Home Videos Photos
Home >> Playboy , Heidi Montag >> Heidi's Playboy Pics Have Arrived!!

Heidi's Playboy Pics Have Arrived!!

Filed under: Playboy > Heidi Montag

heidi1.jpg
heidi.jpg
heidi2.jpg

Here's a peek at Heidi Montag's much talked about by Heidi Playboy spread.

See if you can spot where she received help from her friend, Photoshop.

CLICK HERE to see the rest!!!!

We think not showing any titty or any kitty is lame lame lame.

It's fucking Playboy - NOT Maxim!

What do U think?

    Posted: Aug 13, 2009 at 6:06 pm / Email this  »
    « Previous story
    Spider-Man The Musical Going Ahead As Planned, Claim Producers
    Next story »
    Oprah Losing Stedman?!?!
    See All 314 Comments

    314 comments to “Heidi's Playboy Pics Have Arrived!!”

    More comments: [1] 2 3 4 »



    1. 1

      In the third picture she looks uncannily like Ashley Tisdale.



    2. 2

      Why did they make Kim Kardashian show hers? She didn't want to. B/S!!



    3. 3

      Ewwww- so overrated & fugly!



    4. 4

      She has such a horse face. Together with her crappy personality. Yech!



    5. 5

      I thought you had to 'let the cat out of the bag' and show the tatas in order to be in playboy…
      Isnt that what they told kim Kardashian (sp?)



    6. 6

      lllooolll@her photoshopped face in the last picture. That's really bad.



    7. 7

      so much photoshop it doesnt even look like her, which is a good thing, by the way



    8. 8

      she looks like a blow up doll with her mouth open…. horrible pics of her face.



    9. 9

      last pic doesn't even look like her!



    10. 10

      FUGLY and STUPID, thats what I think



    11. 11

      her face does not look good..



    12. 12

      BORING……



    13. 13

      Lame. It's not so much that she didn't show anything, it's the poses. IF they would have given her extensions so it covered her tits I think it would have been better. As it is, looks like she's pledging allegiance.



    14. 14

      fucking lame



    15. 15

      im sorta disappointed that these arent more sexed up…



    16. 16

      HMMMMMMMMMMMMM………….if that's all she's showing that is super fucking lame.How ironic!



    17. 17

      She's pathetic. Enough said.



    18. 18

      What is this shit? She looks like a whore-ish christina aguilara (no idea how to spell her name…)



    19. 19

      I agree with P it's playboy. I'm dissapointed!



    20. 20

      I hope it's the least sold copy ever.



    21. 21

      Its a shame about the face !!

      She probably paid hef to be in the mag !!



    22. 22

      What the fuck is wrong w/ her neck in the third picture. It's like they cropped her head and set it down directly on her shoulders.



    23. 23

      is it weird that her mouth is open in all of the photos, or is it just me?



    24. 24

      Well if she did show some boobage you'd call her slutty Perez. But yea, it is playboy and not maxim.



    25. 25

      fake breasts are so gross looking

    26. dd says – reply to this


      26

      The last pic doesn't even look like her. She has a great body though.



    27. 27

      nothin special….she looks different in the last one.



    28. 28

      PHOTOSHOP!



    29. 29

      1ST, NOT BAD, 2ND BORING AS FUCK, 3RD EW.. ACTUALLY, ALL OF THEM EW IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT HER.. EW EW EW EW EW….. I FEEL BETTER NOW.. YUCK.. NOW…



    30. 30

      *yawn* is their time up yet? Hef really knows how to pick em. The way the pictures are layed out is nice but the girl…not so much!



    31. 31

      her face is beyond repair…



    32. 32

      Good body but ugly horse face . and playboy was fucking stupid for not asking for at least some tit shots



    33. 33

      I fell asleep looking at these pics.



    34. 34

      And if she did show any 'titty' or 'kitty' Perez you'd call her a ho.



    35. 35

      I think the list would be shorter if you figured out everything that wasn't photoshopped. Let's see… maybe that tree in the background of the first shot? That's about all I can see.



    36. 36

      Yeah…so did she not show anything so she would seem more Christian? Talk about ridiculous



    37. 37

      Surprise, surprise. Her face in these pics looks as dead as her brain. I still say Perez should stop posting anything about these dipshit fame whores.



    38. 38

      I think the world could go without saying any of it! Her body is ok I guess but enhanced but that face is fucking terrible!!!!!!



    39. 39

      WTF HAPPENED TO HEIDI'S FACE?! Was the plastic surgery NOT ENOUGH?! HAHAHA.



    40. 40

      Fugly bitch, is their 15 minutes up yet. Did you guys here Troll gives her 20-30 orgasims a day. Hahahahahahaha



    41. 41

      What is wrong with her eyes? Her face is so ugly. Damn, I can pose for playboy



    42. 42

      yawn.
      CLOSE YOUR DAMN MOUTH!!!!!
      classic "is-this-what-models-do?" face. lame lame lame.



    43. 43

      she should be oh so proud.

      ps girl, there's such thing as food.



    44. 44

      She's a beautiful girl, why did they photoshop her face so much? It doesn't even look like her!



    45. 45

      LAME!!!



    46. 46

      she has the same expression in every picture. she cant model, she just looks good naked. no talenttt!!!!!

      and i agree with ambrosia, she does kinda look like ashley tisdale, also, she kinda looks like christina aguleria a little bit in the third picture



    47. 47

      last pic look like they put someother face on!look!there's no neck!and seems bigger??

      lol.those pictures.big laugh at the unsexy black panties.really.she was less dressed when sporting her heidiwood dresses

      THIS IS RIDICOLOUS !!!



    48. 48

      this is just one of many nice bodies… another pretty girl dying her hair blond.

      I see nothing special…there are many out there that look like this.

      We're all special in our own way …but appearing naked - looking like any other naked girl…

      nothing special. lol



    49. 49

      blech… fuck she's ugly.



    50. 50

      I bet her nipples are messed up from her breast augmentation!LOL!



    51. 51

      Her face looks different in each picture…and why does she want ANOTHER boob job? Jesus.



    52. 52

      it doesnt even look like her, wtf !



    53. 53

      What in the hell is wrong with her eyes in the third pic? She looks like an alien or something.



    54. 54

      what the fuck is wrong with her head???



    55. 55

      look at the 3rd picture..it's like they used the cut and paste method it looks way lame! btw she is lame!



    56. 56

      Gross, theres just something not right with her face!!



    57. 57

      what's wrong with her face?

    58. PaS8 says – reply to this


      58

      I didn't think it was possible to make her any more fugly.
      I stand corrected.



    59. 59

      I'd have rather thumbed through the Victoria Secret mailer. Even JC Penney lingerie advertisements are more provocative!



    60. 60

      What's wrong with her face???



    61. 61

      I thought broads were supposed to be ATLEAST topless in their photos.



    62. 62

      And the kneeling pose looks like she's into SCAT… eeeewwwwwww



    63. 63

      They CLEARLY shopped out her giant round chin and jaw. Not even close to the real shape of her face.



    64. 64

      What happened to her face? When The Hills first started she was so much more attractive. Now she's as ugly on the outside as she is on the inside.



    65. 65

      What a fucking poser.



    66. 66

      really really bad photoshop on her face!!!!!!



    67. 67

      I thought the point of photoshop was to achieve the best possible result with a picture that is less than perfect….so, where does removing her neck come into the equation? We get half a boob, no neck and….she's like proud of this?



    68. 68

      Her face looks super fuckin weird.



    69. 69

      EW!!! something is off…can't put my finger on it but she looks like she could be Albino with down's syndrome.



    70. 70

      Her might chin is missing in the last picture.
      Thank God.



    71. 71

      hahaha what happened to her face!! i don't get why they need photoshop they end looking worse with that crap



    72. 72

      Re: SarahFair – #5 if that's true I REALLY HOPE Kimmy sues Hugh's old senile ass



    73. 73

      Playboy cannot possibly think that putting Heidi on the cover will actually sell more copies, even if she was naked. We'd all just check out the pictures on PerezHilton.com anyways, right?

      It's a desperate ploy from a desperate company who is going to have to learn how to brand Playboy without the magazine that made it famous. They don't even put the hottest girls they have in the actual magazine, they put those girls on the internet. Does that make sense to you? Hef's getting old man…



    74. 74

      what a crock of shit



    75. 75

      The third photo is so horrible, I just had to sign up for a profile and leave a comment. She looks like the octomom.



    76. 76

      Hey body is okay b/c of all the work… but she is too skinny, and her face isn't pretty. She looks too fake. And the photoshoot just makes her skankier… not more popular. I will be so happy when nobody talks about Heidi and Spencer again. I hope nobody watches the new seasons of The Hills now that LC is gone.



    77. 77

      i wonder if they put the bad pics in on purpose because shes such an annoying twat



    78. 78

      poor girl! she looks like a man :( hahahaa



    79. 79

      The first picture is photoshopped to hell! It looks like she's standing in front of a backdrop! WTF, it looks so weird.



    80. 80

      Horrible.



    81. 81

      Ew, the third does not look like her. Nothing new here.



    82. 82

      Re: VioletMars – The Kim Kardashian shoot was really good. Interesting.



    83. 83

      i thought she was a devout Christian. umm… doesn't this kinda go against what Christian's believe in?



    84. 84

      zzzzzzzzzzzz!



    85. 85

      *yawn*



    86. 86

      I dont think jesus would approve.



    87. 87

      Laaame. These pictures are boring. And I agree why wouldn't she just show it all. We all know she has no shame.



    88. 88

      What's going on in the last photo? Her head looks like it's been pasted on! :/

    89. @v@ says – reply to this


      89

      Re: skeezer – 22 - Good eye. That way they can get more of her body in the shot without panning back. I think.



    90. 90

      BUTTERFACE



    91. 91

      The first picture looks like she is wearing a big kotex. Either that or she has a big fat twat!



    92. 92

      Let's see, Playboy pays her NOT to be naked? Gee, I wonder why Playboy is losing money hand over fist and going to hell in a handbasket? Losers! Who the hell wants to see pictures of women with clothes on, isn't that left to Ladies Home Journal?



    93. 93

      she looks like a complete idiot. she should be embarrassed. endofstory.



    94. 94

      haha .. no neck in the third picture



    95. 95

      p.s. Heidi is really ugly and reminds me of the saying "I never went to bed with an ugly woman, but I have woken up to many"….Woof woof….



    96. 96

      Are you shitting me? Why would they have Spencers interview with Heidi in the mag???? It was so STUPID!!!! I actually read the shit…



    97. 97

      those fake tits look so bad,they were prob cheap,anything under 12,000 is to cheap..shes got no hips..what was she thinkin



    98. 98

      Re: Puffin – I just remember the meet the Kardashians episode where he insisted she had to do it if it was going to be issued.



    99. 99

      Bitch is a stone bone G-R-I-F-T-E-R. Even Hef isn't infallable.
      Soooooo, I'm guessing Kim (juggs)Kardashian feels pretty slutty right about now!



    100. 100

      This is so hilarious! I can understand airbrushing some imperfections on her body but airbrushing her face-SHAMEFUL! It doesn't even look like her! (But I suppose that was the point) EWW!!, to both the before and after…

    More comments: [1] 2 3 4 »