Exploitation At Its Worst

Filed under: Anglophilia > Jade Goody

jadeeee.jpg

1981-2009!

"In loving memory"!!!!!!!

WTF???????

OK! magazine has just come out with a special Jade Goody "tribute issue."

Uhmmm….

She's not dead yet!!!!!!!!!!!

    Posted: Mar 17, 2009 at 11:25 am / Email this  »

    135 comments to “Exploitation At Its Worst”

    More comments: « 1 [2]



    1. 101

      If true, this is awful! They are showing no compassion whatsoever. She sold her stories to them to get money for her boys but now they have really overstepped the mark. Seriously, things have to change in some aspects of the media. Jade has helped highlight some important health issues but it is clear that the media just don't know when to stop. There should be some guidelines.



    2. 102

      How inappropriate. So wrong!

    3. @v@ says – reply to this


      103

      Well, as wrong as this pre-deceased article still is on many levels, it's good that the kids will get some OK money. If they get it. At least they paid her from getting headlines out of her. I wonder if Perez kicked in.



    4. 104

      you are such a hypocrite!!!! you just did the same thing with reporting the death of natasha richardson. so irresponsible.



    5. 105

      She was paid for this issue, just as she's paid for everything out there. She wanted it out beforehand, so that she could have the money for her boys.

      www.isjadegoodydeadyet.com



    6. 106

      jesus! they could have at least waited until she dies!!!!



    7. 107

      How do we even know this bitch really has cancer? Wow a bald head. Somethings fishy.



    8. 108

      Um, you're part of "exploitation at it's worst" too Perez because you keep posting about her. She is also exploiting herself and her family, so I feel NO sympathy for her at all. I do feel bad for her children since they've had to be dragged into this.

      What fucken person goes in the media like that when they're dieing? Screw her and you Perez. At least OK magazine are just doing what they always do. I consider them to have more diginity then Jade Goody. Her poor kids have to loose their mom and have it shoved in their face every single minute. Shame on you as well Perez.



    9. 109

      ughhhh..this really upsets me!!!
      FUCK YOU OK! Magazine.



    10. 110

      OK magazine are bottom feeders. That's in very poor taste, printing a tribute magazine before she's cold in the ground - shame on them. What can you expect tho' from a trash rag that features loser toss bags like kerry Katona or Jordan?



    11. 111

      Its not out yet though. Look at the date 24th March… i havent seen it in shops either, i wont come out till next week, by which time, very sadly, jade will most likely be dead :(



    12. 112

      Also do you know how many of this issue OK! will sell!? A ridiculous amount! I work in a supermarket in the UK and the past few weeks OK! has just been all about jade and ive never seen so many of them sold!



    13. 113

      issue 666? that's weak.

    14. NJK says – reply to this


      114

      what in the fucking world? :| |||||||||



    15. 115

      miley cyrus deserves to be in issue 666.



    16. 116

      i dont know who she is but coming on this site i keep hearing about her…im sure she is selling pictures and stuff and why is this site promoting news on her? does she want to die? why give up like that and why publicize it on this site and ok magazine? i dont understand…



    17. 117

      oh, what about this site and its mistake about reporting that actress as dead WTF??? was that all about???

      probably do get more hits….GEEZ



    18. 118

      F'ed up beyond belief !!!! Anyone else notice the issue # is eerily 666 ……… Freaky !!



    19. 119

      Um, who do you think authorized the issue and the pictures? That said, they could have waited - sheesh! This whole spectacle has been every kind of disgusting, however. "She's doing it for her boys" what? Teaching them that nothing's sacred and anything's for sale if someone's buying? They'd be better off with less money and more role modeling.



    20. 120

      How sad! That's all I have to say. :(



    21. 121

      omg! freaky! Notice how this is also issue number 666. Scary shit! Burn it!



    22. 122

      did anyone happen to notice how this is "issue 666"?



    23. 123

      ahhaha what the fuck? that's kinda messed up



    24. 124

      that is so wrong.



    25. 125

      Great work Perez, exploitation ans then you put it on your website. MEDIA WHORE



    26. 126

      At least she got issue #666.



    27. 127

      All respect lost for Jade, Jade's "friends" and family *(excluding sons and their father) and OK! magazine



    28. 128

      i completely agree!!! i get OK every week and they always do that!
      but i think they have just crossed the line!!!!!! can you imagine how upsetting that is!!?



    29. 129

      Ummmm did anyone else notice that it's issue number 666?
      Creeeeepy…



    30. 130

      not the issue # 666



    31. 131

      note the issue # 666



    32. 132

      OMG, I feel so awful. I busted out laughing when I saw the "ISSUE 666" part after it quoted her as saying "I will come back from heaven to look after my boys." OK totally did this as a tongue-in-cheek "fuck you." It's issue SIX-SIX-SIX, come on now!!!!!



    33. 133

      omg!!! r u serious!! dont they realize what a lil bitch she really is!?!?! i still remember what she said to that indian girl on big brother!!! and it seems like everyone is forgetting how she made a fool of herself while she was a pagent queen!!! UGH!!!



    34. 134

      thats so sad, she died on the 22



    35. 135

      This is weird. The issue says, March 24th, 2009. She died 2 days before.
      But then how did Perez post this on March 17th, 2009?
      Very fishy, don't you think?

    More comments: « 1 [2]