Gisele's Baby Bump Photoshopped
Working while preggers!
Gisele Bundchen is adding London Fog onto her long list of ad campaigns.
The mommy-to-be posed for the campaign, shot by Nino Munoz, only a few weeks ago but the brand decided to photoshop her baby bump so she appeared more svelte when modeling their merch.
Dari Marder, the Chief Marketing Officer for London Fog says that, "although Gisele was photographed while pregnant, most of the shots have been retouched to respect her privacy during this wonderful and personal time in her life."
So much for privacy! Gisele hasn't even confirmed herself that she is sperminated!
At least she looks hawt!
Katie Price Doing The Detonator For Almost A Year?
Poppa Pitt Has 6pm Curfew!!!
first
fuck i would tap that so hard
who cares about giz?? if you want true talent.. utube search "greg's amazing vocals"
She looks like a man. But it works for her!
The second photo is not done well at all. Why would they use her if they were going to Photoshop out her belly? Sounds like someone changed their mind at the last minute.
WinonaJohnson looks like a man. Gisele is hot!
Overrated.
i thought that was cate blanchett at first
I hope she gets stretch marks
Privacy? while she's posing practically naked? That's not the word I'd choose. And I guess sex can sell anything if it can sell London Fog raincoats!
thats some bad work in number 2.
She is HOT!
why is she doing a photo shoot if she wants privacy ? ppftt..retard.
lol just another prove that they are photoshopping EVERYTHING in these magazines..
Amazing body..you gotta give it to her. Now face wise, she could use some help….i'm just saying.
She doesn't HAVE to confirm that she's pregnant. She didn't say she's NOT pregnant. She didn't sat she IS either. She doesn't own you or anyone else a confirmation.
BAD photoshop job….the second picture is horrible!
Hmmmm…
Stay "private" by pretending you're not pregnant?
Weird ass society we live in…
Not so much Gisele was keeping it personal, more like her agency can make more $$$$$ when she doesn't look "human" or "pregnant."
I don't buy it.
Sorry, I don't buy London Fog, I mean.
I'd rather go second hand to be sure I'm purchasing something made by indentured slaves in Taiwan or rural China.
this privacy things bugs me too. she's a bitchy model who doesn't wanna look fat (even if she's pregnant and it's okay no to be thin). plus: publicity. more people see the picture/buy the issue - they sell more of those coats.
gorgeous girl
Her body looks nice but her face is kind of Fug in these. PhotoShop can only do so much…
That second pic is creepy bad! They look like they photoshopped her stomach and hip off….very weird looking. I myself have never thought that she was that pretty. Same for CoKate too. FUG both of them!
I think she's gorgeous but those pics look wrong. Not classy at all. Its like they'd tried to hard to make it sexy but it just come off as tacky porn…
The retouching is brilliant! All hail the masterful retoucher!
I just got two questions. Why would a naked model wearing the raincoat make me wanna buy it? And can't she close her mouth? There's nothing model-ish about posing with your mouth open, if so then I'm a model in my sleep.
she's so pretty
obviously her body is just amazing, but….. HER FACE IS SO MANLY !! looks like alexis arquette´s
OMG you are all insane..anyone would love to be photographed just wearing a trenchcoat and look just as good doing so. All of you negative people should be ashamed of yourselves trying to bring down Gisele and these fabulous pix. She looks great
she looks horrible in the first one. and isn't she supposed to be a model? why is her expression the same in each one!?
maybe it's because she's pregs and just has to concentrate on making her body look it's best, but she's not giving great FACE! her expressions are just BLAH. is it just me?
I've come to the conclusion that she's a buttah face. But I guess she's laughing all the way to the bank. How can someone so ugly be a top model? Totally not fair. I'm way cuter.
The second one looks bizarre.
That is pretty pathetic. Who would want to ever hide their pregnancy and she needs to gain weight.
That is one ugly woman.
I think she is nice but I dont know why she is a supermodel. She seems so average looking to me.
how private are those pics??
She has "man-face" ewwww
Those pictures are so boring. They should have left the bump. You can really tell on the first picture something is not right.
Why are so many people saying "Her body is amazing but her face is busted" when the WHOLE POINT OF THIS POST is that her body was photoshopped!!!!
God, what a horrible looking woman.
How can she expect "privacy" while posing naked???
Can they photoshop her face? Seriously, she is not good looking and her notoriety is beyond me.
hhmmm, selling trench coats using nudity. sounds like their target audience is pedophiles…………
STUPID !!!!!
Respect her privacy??? Are you kidding me??? She's all but naked. Privacy Schmivacy. Not my definition of private.
Re: Shan4547 –
aw you are so smart hahahaha
Butterface!!!!!!
Actually the brand didn't decide to retouch it, she asked them if they would "to respect the baby's privacy".
But no doubt someone will be doing a Britney-esque bump shoot soon enough.
Not bad for being preggie!
Her face is so ugly. I just don't get what it is that people see in her. "worlds most famous supermodel" WHY? Yes her body is pretty perfect but her face could stop a clock. Ick
Best pix
sperminated what a word!
Re: SF90 –
Hahaha lllllllllooooooooooooollllllllllllllllll
u're very funny!
HAHAHAHAHA
She's not pretty at all
photoshop makes her that pretty!
Re: cinnamon_rae –
HAHAHA llooolll
i agree with you