Home Videos Photos Shop
PerezHilton CocoPerez T. Swift Kim K. Selena Gomez Teen Mom PerezTV

Republicans Are In A Tizzy

| Filed under: Sarah Palin

This definitely brings the LOLs!

Republicans are very very VERY upset that Sarah Palin was not retouched on the cover of the latest Newsweek.

CLICK HERE to check out all the hilarit!

Strangest Celebrity Feuds!
The More You Know: 25 Celebs Who Are Secretly Good At Basketball!
Worst Dressed Celebs Of The Week!
Celebrity Aquarians
Perez's Pics Of The Week: Oct. 4th - 10th, 2014
Celebrity Beauty Queens & Kings! Famous Faces Who've Participated In Beauty Pageants!

329 comments to “Republicans Are In A Tizzy”

More comments: [1] 2 3 4 »

  1. 1

    OMG!!! They need to deal with it. I'm glad that it isn't retouched. It just shows me that she is a normal person and has the same problems as any other woman.

  2. 2

    Oh wow.. poor Palin

  3. 3

    I don't understand what they expect! This seems perfect for "Joe 6 pack" and she looks like a true "HOCKEY MOM" haha i mean seriously..she is lame, and totally not presidential…haha

  4. 4

    HA HA HA!!! This makes me happy!

  5. 5



  6. 6

    I will be the happiest person alive…on Nov. 5th!!!!
    When this is finally over!!

  7. 7

    LOVE SARAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I GUESS OBAMAS CRIMINAL STAFF PAID NEWSWEEK OFF TOO! OBAMA IS SCARYYYYYYYYYYY. EDUCATE YOURSELF ON THE REAL OBAMA….NOT THE ACTOR…look up ACORN!!!!!HE's buying his way to the White House people!

    Have a good evening!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    GO PALIN !

  8. 8

    economys gone to shit, useless war is going on, yet they are mad a magazine is un-photshopped…get a fucking clue!

  9. 9

    And that's part of whats wrong with this country, wanting to "varnish" everything in sugar-coated perfection. Fuck all these superficial bitches. The bitch wants to preach that she's folksy.. well there you go. EAT IT!

  10. 10

    Nasty Sarah is just plain ugly and gross!

  11. 11


  12. 12

    they make a gooooood point about the halo on barack…..

  13. LBaby says – reply to this


    Obama and the liberal media are the blind leading the blind.

  14. 14

    Are they effing kidding me?

  15. 15

    She said that was a "gross slap in the face" to Palin! Get real! Sarah Palin is a gross slap in the face to all intelligent, articulate and rational Americans.

  16. LBaby says – reply to this


    Re: nyc_opinion – AGREED :)

  17. 17

    Fucking blah blah blah. It's Palin's true self, warts and all. Who cares? She's as ugly up close and personal as she is on the inside.

  18. 18

    Hopeless…absolutely HOPELESS!!! WHAT THE FUCK!?!? They are the saddest group of people I have ever witnessed!! Maybe FUXnews should do some filtering of the pieces they allow on the air before continuing to embarrass themselves!! Jesus CHRIST! What worthless people!!

  19. 19

    hahaha I find it hilarious that FOX FRICKEN NEWS, of all media outlets, has the audacity to accuse Time of being one-sided! Talk about a pot calling the kettle black!

  20. 20

    what did they shoot her reflection in a make up mirror with a macro lens??……..not fair……typical

  21. 21

    That's good old FOX news for you. They have nothing better to do than complain about a picture? Quality journalism at its best.

  22. 22


  23. maryc says – reply to this


    Are those moose pox?

  24. 24

    That is the funniest fucking thing I've ever seen!…and it was said with a straight face to boot!

    God, what a sensitive piece of work. These people need to get a life.

  25. LBaby says – reply to this


    he needs the "halo".. being he's a terrorist and all.

  26. 26

    umm boy, who really gives a shit? Why should they fucking care?? We are voting for our future VP based on the way she looks? Barack is fucking sexy anyway, he doesn't need to be photoshopped. Why didn't they just cake her in makeup like they do when she's on stage? Unfortunately for Palin she is a cunt and Newsweek hates her. Just because her hairy ass face graces the cover of a grocery store mag doesn't mean i'm not going to vote for McCain/Palin..i'm simply not voting for her because she's an idiot!

  27. Avity says – reply to this


    OMG! I got this Newsweek in the mail the other day (yes, I subscribe … it was free ;) ) and I must say, I REALLY didn't want to see a close up of her blackheads by her nose, or her hairy upper lip… She's decent looking from afar, but I wouldn't want to see her close up!

  28. 28


  29. 29

    this is the most retarded thing i have seen republicans freak out about ever. I'm not a fan of Palin because I don't think she is ready to be president but on that cover which i own myself I think she looks beautiful. I don't like her but her looks she always has going for her. figures that fox news would be partisan and turn something so small on an attack against dems. if you want real fair unpartisan news don't watch fox.

  30. 30

    This is pry the most pitiful thing I have ever seen. Fox news is a complete joke….I refuse to watch such filth.

  31. 31

    Re: ||Jenna|| – haha! sooo true!

  32. 32

    this just goes to show how stupid every single republican is!
    republicans are more concerned with this then americas problems!!

  33. 33


  34. 34

    let the pissing match begin

  35. 35

    Wow! The Republican Representative was the one tearing apart Palin and any flaws she may have. What an Idiot! Palin looks fine. She's not a flipping model why would they retouch her. She's a running mate for the White House not Christy Turlington. Do we really have nothing more important to talk about with Palin? Her plan for solving the economic crisis and how specifically her and McCain are going to end the war if they win the election? Still can't believe that it was the Republican Representative that was totally tearing Palin down what a SH*T Head!

  36. 36

    a bit shady, but didn't we all know newsweek was liberal already? i mean really.

  37. 37

    this is what the republican party has come to. photoshopping. real intelligent women don't need photoshop to be leaders.

  38. 38

    This is so stupid. I can't believe (well actually, I can; it IS fox "news" after all) that they are making such a big deal out of this. Shouldn't they be happy that they are portraying Sarah as "this is who she really is?" Instead, they're so upset that they will lose votes from people who liked her just because of her looks.

  39. ttt says – reply to this



  40. 40

    Oh Jesus! Your kidding right? i thought she was running for vice president not ms America? this just shows how she’s not really focusing on the true importance of this election. she’s like a teen age girl running for prom queen "waaa i don’t look perfect in that picture!" jeez shut up and read a book palin!

  41. 41

    You think its funny? It is so true-the media is so one-sided its disgusting. I know its something dumb like retouching, but just let the people decide based on the issues don't portray one as perfection and the other one as less than perfection. I enjoy your website on the entertainment aspect, but Perez stop getting so political-the beauty of the US is freedom of having one's opinions of choice- so stop bashing anyone who doesn't have the same opinions as you.

  42. 42

    leave it to the republicians to get pissy over this
    worried about not retouching a photo wtfh?
    newsflash:normal people dont have retouchers on their photos
    she is an amazingly pretty woman anyway so it doesnt even matter
    leave it to fox news to blow this up as well
    i cant wait until this fucking election is over
    this campaign has gotton so nasty, so overpublicized, and its really
    a soap opera now

  43. 43

    Is Sarah a supermodel? No! So why should she be touched up like all the supermodels? She is a real person, and we can see her flaws. We all know that supermodels on the covers of magazines do not look like that in real life. Its nice to see a real person on a magazine!

  44. 44

    i think they need to get over themselves, it's just a picture.
    in a way Palin could use it as an excuse that she doesn't feel a need to hide her flaws with a touch up of a picture because she wants to share her true self or some other kind of crap she can come up with

  45. 45

    Are you serious? Of all things to be upset abotu this is what they bitch about? just shows how superficial republicans are

  46. 46

    Are you kidding me? This is the best the republicans can do? Complaining that you can see her pores? Well, I was going to vote for her but now I am not because I see unwanted facial hair!!

    Obama/Biden 08

  47. 47

    As much as she irritates and disgusts me, I don't think she needs retouching–she is beautiful and has great skin.

  48. Suze says – reply to this


    oh dear lord…she needs to chill out. this is becoming insane. Stupid crap like this make the Republican party look petty.

  49. 49

    give me a fuckin break! stupid fux bitches need to go fuck themselves. vain superficial bitches who could give a shit less about anything else but looks!

  50. 50

    I've worked as a photojournalist for many years and newspapers and mags DON'T retouch photos. It would be considered VERY unethical to do so since the photos need to be truthful. The "halo" effect on Obama is backlight from some kind of lightsource…not edited on in photoshop people! Clearly many of you seem very confused about what journalists do. Pity for all of us I guess. Magazines like US weekly and other ENTERTAINMENT mags do retouch…that' s a whole different story.
    This is Newsweek though. Remember when the whole thing happened with OJ Simpson when one of the weekly's darkened the image so that he looked darker than he actually is. There was an uproar in the journalistic community and everytime something similar has happened…people lose their jobs.
    Now as far as choices of images go…there are clearly more and less flattering images to choose of people but NO respectable news organization does any wrinkle retouching EVER!!! You're only allowed to do to a newsphoto what can be done in a traditional darkroom. Anything more has to be labeled as a photoillustration.

  51. ppmml says – reply to this


    If Republicans are going to promote her as the down to earth "good mom" why would they expect her to be retouched like a super model… they should be happy that she is portrayed as a REAL woman not the painting that most photo shopped magazine pics turn out to be!

  52. 52

    Re: ||Jenna|| – totally agree with you

  53. LBaby says – reply to this


    Re: bdenesik – Agreed, but I just don't see why Obama should be retouched then.

  54. 54

    Angry that they will see her real face? Give me a fucking break!! Maybe they should stop wasting their time being angry and try to focus on revamping all of the fucked up republican policies. Fuck McCain & Palin. I'm scared of anyone who would actually vote for these fools.

  55. 55

    And just HOW is talking about her un-photoshoped picture a good indicator of how good of a VP she'd be????

    fucking idiots at Fox

  56. 56

    There isn't enough makeup in Hollywood to make Caribou Barbie attractive. And what she should be concerned about is acquiring a BRAIN. She's a mouthpiece for McBush without an original thought of her own. I hope she's back in Juneau on November 5th.

  57. 57

    Man, that was full of LOLs!!!! That chick on the right is serious as all hell!!! Is she really serious!?!? Did she even read the content inside? I guess I gotta run out and cancel my Newsweek subscription…maybe "Sexy Sarah" should have put on some sexy make-up and waxed her sexy eyebrows. That shit ain't flattering.

  58. 58

    newsweek can do what they want if they want to portray obama like the "celebrity" most people accuse him of then let em
    and if they want to portray sarah as the "soccermom" that she is then let em
    it was the republicians who were against going hollywood anyway
    yet they want retouchers? you really just cant please anyone

  59. LBaby says – reply to this


    If ANY retouching should be done, it should be done on Obama's PURPLE LIPS. lmao.

  60. 60

    I'm not sure we are in a tizzy. She's HOT without touching up. I doubt she's had work done, either, a la Biden. Did you see his eyes? And the Botox!

  61. 61

    Good Lord, can it get anymore picky ass on the Republican side? There are much bigger problems to be focused on right now than whether or not a photo has been retouched. I couldn't care less whether a candidate gets her mustache waxed or not, as long as she has a viable plan to get this country back on track. I wish both sides would stick to the issues at hand and stop this stupid crap. I want answers from them both on how they're going to solve our problems, like our economy and getting our troops back home.

  62. 62

    You do all know that Newsweek has a policy that none of their photographs–NONE, EVER–are retouched! You'd think that Fox News would bother to have someone from Newsweek on to defend themselves rather then these shrill old hags. Besides that, the economy fell to a 5 year low today. This story kind of pales in significance, doesn't it?

  63. 63

    she's trying to be the vice president of america not miss america. get over it.

  64. 64

    LOL. I agree it's NO big deal. I think the point is that she wants to be just 'one of the folks', regular, ordinary joe-six-pack. How many joe-six-packs do you know that get their photos retouched to remove all flaws? I say that Sarah Palin asked for it, and she is getting exactly what she wants. She wants to be ORDINARY.

  65. 65

    this is the dumbest thing i ever herd in my life they should be more upset at what they wrote insted of how she looks if she was ugly would they still like her they drunk the kool aid on this one man the economy is in a dumb and here this bitch is with a magazine mad at how mrs. lame plain looks fox news has to be the dumbest news network that ever excisted

  66. 66

    holy fuck.
    is this how fucking superficial and shallow america has become?
    i mean this is a campain, our presidental one. and bitches are crying
    cause sarah palin depends on retouching instead of plucking out her
    chin hair or waxing her stache? i mean obviously she is a huge celebrity now..
    its who she is. maybe they wanted to show her raw. i mean isnt that who she really is? i cant beleive there is a whole news segmant on this lol. its rediculous. god forbid she have a fly-away on her next magazigne cover.
    obama/biden 08
    whoever you choose. vote ppl :)

  67. 67

    the blonde chick and andrea make me wanna hurl.
    jesus christ who gives a fuck if its not retouched
    it shows how she really looks, and its not bad at all.
    blahhh, it is fox news after all.
    stupid superficial people, i swear.

  68. 68

    OH MY GOD.
    this is just fucking REDICULOUS! Sometimes they don't retouch people, why are they making such a huge deal about it? Just cause they don't retouch a republican automatically they are a liberal magazine and thus should cancel your subscription?!?
    They are overreacting to it, everyone has physical flaws. Shes not running for Miss America, shes just MIGHT run the country, who gives a fuck what she looks like? Thats not even relevant.
    Fuck this Republican bullshit.

  69. 69

    Well she is the devil in disguise!! some flaws had to show up!!
    God Fox News is no BBC! arent news channels not supposed to show any bias??

  70. KayJ says – reply to this


    Re: sally8 – agreed :)

  71. 71

    Anything to cry foul. Republicans have turned into the biggest whiners. They're the same ones using Obama's middle name to drive home the fear to their base that he is a terrorist.

  72. 72

    OMG, are you fucking kidding me!! i can't believe they're even talking about this - American's can be really f'ed in the head sometimes!! with all the real news happening in the world, only in America would dumbass people be upset about something like this and turn it into news!

  73. LBaby says – reply to this


    Re: jakeysmom – lmao

  74. 74

    Wow Perez, an anti Obama segment in Faux Newz????? Now thats unique, never seen it before, this is groundbreaking, none has heard of something like this in like ever.
    Keep up the hard work for exclusive content.
    'So unique, so precious.

  75. 75

    Sarah Palin represents herself as a regular ole gal, she can deal with a regular ole picture on the front of a magazine. Isn't that the facade she's trying to bring out anyhow? Stupid.

  76. 76

    Does the pit bull need her mustache waxed or bleached?? Should she be the new spokesperson for Biore pore strips? I think so, since she's gonna lose this fucking election with "John McPain" Mr. "No Time For On The Job Training, My Friend"

  77. 77

    god they need to seriously shut the fuck about this
    really all palin is known for is being a milf
    and now that we all can see her as a person who looks really just like anyone else at her age these kids are getting all butthurt because they know that if everyone was to see palin as an average looking women, no one would really want her as a vp.
    its funny how shallow everyone is.
    the picture isnt even that bad tbh
    such a waste of time to create a whole fucking debate over whether this was fair
    shes running for vp of the us. not miss america
    we dont care if shes hot or not
    so just shut uppppppppppp

  78. 78

    Oh, get over it.

  79. 79

    As Artie Lange would say - "WAAAAHHHHH!!"

  80. jefdo says – reply to this


    It's not surprising, Newsweek is left wing like the New York Times, which does nothing but hurt their credibility. Journalistic Integrity is dead, it seems none of them came remaine unbiased. It's not just the retouching, the article isn't very kind to Palin. Newsweek could write some disturbing things about Obama, but god forbid they take shots at their beloved savior.

  81. 81

    Why would she need to be retouched? She's gorgeous the way she is.

  82. 82


  83. Anonymous says – reply to this


    I'm no fan of the animal hating & killing Palin, but I do agree that this is not right at all. All of you guys who are saying no biggie, but how would you feel if someone took an extreme close shot of your face and then plastered it on a magazine for the world to see? No one looks good that up close. If you are going to take a normal photo, then fine, no need for photoshop. But w/ that close of a photo—everyone would want their face photoshopped. True Fox News is pro-Republican, but also true that Newsweek is pro-Democrat & very pro-Obama.

  84. 84

    It's Newsweek kids … not Cosmo! And regardless, she looks just fine. FOX is really reaching there. Wonder how much they paid Andrea to be so "fired up." "It's a sa-lap in the face!" Please.

  85. 85


  86. SuzyP says – reply to this


    This is ridiculous!!!!!! The economy is crumbling and these fuckers are talking about re-touching??????!!!!!!!!! What a bunch of air heads. Get a life and worry about the important things in this election. WHAT IS WRONG WITH PEOPLE???!!!

  87. 87

    another example of media control.

  88. SWFxx says – reply to this


    this is insane
    shouldnt they be worrying about how this person is GOING TO RUN OUR COUNTRY as oppose to how many blemishes she has??
    how can they call themselves feminists!?

  89. 89

    Is there a big close up of the picture online somewhere where we can see it?

  90. 90

    Economy, health care, war..there's a lot of other things to talk about. Anybony who would be actually offended has too much time on their hands and should be doing research on their political issues.


  91. 91

    Get over yourself

  92. 92

    This is idiotic!!. Who cares, and who would even pay attention to that?? It is obsurd to talk about such things when we have bigger problems to deal with.

  93. 93

    LOL has Palin come out with a comment on the newsweek cover? So basically it's just the tabloids / news and bloggers pointing it out and making a huge fuss about it. Honestly, when I read the comments of people I wonder how our world has become filled with a bunch of educated RETARDS!

  94. 94

    Re: nyc_opinion – your retarded dude do u even know who that superficial "maverick" is your the reson the world will go to shit on nov. 5th if shes elected

  95. 95

    WTF? werent they the ones crying that a woman should be treated equal and can be a powerful leader but now theyre complaining because her pic isnt retouched? Does John McCain demand all his photos are retouched?

  96. 96

    Oh for crying out loud! I will be sooooo glad when this election is over! This is really getting childish.

  97. 97

    Oh my gosh, well that's just not nice, doncha know? /sarcasm

  98. 98

    Yea, I just looked at a close up where you can see the picture really well. IT'S NOT THAT BAD.

    Seriously, Republicans needs to look at the reality of the fact that people just DON'T LIKE HER and think that SHE IS A JOKE and stop trying to get her special treatment and try to convince people that she's not being treated right. Shut the hell up and find something better to debate, maybe the actual real problems in the country. I've never heard something more ridiculous being argued about.

  99. 99

    Not ALL REPUBLICANS care about this issue.
    It's wrong to stereotype everyone based on others.
    I'm just saying…

  100. 100

    newsweek is a super liberal magazine, they intentionally made her look bad.

More comments: [1] 2 3 4 »