Home Videos Photos

Lauren's Out, But Whitney's In

| Filed under: Fashion SmashionWhitney Port

whit.jpg

Gag us. Gag us hard - and often!

Lauren Conrad's overpriced clothing line was recently dropped from trendy Beverly Hills boutique Kitson.

But, the store has decided to add another overpriced, Hills-inspired line to its collection.

Two Whitney Port designed dresses can now be picked up at the store.

The dress on the left is priced at $495. The ruffle round the neck dress is $345.

Would you spend that kind of money on those dresses????

[Image via Kitson.]

Worst Dressed Celebs Of The Week!
Ariana Grande's 'Good Side' Has Taken Over Every Magazine! See Which Publications Met The Diva's Left-Side Demands!
Lauren Conrad's Top Ten Style Tips In Gifs!
Beyoncé's Best On Stage Looks: See The Evolution HERE!
Best Dressed Celebs Of The Week!
Perez's Pics Of The Week: Sept. 5th-12th, 2014
Email this  »

113 comments to “Lauren's Out, But Whitney's In

More comments: [1] 2 »



  1. 1

    I wouldn't spend $10.00 on their crap!



  2. 2

    They are all a bunch of jackasses that make ugly clothes.



  3. 3

    cute, but hellz to the no



  4. 4

    I'd pay the $495 to be able to throw eggs at LC while she wore the dress. Then they'd have to give me a clean one to take home.

  5. Anonymous says – reply to this


    5

    love her.



  6. 6

    those dresses are FUG!!!!



  7. 7

    simple answer to a simple question: NO.



  8. 8

    I will pay that if I received a million dollars cash back.

  9. cynth says – reply to this


    9

    no



  10. 10

    Im with green*eyes on this one. who do they think they are charging that much??



  11. 11

    those have to be two of the crappiest dresses ive ever seen on this planet.

    poor lauren conrad being dumped for another hills actor. were her dresses not that good or something?

  12. yajiz says – reply to this


    12

    FIRST BITCHESSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    THOSE ARE SOME UGLYASS DRESSES!
    SHIT, EVEN i CAN DESIGN SOMETHING WAY CUTER!



  13. 13

    fucking garbage!



  14. 14

    I like them but I think they are way overpriced. Be a little more humble if the only reason you got your own fashion line to being with was because you got on a reality show by luck.



  15. 15

    I think both of the dresses are pretty eh. No where NEAR worth that much.

  16. <= says – reply to this


    16

    F@%K AND NO……….



  17. 17

    The one on the left is okay, but it's nothing so special to warrent the "designer" tag - it's nothing that you haven't seen for the past two years. The one on the right just sucks. That zipper is sooooo unflattering - that's what caught my eye before that ring around the collar thing. I feel bad for these girls b/c someone is blowing smoke up their asses that they're REAL designers - just cause you can shop your ass off doesn't mean you can design. This "line" is headed for the discount rack, too. And Where are these dumb girls' marketing people to say "yeah, you may make some money, but you need to price your line so the girl in Ohio who watches your show can buy your clothes". That's when they're gonna make $$$ in clothing. That's Marketing 101.



  18. 18

    that kind of money on them?? absolutely not. its cute..but not THAT cute.

  19. yajiz says – reply to this


    19

    hmmmmmmmm…I guess I wasn't first after all.

  20. KayJ says – reply to this


    20

    absolutely hideousss. i wouldnt pay .25 cents for that at a rummage sale, another talentless tv hooker



  21. 21

    ummmm….no.



  22. 22

    $
    $
    $
    aww hail naw!!!
    $
    $
    $



  23. 23

    Fuck no. They're ugly.



  24. 24

    i can get kitson shit at gabriel brothers. 29.99. no fucking lie.



  25. 25

    hell to the mother effin no!

    but you know a bunch of miserable rich people will be buying that shit despite the sorry state of the economy. .. makes me sickkkkk



  26. 26

    Re: yajiz
    sorry, bitch, you aren't first. nor will you be when you have class every hour on the hour.
    now…mommy is calling you for your dinner



  27. 27

    WHAT PEREZ DOESNT SAY IS THAT HE WAS WRONG ABOUT GAY DAYS AND MILEY ITS ALL A LIE GAY DAYS HAS ITS REGULAR TIME AND ONLY THE LAST DAY THERE GONNA BE RIGHT ACROSS IN THE OTHER DISNEY THEME PARK!!!SAID BY THE GAYS THEIR SELVES "WE ARE NOT MAD WITH MILEY WE WISH SHE WOULD COME PLAY FOR US!!!"

    YOU WOULDNT SAY THAT WOULD YOU??? SINCE YOU HATE MILEY SO MUCH, YOU WOULDNT ADMIT YOUR MISTAKE!!!!!



  28. 28

    hell no it looks ugly and cheap!!!!!!!!!!!!!



  29. 29

    I wouldnt wear that shit if they payed me for it….hideous!



  30. 30

    the one with the zipper pointed out is disgusting! if i have a zipper on my dress i DO NOT WANT IT POINTED OUT!!! it's not an accessory! what's next highlighted zippers on jeans!!!!!!! wtf!!!!!!



  31. 31

    Sorry; they look like crappy, slapped-together Home Ec dresses to me. She needs to watch Project Runway and see how it's done.



  32. 32

    HELL NO!! F*CK I CAN MAKE THOUSH DRESSES MYSELF PLUS THEY PROBLY DONT MAKE THOSE DRESSES IN PLUS SIZES HA!



  33. 33

    no.



  34. 34

    No chance. Especially when she has to model them herself. Yuck.



  35. 35

    At the end of the day all that matters is the quality of the clothing,that is what determines the price. whether it is made by gianni versace or whitney port is irreleven, i say id buy em.

  36. Ang M says – reply to this


    36

    Hellz NO! The one on the right–this 80 lb chick looks like she has back flab–imagine how "normal" girls would look in it!



  37. 37

    Complete and total trash. I wouldn't even pay a penny for it.



  38. 38

    I might let my dog poop on them. Buy them, no. Even if they sold them at Walmart. I can totally see them on the $5 clearance racks.



  39. 39

    Are exposed shiny metal zippers and clown collars in vogue now? You'd have to pay ME to wear that crap



  40. 40

    One word… UGLY.



  41. 41

    H to the E to the double L NO



  42. 42

    um no, no, no, no, no

  43. eN says – reply to this


    43

    I like the sequinish effect on the left dress, but I don't like the huge sleeves. The right dress is a big mistake. I've always liked my zippers discreet and hidden. Plus the zipper contrasts the dress. It shouldn't stand out. As for the price tags, they are ridiculous prices for simple looking dresses. But if I were a Whitney fan, I would spend the extra 100 just for the name.

  44. gsnap says – reply to this


    44

    Hell no. Why in God's name do these nobody "REALITY TV STARS" think they can be famous fashion designers anyway? What qualifies them? Being on TV? I think not!



  45. 45

    no and no

  46. Rose says – reply to this


    46

    Ugly hooker attire, noty.



  47. 47

    This just pisses me off. Not only are those dresses hideous, but they also look like a high school student in BEGINNERS clothing sewed these pieces of so-called "fashion" together. And to be $500? These girls have no idea. They'll never be the next Coco Chanel or Marc Jacobs. Ridiculous.



  48. 48

    love whit, but she's delusional if she thinks she's gonna make it charging 400 bucks for that shit



  49. 49

    I wouldn't pay the money, but at least they look different. All of Lauren's dresses looked the same.



  50. 50

    I'm going to be honest, those are beautiful dresses. If i were filthy rich, i'd buy them in a heartbeat. they are obviously not for the majority…but they are gorgeous! And i like Whitney!



  51. 51

    hell no. i wouldn't beat a dog in the ass with those ugly pieces of shit.



  52. 52

    I really like the one on the left, but I probably would not pay more than $30 for it.

    I think it's ridiculous to charge that much when you are a beginning designer.



  53. 53

    The Salvation Army has much worthier clothing.

    These designs are pathetic.

  54. MrsMo says – reply to this


    54

    eeew..they look really cheap. And the black one is definitely not unique.



  55. 55

    im debating on if their is anything wrong with the price

    1. i wouldn't buy it because im a guy and i wouldn't buy it for a female because im gay and greedy like the rest.
    2. these are one of a kind dresses, probbaly made with great material from girls that worked at VOGUE, thats huge in itself. and they are starting designers and usually starting designers start out cheaper. But with lauren and whitney having all this popularity and power, im sure those rich bitches in L.A are buying this stuff



  56. 56

    Love whitney… but hell to the no.



  57. 57

    ahhh, no, no I would not pay that kind of money for those dresses.



  58. 58

    the first dress is alright? the second dress is confused bullshit.



  59. 59

    Perez, your hatred of Lauren just proves what an ahole you are. You constantly report how lousy her clothing line is doing, while every other celeb/gossip site posts things like this:
    Good news for The Hills star Lauren Conrad. Her contemporary collection is selling up a storm!

    “The sell-throughs have been fantastic,” said Frank Doroff, vice chairman at Bloomingdale’s, told WWD.”We got it in and sold out immediately. We can’t get the merchandise on the floor fast enough. It is, by far, the best-selling celebrity line we have. It’s so much better than I thought it would be.”

    Executives at MTV Networks, which backs Lauren’s brand, projected it would reach around $2 million in wholesale volume during its first year at retail.
    ___________________________________________
    Makes you look pretty stupid Perez. I would pick Bloomingdales over lame Kitson anyway. Kitsons is for the airhead, dumb as a rock Hollywood type. Bloomingdales is a legend.



  60. 60

    They look like something from a Tarjay sale paper.



  61. 61

    Are you kidding? I can get the same shit at Target for $30.



  62. 62

    Hale to the no, honey.



  63. 63

    nope !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



  64. 64

    lauren's dresses are so much pretty!



  65. 65

    Ah, no~



  66. 66

    haha…. hell to the motha fuckin no



  67. 67

    I think she designed those to make fun of her fans.



  68. 68

    They are cute and maybe if I had the money I would but unfortunately I don't and so no I would probably never buy either of them.



  69. 69

    Poorly constructed dresses…Yep seems like it belongs at forever 21 in the clearance isle



  70. 70

    Ewww! Those dresses are heinous! They look so cheap and tacky. You would look classier shopping at wetseal (and you wouldn't spend more then $50 lol). Really the Hills is an amusing show but those girls aren't fashion designers.



  71. 71

    HEEEEEEELLLLLLLL no.
    they're ugly and they don't look like a good quality at all.



  72. 72

    there ok but totally not worth the price..i wud buy it if it was like $5.00



  73. 73

    Re: Disturbed – if u dont like perez why are u on his site



  74. 74

    Whitney seems nice, but NO.



  75. 75

    Re: courtneyboo – totally agree
    love you whit
    but w/this economy good luck
    selling those



  76. 76

    Monsterous-I wouldn't use those dresses to wipe my ass



  77. 77

    You can find the same style dresses at stores like Forever 21 for under $40. It's ridiculous that they consider themselves designers and are willing to charge that much for something that someone else has already done many times over. Maybe if they got more creative and showed everyone something new and innovative, people may consider spending that much for one of their pieces. And does it bother anyone else that they both try to find models that look like them? For some reason that just bugs me!



  78. 78

    THE ZIPPER DRESS IS HORRIBLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!



  79. 79

    Re: jackers – Actually, exposed zippers is supposed to be a big thing now. This isn't the first dress I've seen it on, and I'm sure it won't be the last. Lanvin and Rachel Roy have done dresses with them.



  80. 80

    Those rags are EFFING HIDEOUS!!



  81. 81

    nada…they both suck! how bout they come up with something original!!



  82. 82

    these dresses are Disgusting!!!!!! That zipper in the back is FUGLY.



  83. 83

    Agree w/ "green*eyes.



  84. 84

    HELL TO THE NO! THAT SHIT IS FUGLY…I HAVE BETTER DRESSES IN MY CLOSET FROM FOREVER 21 LMAO!



  85. 85

    Uh EW. Hell no. Sorry but the only one winning fashion wise is Heidi's reasonable price on her stuff. But even that isn't good….



  86. 86

    why are they charging so much? what the fuck are they made out of? besides, those dresses are quite ugly… and we have all seen them before.

    if they want respect as designers, they better come up with something innovative and something actually people will buy not this crap!



  87. 87

    That dress on the left is in my top 10 of ugly dresses. It looks like an old man toupee is around her neck.



  88. 88

    I like Whitney, but these dresses (like Conrad's) are nothing new and SO overpriced. They'd both get more support if they guest-designed simple designs like this for H&M. Maybe then they'd actually sell. Their demographic is teenage girls who usually don't have that much money, after all.



  89. 89

    I wouldnt pay that much for that dress even if it came with Whitney attached to it.

  90. piino says – reply to this


    90

    HELL YEA!! -_- i would be whitney for halloween and sell my dresses when i'm drunk. hehe, im kidding, girl!! i luh you.



  91. 91

    This clothing line will also be a total flop, nobody wants to pay those kinds of prices for DESPERATE TALENTLESS AMATEURS FROM "REALITY" TV SHOWS!



  92. 92

    They are both ridiculose for the money. I wouldnt even wear those if they were given to me for free. Fair play to her tho, shes makin money. If Audrina designed some stuff Id probably buy it, she has the best taste of them all and didnt even have a fashion intern or go fashion school.



  93. 93

    Whitney is the most boring person on the show and her only function is to sound princess Lauren on the things that happened in her boring selfmade-drama filled life so that the viewers can catch up. Poor sod!
    Also, her own dressing sense is beyond crappy. She has no clue as to what kind of clothes make her very skinny body look remotely attractive. And don't get me started with her hair. I can't understand why somebody working in the fashion industry would hire a person which dresses in such an awful way. Aren't the people working in the fashion industry supposed to reflect what goes on in fashion right now and be some kind of styling role model themselves? Whitney is clearly none of that.
    Those dresses are a mortal offence for all the talented people trying to make it as a fashion designer and who will hardly get a chance because all those trendy and pricey boutiques are stuffed with the shit from some reality show trollop.



  94. 94

    No thanks! I'd rather wear a trash bag with a couple holes cut in it than that ugly shit!



  95. 95

    95% of you prolly dont even know fashion. they might be overpriced but the dress on the left id definitely wear…

    watch what not to wear people. you'd know.



  96. 96

    Those are sum pretty pricey dust rags!!



  97. 97

    no way in hell!



  98. 98

    wow whitney has a really wide back for such a skinny girl or at least in the silver dress it looks that way



  99. 99

    I wouldn´t spend my money on that at all. Nothing special about it and frankly I find those clothes rather dated.



  100. 100

    i like the sequined one, buuut same as everyone i wouldn't pay that much for it eitherrr

More comments: [1] 2 »