Home Videos Photos

Early Full Frontal-Nude Madonna Pic Expected to Nab Big Bucks

| Filed under: Madonna

madonna.jpg

When Madonna was a struggling dancer in the NYC back in 1979, she agreed to pose for a fully frontal nude pic for $25.

Well, the photographer who took that snap is poised to make a ginormous profit off said photo.

It's up for auction at the New York branch of Christie's on February 12th, and it's expected to go for at least $10,000.

Will the highest bidder be Madge herself?

[Image via WENN.]

51 comments to “Early Full Frontal-Nude Madonna Pic Expected to Nab Big Bucks”



  1. 1

    Mentioned on Yahoo!'s Entertainment section hours ago.
    .
    OLD NEWS NOW PEREZ



  2. 2

    "Playboy published six photos from the shoot in 1985, though the one going on sale is 'maybe the most explicit one,' says Humery."

    But I doubt she cares too much about this. As she said in '85; "so what"?



  3. 3

    She has a beautiful body, but why would somone pay for photo's that are already out? I have them all from an early book that that publisher released in the late '80's.



  4. 4

    I don't care to see that, but I'm sure it will make big money



  5. 5

    OH God, you said EARLY frontal pic…. jesus



  6. 6

    Hairy pits and all?



  7. 7

    From what I remember, she wasn't much to look at back then. She was super-thin with no curves.



  8. 8

    Seen it once you have seen it a million times. BIG DEAL!



  9. 9

    25 bucks? Wow, talk about an investment, right?



  10. 10

    We've all seen her hairy monster before. Nothing new. Nothing interesting.



  11. 11

    I'm not sure I'd want to see her naked. how can i hate on a 50 year old w/probably 2% body fat? because it may be hotter to have a little something going on (scarlett, jlo, j alba). she worked all hers off. what's to look at except pasty skin & protruding bones? not hot.



  12. 12

    Why does anyone care?
    There has been plenty of naked pics of Madonna in her early days
    ~yawn~
    They should use the pic as toliet paper because that's all it worth.



  13. 13

    At this point, who hasn't seen this old whore naked?



  14. 14

    Re: Jessismac – for real! Better than any 401 'k!



  15. 15

    This puta acts as if no one has not seen her cuchara before…



  16. 16

    i dont know who this photographer is but another guy called martin schreiber photographed madonna nude in 1979… his shots were printed in playboy in '85. he did a small exhibition a few years ago and the photographs are beautiful… she's young, pretty, innocent(ish) and the shots are tasteful. seems a bit strange that this guy has the same story as schreiber but only one print…



  17. 17

    Omg she SO will bid on those!!
    That is, if they are exclusie and have not ever been released…

    Add me on myspace, yo.
    www.myspace.com/angelbaby1656

    xxxxx



  18. 18

    I THOUGH YOU WOULD BE THE FIRST TO BID ON THAT PHOTO PEREZ! YOUR IDOL AND QUEEN. In those days she was very hairy, stomach, pits, arms, legs and her eyebrows came together. Probably a mustache too. I bet that turns you on.



  19. 19

    Shame on anyone who pays that much for a pic -of anyone!-instead of giving it to the needy!



  20. 20

    the actual photo is on the huffington post. that's a lotta escarole.



  21. 21

    who the hell cares if something is posted somewhere a few minutes or an hour ago? Pick your source and just fucking go there right? Do you really want to go to entertainment weekly /etc etc ..? This is news with the added flavor of irreverence.. now come on..how could you pass up that part?

  22. Wrenn says – reply to this


    22

    I bet that bitch is hairy!



  23. 23

    Re: Goddesss – You are so right about that. That book shows everything! I doubt Madonna is worried.



  24. 24

    Why would anyone pay ANY money to see this naked whore? She is, indeed, a whore but some may not recognize her as such because she is a performer, too. (No, she isn't a musician!) As long as she is in the spotlight, she doesn't care if its good publicity or bad publicity…the point is just to get publicity.



  25. 25

    why would she try to get the photo?
    she published sex years ago with graphic full frontal photos.
    i mean you can find those online easily..
    why is this a big deal?



  26. 26

    That sounds a lot like what happened to Marilyn Monroe.



  27. 27

    That should be good. Waxing wasn't popular back then.



  28. 28

    The photographers name is Lee Friedlander and he is one of the most famous and stories photographers in the art world.



  29. 29

    Re: amylynn – are you retarded? no really…are you? it's a pic of M when she was 20, not 50 you dummy!



  30. 30

    Who hasn't seen her hairy bush already??? Therefore, WHO would pay $10,000 to see it again!?? PLEASE, she's paying Guy Ritchie $75 million or something so WHE WON'T SEE it EVER again!!!



  31. 31

    The whole world has already seen this hag naked…whats the big fucking deal? Maybe this picture will show the razor sharp teeth in her vagina.



  32. 32

    I have seen them (they have them on p e r e z r e v e n g e . c o m), my god did she have a hairy bush!! She looked like she had a black man in a headlock!! And those armpits!!!!! Holy Jebus!



  33. 33

    It will only be interesting from a history of grooming point of view. Waxing was not very popular back in the Land Before Time when dinosaurs and Madonna roamed the Earth.



  34. 34

    I saw that big ole bush before and it scared the hell out of me.
    What the fuck were they thinking back then.
    Her asshole was just as furry.



  35. 35

    I hope Lourdes never see's the pic of her mom with a mouth full of jizz..



  36. 36

    madonna made 300 million last year she could care less lol



  37. 37

    Madonna has more hair on her legs than most men. God please teach Lourdes how to wax or she will look like a Neanderthal.



  38. 38

    She probably will buy it, which seems fair since she could care less about overcharging fans with her ridiculous ticket prices.



  39. 39

    Didn't Madonna already sell an entire BOOK of nude photos??



  40. 40

    WHO HASN'T SEEN THIS OLD ASS BITCH'S JUNK HANGING OUT ALL OVER THE PLACE???????



  41. 41

    Old news plus we've already seen Madge naked a bizillion times… even my grandma saw pics of her they where all out there during the Bed time…



  42. 42

    That comes to $5000 a tit.



  43. 43

    love her.



  44. 44

    if i am her… i would buy it. say all you want to say fuckers. but i will kill this thing.



  45. 45

    These prints were feautured in a book years ago and have appeared in Playboy and Penthouse. Can't see that they would be worth ANYTHING



  46. 46

    madonna already said she would not be buying it
    god perez get with the program

  47. AMO says – reply to this


    47

    She's such a skank.



  48. 48

    Re: AMO – Why does posing nude make her a skank?
    Americans are so fucking uptight about nudity. It's not like she was finger fucking herself for Christ's sakes. Get over it!



  49. 49

    Oh God, please no!
    *throws up*

  50. -V- says – reply to this


    50

    I've seen it, it's gross, I'm permanently scarred…

    She's sitting, with legs open and she has the biggest, blackest bush. That things starts at her belly button and goes down her thigh about 4 inches. Her pubes are like 6 inches long.



  51. 51

    I ran across the supposed photo in question on a blog recently…..all I can say is….WAX MUCH?!? We're talkin' BUSH! Not like the baby's butt or landing strip she sports nowdays.