Welcome to PerezHilton.com
Welcome to PerezHilton.com - Hollywood's Most-Hated Web Site!
Celebrity Scoop Goes Here
E-mail Perez@PerezHilton.com

Report technical problems.
Perez Posse signup FAQ

Contact us to advertise on PerezHilton.com



Wear it, share it, give it, get it! Represent!

Jump to your favorite celebrity

Articles by date

Brooke Doesn't Need Jack Bauer To Save Her!

Filed under: Legal Matters

wenn5261756kiefer1.jpg

And the plot thickens!

While 24 star Kiefer Sutherland was deep in a method acting trance on Monday night, playing "hero" to Brooke Shields by breaking Proenza Schouler designer Jack McCollough's nose at a Met Gala after-party in New York, he missed the memo that Brooke didn't need his help!

Although witnesses have come forward and reported that McCollough pushed Shields onto the ground during the party, reps for Brooke are saying otherwise.

"Jack did nothing inappropriate. It's not clear what caused Kiefer to do what he did," Shield's rep explained on Tuesday.

The rep for Brooke won't confirm whether or not McCollough laid a finger on Shields, but the actress will be interviewed by NYPD later today to get to the bottom of it.

No word on whether or not the incident will create a world of legal trouble for Sutherland, who is still on probation due to a previous DUI!

[Image via WENN.]

12 comments to “Brooke Doesn't Need Jack Bauer To Save Her!”



  1. 1

    And we care because……



  2. 2

    LOSER



  3. 3

    This is suddenly interesting now. If he genuinely believes that he was defending someone who was being harmed, then does that clear his name of any wrong-doing? If Shields says that she wasn't actually being harmed, does that affect how Sutherland should be treated by authorities?



  4. 4

    I luv Keifer.



  5. 5

    IF BROOKE STICKS TO HER KISS ASS STORY ABOUT NOTHING HAPPENED THEN JACK BAUER IS IN A LOAD OF LEGAL SHIT AND POSSIBLE JAIL TIME. IF INDEED THE INCIDENT HAPPENED AS KIEFFER SUGGESTS THEN THE WORST IS HE GETS A CIVIL LAWSUIT FROM JACK FOR LEGAL FEES, MED EXPENSES, TIME OFF WORK ETC. IN THAT CASE I DOUBT ANY CHARGES WILL OCCUR. WHY IS SHE STICKING UP FOR THIS GAY DESIGNER ANYWAY? THAT'S LIKE STICKING UP FOR GAY BOY PEREZ AND DISSING MISS CALI AFTER HE ASKS A QUESTION AND DOESN'T LIKE THE ANSWER. HYPOCRITE!!!!



  6. 6

    He is so cool…I would have loved for him to come to my defense…ha, ha. I hope this doesn't cause him all that much trouble, though…looks like it might… :(



  7. 7

    sutherland is a twat
    why would he even be invited
    to such a event….
    & i love proenza, they can do
    no harm in my book.



  8. 8

    Jack was standing up for (what he thought) was a lady. Good on him. Perez is being a bitch because the guy who got head-butted was probably gay.

  9. LSD says – reply to this


    9

    GOD I WANT HIM EVEN MORE NOW! HOW HOT IS THAT?!?!?! A DAMSELL IN DISTRESS! OH HELP ME KIEFER! HELP ME! OH - THAT'S SO HOT! SERIOUSLY!!! I'M GETTING ALL SORTS OF BOTHERED JUST THINKING ABOUT IT! YUM-I-LI-CIOUS! HE CAN SAVE ME ANY DAY!



  10. 10

    Isn't this nice? It's real clear that Brooke is covering for her little designer buddy's bad behavior. Kiefer came to her rescue and now she's shitting all over him to cover it uP. Never liked her. She is a bit off a full load. When she made uP with Tom Cruise I officially wrote her off as just like HIM. UGH. I sincerely hope NYPD will warn her that lying to a police officer can result in many things all of which are very serious. Tell the truth, Brooke.



  11. 11

    Violent Scumbag. Jail time and huge law suit. Yeah.



  12. 12

    The desinger is goregeous, Kiefer is about as ugly as a guy gets. How can anyone justify such violence,it better have been that he was saving her life,anything else is criminal.