mind seeing them, or just don't care!

    The world today……D:

  63. Germa says – reply to this
    63

    Re: JC – JC says – reply to this 29Thank GOD! The way people freaked out over that whole incident was totally ridiculous. There is so much allowable violence on TV which religious right wing conservatives never protest. The continuing war in Iraq and all of that violence and death and destruction is consistently supported by those same moralilts. But we see a supersonic flash of a part of a boob, and a big deal was made over that!? Please people, get a life.
    ————

    You re right! This nipple incident was the JOKE all about Europe back then in 2004 - we, I mean our German comedians on TV, couldn t BELIEVE that such an unimportant thing as a nipple slip could lead to a state crisis in the USA!! It was THE laugh in some of Germany's largest comedy shows! Did we have a FURTHER laugh about American bigotry! :-)
    I m however please to read that your nation now has found some sort of "closure" and your papers and press can hopefully take care of mor eSERIOUS issues! *G*

  64. txgal says – reply to this
    64

    It wasn't a tassel. It was a nipple shield. She got it in Houston.

  65. SanD says – reply to this
    65

    Perez, when someone as talented at jj has to resort to showing her tits on national television, you can't help but see her as nothing more then pathetic. So many women in the world scream to be heard and respected but when that fails, they resort to the usual t and a.

    pathetic. Like her., she's done!!

  66. a says – reply to this
    66

    the problem was the she was on network tv. if it would've been on cable no one would care. she was stupid, trying to draw attention.

  67. DAVE says – reply to this
    67

    Re: zeke – PULL IT OUT BABY & I'LL CHEW IT RAW!

  68. mindf says – reply to this
    68

    omg have you guys not seen the photo thats not covered up that is a star attached to a barbell going through her nipple kinda hot if i must say soo. just do a google image search and it will show a blowing up photo of it check it out

  69. Damit says – reply to this
    69

    So does this mean Janet can FINALLY be taken off the Blacklist? I miss her!

  70. Shayn says – reply to this
    70

    Awesome! It was embarassing being an American during this whole thing. As Americans we are sooooo uptight and lame when talking about sex. Just to bad Janet got stuck in the middle of it all and it hurt her career so bad

  71. Alici says – reply to this
    71

    I love Janet!!!

  72. JESUS says – reply to this