Debbie Rowe Forfeits Kids For More $$$$$$!!!!

wenn5320854.jpg

They say everyone has a price, but Michael Jackson's ex gets hers in installments!

Debbie Rowe, the pop star's former wife that acted as a surrogate for Jackson's two oldest children, was paid $4 million from her former mother-in-law to relinquish her parental rights - for good.

"It's one final payday," said a source. "They felt it was like a ransom-type thing. [Rowe] jumped back into the picture because she wanted money.

This is the third time Rowe has been given money to disappear from the children's lives, and she does not seem to mind.

After the birth of Prince Michael and Paris, she agreed to step aside and let Michael raise them in exchange for $8 million, plus $900,000 annually for five years.

It's like winning the soul-sucking lottery!

The second time was in 2001 when Jackson was in the midst of his child molestation case. Rowe wanted to exercise her parental rights but ended up giving Michael full custody for another $4 million plus a $900,000 home.

Pathetic!

"This would be it. This takes away any rights she has to challenge custody at any given time," says a source regarding this final payday for Debbie. "If something happens to Katherine, [Rowe] can't challenge the next [guardian], whether that be Diana Ross or someone in the family."

You'd think she would have signed something earlier!!!

[Image via WENN.]

    Posted: Jul 14, 2009 at 10:30 am / Email this  »

    53 comments to “Debbie Rowe Forfeits Kids For More $$$$$$!!!!”



    1. 1

      its not like she pretended to care and then back out after the money came along…she has pretty much stated from the start that she didnt want to be there as a mother figure, that she had them so they could be MICHAEL's children..not her's….so at least she has been honest about her intentions….if that is the least u can say….



    2. 2

      which one is the horse?



    3. 3

      …as attractive on the inside as on the outside.



    4. 4

      I think
      she likez buttered
      LOBSTER more…..
      ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww



    5. 5

      Chaz Bono could give her some beauty tips!
      Candy Spelling could give her some parenting tips!



    6. 6

      They shouldn't have paid her at all. It was clear she was simply in it for the money (the reason she gave up custody in the first place). She never cared and that should've been their case against her. The kids are better off w/o someone who just shows up when there's money involved.



    7. 7

      I think she has already lost any rights to custody - which judge would grant her custody after selling her children? Katherine should not pay her.

      Then again, we don't know if this story is true. We have heard so many different stories, one time she was bonding with Katherine, then she was crying over Paris' words at the memorial service, then she was looking after her horses during the service and now she wants to cash in.



    8. 8

      i think she should take the money because she definitely does not deserve the kids.

    9. opkl says – reply to this


      9

      bullshit



    10. 10

      She's a revolting human being…period!

    11. Ne says – reply to this


      11

      THAT DUMB WHORE. WE BALL NEW THAT'S WHAT IT WAS ABOUT.



    12. 12

      If this actually turns out to be true, then this horse faced bitch is a horrible human being. She never wanted the kids so she shouldn't have them. She can go lay under her horses. As for wo gets the kids, I really hope it's not his horrible father. That man has caused enough damage already. Him being around those kids as they grow, especially in adolescence, which is a critical time for kids, is going to be a disaster. That son of a bitch needs to go live with Debbie. They can both go lie under her horses.



    13. 13

      It's kind of sad for those kids to have a price….



    14. 14

      Seems like she has stepped forward the times when the children were in possible peril because of the actions of MJ. The fact that she had to come forward so many times makes MJ just as bad a parent. And don't forget he married her only to improve his image at the time and have her give birth to children. It was always a business arrangement. The fact that there are so many loose ends all these years later tells he was really stupid or there is something the media isn't being told about this deal.



    15. 15

      Maybe…she's trying to do what's best for the kids because she realizes that she doesn't have the mother instinct. Not all women are cut out to be mom's, and she has not been in their lives at all thus far. Taking them into her life would be a mistake. But then of course….why take the money too??



    16. 16

      bitch please.. ew.



    17. 17

      What a disgusting, money hungry bitch. Just imagine how those kids are going to feel when they read about this in the future. No one wants to know that their mother abandoned them for money. Things just keep getting sadder and sadder for them.



    18. 18

      THE BITCH IS BEYOND TRIFLIN. IT WAS ABOUT MONEY ALL ALONG..SHE NEVER HAS & NEVER WILL WANT THOSE KIDS. KARMA IS A BITCH AND SHE'LL GET HER THREE FOLDS.



    19. 19

      a deal is a deal, she pushes the kids out of her and she gets well paid. nothing pathetic about it. the only sad thing is you trying to drag this women through the mud. lots of women get paid to have children it not really uncommon at all



    20. 20

      I don't know. There is two sides to every story. I heard she came to an agreement with Katherine to keep Joe Jackson away from the kids. And if she allowed Katherine to keep the kids and not fight because they are family, then why not take the 4 mil? Give me one good reason why not? They have the $.



    21. 21

      Re: JigSaw – The cute one!



    22. 22

      This is BS. I will beleive it IF I read it on a more reputable site.



    23. 23

      It's not like she even knows the kids. Doesn't sound like that bad of a deal since the kids could care less about her anyway. May as well get what she can out of it. The kids are happier with the Jacksons and if Katherine dies, the rest of the family can take care of them.



    24. 24

      LET HER ENJOY THE MONEY CUZ SHE'LL BE BURNING IN HELL LATER



    25. 25

      If this is true…which I actually think it is, this chick has got a hell of a bite from karma coming on her fat ass. What a piece of crap. I understand getting paid originally for the service she offered, but to keep stepping in for more cash, I'd tell her to go piss up a rope.



    26. 26

      Hey Michael Jackson PICKED the bitch to be his(or sprem donators) kids!! He must of been really high that day.



    27. 27

      shumpon shumpon shumpon heee heee shumpone…….cuz dis is thwidderr thwidder nightttttttt….



    28. 28

      Re: ~Ijustdontcare~ – You don't need to read it anywhere else! How much more reputable can it get than right here? If it's on Perez, then SOMEONE said it!



    29. 29

      Debbie,,,your separated at birth twin called,,you know Anna Nichole Smiths mother,,,yeah it seems that Richard Hatch phoned her (he didn't have your digets,,yet). Anywho,,,not only is he interested in cooking up some romance, he thinks the three of you should get together at Burger Pig and form the blood sucking parasite/leech society!! I can see the three of you cackling around a gigantic cauldron of "ugly in and out" stew "hatching" your next loooser opportunity. P.S. Please don't eat the horse,,,,



    30. 30

      This woman is a frightening amalgam of cold, greed, cruelty and a desperation for more money at the price of the very begins who grew inside her for 9 months.

      I personally would never want to be near her. I feel like she's got to be one seriously twisted btich on the inside.

      Use the money and get help Debbie. Lots of it.



    31. 31

      Those poor children. Haven't enough people used them? Everyone pretends to want them. It's just the money! I'm glad they'll be with Katherine. Debbie can suck it.



    32. 32

      Your mom would take $20 and some Burger King coupons to give up her parental rights fatboy.



    33. 33

      Thank God she is out of the picture if this report is right. SHe gave up her rights and have said MANY MANY times that just because she gave birth to them, it doenst mean she is their mother. To be a mother is an ongoing process which she never took part in. Go away Debbie!!

    34. Nikon says – reply to this


      34

      It doesn't surprise me that she's in the equestrian world either. There is a tendency to be money grabbing and a tad morally void, if you ask me.



    35. 35

      WOW I THOUGHT THAT WAS ROGER CLEMENS, THE BASEBALL PITCHER WITH THE HORSE! LOL!

    36. minky says – reply to this


      36

      I don't understand why Michael even considered her in the first place. Money hungry trailer trash.



    37. 37

      Really Mario, the New York Post is your news source??? You have to be kidding me… next you will be quoting the National Enquirer!!
      .
      I call bull shit on this… the NEW YORK POST is one of the worst rags out there!!!



    38. 38

      why would he pick some low lifer like her to have kids???,,when he had literally a whole WORLD full of women (who would of jumped on his junk)… to pick from????…He sure was a weird one! there were tons of women who probably would of had his kids for NOTHING.



    39. 39

      What a bitch. Its a good thing that she is out of the way because she doesnt deserve the kids



    40. 40

      I know for a fact that this is not true. Come on.



    41. 41

      she disgusts me..



    42. 42

      Re: ~Ijustdontcare~ – Exactly! Perez, or PerASS, is no different from all of the other douche bag news channels and websites that report false things about Michael Jackson.



    43. 43

      This Woman Actually Makes Me Sick…Why Tha Fuck Did She Have Those Children If shes Just Goin To Choose Money Ova Them EveryTyme….Fat Shit……She Deserves Nuffink Off That Family…..This Really How Hard She Was Willing 2 Fyte For Her Kids:@

    44. M&M'z says – reply to this


      44

      OMG, I wish Diana Ross could jump in right now!! Her children would be great examples for M.J.'s children. Someone has to get them away from Joe Jackson and that GREEDY FAT COW who gave birth to them. It's discusting how everyone is still only thinking about the MONEY!!!

    45. M&M'z says – reply to this


      45

      Re: karencarpenter – Wow, you said it perfect!!



    46. 46

      what the hell did she do with the money she got the first time?!



    47. 47

      I HOPE YOU ARE WRONG PEREZ!!!



    48. 48

      If this is true all I can say is that she is a dsgusting piece of garbage. Who sells their kids for money, and then extorts more money at a time like this.



    49. 49

      I WOULD SAY

      MOST HATED PERSON IN CALI RIGHT NOW ???



    50. 50

      Poor guy. Anyways its not like hes stressing now, but its really sad to see everybody cashing in on him. Hope the kids stay positive.



    51. 51

      OMG
      She is HIT!
      *shudders and cries in a corner*



    52. 52

      What a mess even Klein ran from her. How much weight has she packed on? She weighs more than her horses! She fared pretty well for a high school grad turned glorified receptionist/assistant/opportunist. She was never a Nurse. Once again: Lesson money does not bring happiness. Deb call Jennie!!!!

      WoW this whole town is bugged…

    53. @v@ says – reply to this


      53

      It's my opinion that this story is patently false.