Home Videos Photos
Home >> Film Flickers , Rachel McAdams >> Rachel McAdams Brings The Glam To Sherlock Holmes

Rachel McAdams Brings The Glam To Sherlock Holmes

Filed under: Film Flickers > Rachel McAdams

sherlock-mcadms.jpg

Check out the newly released poster for Sherlock Holmes.

The beautiful and talented Rachel McAdams will be playing opposite of Robert Downey Jr. as the femme fatale Irene Adler.

Looking good to us!

    Posted: Jul 27, 2009 at 4:30 pm / Email this  »
    « Previous story
    Marc Jacobs' Powerful New Tees!
    Next story »
    Joe In Tears Over Camilla
    See All 51 Comments

    51 comments to “Rachel McAdams Brings The Glam To Sherlock Holmes”



    1. 1

      oh shes stunning :O

    2. lolli says – reply to this


      2

      shes fugly. sorry. great actress though!



    3. 3

      so sad



    4. 4

      This News day blooooowwws!



    5. 5

      WOWSA!.



    6. 6

      That movie looks terrible. Sherlock Holmes and vampires? Lame to the extreme.



    7. 7

      Yay! I love her! I'm going to see her in The Time Traveler's Wife!



    8. 8

      love love love.
      i can't wait, rachel mcadams looks lovely.



    9. 9

      Dunno if im first and i dont care. =P Rachel looks GORGEOUS!!!!!! =DD I adore her!!!



    10. 10

      funny, i was just thinking how ugly she looked!



    11. 11

      I love her, she's beautiful, smart and a good actress (L)_(L)



    12. 12

      Amazing that somebody this talanted once got billed under Lohan.



    13. 13

      She annoys the piss out of me… just like most of them in Hollywood.

    14. lolli says – reply to this


      14

      shes like a young sarah jessica parker…hmmm



    15. 15

      UMMM…yay?



    16. 16

      GORGE!



    17. 17

      She is smoking hot and I love her in every movie.. She's classy and respected.. She isn't a tramp and didn't sleep her way to the top.. How many actresses can say that now-a-days? Not many.. She's one of the few truly talented actresses of her time.. Love her…



    18. 18

      ….nice frock Perez. Did you loan it to her for her publicity shot?



    19. 19

      she looks horrible in that pic. She is pretty though, the photografer got it all wrong with this one



    20. 20

      thinks looks terrible :/



    21. 21

      Haha, she looks just like I imagined Irene Adler in the book. Okay, now that I read that I sound like a nerd.. anyway, I'm glad they have a talented actress set to play her :)



    22. 22

      Such an AMAZING actress and very beautiful.

    23. Twime says – reply to this


      23

      I love her; she's such a great actress…



    24. 24

      BIG AGE DIFFERENCE LIKE USUAL!



    25. 25

      she looked better in mean girls and the notebook.



    26. 26

      british film set in britain yet only one of the three leads are british, there are plenty of home-grown actors they could have used, so she better be pretty damn good if they were overlooked for her



    27. 27

      i'd go see this.



    28. 28

      Re: HavierPotter – They're totally different characters! You can't compare them..



    29. 29

      AVG LOOKING CHIC, AVG ACTRESS. HOMOS HAVE A DIFFERENT TASTE IN THINGS. PEREZ IS AN IDIOT.



    30. 30

      i'd like to bring the John Holmes to Rachel McAdams



    31. 31

      I don't think i've ever seen an unattractive photo of Rachel McAdams, I have now.



    32. 32

      I can't wait for this movie



    33. 33

      she looks lovely!!



    34. 34

      She is so gorgeous. Love her!



    35. 35

      Re: PixieCullen – agreed!



    36. 36

      Cheese cute. I'm not thaaat crazy over her.



    37. 37

      Could she be any hotter?



    38. 38

      I don't find her 'gorgeous'.
      I think it's just a matter of her name, I don't find 'Rachel' an all that appealing name. (My name is Rachel and I hate it…yuck).



    39. 39

      Oh no, this isn't going to be one of those period-costumes-with-a-modern-twist type movies is it? That hair is NOT accurate Victiorian looking hair. *humph*

    40. uh says – reply to this


      40

      I really wish they wouldn't f*** around with Sherlock Holmes. Can't they come up with another character so they don't have to ruin one? And Irene Adler isn't some sort of femme fatale. Idiots.



    41. 41

      I hope it's good as I plan to see it.



    42. 42

      Nope, don't think so!! She's a big bore. I'm going to skip this one!



    43. 43

      timeless beauty!

    44. ktea says – reply to this


      44

      sucks that shes in this movie. i hate her and shes the only reason i probably won't see the movie. gross gross gross!

    45. @v@ says – reply to this


      45

      I like her, but…mole-y mole-y…every time I see her. So sorry.



    46. 46

      This character was in ONE short story and was not reallt a femme fatale. She has enormous dignity and class and is the only woman ever to defeat Holmes. Thereafter she is only referred to by him as "the Woman." He's not even attracted to her, because Holmes is basically asexual.



    47. 47

      She's so gorgeous! =)



    48. 48

      she looks a little weird in this pic



    49. 49

      can't wait 2 c the movie, i love RDJ



    50. 50

      I love her; she's so pretty an talented :)



    51. 51

      She's gorgeous that girl.