Not Lots Of Love For Katie - Actress Debuts On Broadway To Mixed Reviews!

wenn51993122.jpg

Katie Holmes is starting to receive feedback for her Broadway debut in the revival of All My Sons.

However, the show is getting mixed responses.

The Daily News seems to have liked her performance, stating that Katie made "a fine Broadway debut."

They add, "Her rather grand speech pattern takes getting used to but she seems comfortable and adds a fitting glint of glamour. Dancing with (John) Lithgow, kissing Wilson, she makes you forget about her being Mrs. Tom Cruise."

Tom Cruise, being the perfect hubby that he is, was also in the audience for his wife's debut.

Holmes plays Ann, the daughter of a business man.

The New York Times wasn't feeling her portrayal!

They say, "While Ann is supposed to arrive at the Keller household with high hopes and good intentions, Ms. Holmes delivers most of her lines with meaningful asperity, italicizing every word. This Ann is straight from the school of the Erinyes (those avenging furies from Greek mythology), and I didn't believe for a second that she really loved the honorable, naive Chris."

Ouch.

The New York Post added, "Lithgow starts in a sunny, benign fashion, but eventually finds himself screeching alongside Holmes, looking tough under a glossy wig, and the all-American Wilson."

Poor Katie.

At least she's trying hard.

P.S. For someone so extremely thin, her legs don't seem to match the rest of her body!

[Image via WENN.]

    Posted: Oct 17, 2008 at 5:45 pm / Email this  »

    51 comments to “Not Lots Of Love For Katie - Actress Debuts On Broadway To Mixed Reviews!”



    1. 1

      yawwwwwwwwwn



    2. 2

      god - remember she used to be interesting. shes been bathed in beige.



    3. 3

      ;



    4. 4

      The magic of heels :-)



    5. 5

      no love for those cankles!



    6. 6

      poor katie



    7. 7

      Why is Katie looking so matronly nowadays?



    8. 8

      Yeah-she never really looks too skinny in her skinny jeans. Just like Mushy!



    9. 9

      and to think she is from ohio……..as everyone thinks on previous posts…..ohioans and a bunch of racist hillbillies………….
      wonder who she is voting for?????



    10. 10

      first? tickets?



    11. 11

      poor thing, she can be bone thin, but she can't lose the peasant legs



    12. 12

      at least she's making her own money!



    13. 13

      it's really sad
      i used to like her
      but now she just freaks me out like Tom Cruise does..



    14. 14

      Cankles, too funny Mamajud! I was thinking the same thing.



    15. 15

      not to mention the Fred Flinstone feet, oooh that's mean, I'm sorry, well at least she gets an eternity with spaceman



    16. 16

      more on tomkat at sizzling.wordpress.com!



    17. 17

      I hate her ugly hairstyle she's been sporting lately. (NOT IN THIS PIC, OBVIOUSLY IT'S A WIG)
      It's like a shaggy mushroom cut.
      She should consider this wig though.



    18. 18

      Re: theadam – shut the fuck up about those damn tickets!



    19. 19

      I'm sure she sucks. Has she ever been a good actress? NO!!!
      And she is a big ol' girl. Bottom heavy w/ thick legs.



    20. 20

      Re: avebgirl139
      I was thinking the same thing!



    21. 21

      Re: wanna milk me?? – you are so mysterious…..profile gone….yet still here……the haunting of milk me………..lol



    22. 22

      Don't be fooled, Tom is always in the audience to make sure she doesn't escape!



    23. 23

      Elephantitis legs can be a sign of standing for too long or perhaps be a genetic thing. Whatever Katie’s reason for the large calves, she ought to stick to wearing slacks or long dresses. This frock cuts off her legs at exactly the wrong spot and merely draws attention to her “trouble” area.

      Maybe the thick legs are a result of living with Tommy-Girl…



    24. 24

      Love Katie. Least she has ambition. Some actresses just sit there and depend on their beauty. Ick.



    25. 25

      eww, you can clearly see that is a wig, more makeup on that forehead please



    26. 26

      Katie Looks OLD!!!! Tommy Boy must be sucking the life out of her!



    27. 27

      Re: mamajud
      yea….when i changed my avatar awhile back my profile disappeared….i can't figure out why it says deleted or private……….
      FIX IT PEREZ YOU FUCKTARD!!



    28. 28

      oh god! did anyone of you notice that you are looking at her calves. she has really long legs and there hidden behind her long dress. but your looking at the chunkiest part of her legs jeez so judgemental



    29. 29

      Katie’s thick legs and lower torso may be one of the reasons she’s been wearing baggy, rolled up jeans recently…they hide the problem! Given that Tommy Girl is such a persnickety eejit, I’m surprised he hasn’t insisted she have liposuction. Maybe he holds her “large legs” over her head, telling her that she’s lucky to have such a “good” husband, looking the way she does. Wouldn’t put it past him…



    30. 30

      omg I read another poster say her legs are big and … low and behold they are



    31. 31

      she has major cankles. always has.



    32. 32

      everyones legs look fat at that angle…



    33. 33

      TOM'S A FAG!!



    34. 34

      Oooh Cankles! Yes!



    35. 35

      Some women just have big legs. We are all different and imperfect; and that is a good thing.



    36. 36

      she has cankles

    37. MP says – reply to this


      37

      The NYT never likes anything; don't put too much stock in their review.

    38. AMO says – reply to this


      38

      Easy tree trunk legs with the Fred Flinstone feet… yuck!



    39. 39

      my god she does have some cankles! her upper body doesnt match her bottom at all! she used to be such a cute looking girl during the Dawsons Creek days. You can definitely tell Tom has brain washed her. She is absolutely nothing like she used to be. she always looks soooo sad!!!Get some courage and fucking leave!!! your daughter is learning all this bullshit brainwashing too!!! Tom was (semi) normal too before he got into that crazy ass religion. I used to be sad about tom and Nicole breaking up, well not now! shes doing soooo much better since they divorced!!!



    40. 40

      She is wonderful. A great actress. Tom is amazing. I love them.



    41. 41

      what's with the thankles? (thigh connected to a foot) scaaaary!



    42. 42

      Ooh. Biatch. She's waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay thinner than you, fatboy.

    43. jemms says – reply to this


      43

      r u all fucking kidding me??? her legs look fine…she has muscular legs from the running. would you prefer that she had sticks for legs like nicole richie??? wtf??



    44. 44

      SHE'S ALWAYS HAD TREE TRUNK LEGS.



    45. 45

      She has ugly feet. I have beautiful size 6.5 feet. I also don't do boring plays to try to escape my short crazy husband. My life is looking pretty good right now. Thanks Katie

    46. Anne says – reply to this


      46

      Those calves are as thick as my tights… horrible!

    47. mben says – reply to this


      47

      OMG Perez! I was thinking the same thing about her legs… I did a double take>>> Are those Cankles I see???? Yikes!

    48. mben says – reply to this


      48

      Re: kadramaqueen18
      When was Katie Holmes ever interesting… when she dated Z-lister Chris Klein?



    49. 49

      A cousin of mine was lucky enough to see the show.
      He thought she was great. He didn't have any problem with her delivery of her lines or her acting. He and his partner, who are both in love with Wilson, said that they were smitten with her and beleived the players and in the story.
      P you need to get over the HATING on Cruise and Holmes (among others)



    50. 50

      "Major threat to basic Constitutional rights”
      - League of Women Voters

      DONATE: www.NoOnProp8.com
      NO to HATE. NO on 8

      Los Angeles Times
      “By banning same-sex marriages, Prop. 8 would create second-class citizens.”

      The San Diego Union Tribune
      “No on Prop. 8. Gay marriage right should not be repealed.”

      The Napa Valley Register
      “Vote no on Proposition 8. In our view, Proposition 8 is a misguided and unconstitutional proposal. We urge voters to reject Proposition 8.”

      Redding-Record Searchlight
      “Same-sex vows cause no harm to our families. The reasons given for Proposition 8 just don’t stand up to scrutiny.”

      The Bakersfield Californian
      “Californians need to move beyond the divisiveness that Prop. 8 has engendered and embrace tolerance and reconciliation. Live and let live.”

      Our opposition has a war chest of millions of dollars, and we must match them dollar for dollar. Every dollar counts, so please contribute today and again in the coming weeks. Backers of Prop. 8 raised $24.3 million as of the end of September. WE have only raised $15.4 million. WE are seriously underfunded.

      NO to HATE. NO on 8
      DONATE: www.NoOnProp8.com



    51. 51

      The picture was taken from a low angle, making her legs closer to the camera… Which makes them seem larger than they really are.