Rachel McAdams Brings The Glam To Sherlock Holmes

Filed under: Film Flickers > Rachel McAdams

Check out the newly released poster for Sherlock Holmes.

The beautiful and talented Rachel McAdams will be playing opposite of Robert Downey Jr. as the femme fatale Irene Adler.

Looking good to us!

Posted: Jul 27, 2009 at 4:30 pm / Email this »

See All 51 Comments

51 comments to “Rachel McAdams Brings The Glam To Sherlock Holmes”

beckyyyk says – reply to this

1

oh shes stunning :O
lolli says – reply to this

2

shes fugly. sorry. great actress though!
erica317 says – reply to this

3

so sad
BOOMBOOMPOWrez says – reply to this

4

This News day blooooowwws!
Obnoxious_Joe says – reply to this

5

WOWSA!.
NeatoAwesome says – reply to this

6

That movie looks terrible. Sherlock Holmes and vampires? Lame to the extreme.
Jantwinix says – reply to this

7

Yay! I love her! I'm going to see her in The Time Traveler's Wife!
Little Rachy says – reply to this

8

love love love.
i can't wait, rachel mcadams looks lovely.
helen2009 says – reply to this

9

Dunno if im first and i dont care. =P Rachel looks GORGEOUS!!!!!! =DD I adore her!!!
hannahsays says – reply to this

10

funny, i was just thinking how ugly she looked!
PixieCullen says – reply to this

11

I love her, she's beautiful, smart and a good actress (L)_(L)
Spindoc says – reply to this

12

Amazing that somebody this talanted once got billed under Lohan.
Buffy999 says – reply to this

13

She annoys the piss out of me… just like most of them in Hollywood.
lolli says – reply to this

14

shes like a young sarah jessica parker…hmmm
Sharon Mirrors says – reply to this

15

UMMM…yay?
hejhanna says – reply to this

16

GORGE!
BeautifulBrunnette69 says – reply to this

17

She is smoking hot and I love her in every movie.. She's classy and respected.. She isn't a tramp and didn't sleep her way to the top.. How many actresses can say that now-a-days? Not many.. She's one of the few truly talented actresses of her time.. Love her…
karencarpenter says – reply to this

18

….nice frock Perez. Did you loan it to her for her publicity shot?
ohperezluvyou says – reply to this

19

she looks horrible in that pic. She is pretty though, the photografer got it all wrong with this one
jellotime91 says – reply to this

20

thinks looks terrible :/
thetreehugger says – reply to this

21

Haha, she looks just like I imagined Irene Adler in the book. Okay, now that I read that I sound like a nerd.. anyway, I'm glad they have a talented actress set to play her
Greatdane says – reply to this

22

Such an AMAZING actress and very beautiful.
Twime says – reply to this

23

I love her; she's such a great actress…
PLEZZZ says – reply to this

24

BIG AGE DIFFERENCE LIKE USUAL!
HavierPotter says – reply to this

25

she looked better in mean girls and the notebook.
The Mancunian Candidate says – reply to this

26

british film set in britain yet only one of the three leads are british, there are plenty of home-grown actors they could have used, so she better be pretty damn good if they were overlooked for her
SIren6xx says – reply to this

27

i'd go see this.
BeautifulBrunnette69 says – reply to this

28

Re: HavierPotter – They're totally different characters! You can't compare them..
xcalibur says – reply to this

29

AVG LOOKING CHIC, AVG ACTRESS. HOMOS HAVE A DIFFERENT TASTE IN THINGS. PEREZ IS AN IDIOT.
bongo says – reply to this

30

i'd like to bring the John Holmes to Rachel McAdams
Kay122 says – reply to this

31

I don't think i've ever seen an unattractive photo of Rachel McAdams, I have now.
Iamawesomer says – reply to this

32

I can't wait for this movie
MrsFelton86 says – reply to this

33

she looks lovely!!
immolate says – reply to this

34

She is so gorgeous. Love her!
putthekoolaiddown27 says – reply to this

35

Re: PixieCullen – agreed!
La Coacha says – reply to this

36

Cheese cute. I'm not thaaat crazy over her.
yankees21 says – reply to this

37

Could she be any hotter?
bunnythesaint says – reply to this

38

I don't find her 'gorgeous'.
I think it's just a matter of her name, I don't find 'Rachel' an all that appealing name. (My name is Rachel and I hate it…yuck).
I'llbeyourpinupgirl says – reply to this

39

Oh no, this isn't going to be one of those period-costumes-with-a-modern-twist type movies is it? That hair is NOT accurate Victiorian looking hair. *humph*
uh says – reply to this

40

I really wish they wouldn't f*** around with Sherlock Holmes. Can't they come up with another character so they don't have to ruin one? And Irene Adler isn't some sort of femme fatale. Idiots.
Paris France says – reply to this

41

I hope it's good as I plan to see it.
Vivbabe says – reply to this

42

Nope, don't think so!! She's a big bore. I'm going to skip this one!
ix3perez says – reply to this

43

timeless beauty!
ktea says – reply to this

44

sucks that shes in this movie. i hate her and shes the only reason i probably won't see the movie. gross gross gross!
@v@ says – reply to this

45

I like her, but…mole-y mole-y…every time I see her. So sorry.
Amphitrite says – reply to this

46

This character was in ONE short story and was not reallt a femme fatale. She has enormous dignity and class and is the only woman ever to defeat Holmes. Thereafter she is only referred to by him as "the Woman." He's not even attracted to her, because Holmes is basically asexual.
*Julez* says – reply to this

47

She's so gorgeous! =)
calixo says – reply to this

48

she looks a little weird in this pic
camalex1 says – reply to this

49

can't wait 2 c the movie, i love RDJ
Kelly Cullen says – reply to this

50

I love her; she's so pretty an talented
abeatleaday says – reply to this

51

She's gorgeous that girl.