Welcome to PerezHilton.com
Welcome to PerezHilton.com - Hollywood's Most-Hated Web Site!
Celebrity Scoop Goes Here
E-mail Perez@PerezHilton.com

Report technical problems.
Perez Posse signup FAQ

Contact us to advertise on PerezHilton.com



Wear it, share it, give it, get it! Represent!

Jump to your favorite celebrity

Articles by date

Worth It?

Filed under: Media Minute > Matthew McConaughey > Jessica Alba > Jamie Lynn Spears

jamielynnok.jpg

OK! magazine smoked its competition this year and scored three celeb baby exclusives in a row this summer.

Jamie Lynn Spears and baby Maddie graced the July 21st issue, Jessica "Don't Call Me Latina" Alba and Honor Marie were on the cover of the July 24th mag and Matthew McConaughey and babe Levi strutted their stuff on the August 4th cover.

According to the NY Post, the early estimates suggest that the issues sold well above the average, but with the exception of Jamie Lynn Spears, probably did not offset the prices paid by the magazine to snag the stars' babies.

Ha! Little Spears beat Alba!

The Jamie Lynn issue sold an estimated 750,000 copies on newsstands.

OK! was said to have paid $1 million to first break the news that she was pregnant, followed by the baby photo.

We're sure the Brangelina Wonder Twins issue will shatter all 'baby exclusive' sales records! Those pics went to a diff mag.

[Image via WENN.]



112 comments to “Worth It?”

More comments: [1] 2 »

  1. carme says – reply to this
    1

    y does she look so fucking old?

  2. finge says – reply to this
    2

    miley cyrus got fibgered by kellan from house bunny movie

  3. carme says – reply to this
    3

    FUCK YEAH I WAS FIRST

  4. hello says – reply to this
    4

    first

  5. viivi says – reply to this
    5

    wow

  6. AVA 4 says – reply to this
    6

    Hmm..

  7. alyss says – reply to this
    7

    jamie lynn's baby is SO UGLY.

  8. Bongo says – reply to this
    8

    News Flash! Nobody cares, you tubby cocksucker!

  9. 9

    boo

  10. viivi says – reply to this
    10

    babies shouldn't have babies.

  11. Beth says – reply to this
    11

    first??

  12. kayla says – reply to this
    12

    photoshop

  13. 13

    www.youheartmaggles.com

  14. peach says – reply to this
    14

    4th? or 1st?

  15. Dara says – reply to this
    15

    y does it look like they put gray highlights in to make her look old

  16. URSUL says – reply to this
    16

    She looks sooo old! The face of a 40 year old on a teen…Weird!

  17. LIZ says – reply to this
    17

    first??

    haha funny

  18. kathr says – reply to this
    18

    okay . I have a question. when jaime got pregnant alot of people wanted to stop airing her show and stuff even tho she was being responsible for her problems. Why hasnt anyone started bitching about how miley cyrus is being a nasty whore and stuff? , she is sapposed to be a roll model for little 10 year old girls. WTF!!

  19. Dawn says – reply to this
    19

    Who the fuck wants to hear about this sixteen year old CUNT???

  20. Wonde says – reply to this
    20

    Slut looks like an old lady with grey hair.

  21. Bob says – reply to this
    21

    Cute baby.

  22. 22

    This is pathetic. Praising teenage pregnancy and Ok-ing making bastard children and then putting them on government assistance for the whole working class to pay for (well ok Jamie won't do that, but most teen moms will). Keep those legs open girls your check is coming in the mail soon…..!!!!!

  23. nobod says – reply to this
    23

    Her hair tone is odd. A bit grayish? Maybe they are trying to make her look older on purpose so as to not promote underage motherhood. But gray is not a good color for a young person.

  24. lola_ says – reply to this
    24

    today is August 2nd, so how could Mateo have "struttED" his stuff on the August 4th cover? Are you 2days ahead in America?

  25. 25

    She looks happy, but honestly does a hasbeen's sister need to grace magazines?

  26. sam-n says – reply to this
    26

    a teenager with such lovely grey hair. and, only a fat old fag would care.

  27. yuck says – reply to this
    27

    my sister had the jamie-lynn article in her room when i visited, it glorified the teen mom thing, i thought it was pretty distasteful.

  28. Allie says – reply to this
    28

    It seems like Jamie Lynn got more popular when she was pregnant/had the baby!

    The babies adorible, but still…not a message to send to her fans!

  29. sick says – reply to this
    29

    Re: Martic – Yep, some bitches are proud of this shit too, I know this one pregnant tweeker/whore chick who is so happy she's getting money every month, thing is she's spending it on drugs and openly said "ride the system" sometimes I think there should be more strict laws…

  30. Nigga says – reply to this
    30

    can some black ass niggah here tell me why do these white hoes always start opening their shitass cunties at the earliest age possible and get their sorry asses pregnant? are they so anxious for dick that they afraid to lose out? for fucks sake,buy some dildos or sumptin..or better still fuck them pitbulls or shepard pets,we all kno white hoes like that shit.

  31. k says – reply to this
    31

    Who cares…all those little pinkies look the same.

  32. Jimmy says – reply to this
    32

    It's obvious that little hillbilly is a-wearin' a WIG, but why?

  33. aj says – reply to this
    33

    why buy the mag when the pics are on the cover? idk

  34. ceec says – reply to this
    34

    wonder twins? why? Was there a bright star in the sky when she gave birth? Are they walking and talking at 3 weeks? I bet alot of your posters have given birth to twins. You report that mag. sales are down, which will lead to lay offs. I understand that the mags want the big cover photo, but if they don't recup the money and then some, how is it worth it? Not to their employees, I am sure. And yes, they should have stayed far away from the spears cover.

  35. idiot says – reply to this
    35

    Re: Nigga – Like black girls and mexican girls don't get pregnant at a young age stfu

  36. presh says – reply to this
    36

    Why let this thick little tart think she's done something clever? As for the ugly bitch and pittstain, why the hell are their latest little bastards "wonder twins"? Please tell us!

  37. Jeff says – reply to this
    37

    what a fucking whore. this will get pregnant teens out there thinking that keeping their child is the best choice…morons.

  38. ash07 says – reply to this
    38

    still drives me crazy that her hair is gray in this picture.

    as for brad & angelina's babies - i just read that people will reportedly have a 30 (!!) page spread on them in the next upcoming issue, and that they paid a half a mill per page. HOWEVER…brad & angie had the money donated to charity. so that, to me, is completely worth caring about.

  39. Kate says – reply to this
    39

    Jeez, Perez, MSN.com had it listed yesterday that People paid $12mill for the Pitt-Jolie exclusives. They're releasing one picture on their site tomorrow and the mag will hit the newsstands on Monday. Old news, dude.

  40. Cesca says – reply to this
    40

    Who wants to bet Jamie Lynn will get pregnant again before the age of 19?

  41. hypoc says – reply to this
    41

    You people who buy the People mag and buy the charity crap are such idiots.

    If celebs are so upset about paparazzi hype, why auction off your kids? That just fuels public fascination.

    They should just unceremoniously release the pics for free, that would diminish tabloid frenzy.

    They should and could donate 14 mill to charity anyway and never miss a dime.

    Instead, they're hypocrites. Donating to charity only furthers their career and image and continues tabloid interest.

  42. Lula says – reply to this
    42

    This Spears' hair is sooo fair, looks like she's gone gray! Looks like EMILOU HARRIS (but less attractive).

    Please do not post pictures of her or veddetter McBoring!

  43. brian says – reply to this
    43

    she's nasty because she's too young for havin kids thats a nasty slut!

  44. yuk says – reply to this
    44

    Jamie Baby Whore

  45. katie says – reply to this
    45

    they also got the first pictures of tori spelling's little girl stella.

  46. Jen says – reply to this
    46

    Way to go OK magazine - lets promote teenage pregnancy!!

  47. b says – reply to this
    47

    I'll be checking out the brangelina twins in the supermarket line. It isn't worth paying for.

  48. yo says – reply to this
    48

    i dont think that means spears sold more mags than alba. it just means spears sold her kid for such little money, the mag made more off of her than they did off the other two who held out for more money. it's about net gains.

  49. manda says – reply to this
    49

    What 17 year old girl would say having a baby is the best feeling in the world, I had a baby at 19 and Its hard and sure its great but its not the best feeling in the world. Try enjoying your teen years that would have been a million times better than raising a child so young. I hope other young girls dont think its all glamour and fun when you have a baby. Cause its not, its late nights and poopey diapers

  50. WTF says – reply to this
    50

    More than half of Angelina's income comes from her children.
    That is disgudting.
    .
    She has enough money to give to charity from her own paycheck.

  51. true says – reply to this
    51

    the twins are gonna be on people magazine

  52. Hush says – reply to this
    52

    How much money do the Brangelina pay you to praise them for pimping their children and polluting the planet with their unstable life style.
    .
    They are two selfish hypocrites who are the biggest fame whores and ego obessed celebs.
    They are not even actors. They are one walking publicity stunt.

  53. joduc says – reply to this
    53

    She looks 45 in this picture. Yes, kids, practice safe sex or you'll end up like her. But then again she's trailer trash, so go to college, get a good job, enjoy life in your prime before you venture into the world of baby rearing. It's the rest of your life.

  54. Misse says – reply to this
    54

    holy moly.
    i just read past articles on this site about JLS.
    i swear, heres a few corey crocker wanna be's!!!
    hey perez, blog about that tool!

  55. Nica says – reply to this
    55

    Does having a baby at 17 transform you into a 45 year old soccer mom?

  56. Kelly says – reply to this
    56

    Brangelina are the worst parents in the world.
    They pimp them even more than Jennifer Garner, and make half of their income out of them.
    :
    Those kids don't have friends,
    never went to school,
    they call hoels rooms a "home" and
    have a new "sibling" every 2 month.

  57. Ghia says – reply to this
    57

    Yeah, it is always great to be 16, with a child, unmarried, and barely have an education. Let's glamorize this so that other girls, who don't have her bank account, try to follow in her footsteps. Irresponsible journalism is what this is.

  58. exBFF says – reply to this
    58

    she looks like a 50-year-old haus frau.

  59. Danny says – reply to this
    59

    Poor Jamie Lynn. Bryan and Britney got all the good looks in the family. A very odd hair color for a teenager. It might work if she was 50.

  60. PSU! says – reply to this
    60

    ..how disgusting…

    since when is it cool to be a single teenage mom?
    THE SPEARS FAMILY IS WHITE TRASH!

  61. Elisi says – reply to this
    61

    I think she sold more cause she's such a young mother, you don't see a celebrity being a mom at 17!

    Although Jamie looks older… like 30, not younger than 20…

  62. Elisa says – reply to this
    62

    and what's up with her hair? it looks grey…

    "jamie lynn's baby is SO UGLY. " i don't think she's ugly, she's just a baby…. they all look the same!

  63. 63

    So that's all you are gonna comment about your adored Angelina??? oh right you have a pending suit coming from their way because of the pics you posted of them in their backyard… the pics you stole from the paps and published in here… that's why you are mum on the whole brangelina deal… you are a sissy PErez!

  64. Nelly says – reply to this
    64

    DISGUSTING. Looks like the start of a new Hollywood Trend: teen-moms.
    .
    DISGUSTING. Looks like the start of a new Hollywood Trend: teen-moms.
    .
    DISGUSTING. Looks like the start of a new Hollywood Trend: teen-moms.
    .
    DISGUSTING. Looks like the start of a new Hollywood Trend: teen-moms.
    .
    DISGUSTING. Looks like the start of a new Hollywood Trend: teen-moms.
    .

  65. miss says – reply to this
    65

    why is she wearing a wig??????????????

  66. Qt says – reply to this
    66

    LOL@ her hair! I'm sure they did it on purpose to make her look older, but damn that looks ridiculous. And I agree with everyone that they shouldn't be putting her on the cover of a magazine!! so stupid!! also she has a very southern hillbily-ish face

  67. Buzz says – reply to this
    67

    Dear Perez,
    I think you must be getting tired or something………Your posts have a lot of mistakes in them.I am talking about your writing here. Take this post, you write:

    According to the NY Post, the early estimates suggest that the issues sold well above the average, but with the exception of Jamie Lynn Spears, probably did not offset the prices paid by the magazine to snag the stars' babies.

    Then you say that the, little Spears beat Alba.
    I think Alba's issue sold more than little spears.

  68. Jimmy says – reply to this
    68

    TAKE A GOOD LOOK - SHE'S WEARING A WIG!!!!!!!
    TAKE A GOOD LOOK - SHE'S WEARING A WIG!!!!!!!
    TAKE A GOOD LOOK - SHE'S WEARING A WIG!!!!!!!
    TAKE A GOOD LOOK - SHE'S WEARING A WIG!!!!!!!
    TAKE A GOOD LOOK - SHE'S WEARING A WIG!!!!!!!

  69. Elyse says – reply to this
    69

    If i was as rich as Brangelina ..i would
    "pimp out my child" for charity, too! idiots!
    it's not "pimping out your child" if you're donating
    $15 MIL to a needing charity!

  70. islan says – reply to this
    70

    Hi Perez, saw on the news today that this coming weeks issue of People will have the twins of the beautiful Angelina and Brad, in fact all of the kids. BUT ON tomorrow , Sunday you can go to People.com and see the picx. on line before the issue comes in your mail on Thurs. or Friday. Think they went for 13 or 14 million, BUT, the fee was split between People and either Hello or Ok…[forget which of the two English ones] It was on my home page news today from USA today, i think… You probably already know this but am putting it here just in case… mm. ct.

  71. val says – reply to this
    71

    I think that you should only sell your baby pictures if the money goes towards a worthwhile charity.. Maybe helping starving kids in africa? Helping animals?

  72. xenu says – reply to this
    72

    God she looks old, and the grey hair isn't helping. Her poor bastard spawn will turn out to be a fuck up just like the rest of the Spears girls.

  73. islan says – reply to this
    73

    Re: lola_
    Because here in the USA we get our magazines in the mail before the actual date.. I got my US on Thurs, in the mail & my People on Friday [yesterday] and both are dated AUGUST 11, 2008. The magazines are always dated ahead…. kind of like they tell us we're pregnant 9 months when it