Debbie Rowe Wanted Cashola And Gets It!

jacksonchildren1.jpg

As we mentioned earlier, Katherine Jackson and Debbie Rowe have reached a custody agreement over the fate of Michael Jackson's children. Katherine will have custody and Debbie will be allowed visitation.

But while we thought that it was drama free and all done in the children's best interest, it turns out there may have been a little more devil in the details.

Rowe has forgone custody of the children in exchange for spousal support payments which total $4 million overall.  According to Rowe (who was left out of Jackson's will), the King of Pop had an arrangement with her in which he paid her $1 million dollars a year.  Unfortunately for Rowe, this was a verbal agreement and so she had no physical proof of the agreement. 

As a result, Jackson's brothers were incredibly reluctant to adhere to her demands that she continue to be paid and, apparently, Jackson's lawyers even said they had grounds to fight the claim. Ultimately, however, Jackson's mother, Katherine, made the executive decision to give Rowe her money just to put the whole mess to rest and avoid putting the kids through even more of a media circus.

One source said, "they just want to get rid of her.  They recognized early in this process that she had no interest in playing a real role in their lives and that it was all about money."

Katherine will remain the children's guardian, and Rowe, in turn, will receive a few hundred thousand dollars a year over a set period of time and be allowed supervised visits.

Apparently, as part of the agreement, the Jackson clan has to say that it wasn't a matter of money for Rowe, even though it was.

It sounds like even though the Jacksons will have to continue paying Rowe, the children ended up with the person who will really look out for them.

All's well that ends well…but Debbie Rowe still sucks.

[Image via WENN.]

    Posted: Jul 31, 2009 at 7:30 pm / Email this  »

    74 comments to “Debbie Rowe Wanted Cashola And Gets It!”



    1. 1

      Debbie Rowe does suck! :P UGH



    2. 2

      Debbie Rowe does suck. -_- I feel so bad for his kids! Not only did they lose their father, whom they obviously loved very much, but they have to endure the press's scrutiny (not talking about you Perez.)



    3. 3

      I'm glad that Michael Jackson's children will be in the care of his mother. Why does Debbie Rowe need all this money? She has no children to care for or a husband, she really needs to just get a job.



    4. 4

      And once again, the almighty dollar rear$ it$' ugly head……



    5. 5

      i believe her….n yeah they should just give her 4 mill and be done with her…screw the whole "visitation rights" that she wants, leave those up to the kids to decide on whether or not they want this woman to be involved in their life. If they choose so, then let it happen…if not…let them be…poor kids everything is happening way too fast for them



    6. 6

      why the hell are they STILL wearing the freakishly wierd masks?????? WTF!!!!



    7. 7

      it's kindof sickening how obsessed with celebrity this counrty is…



    8. 8

      Well duh. What do you expect? The whole marriage was a sham just so she could pop out some kids for MJ and so he could look legit. Whatever happens about the $, it is peanuts compared th the MJ estate and what the family will be getting over the years, and the kids will ALWAYS be taken care of. They are, Jacksons, after all.



    9. 9

      Are you still monitoring my posts and not publishing them p-nasty?



    10. 10

      Perez — start calling her by her "real name" — DEBORAH 'HO' !!

      Forget this "Rowe" business. She saw a deal, and went for it. She's smart that way…………wouldn't you, Perez ? Bare Michael's WHITER THAN WHITE CHILDREN ? I WOULD !



    11. 11

      Re: Queen-Beeotch – It's an old picture.



    12. 12

      She's their mother, The Jacksons owe her that money. They'll make millions milking these children anyways.



    13. 13

      debbie rowe is a stupid greedy dike..



    14. 14

      This greedy bitch is a sorry excuse for a mother and a human being…
      She doesn't give two shits about those kids she is just gonna milk the jackson every chance she gets..
      I bet when those kids are old enough to make there own dicisions I bet she will take them to court and make them pay her for being there biological mother..



    15. 15

      "Debbie Roe" sucks is right. If this story is true, and I understand the reasons for Katherine to want this done and over with, but still. Michael is dead. His debt to her for her "gifts" to him is paid.

      It's obvious that Michael wanted to take care of his family, including his mother. From what I've always understood was he was the major contributor to paying for the Jackson Encino compound. He didnt will anything to Rowe.

      Ugh. With her wealth from being an incubator, you'd think the bitch would buy a brush and some lips.



    16. 16

      malignant bitch, let's hope she dies soon



    17. 17

      u rso fucking dumb. mj owed her alimony. $8M to be exact. it's been 10 yrs and she still hasn't been paid. he stopped paying her for a time, then they started again.

      u know who sux? the people that killed mj

      ur sources r so fucking stupid. tell jermaine that if he wants to talk shit, that he should do it out in the open



    18. 18

      gee i wonder how much joe stands to make from marketing the jackson3….shit talker



    19. 19

      dang I guess debbie still did want money . i actually liked her for a min . whoops nvm !



    20. 20

      Damn. I really thought there for a while that she just might be a decent person. She brought two desperately wanted children into the world, received her payment and faded into obscurity as arranged. When MJ died, she kept saying that she wasn't a mother and that the children would best with Katherine and that she didn't want more money. And I actually believed her. This makes me very sad. There's not a lot of nice things to say about women anymore, it seems. Except my mother. And yours. :)



    21. 21

      im glad yu finalyy wrote something i agree :]
      lov ya perezz



    22. 22

      Yeah, Debbie Rowe SUCKS…and so does the entire Jackson family. They're all out for the $$$$$ and the notoriety.

      The three kids are going to have a hard, lonely childhood and will need a great deal of therapy to help them deal with all that's been happening.

      The adults can argue and squabble over the money all they want; it's the children that I feel sorry for.



    23. 23

      Re: soso deaf – you're actually defending that piece of garbage?



    24. 24

      She doesn't deserve her children, or ANY children, for that matter!!! There are few things more hurtful than knowing that your own PARENT values MONEY more than their own CHILD!!! I know what I'm talking about: MY own FATHER married my mom and had me for MONEY. And believe me: it HURTS!!!!!! That leaves deep scars! "Money is worth more than me" is not how your PARENT is supposed to make you feel. And visitation rights?? Lame! Either you're 100% commited to being in your childs life always, or you back the fuck off!!! Don't juggle your kids according to your wishes, they're not toys!!! Either you're in or you're out. She's distgusting!!!



    25. 25

      THIS ISN'T TRUE. DEBBIE ROWE DID HAVE AN AGREEMENT WITH MJ. CHECK THE DIVORCE PAPERS IDIOTS.



    26. 26

      It would have been interesting to see Rowe's true colors if she was offered only visitation rights. That is a color I would have liked to seen.



    27. 27

      well i think MJ never should have married her anyway, she was pregnant before they got married, and she will remain a money problem to the family. Spousal support …for what?



    28. 28

      Excuse me but I already said this on your thread Katherine Jackson & Debbie Rowe speak #16. I called this one not to say I told you all so but I TOLD YOU SO!!! I can't believe that people actually stick up for this greedy Bitch.



    29. 29

      It's a little scary to think of Katherine raising them, it's not like she's got many years ahead of her. I can't imagine her raising a teenage Blanket, she'll be in her early 90's by the time the kids are becoming young adults. After losing my sole parental figure at such a young age, I'd be so terrified of losing her as well. While she may have custody, I really think their guardianship should be with one of Michael's siblings, specifically Rebbie.

      My heart goes out to those kids.



    30. 30

      PAh! She's there for life!



    31. 31

      It was a business arangement made between Michael and Debbie. She should get paid because that's why she had the kids for him. Everyone knew what was going on. It's not Debbies fault that Michael was bizarre and wanted to buy his kids for an ungodly amount of money. She was promised something in return for her "hand in marriage" and the birth of their children"… so she should get it. They didn't have to earn his money either, at least she did him an actual service.



    32. 32

      whatever happened to diana ross?people seem to forget she's second in line to guardianship should anything happened to katherine.



    33. 33

      No, MJ sucked for using her. She deserves to be paid for life.

    34. @v@ says – reply to this


      34

      I believe Michael had this deal, and a deal needs to be honored. Debbie Rowe gave him his children, and that is no small thing. He wanted sole parental rights, and he got them; indeed, he threw money at her to keep them to himself the way he wanted. Katherine has done the right thing here, and the children can start to get to know their birth mom like they should have in the first place. Kids have a great need to know their biological parent no matter what anyone else says about it. This looks like a win/win all around to me, and the kids will have more adults who love them that they can turn to if need be.



    35. 35

      soso deaf is probably debbie rowe, what a slovenly, gluttonous piece of garbage



    36. 36

      I still don't think it's that bad Perez. So she wants to continue the spousal support payment Michael had been paying… that does not automatically mean she wants to be in their lives FOR money. You didn't phrase it correctly, it's not about "supervised visits", there will be a child psychologist, selected and paid by both parties, who will work to encorporate Debbie into their lives on a meaningful basis. (not verbatim)

      I think this is the right thing to do; 1. Debbie continues to get spousal support as per her prior deal with MJ. (Can't they prove it by showing money transfers? Didn't one of MJs business people know about the deal - they had to have) and 2. She will be reintroduced into their lives by a trained professional. That will go a long way towards understanding and accepting all the changes in their young lives.

    37. Nesa says – reply to this


      37

      Fat pathetic bitch just want to extort money. Heifer can care less about those kids she don't want to visit them. I hope her fat ass choke on that money.



    38. 38

      I don't imagine the children wanting anything to do with Debbie once they're older and have a say. It's such a shame she values money more than her own biological children. Every time I see them, I feel like hugging them and protecting them.



    39. 39

      debbie rowe SUCKKKS
      pooor kids



    40. 40

      You know, it's MONEY that sucks… she mothered those kids for the money, no doubt, and he was willing to pay for her children. Money is the root of all evil. Why wouldn't she want more?



    41. 41

      Those poor kids are scr***d no matter where they end up. And probably for the rest of their lives.



    42. 42

      While Katherine Jackson may be more "fit" to raise them, what's gonna happen when she dies? I , she's in her late 80's. It's tragic when a parent dies and you have to go live with someone else, but it's likely that these kids will have it happen to them twice.



    43. 43

      There is no way in hades I could walk away from my two children for any amount of money. Stop that!



    44. 44

      Re: Queen-Beeotch – dumb bitch this pic is OLLLLDD..IT WAS 2 MTHS BEFORE MJ DIED..GEEZ.



    45. 45

      Hmm. Let me guess. The source of this story is the New York Post.



    46. 46

      Its hard to believe that any woman would sell her own babies for any price. Debbie has got more money out of MJ than any surrogate or adopting parent ever would have gotten. She is heartless and her children deserve much better from her than what she is doing to them. Lets hope Joe Jackson keeps the hell away from those kids too.



    47. 47

      Those kids where born into screwed circumstances and will life the rest of their lifes in the same way. Everybody involved with those kids is screwed up, period. They will never have a chance to live a somewhat normal life, never.



    48. 48

      Who the fuck cares about that whale anyway? Who the fuck exactly does she think she is, trying to make the Jacksons say "it wasn't about money"? Many seem to claim that she wasn't even their biological mother anyway!

      I hope the Jacksons really do come out and say, "We paid her whale ass money so she'd just fuck off already. OH AND PS: TEH HARPOONZ! MAN THEM!"



    49. 49

      You people are pathetic. Debbie Rowe provided services as basically a surrogate to carry his children (like millions of other surrogates around there). An arrangement was made to pay her for her services - the marriage in name only so the children would be legitimate was just a sham. This is not about whether she cares or doesn't care about the services - this is about fulfillment of a contract. However, she does have a biological tie to the children and as their biological mother she cares that they are raised properly, and that they have minimal contact or supervision by 'Grandpa Joe'. This does not make her a greedy person, nor does it make her deserving of name-calling, derision or death wishes. Get real people - you are all a bunch of ignorant, pathetic jerks.



    50. 50

      omg Rowe had the kids just to be making money out of them, that is just cruel and sad for the kids but at the end they had the best father they could ever had and that was their gift.

    51. Ammie says – reply to this


      51

      Debbie Rowe had legal rights to the children because MJ didn't get that legally finalized. Debbie will continue to get what MJ agreed to and MJ's estate will continue to get what Debbie agreed to (the children). So the deal continues exactly how MJ and Debbie agreed.



    52. 52

      It was obvious that fat hefer was making a stink because she wanted money and she wasn't going to back off until she got it. It's good they spread it over a number of years instead of giving her a lump sum. She would have blown a lump sum in a couple of years and be back making more threats. What a bitch threating to sue for custody if you don't get money.



    53. 53

      Mr. Hilton, I totally agree Debbie Rowe, sucks and she is ugly too no doudt. I'd put that Bitch out of my life too. She has always been about money. She knows not one thing about raising children; a Dog would do a better job in that department then that ugly bitch. Sorry but true. I can't wait til the cut off day of the money they will be giving her. She totally, totally sucks big time.



    54. 54

      Ok, this is the FIRST time I don't agree! I DO believe she wanted to make sure the kids were in good hands…away from JOE JACKSON! She was always paid spousal support and that was NOT a secret! I think Debbie is given a bad rap..I would've had kids for MJ had he asked! A lot of woman would have! The kids are hidden from the tv, according to the Jacksons! I STILL think Katherine is too old! What happens if she passes away next year? WHO…then will take care of the kiddies???



    55. 55

      Oh and once again, Debbie did what MJ wanted….have kids and HE paid her to stay away so he could have them to himself! Why does everyone forget this?



    56. 56

      NOBODY in that fucked-up family should be allowed to watch over children…



    57. 57

      HOPEFULLY…Debbie Rowe will love these children and be the one to protect the children from JOE JACKSON if Katherine cannot.

    58. Jai says – reply to this


      58

      Those poor kids, their life is so fucked up. They are going to need therapy for the rest of ther lives just to sort it all out.



    59. 59

      Yes, she totally sucks for letting the kids stay with a woman they know, and presumably love, while still receiving the money she was promised by MJ. What a bitch!

      She definitely should have sued for custody of children that don't really know her and split the family up! That would have been much better!

      Michael made a deal with this woman. No matter what it was, it should be honored.



    60. 60

      wtf are those masks gonna do? protect them from bullets? fuck we all know what they look like, fuck off.



    61. 61

      She was just a baby incubator.

    62. jian says – reply to this


      62

      you know the jackson camp put this out there. leave her alone. They had an agreement. its less money than his advisors and family leached off him for nothing. she gave him his children.

    63. jian says – reply to this


      63

      she also doesn't want to confuse them during this difficult time and will gradually get to know them. SHE IS THE ONE WHO INSISTED ON A PSYCHOLOGIST!!!! The family needs one too frankly.

    64. jian says – reply to this


      64

      Perez you idiot. Dumb greedy byotch Katherine INSISTED MJ and she get married so it looked legit. She was going to do it for him OUT of marriage. The JACKSONS are the jerks trying to smear her.



    65. 65

      Re: Sherilyn – very well said. i completely agree. very sad how ignorant people are… :(



    66. 66

      Re: Queen-Beeotch

      this is an older pic



    67. 67

      Re: curiousred – How do you figure they owe her that money? She was already taken care of the first time around, which is most likely why MJ excluded her money grubbin ass from the will. As for your comment about Katherine milking her grandchildren, did you fail to realize that MJ left 40% of his estate to her, she would have been set with or without the children. Rowe knew her ass was toast as far as ANY custody hearing would go, she's been quoted as saying she DOES NOT WANT THESE CHILDREN CALLING HER MOM, so she went for a consilation prize.



    68. 68

      Re: daddyboytoy – How bout you read up, its not THAT money she's after, she wants another 4million in addition to what she was already awarded and the "verbal" arrangement between her and MJ is bs, she seems like a smart enough cookie and seems she would now better and get it in writing.



    69. 69

      Re: lastonestanding – for using her? 1. She approached him 2. She signed agreements in her divorce papers for a certain amount and thats all she should get. 3. Should all surrogate mothers be paid for the rest of their lives? 4. Why not get the agreement for the $4million in writing? and FINALLY…5. She was EXCLUDED from the will…You can't dispute written agreements, verbal contracts do NOT hold up in a COURT OF LAW, the law would have been on KATHERINE'S side, but once again she proved to be an intelligent woman and decided to rid herself of the problem completely.



    70. 70

      Re: miss ash – Death is a natural part of life, its sad that MJ went too soon and the controversy that surrounds it, BUT whether they're with Katherine at the time of her death or with one of their aunts or uncles, I'm sure her death will be hard on them either way. As for raising the children, I'm sure many with children of their own, as myself, would agree that it takes a family to raise them. I am positive they will have constant interaction with their aunts, uncles, cousins, etc. and as they grow it will be those people who help mold them into fine young adults.



    71. 71

      Re: therealstinkweed – It's kinda hard to get people to believe this deal, when it isn't in writing or on record.

    72. Sgirl says – reply to this


      72

      Do you honestly think that the grandmother wants those kids for any reason other than the money they are tied to? You are really stupid if you believe otherwise. The Jackson family is all about the $$. What's 4mil compared to what's at stake?



    73. 73

      Debbie Rowe got a lump sum at the end of the sham marriage. She doesn't need support and she shouldn't need $$ to visit her kids — any further payments to Debbie Rowe must be hush money. Let's face it, she knows a ton, including the identity of her two kids' dad. These may be the reasons why MJ did things differently with child #3, "Blanket" — of all gawd-awful nicknames. Neither parent is known for the bambino. It's so sick-puppy twisted.



    74. 74

      I agree with you guys but I have to say that Michael went into contract with the woman to have the children. This is my guess. C'mon you really do not think she would be attracted to that, as Perez would say, "fugly" woman do you? So she is getting paid. She was promised money and she should get it. Another thing, thank goodness these beautiful children will be raised by family that truely loves them. One more point remember that as much as we love Michael Jackson for his great talent the man was a drug addict. How do you think this may have affected his children. People seem to forget about the real issues at hand.