Welcome to PerezHilton.com
Welcome to PerezHilton.com - Hollywood's Most-Hated Web Site!
Celebrity Scoop Goes Here
E-mail Perez@PerezHilton.com

Report technical problems.
Perez Posse signup FAQ

Contact us to advertise on PerezHilton.com



Wear it, share it, give it, get it! Represent!

Jump to your favorite celebrity

Articles by date

This Gimmick Could Backfire

Filed under: TV News > Awardz

oscars__opt.jpg

What a sucky ploy to lure in viewers!

This year, the head honchos for the Oscars have decided not to release the names of any of the celebrity presenters.

Usually they'll mention and promote their celeb presenters weeks before the show to get people interested in watching the telecast.

This time around, Oscar producers Laurence Mark and Bill Condon are doing something different.

They're hoping to get viewers interested by keeping people in suspense.

Unger said today, "There will be fantastic movie stars that appeal to a whole range of movie lovers and fans of our show. We're just not going to tell you who they all are."

Boring!

The show will air live on February 22nd from Los Angeles.

44 comments to “This Gimmick Could Backfire”



  1. 1

    those awards shows put me right ot sleep.



  2. 2

    I'll be there shovin' up the winner's asses!



  3. 3

    if you have an awards show for your perezies we can all present for you.



  4. 4

    WHO CARES AS LONG AS ANGELINA DOSEN'T WIN! THAT'S ALL I AM WATCHING IT FOR JUST TO SEE HER SCORN!!!! HAHAHAHAHA!



  5. 5

    total waste of money.



  6. 6

    Ugh, if they REALLY want to get viewers to watch, how about less stupid interpretive dance segments, and just announce the damn winners. It amazes me that people in hollywood so overestimate how interesting they are.



  7. 7

    Doesn't matter. Stick a Oscar up your culo you fucking idiot…



  8. 8

    Re: mama of 2 – HAHAHAHAHA!



  9. 9

    Re: LettyB – lmao *evil snicker*



  10. 10

    Wow….I'm devastated. Not. Who care?



  11. 11

    WHO CARES



  12. 12


  13. 13

    WHEN IN ROME WHERE ARE YOU?



  14. 14

    They're not going to give me any incentive to tune in ahead of time? Why bother then? I guess they couldn't get an big-name stars and so that's the real reason they've decided not to announce who they DID get.

  15. MP says – reply to this


    15

    The Oscars are always boring no matter how they change it up. They need to get rid of the middle awards and just give out the main ones typically handed out in the beginning and in the end.



  16. 16

    Re: LaDiva says be warned… – it's gonna be jokes if it happens again!!!!!



  17. 17

    Big mistake!



  18. 18

    I bet there are fewer celebrities willing to give out awards now that they no longer have swag bags or at least swag bags that are worth as much as they used to be because the IRS started cracking down on all of the freebies that they were getting which in some cases were worth upwards around $150,000. Ridiculous! Just for giving a stupid trophy that's long since lost it's stature. The Oscars and the Golden Globes mostly look like a popularity contest rather than an acknowledgement of the finest in cinema. Back in 2000 they showed a clip of an actor whom I've never heard of portraying a polish artist that I never heard of in a film I hadn't heard of and in the brief film clip I was moved to tears! That man should have won not Russel Crowe but he was the more popular nominee.



  19. 19

    Re: LettyB – Ahhaa serves that bitch right. That hoe thinks cuz she's popping all these kids and doing charities (for publicity) that someone is supposed to kiss her flat ass… Fuck no.



  20. 20

    Unless Heath Ledger is presenting via Ouija board, the actors presenting will be the same boring people.



  21. 21

    hollywood needs new stars. theyre all getting old and haggard looking.
    no one wants to watch a bunch of uglies



  22. 22

    I agree. The only chance they have of getting me to tune in is by flashing pictures of someone I find interesting over and over and over again. I'm not the kind of person who marks these events on my calander and I'm probably not alone.



  23. 23

    I definitely see this one backfiring. . . because I never cared about who the presenters were before! Why would I care now?



  24. 24

    Re: LettyB – Don't worry precious! I'm still here…



  25. 25

    people get all excited for these award shows and then fall asleep halfway through it. what's the point in that???



  26. 26

    Umm…does anyone watch this show for the presenters. It drags on and on and on. Maybe the should have Playboy Bunnies present. That might help their audience pay attention……..at least almost half of them.



  27. 27

    Those awards shows are so boring and lame.. Who the fuck cares



  28. 28

    Re: WONDERFUL – some with actual talent this time around..



  29. 29

    Yeah. Nobody is going to watch this shit. I only watch to see how shiteous the dresses are this year.
    I think a lot of people are sick of the constant stream of awards shows that are nothing but these overpaid actors patting each other on the back.



  30. 30

    Re: Trixie25
    I totally agree.



  31. 31

    yeah - cuz the reason I watch the Oscars is to see the celebrity presenters? WTF.



  32. 32

    I think that's awesome…something different for a change! I'll surely watch!



  33. 33

    Oh, that DEFINITELY makes me want to watch. Heavy sarcasm.



  34. 34

    i never even know who is presenting!



  35. 35

    seriously you people really need to learn real cinema.
    and the oscars does it for yea:D
    i love it. and the idea– kinda* they better have some great ppl. johnny depp. leo dicaprio anyone?!?!? lol I LOVE THE OSCARS:D!!



  36. 36

    Horrible idea! Who they possibly secretly have that might draw in more views? It's the oscars all the a listers are already there. If they want higher ratings they should bring BIlly Crystal back….or PEREZ!



  37. 37

    Who cares about this boring-ass show…I for one will NOT be watching!!!



  38. 38

    Suspense over who's gonna deliver the world's most insipid banter? That's like being excited to find out how stinky a baboon's ass would be right after a steaming dump.



  39. 39

    Re: jennaville22 – You have to be a plant. No one talks like you write; also no one thinks like you write. Come to think of it, you're full of shit.



  40. 40

    Most of the time, the celebrity presenters suck really bad. I wouldn't advertise them either.



  41. 41

    totally unfair.



  42. 42

    This is the dumbest thing ever! I dont even care who presents, I just want to know who wins. Watching the show bores me to death! The speeches are long and boring! I just want to know who wins and that's it. If I want to hear a speech I will check youtube the next day.

  43. allyk says – reply to this


    43

    won't change my mind. i've grown up and am so over the self promotion,self indulgent rhetoric spewed from people who are only revered because they have money. there are so many talents who have not been afforded the same opportunity because of their lack of "movie star" looks. talent should be appreciated for just that., regardless of how pretty you are.



  44. 44

    ERgh. They're gna have less audience for sure.