Dan Rad Has No Tolerance For Homophobia!!!

danrad.jpg

Daniel Radcliffe took time out from looking hawt on the cover of UK gay mag Attitude to expres his disdain for the intolerant.

The Harry Potter star says:

“I just loathe homophobia. It’s just disgusting and animal and stupid and it’s just thick people who can’t get their heads around it and are just scared. I grew up around gay people entirely. I was the only child in my class who had any experience of homosexuality or anything like that.”

Amen!

A boy after our own heart!

    Posted: Jul 24, 2009 at 4:45 pm / Email this  »

    111 comments to “Dan Rad Has No Tolerance For Homophobia!!!”

    More comments: « 1 [2]



    1. 101

      why didnt you post his comments about the bnp? i think at this point in time people are feeling more threatened by them and on top of everything else they are homophobic as well



    2. 102

      Re: zooby – dont be an idiot he is no racist, he said in the same interview that he is disgusted by the bnp



    3. 103

      thanks dan, you said it!!!!



    4. 104

      Sounds like he's trying to lay the padding for a blow!



    5. 105

      He should try it, he might like it!



    6. 106

      First of all, just because a straight man like Daniel is supporting gay rights does NOT mean he's gay nor does it mean that he's secretly in the closet. That's a gay man's fantasy talking. Or an ignorant person.

      Secondly, he probably brought up the issue of gay rights because the interviewer asked him about. He WAS interviewed for a GAY magazine after all, so of course homosexuality came up.

      Thirdly, he should be commended - rather than critiqued - for being honest enough to take a stand against homophobes.



    7. 107

      Re: sk8terboy1983 – Is that you Andy ?????



    8. 108

      Re: PixieCullen – He probably just meant that he was the only one who has spent time around gay people (in a positive way)



    9. 109

      He'd be a boy after your own heart, if you had one!



    10. 110

      good for him!



    11. 111

      I;m confused is he or not?

    More comments: « 1 [2]