Home Videos Photos Shop
PerezHilton CocoPerez Khloé K. Star Wars Twitter T. Swift PerezTV

Debbie Rowe To Get Custody Of MJ's Children?

| Filed under: Michael Jackson


It is being reported that Debbie Rowe will be able to take full custody of the two children she bore for Michael Jackson, even though it was widely reported that she had given up her parental rights.

Well, that is not so!

During the custody trial in 2005, she attempted to relinquish her parental holdings but because she did not complete the required "parental fitness investigation", her parental rights were never terminated.

So with her rights still intact, under California state Law, Rowe is now presumed to be the person who will get custody.

The only way to deny Rowe custody is if a court determines it would be "detrimental to the children."

Sources suggest that the likelihood that Rowe will ask for custody is good, as she will get "a huge amount of child support from Jackson's estate."

Our question is, what is to become of Blanket? Will he be separated from his siblings? We sincerely hope not.

And this woman will likely be paid off by the Jackson family. At least we hope she is. She shouldn't get those kids!

[Image via Getty Images.]

Controversial Celebrity Dads!
Celebrity Couples Who Moved Too Quickly In Their Relationships
Controversial Couples: Relationships That Haven't Been Respected By All!
Cutest Celeb Family Halloween Costumes!
Hollywood's Most Tarnished Parent-Child Relationships
Michael Jackson's Top 5 Music Videos!

123 comments to “Debbie Rowe To Get Custody Of MJ's Children?”

More comments: [1] 2 »

  1. 1

    Why shouldn't she get the kids? They will probably have a much more normal life with her than with the Jacksons.

  2. 2

    I really don't know anything about her… so I'm very curious, why don't you think she should get her own kids? She is their mother… why shouldn't she raise them? I don't even understand why she gave up her rights in the first place?

  3. 3

    why shouldn't she get those kids? It's not like living with MJ was so normal…

  4. 4

    why shouldn't she???? They would be better off than with that circus of a family…the Jacksons….I pray to God she gets custody of those children. they will be much better off with her.

  5. All says – reply to this


    Oh right Perez, and who should get custody? One of the Jacksons? Those kids will be exploited until they are as fucked up as Michael was.

  6. 6

    why shouldn't she?

    she was the key witness on Michael's trial. I thought she was the one who gave him freedom, and she's the mother of the kids, it's now up to her to raise them or not.

    And I'M SAYING THIS, as a michael jackson fan since the age of 2 years old, I'M NOW 23, still in shock … but waiting for the truth about his death, and for this thing to end. Michael needs to finally rest in peace. I'm sure, somewhere , perhaps on another planet, or the moon, he's actually enjoying this…but enough is enough, we've had enough.

    Let him rest in peace. Let the king rest. Let the king be…though we don't see him anymore.

  7. 7

    well you have to realize at this point they're not normal children and also siblings should not be separated at any cost. i think family members that have actually spent time with them should be their guardians, why does that not make sense? who wants to lose their father suddenly and then have to go live with a virtual stranger with one brother missing? that doesn't seem right to me.

  8. 8

    I don't think Debbie should have custody either. Where was she before? You can't pop out of your kids lives for a decade and then pop back in suddenly. Besides Michael, they were raised by their nanny, Michael's mother, and Michael's extended family. They are Jacksons. Perhaps Debbie gave birth to them, but as the child of divorced parents having been raised by a single parent myself, I know that your real family isn't the one that births you but the one that takes care of you and raises you. Those kids don't know Debbie at all, thrusting them to live with a stranger would increase their stress level so much. Besides, what makes everyone think Debbie Rowe is that much more normal? Given some of her choices, I highly doubt it. The children should be raised by the people they know that have always been there.

  9. 9

    she should not get those kids, all there life they wore masks and had so much crazy shiz in there life. How about the kids live with someone normal

  10. 10

    Hell no!!! Remember Debbie said "I gifted Michael his children" She said that during Michael's trial on the stand. Also Debbie was well funded for her gift over 8 million dollars plus. You can't seperate the 3 kids. They belong to family. Debbie wasn't their raising her gift to Michael. These children were so well protected by Michael. I wouldn't want them to be exposed in the public eye. Hoping Katherine will get custody.

  11. 11

    Those poor children. They havent had a normal life since they were born and now its just going to get worse. I hope the Bio mom lets them live with family that they know and feel comfortable with.

  12. 12

    NO, she got paid out almost $10M - why should she get them? Just because she birthed them does NOT make her a mother. She has not had very much (if any) contact with them throughout the years. This woman likes horses, not kids!

  13. 13

    The kids will have enough problems without them being separated. All this talk of estate money, there might not be any left after the creditors get theirs.

  14. 14

    Those poor kids, the world as they know it has just turned upside down! Good luck to them.

  15. Aj20 says – reply to this


    I hope she get custody of her childrens better than the wacko sicko Jackson family

  16. 16

    well i dont know her maybe she is a nice person and could take care of her daugher

  17. 17

    I knew this would happen. These poor kids have suffered enough in their messed up lives and now there could be a huge custody battle.

  18. 18

    Thats if she wants them check your facts rat bastard

  19. 19

    She'll only be in it for the kids INHERITANCE.

  20. 20

    Why the hell not… she gave birth to them.

  21. 21

    I have to agree with Perez on this one those children need to be with Family that they know and trust not with some egg donor

  22. 22

    I think they'd be better off than without his wacko side to warp them. have you ever thought about telling her side of the story? He's a control freak, even Lisa Marie said so when they were married. Doesn't mean she's unfit.

  23. 23


  24. 24

    okay… i dont really care if she gets the kids,
    as long as she is able to support them financially
    and emotionally. if she cant`, then get the fuck out
    of the way.

  25. 25

    Of course, Debbie should get the children. She is their biological mother. I'll bet she would be a good mother too.

  26. 26

    How is she a worse parent than MJ? Seriously?

    And what do you know about parenting Perez?

  27. 27

    Why shouldn't she get her biological children? Your sense of propriety is so out of whack lately….What's wrong with you? The Jacksons have proven themselves incapable of providing any semblance of normalcy to their own kids..>Why not give this woman a shot?

  28. Arshe says – reply to this


    Um why shouldn't she get custody is she not enough of a screwed up celebrityh?

  29. 29

    Re: Whatever-u-say!

    She was FORCED to keep away from the kids.

  30. 30

    Re: **LondonHockeyGurL** – now why would he start checking facts now? all he does is piss everyone off, gets bitch slapped for it and claims his eye fell out…

  31. 31

    I sure hope she does NOT get the kids! I hope that Michael's mom or sister will get the kids! They need to be around family that they know not some strange woman who is only out for the money! I hope they pay that money hungry cow off and keep the kids! Besides the kids need to stay together! If that cow gets the kids she will use that money for her benefit and not the kids! They need to be cared for by family who have their best interest at hand, not some cow who never wanted the kids in the first place!!!

  32. 32

    Wow Perez, what a shitty card you are…

  33. 33

    Perez, you're a potato head piece of shit and I hope you rot in hell

  34. 34

    I'm only here to witness the down fall of this trash site. Don't you people have anything better to do than to gossip about celebrities? Perez is a little bitch attention whore. "Oh! Look at meeeee! I have a website and talk shit about everyone! I will SUE YOUUUU!"

  35. 35

    It's my understanding hat Michael didn't have ANYTHING to do with his family so I surely don't want them to rear these children….I don't understand some of Debbie's choices but she seems saner than anyone else…

  36. 36

    Re: Kylian – dont come on here then! you idiot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! he can say whatever he wants its HIS BLOG not yours and not ur mammas! get lost and go on another web blog you fool!!!!!!!!!!! im sick of people like you. dont like what u read or see???? close your damn eyes and dont read it then, you sure as hell comment and read his stuff making him more money! Team Perez!

  37. 37

    Well, she pretty much sold her eggs and rent out her uterus to Jackson. But she is the biological Mother. So I will reserve judgement on weather she is a fit parent till DCFS has determined done an investigation

  38. 38

    Oh Perez, you are such a judgmental asshole!!! Exactly why shouldn't she get her kids??? She was so worried about the children in 2006 that she sued Michael for custody, so her desire to be with her children isn't anything new! She might be able to give those kids a normal, happy childhoood that isn't filled with weird behavior, wearing masks, a drugged out dad and constant pursuit by the paparrazzi. R.I.P MJ

  39. 39

    Uh..the Jackson Family getting the children?? Are you KIDDING ME!!!
    I hope she does get the kids.

  40. Unari says – reply to this


    A real mother would never have given them up in the first place. She had nothing to do with them and shouldn't get them now. She was only in it for the money.

  41. 41

    Re: Kylian – Fuck you. Your an asshole. Don't talk shit about Perez. If you have nothing nice to say then say NOTHING….

  42. 42

    Oh man. This tragedy is far from over.

  43. 43

    He continues to fuck up kids lives even after death!!!!!!!
    They should have always lived with her!

  44. 44

    Biologically the kids are obviously not his so I seriously doubt his family will have any chance of getting them.

  45. 45

    She gave the kids up for money before, she doesn't deserve to have cust. of them….Pay her off again to stay away from them and have as much contact as she has prev. , if thats any at all.

  46. CHC says – reply to this


    If the alternative is the Jacksons taking them, then they'd be better off on the streets!

  47. 47

    Re: MoonlightMassage – Agreed 110%….These ppl. should stay the hell out of here if they don't like it so much…Find a place you anjoy being ppl.

  48. 48

    Perez.. once you again I must call you a fucktard pakuni. Why shouldn't she have the kids? Would you rather the kids stay with the dysfunctional mess that is the Jackson family. Fucktard.

  49. 49

    De ja vue when Anna Nicole died and everyone wanted custody of her daughter and access to the inheritance money. So sad…I dont know her or any of his family well enough to say but I do hope they will be placed where they will be raised in the most loving, stable environment possible and where their identity will be protected and not exploited. I find it hard to believe as a loving father he would have already named a legal gaurdian in the case of his death…especially with so much money involved.

  50. 50

    ew she just blew kids out for MONEY!! She's scum out for money only!! Dont put those poor kids with a woman who just gave them up for cash!!! sick!

  51. 51

    If she is capable of looking after the kids they should go back to their mother. They have already lost a father, why deny them a relationship with their mother?

  52. 52

    Ew dont put those poor kids in the company of Papa JOE!!! He's liable to make them go get a switch off the tree outside!! He's an ass.

  53. 53

    Really Perez you douche!? I did not realize you were a certified child therapist OR had the qualifications to say who should and should not receive those children. Get a life you fat load! She's done nothing but bring those lives into this world, you are not part of that families inner circle nor do you have the qualifications to make such a statement. You have so many opinions yet have you taken the time to review your own actions, words and behaviors? All you do is slag people off all day, you add nothing positive to this world. You're just a pathetic hater, get a life. I wish someone would pay you to shut your ignorant mouth.

  54. 54

    She should NOT get those kids! She's never wanted them!
    When they had them, she and Michael had a contract that he would be the sole custodial parent. In 2001, SHE filed for termination of her parental rights! SHE accepted $5 million dollars from him to stay away from the kids! If she gave a shit about the kids, she would NEVER have initiated giving up being a parent and she never would have accepted money for anything! She is a gold-digger!
    Give custody to the nanny….she's the one who has raised them and loved them and cared for them and been in their lives! Besides, if she continues to raise them, they have stability, and they get to stay together!

  55. 55

    Why shouldn't he get the kids. Look how messed up the Jackson Family…why don't we just turn the kids over the grandparents, so they can have another shot at raising normal kids? You're an idiot Perez.

  56. 56

    Re: CuddlyCarla – So you're able to make this statement because you are in the Jackson families lives and you know for a fact that Debbie has not been there for her kids? Give me a break. You are speaking on a subject you know nothing about at all.

  57. Lene says – reply to this


    She might be their birth mother, but SO FUCKING WHAT?!?! She hasn't been in their lives for YEARS! and now when Michael's dead, she can just step in??? Nope. The children don't know her. And if she takes custody, what about Blanket (prince Michael) ??? Debbie is not his mother, so that would mean the siblings would have to separate!

    They've already lost their father, i really hope they won't have to loose each other. :(

  58. 58

    Re: angel_une – oh yes! Because the Jackson's did such an amazing job of raising a 'normal' family!? Have you been living in a cave? Wtf….?

  59. Lene says – reply to this


    Re: Spindoc

    Michael did say the children were bio his.

  60. 60

    She is a nice woman, look at her! She didn't change (her appearance) after being Michael's wife (and becoming famous). I respect her! She was a nurse at a plastic surgery practice, but look at her! She looks natural, and she surely has not 'overdone' it. She appears to be the same person before and after, unlike that Goslin woman. I think Michael knew she was good; that's why he married her: just a good woman inside and out, and not fake or corrupted by money!

  61. 61

    She's as mad as a box of toads. It would be terrible to take Blanket away from his siblings after he's lost his dad.

  62. 62

    Those poor children… :-(

  63. 63

    I agree with you on this one. She shouldn't get custody now..She hasn'[t been apart of their lives thus far so why now should she a virtual stranger come and seperate them. Their 12 and 11 if she really wanted to be a mother then she would never have given up any rights no matter what type of money ws being offered. Last who would want to be with a mother they knew didn't want them and only has them now to get more money.

  64. 64

    Re: gimlet123 – shut the fuck up

  65. 65

    To those saying she wasn't part of their lives, from reports I've seen/read/heard elsewhere she did in fact visit them and spend time with them throughout most of their lives. So she's not a complete stranger.

    His family did such a swell job raising Jacko, yes let's give them the kids!

  66. 66

    Re: Spindoc – i was thinking the same thing, they are all too white….

  67. 67

    I seriously doubt this woman could screw them up anymore than living with Wacko Jacko did or his messed up family could.

  68. 68

    Re: JigSaw – Haha -)

  69. 69

    Re: CuddlyCarla – I agree with you, I really don't think that she should be getting custody of the children. she is only going to want them because of financial gain (even though it wouldn't be huge sums)

  70. 70

    From a mother's perspective, any mother who would give up or attempt to rights to her children shouldn't have them at all. Clearly, she didn't want them and therefore shouldn't have them now.

  71. 71

    Who the f… are you to say who should or should not get the kids??? You know nothing about those people or what they're about. STFU already, Mario!

  72. Arshe says – reply to this


    I dont see how she is an unfit parent, there has been no bad news spread about her. As far as giving up her parental rights well she never fully did and with MJ she was up against millions and his lawyers. I wouldn't be so quick to judge, she is their biological mother and for all we know the jackson family is a bunch of strangers to them.

  73. 73

    Why not? They are her kids, and she has tried to make contact with them over the years. Michael was a legend but also a big dose of weird, she can't be any worse.

  74. 74

    She Should get the kids.
    Michael selected her as their mom.
    It's more rare that a woman be a pedophile then a man so
    the kids are already safer with her.
    Debbie/ the kids mom -
    I'll bet you a dollar that she Never holds any of the
    kids a window. Micheal - wanting to be white skinned
    had whiter kids - and the only reason to hold that
    baby out a window would be for two reasons…
    1) Publicity stunt.
    2) Jealousy - his kids are white/r naturally - especially
    the baby he held out the window and named Blanket?
    (I think the babe held out was named Blanket?).

    Micheal's parents? -That's what happened to Micheal in
    the first place.
    I saw him on tv and he says himself that he didn't have a childhood.

    The Jackson family - they come to the surface now and then…
    Some more in the spotlight then others.
    The kids will lead a more normal n private life with
    the mom or a 'pedophile-proofed' Jackson home.
    In a Jackson tv production - years ago - Toya was
    sharing how she, Michael and others
    were molested by their dad -
    this now makes a lot of Sense after
    watching Michael over the years.


    Love Yas!

  75. Arshe says – reply to this


    She probably tried to get custody when she saw the drug use, we don't know what went on behind closed doors with them, their lawyers or him and his money. I just dont see this woman in the public eye running her mouth and making vulgar statements so she has more of my respect then most people in the public view.

  76. 76

    So Perez - I know you're about the Gay rights and I respect that.

    But don't you think Michael Jackson should have had 'Pedophile'
    rights? After all it all ties into sex and is about sexual organs. Why can't a pedifile marry the child of his choice and why can't they have rights as a pedophilia couple?
    If it's ok with the parents - why can't a pedophile marry his true love?
    What if pedophiles are born that way?

    Sick I know…just making a point.lol.

    I love Ya!

  77. 77

    Maybe Janet should get the kids? Her & Jermaine?

  78. 78

    It is not going to be easy to decided who gets custody of these kids. They are NOT biologically his. They are as white as my ass. They may know the Jackson family, but I would hope that he would not want them to be raised by abusive parents as he was. In regards to Perez reporting this as a publicity stunt, he has done some strange things in his life and nothing would surprise me. Dangling Blanket from a balcony! Come on!

  79. 79

    As with everything else in the life of Michael Jackson, the kids will be a COMPLICATED issue.
    Biologically, they are not his, so it will be interesting to see what happens to them.
    Poor kids .. Please keep them away from all Jacksons!

  80. 80

    Re: PammieTee – right so because you are a breeder you are now qualified to make statements on how other people parent!? LMFAO!!!!! You do not know what the arrangements were between this family, you do not know what her involvement or lack thereof with these children was so instead of wasting your time playing pretend psychologist why don't you go look after your kids! Just one more fine example of just because people can breed doesn't mean they should.

  81. 81

    Janet should get the kids!

  82. 82

    Re: CuddlyCarla – right because you live with the Jacksons so you CLEARLY know what their living situation is like and therefore can be a judgmental person because you know it all better! LMFAO.

  83. 83

    Didn't they have an agreement.
    She just bore him the 2 children they never had a relationship.
    She was paid for her services and relinquished custody.
    Am I wrong here that is what I remember hearing.
    If that is the case why should she get them now it
    would be for the $$$ she would want them not out of love.

  84. 84

    Maybe Hagdonna will adopt them? Oh nevermind, they are white.

  85. 85

    if she loved er kids soooo much y wud she giv em upp
    she wantz all of his moneyy

  86. 86

    While she doesn't seem like she ever wanted the kids, I can guarantee they won't have a normal life living with the Jacksons. Janet seems the most normal and she's still in the middle of her career (i.e. no time). Even so, not sure Debbie could handle the media crap surrounding the kids.

  87. 87

    she didnt want them!! she wanted to relinquish her rights!!! She said "Those are his kids..they are HIS kids"…give them to Kathryn, she's the heart and soul of the Jackson Family.

  88. 88


  89. 89


  90. 90

    I hope the kids will be able to finally live a NORMAL life. I think it's horrible that they had to shroud themselves in ridiculous masks.

  91. 91


  92. 92

    I thought she was Blanket's mother too no? I hope those kids go to one of MJ's brothers or sisters.

  93. 93

    Well…she is the mother.

  94. 94

    Should his parents be allowed to adopt any of those kids?
    I sure hope not!
    His sister should (Janet) should prevent that from happening
    And adopt all of them together.

  95. 95

    yeah why shouldn't she get her children….fuck that. He made sure to take them away from her…fuck you perez!

  96. 96

    I think so.. maybe some stability would be good.. who knows!! I think for now it is good.

  97. 97

    she gave her children away for MONEY. that's the cruelest thing you can do.
    PLEASE dont give her custody.

  98. 98

    I believe she "sold" her kids to Michael. She merely acted as a type of surrogate (not quite, I wonder who was the bio dad). Angelina Jolie should adopt them!! These kids would have a chance! Just saying….

  99. 99

    She has more of a right to the kids then Michaels family who have not been involved in their lives much either. Joe Jackson is an abuser & Katherine never did anything about it! The grandparents are too old anyway. Let the kids (blanket too) and the nanny (who has been the surrogate mom) go have a normal life on a horse ranch with their bio mom. Get away from the money grubbing Jackson family and get rid of the silly veils please.

  100. 100

    No matter what, this woman is the mother of the children, period.

More comments: [1] 2 »