Debbie Rowe Refuses To Take More Jackson $$$$, She Claims!

wenn5320854__opt1.jpg

An attorney for Michael Jackson's ex, Debbie Rowe has sent a letter to the New York Post demanding a retraction for the story they reported that his client accepted $4 million to give up her parental rights of Jackson's two eldest kids.

"Among the several contenders for overzealous and inaccurate sensationalism, the New York Post has now seized top honors," the letter explained. "Ms. Rowe has not accepted — and will not accept — any additional financial consideration beyond the spousal support she and Michael Jackson personally agreed to several years ago."

It's not like the story is that outrageous!

She's done it before!!!!

[Image via WENN.]

    Posted: Jul 14, 2009 at 8:30 pm / Email this  »

    50 comments to “Debbie Rowe Refuses To Take More Jackson $$$$, She Claims!”



    1. 1

      Wow what a babe! The horse of course!



    2. 2

      blah blah blah



    3. 3

      Do you think Kate Gosselin took unhappy lessons from this woman?
      Wow she looks mad and scary!!!!
      The tee shirt is adorable though!



    4. 4

      actually you dont really know that she has before, now do you? Its just gossip you are reporting, there is no truth to it, and you know that



    5. 5

      FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FOR YOUR KIDS DEB!!!!

      TEAM DEBBIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



    6. 6

      This is one time when I just can't get your back. No one really knows what went on between them and what the agreements were except MJ and her. If she wants to be a mother to her children now that MJ is gone, who are any of us to judge? I would be doing the same thing if the alternative was allowing the kids anywhere near Joe and his band of opportunistic, money-grubbing sons.



    7. 7

      Ok people we dont know her, chill. We sound like evil bitches who do nothing but drool compared to her view. So chill.



    8. 8

      lollll debbie u will NOT get those kids..she wants prince michael "blanket" also…she didnt evn have him..i guess cuz he looks more lk michael..lol anyways i DO believe those are mj kids..they look lk him..and they belong to the jackson family..end of story.



    9. 9

      BABY MAMA WHITE JACKSON been hittin' the HAAGEN-DASZ a little too much lately.

      Michael's white kids are so cute………….clearly DO NOT RESEMBLE BABY MAMA BIG BERTHA THERE ! I MEAN, YEEECH !

    10. M&M'z says – reply to this


      10

      Just put Diana Ross in charge look how well she has raised her children.

    11. fiona says – reply to this


      11

      Bugger OFF. She has money, and to barter more would only further disrupt her privacy. Kids, if you are reading, she has more to gain by not claiming you. IF she really offers you a home, it is because she is willing to surrender her privacy to provide a relatively normal home for you. Conversely, if she negotiates a cash disclaimer as the birth mother…. walk away. Money is the devil's blood. No religious reference intended. Just a true observation.

    12. Arshe says – reply to this


      12

      I dont really find this woman to be unfit, that is yet to be proven. I do respect that she isn't fake baked, plastic surgery looking and is taking care of animals. I think you may have missed the mark on this one Perez.



    13. 13

      shes just trash, poor kids.



    14. 14

      Re: blubabiecutie – You would be wrong then. Latoya revealed in an interview that Blanket is NOT Michael's biological son. He had a surrogate mother and Michael picked the sperm donor out of a book. None of these kids are his. I hope Debbie is stepping up to the plate. Someone needs to put the kids above $.



    15. 15

      A friend of Michael Jackson’s babymama Debbie Rowe has come forward with revealing e-mails that make it clear that Rowe has no interest in actually getting custody of the two children she had with the King of Pop. In an interview to air tonight on Extra Debbie Rowe’s friend and confidant, Rebecca White, reveals details from e-mails from Rowe sent days after Michael’s tragic death.
      From the start, Rowe made it clear that she did not want custody of the kids. In an email dated July 2, 2009, she writes:
      “I’m not going after custody. These kids are not mine. They were never mine. They were always Michael’s. I was Michael’s best friend.”
      But then, three days later on July 5, Rowe writes to White:
      “My lawyer is telling me I have to take some responsibility about the welfare of the children. Do I want the kids? Hell no. Does it look good for me to ask for them? Absolutely. I don’t want to look like the woman who gave away her kids and just forgot about them. Would Michael want Joe to have them? I think it would be the last thing that he would ever have wanted.”



    16. 16

      Debbie is looking like SHIZ……



    17. 17

      She's a big burly gal with a potty mouth.
      Yep. Looks like a lesbeen to me.



    18. 18

      Unh -Unhhh.
      That is Larry the Cable Guy.
      Heheheh.



    19. 19

      Leave this woman alone. Do you really think she'd be worse than Michael's mother? That woman couldn't even protect her own children from that asshole father. And you don't think the Jackson's are all hovering around for their brother's money? Think again. Most of them are losers and wannabes. Michael is the only one who really made it big. They are all going to live off him. Look at all the people making money off his death. This lady gave birth to those kids and regardless of any will - you cannot leave your kids to anyone like property. The courts will step in. Katherine only has them for the time being. Besides, the kids are old enough to have a say in where they want to go.



    20. 20

      she needs to sit her ass down

      www.yeahshesaidit.com



    21. 21

      I dont like her.
      She just wants the kids for the money.
      She said that she dosnt want to be their mom, and she
      also said that there michael's kids, not her's.
      Just like in the past, the Jackson family could just give
      her more money…and she will then back away



    22. 22

      Yeah, and if she gets custody of the kids she knows it is big $. So, If it is not 4 million she received for giving up her kids, how much was it Mr. attorney? And how is able to live so lavishly by not working and raising expensive horses? Duh.



    23. 23

      Re: ArsheRe: light2you – Arshie, how can you respect a woman how is obiously not taking care of herself with or without surgery?



    24. 24

      i dont think any newspaper, magazine, orrrrr website is credible anymore…nextt



    25. 25

      Re: Susie-Q – And you don't think she had alterior motives for having his kids? Knock, Knock! Any one in there?



    26. 26

      Re: MisMelis – Watch out, the kids are able to read the internet while you are slamming their grandfather. Shame on you.



    27. 27

      Re: NativeNYer – And you think Debbie will put thr kids above $. Dream on.



    28. 28

      quit judging ppl. you weren't there and you don't know. stop making assumptions about shit you know nothing about. everyone has an opinion, that doesn't make it right.



    29. 29

      I just think that this is really sad…
      i hope that the court/judge will REALLY see why wants the kids [$$$$]
      I think the kids will be great just staying with jacksons family now.
      the kids are family to the jackson's.



    30. 30

      shes ugly

    31. Arshe says – reply to this


      31

      I respect the fact that she isn't on every tv channel like all the jacksons selling interviews. Of course she is the better parent. The media is being fed by the jacksons pr machine, big money and big lawyers are working hard to take this woman down.

    32. Arshe says – reply to this


      32

      This woman is going to go to court as the biological mother asking to raise the children in privacy in a normal environment out of the public eye of course the judge will let her have custody. The jacksons will have the children singing and dancing, signing movie deals while there father is fresh in the grave. Ignorant americans.

    33. Arshe says – reply to this


      33

      And for those commenting on her looks she looks exactly like a soccer mom. hahahaa



    34. 34

      perez can you please hook this chick up with a make over…this look is getting very old. someone help her please…she has money and looks a mess!!



    35. 35

      Re: The Real Sheba088 – 17 and 18 I detest drunks.



    36. 36

      Just because she did it once before - doesn't follow that she will keep on taking maoney from the Jacksons to stay away from her children…Ask yourself why they are so desperate to hang on to them it's not as if they were actually Michaels children.. Grandma Katherine is probably in line for a lot of child support money and the Jacksons are not exactly rolling in the stuff now…



    37. 37

      How is she any different than a surrogate excepr MJ wifed her in a lame attempt to fool the public into thinking a) he's into women and 2) they are his kids. Leave Debbie alone!



    38. 38

      i think we all know thats b$$llshit lol . . . . i bet she fucks those horses lmao!



    39. 39

      Can you imagine how she feels?? She gave up two babies 11 and 12 years ago. Being a surrogate is not unusual or unheard of. Women do it all the time. She and Jackson had an arrangement that it none of our business. She has, since his death, done nothing to indicate she is money or fame hungry. I refuse to judge her. ALSO, don't comment on how ugly or angry she looks, she's not a celeb with dietitians and personal trainers. She's in oversized t-shirts, raising horses. Leave her be!



    40. 40

      wow. she's become so hideous and angry looking. and so butch. looks like she's into woman from her clothes and body language. she looks like a man dressed up like a woman. i 100% believe her kids father is a very good looking man!



    41. 41

      Re: blubabiecutie – How can you say "they look like him" - they only look like MJ after he's had 13 different lots of plastic surgery on his face and a shed load of skin bleaching..and "they belong to the Jackson family" what are they commodities?..Well lets face it MJ bought them so his family (like you) probably think they own the rights to them now..



    42. 42

      Well you can't really go after somebody for selling children without also going after the guy who bought them. If she is creepy for selling them, then Jackson is creepy for seeking to buy them.



    43. 43

      Re: minaahm – Yeah Yeah Yeah, probably the same Michael Jackson fan that released the phony story to the NYPost. Rowe couldn't possibly be a worse parent than Joe Jackson the abuser, and Kathrine the Enabler.



    44. 44

      …rowe, rowe, rowe your bloat gently down a stream…



    45. 45

      TALK ABOUT MAN FACE! EWWWWWWWWW!



    46. 46

      MAN FACE! EWWWWWWWWW!!!!!



    47. 47

      Bitch is gonna take the money…..



    48. 48

      that is freakin hilarious. ur the bomb! :D



    49. 49

      I saw an interview with Debbie Rowe, and she said Michael Jackson paid her millions for giving birth to his first two children. He also bought her a ranch and a beautiful home. She also said she was not going to pursue custody. She should get a retraction. I can not believe how many rumors are out there and most of them are being started by the media, such as, ET, Inside Edition, Access Hollywood, and all the tabloids.



    50. 50

      She sold them before, so I would not be shocked if she was trying to get more $$$$ to stay out of their lives for good, and I don't see 4 million being enough for someone that sold 2 babies.

      She would be wearing Disney :O/

      It would serve her right if the judge let the kids pick who they wanted to live with and put an end to any $$$ she might get her greedy hands on.

      To this day I can't understand how she sold her babies for $$$ !