Megan Fox Takes A Swipe At Scarlett Johansson

fox-scarjo-wenn.jpg

Pour a saucer of milk please!

Because Megan Fox just unleashed her claws and made a scratching post of Scarlett Johansson!

In the new issue of , Fox starts out her attack by deeming Zac Efron and Robert Pattinson "too pretty," and then went on to call out ScarJo for her pretensions.

Fox says, "I don’t want to have to be like a Scarlett Johansson – who I have nothing against. But I don’t want to have to go on talk shows and pull out every single SAT word I’ve every learned to prove, like, 'Take me seriously, I am intelligent, I can speak.' I don’t want to have to do that. I resent having to prove that I’m not a retard – but I do. And part of it is my own fault."

Suffering no lack of self esteem, Fox adds, "I’m just really confident sexually, and I think that sort of oozes out of my pores…It’s just there. It’s something I don’t have to turn on."

Get the girl some catnip!

[Images via WENN.]

    Posted: May 9, 2009 at 10:00 am / Email this  »

    217 comments to “Megan Fox Takes A Swipe At Scarlett Johansson”

    More comments: « 1 2 [3]



    1. 201

      wat a hater!



    2. 202

      Her comment was slightly ignorant and politically incorrect. I, personally, take serious offense whenever somebody likes to use the term "retard" in association with dumb and stupid. My brother is mentally ill, and I don't think he'd appreciate being the end of some poorly said insult. Go read the newspaper, megan. Oh, and Sports Illustrated doesn't count.



    3. 203

      Megan fox is gettin on my last fucking nerves…now i dont know why but i cant stand her…The fame is getting to much in her head….
      She still really pretty though ..that doesnt change.



    4. 204

      If she's still referring to elevated language as "SAT words" that gives a lot of insight into her own intelligence! She's hot, but a little humility would make her even more attractive!



    5. 205

      Don't worry, Megan, both you and Scarlett are horrible actresses who got their job because of their looks. Neither of you are that smart. Intelligence and morals are not a requirement in Hollywood.



    6. 206

      (1) She doesn't need to prove that she isn't a dumbass, cos no matter what she will always to prove to be one. Isn't there any other word she could have replaced with the R word? There, right there she proves that she is a dumbass and totally ignorant of her word choice.

      (2) Sounds like someone is slightly threatened by a sexier, intelligent, healthy role model. Scarlet oozes sexiness on all levels. She is a whole packagfe deal.
      *She can hold a conversation without using people to examplify a point
      * She is polite
      *Funny
      *Sweet
      *Has a gorgeous figure. Has a real body that many could achieve
      *She is TALENTED!
      *She is a very intelligent woman. Beauty can only take you so far, a combination of looks, intelligence, people skills, will take you further. Why else would Woody Allen be so captivated by this woman- Cos even he can see all of the above points.

      Megan is shooting herself in the foot. Stick to what she's good at- TRYING to be Angelina Jolie



    7. 207

      Yeah, too bad she doesn't ooze an ounce of class…. dumb jealous whore



    8. 208

      why are people so crazy about her in the first place? She is so ordinarily pretty, nothing that would really catch my attention if I was a guy. Even Angelina Jolie, who has been through surgery, is more interesting-attractive than her. I have seen many pretty girls like her in the movies, so why is she supposedly standing out? Or just go watch Supernatural - each week a stunner. Why is she all that??



    9. 209

      I wasn’t aware that beautiful woman have to prove their intelligence. Fox has to get over herself, she’s obviously worried about her true ignorance shining through. She’s already slipped, considering she actually stated “ I’m not a retard”. She should have thought about her disparaging use of the word.
      If your attractive and unintelligent, you’ll come across that way. If you are sexy and intelligent, good for you. Did she stop to think that Scarlett Johansson may just in fact be educated. I think a little volunteer work and maybe a college course or two wouldn’t hurt Fox.



    10. 210

      Time fer sum mud rastlin!



    11. 211

      EW oh my God get over yourself! I can't stand this bitch. She is very pretty but she acts like an asshole.



    12. 212

      poor megan!!!she's who?



    13. 213

      ROB AND ZAC ARE TOO PRETTY? Oh, she's so funny! That little tranny!
      And Megan Fox, if you're reading (probably is, conceited tranny:
      Scarlett Johansson is a billion times more beautiful, sexy, and smart than you'll ever be. Showing off her "SAT words"? Hey, at least she knows them.
      Unlike you. Conceited much? You had like what, 4 acting jobs? Scarlett is respected. You're looked at like an item. Retards? Well, retards find that offensive. So not only are you stupid, conceited, ugly, and fake, but you're disusting too. Can anybody only mention how much surgery you had to various areas of your body? To look like the piece of junk (being nice here) you do now? I'm also surprised that you know what "pores" are. Since you're so scientifically smart, let me tell you something.
      Beauty is skin deep. But shallowness, conceitedness, and disgustingness is to the bone.



    14. 214

      Wow jealous much? She's starting to fall pretty low on my totem pole.



    15. 215

      Hmm… didn't she just prove her stupidity by using the word "Retard".
      That's a really insulting description of people with mental health issues and she should know better.



    16. 216

      People are obviously going to think she's a "retard", as she so nonchalantly uses - she apparently (and definitely) does not use "SAT" words.



    17. 217

      She has nothing to worry about not wanting to be like Scarlett Johansson - Scarlett Johansson HAS CLASS, IS HUMBLE, CAN ACT, and IS INTELLIGENT–things Megan Fox definitely is NOWHERE NEAR of having.

    More comments: « 1 2 [3]