Completely Gratuitous
Filed under: Gisele Bundchen
So naked, yet so not!
Gisele Bundchen tries on a new look for the latest issue of Photo magazine.
Thoughts????
Posted: June 15, 2009 at 1:45 pm
|
|
|||
 |
92 comments to “Completely Gratuitous” |
||
Interesting….FIRST!
Body looks good but get rid of that ink. It looks stupid.
A bit too photoshopped on the first one, it looks unnatural. But am I the only one that thinks her face is ugly? Like an ugly man face. Her body is hot but not her face.
I don't mind tats on a chick but that's not a good look for her!
The Lakers are the champs bitches!!!!!!
The Lakers are the champs bitches!!!!!!
The Lakers are the champs bitches!!!!!!
The Lakers are the champs bitches!!!!!!
The Lakers are the champs bitches!!!!!!
The Lakers are the champs bitches!!!!!!
The Lakers are the champs bitches!!!!!!
The Lakers are the champs bitches!!!!!!
The Lakers are the champs bitches!!!!!!
The Lakers are the champs bitches!!!!!!
The Lakers are the champs bitches!!!!!!
The Lakers are the champs bitches!!!!!!
The Lakers are the champs bitches!!!!!!
The Lakers are the champs bitches!!!!!!
The Lakers are the champs bitches!!!!!!
I think she looks monsterous in these pictures. Her face, her hair.. THE INK! eugh! gross!!
ew
Are those Croc's that she has on? UGLY
She's has a gorgeous figure why not show it off? I never thought her face was too stunning but she is far from ugly. The temporary or photoshopped tattoos have a pretty pattern to them but it would be awful if they were real. Tattoos can look hot on some 20-30 year old women, but when they become older and their skin starts to sag and wrinkle it will look like crap…or I assume it will look gross because none of the elderly women I have met so far had tattoos. The future will be interesting, grandmother's with ink and implants.
hoootttt… i think
Doesn't distract from her horse face.
Why can't I look like that? She's so absolutely perfect!
She looks good, but those sandles are hideous!!!
they're old photos.
PHOTOSHOP!
SHE IS WAY THINNER THAN THAT!
I think she looks absolutely ridiculous!!!!!
nasty
WAAAAY to much ink!
Im sorry but I've never seen what the big fuss was over Gisele.
ehhh. don't like it. i don't think her big wavy model hair matches with the tats. maybe she should have worn a wig of straight black hair or something?
Her thighs are as big as her waist. That's just not natural…
nice body art she looks like an iguana/duck/snake
butter face. hideous sandals. rockin body.
I think those are her sandals she is wearing. she has her own line out. every time i see her pose with them to advertise I always think to myself " those are the ugliest sandals ever". I am surprised she would put her name on things so not stylish.
Killer body, what of course we already knew that..
the body paint is completely post production (added after the photos were taken)
Gisele has absolutely no patience, and can barely sit through having a basic face makeup job, she would never sit through the 4 hours or more it would take to paint her full body, let alone at least twice!!!! (unless the check was right, but Photo mag is not doing well enough to be able to pay her that kind of money)
Is this an ad for Flojo sandals? WTF is up with her feet? The tattoo bodysuit is neat-o but I can't stop looking at those stupid things on her feet! They totally ruin the pix. And also her face is not that awesome here…agreed, she looks like a dude.
Re: Belle de Jour – Yeah, it would totally suck to have a grandma with an awesome rack and rockin' tats. If you don't like it, don't look at it. Welcome to the 21st century, we'd like you to join us. P.S. Giselle does not really have her entire body tattooed - it's an ad.
she looks like that freaky tattoo guy.
I can't imagine how many hours it took to paint all that.
Re: helloRJ – I agree….the stylist/photographer should have went full throttle with this shoot instead of just making it look like Gisele's head was slapped on a tattooed body…it looks really phony.
This was a great chance for her to go crazy, have fun and get wild, but instead it's just meh….another Gisele Bundchen photo. I'm sure she had no creative control, but it could have been a much better shoot.
Re: Bufffan – I totally agree. Her body is amazing!!!!! I wanna see it without the ink -hehehe - AND NO PHOTOSHOP
Killer body, what of course we already knew that.
God I love all these people flappin their lips about her ugly face blah blah blah. But if she knocked on their door naked they'd break their neck to let her in - LOL
Her face is photoshopped? And the 2nd one looks like Tom Brady!
Her body is fantastic, I see one of the posers here calls her fat. Anything less than this would be ridiculously too skinny.
Butter face but a great body.
whatever it takes to stay in the spotlight…
Very "Jean Paul Gauiltier". Cool!
Makes her body look as bad as her face.
Re: WombatNYC – Why would you say that..?
it looks really realistic, great photos
Fucking awful illustrations!
She is beautiful but her hands look HUGE in the second picture. Man hands. Creepy.
Eww that's just weird
Her body is amazing! But seriously the ink has to go…
I like her Artificial Fake Hair. Some stylist glued that fake hair on her head good. Britney Spears needs to use her stylist while on tour since her weave falls out on chairs while she lip sync and hobble around on stage and attempt to dance on chairs.
Good body but OMG talk about butterface! blech! You bash Fergie but don't comment on this tranny face?
[b] THESE PHOTOS ARE OLD!!! THEY'RE FROM GISELLES SANDAL LINE CAMPAIGN IPANEMA from Brazil!!!!!
THEY'RE NOT FOR THE MAGAZINE ISSUE
THESE PHOTOS ARE FROM 2007!!!!!!!!
COME ON Y'ALL ! WAKE UP PEREZ !
These ads were taken back in 2006 !
They ARE NOT BRAND NEW AT ALL !
And yes they were taken for the so called sandals.. which are from Gisele's Brand called IPANEMA.
And there you have it.
By the way, with a few wise keywords you can find some videos about the makeup/shooting on YOUTUBE.
Cheers
Vk.
Damn, that girl got a good body
Re: Fifih – YEAH
COME ON Y'ALL ! WAKE UP PEREZ !
These ads were taken back in 2006 !
They ARE NOT BRAND NEW AT ALL !
And yes they were taken for the so called sandals.. which are from Gisele's Brand called IPANEMA.
And there you have it.
By the way, with a few wise keywords you can find some videos about the makeup/shooting on YOUTUBE.
Cheers
Vk.
tattooed snakewoman…she does always look sunburned tho
Perfect body, I don't like the tats
Re: raych83 –
omg im not the nly one!!
i just think she looks far too sexual not sophisticated at all
She looks like a man. She is by no means the most beautiful model out there. What is it about her that makes her highest paid? Very many featured face imo.
Ugh! she's so skinny, it's horrific!!
love it, love the ink!!! Wish it was real!!
ummmm, some heels maybe?
Ick sandals!!
I'm not feeling the grandma-in-Florida sandals on her. And what's the point of the body suit of fake tattoos?
im sorry but shes UGLY
i understand that she designed those sandals BUT enough is enough. they are not cute! and distract from the photo
I'd LIKE TO VOLUNTEER TO HELP HER WASH THOSE TATS OFF.
IF THIS IS AN AD FOR THOSE U-G-L-Y SANDALS?!?!?
.
I GUESS THE BEST WAY TO TRY TO SELL THOSE YUCKY THINGS IS TO DISTRACT THE EYE!
Hybrids will be hunted down and killed ALL TOGETHER…
Love
Ugh. SO not hot. I get it's body paint but it just makes her look like she rolled around on a dirty LA street in the second pic and as for the first…way too ugly to comment.
I think they would have been better off if they stuck with brighter colors.
wow…
Pumps would have been hotter. The sandals are just butt ugly….
Wow. I think she's annoying but still wow.
Wait.. are those Crocs? I don't get the combo.
Re: kiwidrop – yeah, they are really out of place! shed have looked better barefoot
put some heels on this bitch quickly, flip flops dont do a thing for a girls figure even if she is built like gisele.
She would be totally gorgeous if she puts a brown bag over her head during photo shoots.
I really don't understand all of the fuss over this girl. She's not ugly, exactly, but she's definitely not beautiful. I see better looking women in real life every day, was she just chosen to be a model because of her height and lean body?
I don't know what it is but I just don't like her, or her douchebag hubby.
i think it would look alot better if it wasnt so dark…they need to add more colorful tattoos brighter ones
THAT'S HER REAL REPTILIAN SKIN
shes pretty but thats like..way too skinny..:|
Everytime I look at her all I see is a MAN!
that is fucking hot right there.
Tyra's typical comment to ANTM contestants seems appropriate here: "Where's Your Neck?" "You Need To Extend It, Make It Long For The Camera!"
its obviously photoshopped or a skin suit because,
1. no one would really want to do that to their body
2. if you look really closely and compare the 2 photos, they are COMPLETELY different patterns
True that, she does kinda have a hot body (kinda because I think she does a lot of bending and shit to make her body look "curvy") but her face is fugs
nup
haha who are these people to say her face is fugly? please.
reminds me of a snake
This isn't really new, she did photos like this with the fake full body tattoos for her sandal line a couple of years ago.
Re: Bufffan – toe-tally agree man. i was begining to think i was on crack or something, cuz i was NOT seein the "beauty" everyone else saw. thanx for clarifying that for me, much appreciated, now i know im not crazed or anything !!!!!!!
Woow very nice!!
I'm already driveling.
OK SHE SHAPED LIKE MY FRIEND 10 YEAR OLD SON.SHE REALLY IS WOW
still think she is a home wracking whore and she should never think that she is that little boy's mom. if i was his mom i would have kicked her ass and never let the little guy be around her.