Financially Troubled Photog Annie Leibovitz Catches A Break???

There maybe a light at the end of the debt tunnel for photographer Annie Leibovitz. The famed artist has just started settlement negotiations on the $24 million loan she is in the hole for. If successful, Annie could return to work without such a heavy burden to cloud her days.
If these talks are unsuccessful, Annie risks losing not only her four homes, but also the rights to any past and future photograph she has ever taken.
Hopefully, something can be worked out as we would hate to see the work of such an extraordinary artist (and a celesbian!) be thrown into the hands of a greedy company. Her work should remain hers.
The houses she should sell to give them back their money. Fair is fair.
What do U think?
[Image via WENN.]
































































this sucks
Nobody needs 4 houses…
so whens the juicy stuff coming in?
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ART BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Her stuff is great, just hope she gets to keep working!
wow that fucking sucks
*
Man, I sure hope Annie can get through this without losing the rights to iconic work.
*
She's one of the greats in the photographic arts, right up there with the likes of Ansel Adams and such.
*
.
If Fair is Fair, as you say, Perez, then it is fair that the company recoup their $24 million dollars. It is not fair if they lose. They are not greedy. Annie signed the contract and took their money. Fair is paying it back as you said you would.
AS USUAL YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT THE FUCK YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. HER HOUSES ARE WORTH LESS THAN 10 MILLION TOTAL, SHE HAS BEEN BORROWING MONEY FROM ART CAPITAL WITH HER PHOTO CATALOG AS COLLATERAL FOR YEARS, SO SHOULD THEY JUST FORGOT ABOUT THE 24 MILLION?
SHE ALSO HAS A 100 LAW SUITS AGAINST HER FOR STEALING PHOTOS FROM OTHER PHOTOGRAPHERS AND CLAIMING THEM TO BE HERS IN PUBLICATIONS.
OH YEAH!! YOU KNOW ALL ABOUT RIPPING OFF OTHERS WORK.
What do you mean her work should be hers? Greedy companies?
SHE asked them for the loan. They didnt seek her out. She offered up her life's work as collateral, she didnt have to. They gave her $24 Million because she is bad with her finances. I used to work in her industry and she NEVER paid her bills…ever. One company that I used to give business to had to go out of business because she owed the almost $1M.
She is a greedy entitled person who mortgaged her life for a buck…why? because she didnt want to sell one of her homes because she thought it was worth more $. Thats right…she needed cash and didnt want to sell one of her 4 homes, so she chose this option.
But of course, because she is a lesbian, she is right? You are a fool…you are a fool's fool…
Come on Annie has been an awful person to those who live near her. She pushed her neighbors out of their brownstone after doing damage to their home. She's really a pig. When you think you're bigger then everyone and you don't treat people kindly…karma sucks. Who does she think she is….she borrowed money and then cries when she has to pay it back. Those days are over for her kind in this economic melt down. Pay the money back Miss Annie Warbucks.
Kiss my ass Annie! You made $33,000 on one effing picture. You pissed your money away, now go live financially stressed like the rest of America. Once again, kiss my ass.
Fair is Ms. Leibovitz taking responsibility for her poor money management.
Listen, this sucks. She should have never pledged her copyrights as collateral. The company is hardly "greedy", having given her 24 million. She should sell her homes, pay back the loan and maintain her intellectual property. They should give her a bit of time to do that, say a year or so, but they have a right to be charging her interest. Whoever gave her the advice that they did should probably be shot.
A contract is a contract.
Re: slite – good for you. You make good sense here.
wasn't there some deal where a large quantity of her "debts" had to do with inheritance issues when her long-time partner died? Inheritance issues that would hot have been a problem or a cost if she had been allowed to marry that partner and have traditional spousal inheritance rights? Or am I thinking of somebody else…….
Sell the houses! Keep the WORK!
This mother fucking fat piggy thinks he is also an Ann Landers! WTF?.
WTF does anyone need 4 houses for? She looks like a house has dropped on her sister anyway …watch the skies , ANNIE.
GREEDY COMPANY??? Why should we feel sorry for her when she used her "life's work" a collateral for the friggen loan in the first place??
Why is this story getting so much attention? Who the fuck cares? Is the media trying to fish out a financial saviour for Annie??
What the fuck did she do with the 24Million dollar loan she took out??? Buy the Fulton Street fish market?
Honestly– don't feel too sorry for her.
Did she put the 24 Mil loan in with Madoff or something?
Why should anyone give a rat's ass about Annie Liebovitz's financial problems?
Most Americans can barely afford the mortgage on just one house.
Re: TheMrsBradPitt – You are correct. That was part of the issue. She could have sold the house she inherited and paid the taxes. What you do not understand is that her inherited amount was higher than the tax ceiling that is allowed by tax law. Most of us do not understand that above a certain amount (many millions), the goverment taxes 50%…married or not.
Therefore, this isnt a gay marriage issue. It is an estate planning issue. Her partner KNOWING that this could be an issue could have done a tremendous amount of things (that straight people do as well) to insulate her partner from this matter.
She is bad with finances…and apparantly so was her partner.
Using the word "artist" to describe Annie Leibovitz, is a great exaggeration. It was only because she photographed celebrities, that she became famous. A monkey can use a camera the way she did. She has no brains, she has no talent. This is why you see her having these monney troubles.
I agree with Lady_Saccharine_Sweetness. NO ONE needs 4 houses. If she sold 3 of her houses she could probably pay them back. She shouldn't have to lose her life's work.
Re: Head Banger – If you are going to take shots at someone, is it necessary to do it in "caps"? And why do you have to be so downright ugly and nasty about it……what does that do for you? I'm not saying….I'm just saying. (We live in a harsh world…..being a little nicer to each other might make it a little nicer world to live in). If you don't like what Perez has to say, you do have other choices?
She could just milk her homosexuality and go on some reality show.
Her and Tila, no?
Very over-rated- that girl Annie Liebovitz.
Vanity Fair needs to get rid of her and give more opportunities to young blood.
Annie's had her day.
A person can have as many houses as they can afford. I really can not understand how an artist of her caliber and artistic reputation ends up broke. I do not feel sorry for her, she may lose her catalogue, but she can always take new pictures (hopefully no more pedaphilic photos please, ie. Miley)
How did she get in so much debt?
She is great at what she does. I hope she can work something out.
How on earth could this amazingly talented woman, who has worked relentlessly for 20-plus years and who makes millions a year for Vanity Fair, be broke?? What did she do with her money? Flush it down the toilets of her four houses????
omg, fucking rich people. SELL 3 OF YOUR FUCKING HOUSES, rich bitch. No one needs that many homes when they're defaulting on a 24 MILLION dollar loan. Give me a break. These assholes could solve the world's hunger problem in a day, and yet they keep it all for themselves. Perez, you're getting richer everyday now - what charities are you helping???? Do you give away more than 1% of your money??? Greedy "celebrities". You should all be forced to donate your money to help the starving kids on the streets. STOP BEING SO GREEDY!!!!!!!