Debbie Rowe Interview FAKE, Her Attorney Claims!
Filed under: Michael Jackson
We mentioned this weekend an interview that Debbie Rowe had recently given, stating that her late ex-husband, Michael Jackson, was NOT the father of his supposed children and that she in no way was taking custody of the kids.
However, this morning, Rowe's attorney, Marta Almli, reveals that this information is not true.
He insists that "The interview did not occur. The article is a complete fabrication."
Well, there lies in the good news and the bad news. The good being that those children will always know who their father is. The bad, that they might have to be part of an epic custody battle between Rowe and the Jackson family!
[Image via WENN.]
Posted: June 29, 2009 at 11:45 am
next
The children are obviously no phycial relation to Michael Jackson, it will be hard for his family to retain custody when they aren't blood relations AND for YEARS Michael has been saying that his family was abusive.
I say give the children to Rowe. Then they will have a chance at a normal life. They can never have a normal life while living with the crazy Jackson family! It is a sin that Michael took those children away from their natural mother. Jackson is burning in hell with SATAN at this very moment because of all the disgusting, sinful things he did with little children. SATAN has special place in hell for child molesters! What a monster!
NO SHIT????
-
WELL STOP REPORTING FAKE NEWS MARIO
OF COURSEE it was fake….why would she want to hurt his image by saying hes not the father…i hate how the media twists stories around..its truly not fair
RIP michael
I agree, it takes more than just giving sperm to make a father.
Perez, I knew you were jumping the gun before you even knew this was fact,you were posting. You will never ever learn.
EVERYBODY, CHECK YOUR FACTS ON THE MICHAEL JACKSON "AUTOPSY" REPORT THAT PEREZ POSTED. A SIMPLE GOOGLE SEARCH WILL REVEAL THAT IT HAS ALREADY BEEN PROVEN TO BE A FAKE.
*****We've learned the story making the rounds detailing the terrible condition of Michael Jackson's body is a fake.
A report in The Sun gave harrowing details of the body, but we've learned the report was fabricated and - completely false.**************
Duh it was fake. Did you read it? Anyways I still don't believe those are his biological children. I think Debbie Rowe will prob get custody.
duh.
that's what you get for quoting a tabloid.
Regardless of whether the interview was real, thos kids are not biologically Jacksons. However, they would be happier, I'm sure, staying with the Jacksons, since that is all they know.
already knew that. there were several posts on blindgosssip about what is really going on with debbie rowe and also about who blanket's mother really is. debbie will get ALL of those kids!
Those are NOT MJ's biological kids! I am certain this fact will be finally revealed when the horrendous custody battle begins. Rowe won't get them, but MJ will be revealed to be only the ADOPTED father.
I have my doubts if teh kids are his. I mean official he was a black man and those kids are white. Not even half black half white and theyr hair is nog like black people have. Its brown. but his hair was black and thats a very strong color.
how could MJ be the biological father of those kids, since they are white? I mean, despite all the operations he had a white skin, MJ still had black genes inside..
A castrato is a male, artificially produced soprano, mezzo-soprano, or alto singer whose voice is artificially changed through castration before puberty. This is done in order for the child to be more physically suited for advanced training as a singer. A castrato may also be one who, because of an endocrinological condition, never reaches sexual maturity. The practice was almost exclusively an Italian one, largely influenced by the Catholic church beginning in the mid-sixteenth century and lasting through the 1800s. Today, castratos are often regarded as a type of manufactured virtuoso, having been victims of, or slaves to, their craft
I believe in that last court case she revealed he wasn't the biological father of the kids. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure it out anyway. None of these parties are ideal, but the lesser of two evils would be for Debbie Rowe to take the kids. I know I wouldn't want my kids growing up anywhere near the Jacksons. Some reports say that the kids don't even know the rest of the family. It's time for DR to woman up and protect those kids.
There is no way those kids can be his. Being that he is an African- American male, despite his looks, those kids are completely white with no sign of any African decent. This will be such a hard decision because neither of these families are stable enough to raise young children.
My grand-niece is half black/half white. She has blonde hair, blue eyes and is pale as hell. You never know…
Is anything you post real? All you do is steal from unreliable sources. Maybe you should make a video and start bawling and play the victim again, blaming everyone else for your miserable life.
Duh, the interview came from News of the World. What did you expect?! Shame on you people for believing some D- list tabloid, and shame on Perez for printing for bogus sources.
Why should Debbie get the kids? How many deadbeat parents are out there who conceive of a child but aren't willing to do the work to care for them? As a child of a single parent and one such other parent, I can tell you right now, heaven forbid something happened to my mom, I would want to have been raised by her parents and the only family I ever knew that took care of me as a family should. Why is everyone assuming Debbie is normal? Given her choices, how can that be? Debbie Rowe has no family that I know of, if I recall correctly her mother died when she was a baby and she doesn't have a large family. At least these kids could be with the only family they know and have access to like 50 family members that could all take turns raising them as they did with the other Jacksons. If they are happy with their grandma, let them stay with her. I remember an old interview with Debbie ten years ago in which she stated she wasn't motherly and wanted MJ to raise them because he was a great parent. I'm sure that will come back to haunt her if she even seeks custody. She will lose.
I'm black by the way . AT first I didn't want Debbie Rowe to get custody of those kids. But after I saw Joe Jackson at the awards. That has completely changed. Joe Jackson is still the abusive, manipulating, snake, of a man.
Katherine Jackson is a weak, enabling, parent who cannot and NEVER has stood up to her husbands pimping, fame whoring ways. This makes her a HORRIBLE choice for those children. Joe Jackson messed up Michael. His wife stood by silently and let this happen. Joe Jackson has decided to pick up the ball and run with it again. Katherine will do absolutely nothing because she cannot speak for herself and is submissive to a narcissist who abused and terrorized his entire family. His red-carpet appearance was a disaster. How in the hell do you have pimp swagger at 150 years old. How in the hell are you gonna promote your record company and bring out your pimp partner, attorney and publicist who are all too happy to promote themselves. How in the hell are you gonna tell the world you're doing great and smile and shuck and jive when your child has died.
State of California, please keep those kids away from the Jackson family.
Team Debbie Rowe
Well isn't THAT the very bottom in journalistic fabrication. I smell a successful lawsuit. You can't just make sh*t up.
Of course it was fake. Anyone who believes anything printed by News of the World needs to get their head examined.
Well, that's no surprise it was fake!
But even if we have doubts about whether they are Michael Jackson's kids or not, remember that it IS possible, even if he was black! Just see Heidi Klum and Seal's kids! Their daughter is white and blond whereas their son is half black. So… You never know! ^^
NO FUCKING SHIT!!!
He did not say that what it said was not the truth . /. .
I call for a DNA test immediatly
do the children look black??? no.no… so you got the answer…
MJ is not the biological father of those kids… they look too white,
nothing "negroide" about them!!
Re: etoile14 – first of all … "negroid" is a term no longer used. that is referred to as politically incorrect. also, if you had ever seen a family of half black children you would know that paris looks black. take into consideration 3 things: 1. when discussing biracial babies, the outcome is not predictable 2. think about what a 50 year old michael jackson would look like without plastic surgeory, you can't because no one has any idea how he would look so their features could be the same 3. THEY LOOK LIKE DEBBIE ROWE. 2 people make a baby.
also, debbie rowe & katherine jackson are not the only 2 parties asking for custody of the children.
Wow I am really glad for the kids that these news were fake.
It's not "there lies in the good…"…it is:
Therein lies the …
Learn grammar asshole
You know what, I'm really sick of your fake news reporting. You're turning out to not really be a credible source, and it's a waste of my time.
You'd think you would learn not to post LIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! But you just keep on doing it. *sigh*
That was a given Weekly world news isn't exactly the best sources in the world.
The sad thing is if Debbie tries to get custody, there's a chance teh siblings could be split up.
People who have mixed kids have no idea how they will look. One lady had twins…one that looked black one white…it is possible. And if michael jackson is not the father who cares…it takes more than sperm to be a dad and obviously he took care of them. And as for u who said mj is in hell…fuck you!! Nothing was ever proved he did anything with those kids and after his first accusation everyone tries to set him up. He was an unbelievable artist and a good hearted man! And as far as him "taking" those kids from her…what kind of mother would give her kids up to someone and not fight for them??…especially if he's not the biological father?! I hop katherine gets custody since that is what those kids know! D.R. never should have gave those kids up if she wanted them that bad…she just wants his money he left them!!!!