How Debbie Rowe Spent The Day

Filed under: Michael Jackson

wenn-rowe-horses.jpg

While almost everyone else in the world was glued to the coverage of Michael Jackson's memorial, Debbie Rowe, MJ's ex-wife and mother of his two eldest children, spent the day quietly tending to her horses in Palmdale, California.

Considering her displeasure with the paparazzi, it was probably a better way for her to mourn his loss.

Now….

What's her next legal move gonna be???

She should not have those kids!

[Image via WENN.]

    Posted: Jul 8, 2009 at 4:30 pm / Email this  »

    77 comments to “How Debbie Rowe Spent The Day”



    1. 1

      leave her alone .



    2. 2

      That looks way more peaceful.



    3. 3

      it must be difficult to be thrown into the spotlight after such a long time, with children involved, and with the passing of a person she was obviously close to in some capacity…



    4. 4

      What a beautiful foal ~



    5. 5

      BASED ON WHAT PEREZ



    6. 6

      WTF did this lady ever do to you? Why dont you get off her back you self-centered prick!



    7. 7

      Palmdale, huh?
      Wow..with all the money she made for birthin' those babies..you'd think she'd find a better place to have horses than Palmdale!



    8. 8

      Why do you think she shouldn't have the kids? Especially if she is truly their biological mother.

    9. aly09 says – reply to this


      9

      wtv perez…. check out USweekly, they have a picture of her outside staples center… get ur info straight, she was watching with everyone else!
      do you get anything right these days?



    10. 10

      Why does everyone hate this woman. She gave (or sold) Michael what he wanted most in the world. He USED her just as much as she used him. So why is she vilified and he adored? That is so hypocritical. He didn't leave her anything in the will, but then what did he leave his brothers, eh?
      That little girl will be a star in her own right one day, you can just tell…..
      She was so beautiful up there and so true…..and she looks like her MOM….Sorry…



    11. 11

      What?!? She shouldn't get those kids??? Just because she wasn't out famewhoring and trying to get her photo taken like some other dipshits, you say she shouldn't get the kids. You're an even bigger idiot than I gave you credit for! Isn't there some fattening, chocolate thing you should be binging and purging? Dumbass…..



    12. 12

      "mourn his loss"…. try again ding bat. Did you mean mourn his passing.. or mourn her loss ? You need to go to summer school and take a couple refresher courses in english grammar.



    13. 13

      LEAVE THE WOMAN ALONE….I REALLY DONT THINK SHE IS INTERESTED IN GETTING THE CHILDREN..AND IM SURE IF SHE WERE THE JACKSON'S COULD MOST LIKELY PAY HER OFF….BUT SHE DOESNT SEEM LIKE A DEMON LIKE CHARACTER THAT THE MEDIA WOULD HAVE YOU BELIEVE…LEAVE HER THE HELL ALONE!!!



    14. 14

      he was a pedophile



    15. 15

      who the fuck r u 2 say who shud have the kids? leave ur stupid opinions 2 urself…what an ass u r.



    16. 16

      Uh, excuse me, but if she's the biological mother she damn sure could/should have them–but only if she agrees to take all three and not separate them. The Jackson family can't even agree on what to do with MJ's body. How will they ever see eye-to-eye on how to raise the children?



    17. 17

      stop trying to cause trouble.. you worthless piece of shit.. LEAVE HER ALONE



    18. 18

      Hell, she couldn't be a worse parent that Katherine Jackson. Every single one of her kids seems to have turned out crazy, AND Michael has said for years that he was abused in the home. Well she was in the home, did she do anything to stop it? How will she stop Joe Jackson from trying to make money of Michaels kids and abusing them too?



    19. 19

      why shouldn' she?



    20. 20

      I do not want her to have the kids neither would michael thats y he gave his mom katherine costody!!!!!!!!!!
      love ya mj….rest in peace!!



    21. 21

      Who the hell are you to say she shouldn't have the kids? Get over yourself already. Your ego is ginormous!



    22. 22

      Re: UrMajestyMsG – Absolutely agreed ! She is no demon. Didn't she try to get them back to protect them when he was up on molestation charges.



    23. 23

      All she does is play with them stupid horses. She would probably neglet the kids and tend to her horses. What does she know about being a mother any ways>?



    24. 24

      Some people need to grieve privately. It's not a crime that she did not go. I'm not going to judge her either way. When my grandpa passed away my grandma did not come to funeral. It sounds bizarre (it's not "the norm") but grief takes so many forms.



    25. 25

      This fat piece of shit, does not deserve those kids. If she loved them so much, she would have been there with them at the memorial and joined them in their mourning. Instead her so called dauther had to stand alone and mourn the loss of her father.

      MJ clearly stated who he wanted to have his kids in the event of his death. This woman was not one of them



    26. 26

      And just who should have the kids? The Jacksons? Oh yes they did such a good job with Michael. Why not give them 3 more souls to irreversibly fuck up.



    27. 27

      MJ's family should NOT have those kids. Everyone of the siblings has claimed to be abused by Joe Jackson. MJ had claimed to be sexually abused, but now the world thinks it's okay to give the mom the grandkids??? She was right there where the abuse happens–doesn't anybody see anything wrong with this picture? This has to be the most dysfunctional family in the world and they just wanna hand over these kids to them??? At least Debbie Rowe hasnt' proven herself to be a drug addled child molester….and until then, at least she should get the kids. The Jackson family has proved they can't raise children correctly.



    28. 28

      I'm really glad to see the tone of these comments. Debbie and Michael had an agreement and from what I can tell, she kept to it. She has stated that she thought Michael was an excellent Father and that she had no place in the relationship. That DOES NOT mean she had no feelings for her kids! It simply means she knew they were well cared for and was honoring her agreement with Michael. Now things have changed and she has every right to have a say in what happens to her children.



    29. 29

      I honestly think Rowe and Katherine should not get the kids. Rowe because she should be left out on a deserted island without a cell phone or internet and Katherine because Joe would have access to the kids. I think Janet or Latoya should raise the kids.



    30. 30

      she doesnt want the kids … she never has shown any interest.
      What she wants is the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ that comes with the kids.
      THIS is why she shouldn't get them.
      She was left out of his will and now is looking for a way in to make some cash

      RIP MJ - love you



    31. 31

      heartless bitch :)

      -
      she has no right to theose kids she gave them to michael so its up to him who looks after them now and he chose his mom and diana



    32. 32

      I normally agree with you Perez, but this time…..she IS the biological mother and I think she is entitled to SOME rights. That said, I think there should be joint custody between her and Katherine Jackson.

      I think people unfairly judge Debbie, when the reality is, there are thousands of surrogate mothers out there.

      Katherine is almost 80 - there's no way she'll be able to actively care for those kids, long term. I think they should work up to sharing them.



    33. 33

      Eww Palmdale.
      How gorss.



    34. 34

      OH, so you (Perez) think that it would be better for the people who SCREWED UP their own children so badly to have these kids to screw up also? Michael was talented, but he was a mess, as are the other kids, emotionally. I pray to GOD that Joe and Katherine do not get those children. All they would do is try to turn them into another payday! Just because she wasn't exploiting his death like everybody else…..what IS your problem P?



    35. 35

      Re: LunarGoddess – Nahh not janey or latoya cause they dont have kids. I think maybe Jermaine cause they were close to him too and he's got lots of kids lol.
      Also perez, debbie rowe was outside the staples center on tuesday, she was crying when paris spoke about michael!



    36. 36

      So cute horses..www.missperfectblonde.com



    37. 37

      Since she said she didn't want the children, that the horses are her children, no she should not have custody of those children. But Katherine is 79 - need a 3rd option - and not Diana Ross. How about Brad and Angie??



    38. 38

      Who the fuck are you to give your opinion as to who should get the kids? You don't know these people. Let them be!!!



    39. 39

      in the end she is the mother! Yes i think she should if they want to go with her!



    40. 40

      Leave her alone! And stay away from her property! She tried to see the kids but MJ would not return her calls. She tried to get custody during the molestation charges. Michael took the kids to Dubai and she had no access then. Debbie Rowe loves those kids and is far better to raise them than a 79 year old woman who stood by as her husband beat a defenceless little boy with a belt…and stayed with the man for many years letting it happen.



    41. 41

      Really..how could she ever have won any case aginst Michael and his money..it would have drug out for years and years and she would have ended up still childless and broke. I like MJ's music..but cmon…can you imagine a court battle against him…you would not win.
      Now..consider the childrens pain if that woman says NO I DONT WANT THE KIDS…they will hear that and really hurt….at least she should fight..and when they are older..they will know she did fight..even..if she doesn't win….she sould at least be given visits.
      Its just a mess…the whole thing..the grandma must love them and they her..but she is very old…if she lives 10 more years she will be how old when the youngest is a teen..cmon..others would be raising these children anyway.



    42. 42

      "She should not have those kids!" WTF? You don't even know anything about her but are suddenly against her? Reportedly she's their biological mom. I would think she had a right to ask for custody if she wanted.



    43. 43

      The woman gave birth for money then walked away from her children for money.

      She has no right to them whatsoever.

      Lets just sit back and see what pans out in the next few months/years and how much this woman gets out of it again…



    44. 44

      You don't know her and have no right to make judgments you haven't a clue about. There are always two sides to a story.



    45. 45

      Not everyone watched the memorial…I didn't watch one second of it!!



    46. 46

      Something wrong wit me bitch to think she bout to get them kids al she won't is the money anyway!



    47. 47

      Something wrong with that bitch if she all out a sudden won't her kids back after all these time she just won't money!



    48. 48

      im from palmdale…:(



    49. 49

      Wow! I am so glad that most of the comments are favourable to Debbie Rowe! I agree! What did she ever do to deserve all this hatred that the media is focussing on her? No one knows the true story so the gutter press just makes shit up. She is not a cold heartless bitch. She had no choice in whatever happened once the second child was born. I hope she gets custody eventually once the children are able to handle the transition. Diana Ross did not even know she was named in the will apparently either. Team Debbie!



    50. 50

      No, she should not have those kids.
      She was contracted to have them. She was paid for a job and she needs to step back to the farm she is living on with her paid money for her services. If she get the kids back then she need to give the money back she was paid for her service and the dermatologist sperm donor should start paying child support to Rowe. If the kids are not MJ's for his mom to keep the way MJ's wanted then maybe they should not inherit MJ's money and Rowe should raise them out of her own pocket. I'll bet Rowe will withdraw her claim to them.
      Rowe has not been in these kids life. I believe that was apart of the contract. It would be very disrupting for her to come into their life now. Those kids know the Jackson's to be their family nothing should change that. I believe Rowe just want the money they stand to inherit if her bills are in default.
      I understand Joe Jackson do not live in the house with Katherine Jackson how is he going to have any thing to do with raising MJ's kids. I would think that man is too busy in the streets chasing women to care about grand kids. I thought Jermaine lived in the house with his mom.



    51. 51

      Perez is such jackass. I am betting they will be 100% better off with her than with the looney tune Jacksons.



    52. 52

      i dont get what the big deal is about her getting the kids if she wants them. If anything, they are more her children legally, by blood than anything else.

      She's human. leave her alone



    53. 53

      Why shouldn't she have the kids? Why is it better for Diana Ross or MJ's mom to get them? She's their biological mother.

    54. 6one9 says – reply to this


      54

      MJ is dead now Perezers………. All bets are OFF now…… Debbie should at least get visitation IF she so chooses . She IS the oldest twos bio Mom and I bet she isn't addicted to 100's of different PILLS like their “so called “ daddy was. HELLO!!!!!!!!!!!



    55. 55

      good for her. She was Michael's friend and she has no interest in fame. She seems authentic (she's the one who wanted the kids wearing masks). Those kids could do worse than growing up on a horse farm with a profane mom (good for her)….the Jackson family is a train wreck, only Rebbie has a long marriage and good parenting credentials.



    56. 56

      Of course she should certainly have those kids. They are her biological children and she was maried to the father when they were born. It's a no-brainer.



    57. 57

      i think it wouldn't be so bad if she got the kids…if they're gonna be around joe when katherine gets them, i think debbie should def be the one to get them

    58. j_au says – reply to this


      58

      There her children - she gave birth to them… there more related to her than anyone in mj's family…



    59. 59

      To be perfectly honest, regardless of what anyone says about MJ or how they feel personally, I think all this speculation and drama should have ended with the memorial yesterday. Those poor kids have enough to worry about after losing their father. The best thing that could happen for them is for whatever happens next to go untelevised and kept away from the public.

      Give them some time to fucking grieve, for fuck's sake.



    60. 60

      Yah know - if she'd showed up at the memorial - the press would've skewered her. She doesn't show and she gets pissed on. What do you want? She seems to honestly have liked MJ and appreciated his contribution to music, and she didn't want her presence to distract from people sharing their feelings. She can't win with you -

      And maybe she SHOULD have those kids and get them OUT OF THE FISHBOWL of Hollywood. You can't possibly think MJ's mom can raise them to adulthood and to a NORMAL existance in HW, can you? If MJ's mom keeps them, they will turn out as weird as the rest her children. And the media spotlight will be horrible for them. Gosh - why not turn off the camera and let the kids be raised out in the country where they can just be normal? Look what the media spotlight has done to so many 'used-to-be-normal' people - like the Gosslins or any reality show person (let alone the celebrities and 'stars' out there!). UGH!

      Leave her alone - and maybe she will be a better parent than you could even hope to be. Maybe she can 'earn' her mommy stripes like the rest of us have.



    61. 61

      The kids would be way better with her than that crazy ass family.



    62. 62

      she is the mother and was his wife when the children were born. The ther option is the circus Jackson family including a 80 year old primary care giver…they have a better chance at normal with her…why would Perez think otherwise…she seems like a normal chick…just not a celebrity



    63. 63

      Money hungry Beast



    64. 64

      No woman that surrenders custody of her children should ever get them back.



    65. 65

      Re: Brendalove
      Being the biological mother is irrelevant as this is not in the best interest of the children. She gave up her parental rights willingly. These kids are too old to suddenly be thrown in with a stranger just because she gave birth to them. It would also mean being separated from their younger brother. None of that would be fair to any of them - they need to be with the Jacksons.



    66. 66

      i bet u it will be revealed those kids are not biologically hers either…most likely she was only a surrogate….cause those kids look nothing like her…not to be mean but those kids are cute….and well she is not



    67. 67

      meh, I wasn't glued to the tv…I couldn't have cared any less.

      Why shouldn't she have those kids? Michael was raised so well that his mother/father should do it again?

    68. @v@ says – reply to this


      68

      Maybe the kids will feel a strong need to know their mother. After all, their Dad is gone now. They have every right to know her, and especially if they want to. How that is worked out is not up to us.



    69. 69

      Leave her alone -you are in NO position of knowledge to know whether she deserves the kids or not.You just go on gossip MORON.Mario you are such a prize prick it is a wonder you still exist.



    70. 70

      Regret is the worst emotion



    71. 71

      I'D REALLY REALLY REALLY LIKE IT IF THE PAPS STALKED MARIO'S EVERY SINGLE MOVE, PUSHED HIM WHILE HE WAS TRYING TO WALK DOWN THE STREET, AND GOT UP IN HIS FACE WITH A CAMERA! THAT WOULD JUST BE AMAZEBALLS! MARIO WOULD THEN SCREAM AND HISS LIKE A LITTLE BABY AND THEN THROW HIMSELF ON THE GROUND KICKING AND SCREAMING! WHO-HOO!



    72. 72

      who the hell are you to decide whether she should have her kids? you ignorant dumbass!



    73. 73

      She should not have custody of those kids, any mother who's willing to give up custody of their children for money doesn't have the right to look after them, especially after doing an interview days after their fathers death saying all sorts about him, that's not what they need, they don't know her as their mother, the Jacksons are the only family they have.



    74. 74

      bitch…even if she didnt care about michael jacksons death,she seems to be so concernerd w/ "her kids".the only ones i saw there at the memorial supporting them was THEIR FAMILY! the jacksons,while she was there tending to the horses!



    75. 75

      I Believe that we should leave her alone, but only if she doesnt fight for custody! Do those kids even remember her?
      i feel so sorry for them and i hope they get to live where they would like.



    76. 76

      Why is there even a custody battle? Paris and Prince Michael are old enough to know who they want to be with. Why can't they just ask them? It just seems odd for someone who has said in the past she respects MJ's decisions as a father, praising how great he is, and now is going against his decisions. People should be asking why full custody, why not just be in the children's lives and respect the family. I dont know her personally so I cant say anything mean about her. Shes a mother and it is hard. But she needs to be realistic. Not even 2 weeks gone by after MJ's death and already causing trouble? Her excuse is that their her biological children, but that doesnt mean a thing. MJ wasnt the biological father, but he is their father. Being a parent is more then just DNA.



    77. 77

      I hope she get's custody of MJ's children. That way they don't have to grow up in the freak show that the Jackson family is