Levi HAWTston, Definitely Posing For Playgirl!
Get ready to see only what Bristol Palin has seen (and maybe Kathy Griffin - but not really!).
Levi Johnston is posing for Playgirl!
Members of Team Levi say that he is in the process of preparing for the spread but isn't quite sure which "side" of his he'll be showing of - "the front or the back." Either way, he's buffing up for the appearance, says his lawyer, Rex Butler: "He is in the gym six days a week for the next three weeks."
Show off the front AND the back. Duh!
No word yet when we get to see this air-headed hick in the mag, but the lawyer's best guess is "probably before the end of the year."
Looking forward to it. He may be an idiot, but that pretty face is hard to ignore.
It doesn't make us forget that he is an idiot, but it is a nice distraction!
Don't Let K-Fat Rent From You!
YUK!!! cover that baby up…isnt that child pornagraphy
oh, child pornography, nice!
EEEEEWWWWWWW, WHERE DOES PEREZ PICK OUT THESE FUGLY ASS PEOPLE? I'd rather look at shit floating in a toilet all day. LEVI IS ALMOST AS UGLY AS TYLER!
Perez, honey…your talking about pornography and have a picture of his baby posted! wtf?? that is so wrong
I knew it would come to this Mario. There are a hundred pictures of Levi Johnston out there. Why this one (as if we don't know). TAKE DOWN THE PICTURE OF THAT INNOCENT BABY'S GENITALS from your website you asshole.
I hope he works out and gets a spray tan, he has zero muscle tone and is quite casper-ish…yuck.
I did not expect a baby dick when I logged on today, seriously, what the fuck
Perez the Pedo
he's so hot. i love him chubby too.
HOW ABOUT YOU REMOVE THE CHILD PORNOGRAPHY FROM YOUR SITE!!! WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU?!
You fuckin creep!! Child pornographers will use this picture (as you probably already have, cocoballs), to satisfy their twisted sexual urges. TAKE IT DOWN!!! This kid has no choice–make a good choice for him!!!
You have no sense of decency for posting this!! This innocent kid will grow up someday and be angry and disgusted that his privates have been shown on your LOUSY fucking website!!
REMOVE THIS PICTURE NOW!!!!!
Re: YOUR FAV in TEXAS – seriously…it is an infant. Get over it.
that is so wrong. pedophiles are probably jacking off to this shit!!!
change that picture now perez!!!!!!!!!!
PEREZ, TAKE THIS BABIES PICTURE DOWN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IT IS SICK TO EXPOSE THIS CHILD LIKE THIS!!!! IF I WERE ANY OF THE PALIN'S I WOULD BE ON THE PHONE WITH A LAWYER, AND QUESTIONING LEVI AS TO WHY SOMEONE WAS ALLOWED TO TAKE A PICTURE OF THIS BABIES GENITALS AND POST IT ON THE INTERNET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
TAKE IT DOWN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We all have cute naked pictures of our kids–we just don't post them where millions of people can see them, you fucking retard. You are violating this kid's rights by doing this. TAKE THE PICTURE DOWN!!!
Please take this down.
It is disgusting how he is selling his story. He really must be dumb but you should not use the word hick on your website. Especially if you would not use other words to describe stereotypes or groups of people. It is just not fair.
Judgng by the pic you have up here he's not a very good looking man. Anywho, I thought Playgirl died a few yea ago?
Sarah Palin is gonna be on your ass so bad–and for the 1st time in my life, I will side with her!!! I can't believe you will make me agree with something Sarah Palin says!! I HATE YOU!!!
PEREZ-O-PHILE…………this is your new name.
I am livid over this picture! I have 2 babies and you will NEVER find a picture of them without their privates covered up! Please take this picture down Perez…it promotes child pornography. I get that it's a "natural" thing, unfortunately we have too many sick people in this world that would actually "get off" on it! It's bad enough that the picture was taken in the 1st place, but you do not have to promote it further! Thank you for listening, and I hope you will do the right thing.
At least he is HOT and an idiot. He could be like Perez: NOT HOT and an idiot.
Didn't Playgirl stop publication a while ago?
Re: Crabby.Appelton – You are an idiot too, and weird.
He's cute but I don't think he should do it. It will only give that twat Sarah and her idiot daughter more ammo.
Re: Aviddiva – oh please. The sick thing is that you people who even NOTICE the baby 'genitals'. Find a cause, idiots.
Re: fantomas –
You are a dumbass.
Re: brainchild –
LOL! Like the kid from the Nirvana album cover? He has no problems with it.
dude cover up the bay you fucktard douche!
Re: brainchild –
If you hate Perez, why do you keep coming to his site?
perez's wiener is about the same size
f- a - g
LOL Child pornography is the sexualization of a child through pictures or videos. This picture does not in ANYWAY do this. It is as non sexual as they come. so if your the one focused on a babies genitles or even assosicating this picture as a sexual thing by saying its child porn..maybe you have the problem.
Re: lakerfan100 – no his dick is like 8 inches, so he claims… it didnt look small but it was only soft
Re: Poindexter-X – It's a different world today, and would you like a naked picture of yourself as a baby–done without your consent because you were too young to make those decisions–on a website run by a gay man who slobbers all over young teenage boys??? It's not done for art here–it's done for tittilation–Perez only does things to get a reaction–he never does it for any other reason but that!!!
Re: Poindexter-X – I used to come to this website because I liked it and thought it was funny. But now I come here because someone has to object to: the hatred, the lies, the innapropriate comments about young teen boys and girls, the slanted stories favoring only people he likes, and on and on. I am by no means a politically correct or overreacting person, but there is something called COMMON DECENCY–which should be shown to those that are too young or incapacitated to make their own decisions.
Re: lakerfan100 – HAHAHAHA
Re: perezishomophobic – i hope that you wouldnt post pictures of your children naked on the internet. there are too many sickos. there are probably pedophiles maturbating to that picture, Levi is an irresponsible parent for exploiting his child like that.
Re: PerezTheBlogNazi –
Cun*t
Jeez pervez, Levi will be showing his ass only. How can you call him an idiot when both you and your sister tout your own college degrees (in Journalism, no doubt!) and yet you can't even spell or use correct verbiage? You are both bigger charlatans than Sarah Palin! Please don't stop! I enjoy watching the falling comments numbers.
Re: brainchild – douche
Bet you have alot of these kind of picture's don't you Mario you perverted pedophile. TAKE IT DOWN SHIT FOR BRAINS.
Re: Poindexter-X – i wonder when you people will grow a brain.
God I hope Bristol takes him to court to get his visitation taken away. This man should not be anywhere near that baby. How in the hell is he going to release photos of his naked son. Why are you posting them Perez? I have said you do pedophile type postings and this just proves it. Take this picture down!!!
Re: Poindexter-X – Don't get me wrong Poindexter.I think your comments are really funny and your a cool dude but out the zillion pics Mario had to pick from,he pics one with a naked baby in it.It just reinforces our image of him as a Pedo.He shows wayyyyyy to many pics of Celetards witht their children and as much as i hate most of those clowns there kids are off limits and shouldn't even be pictured let alone posted on this website
Re: Kdel – it's an old pic and it has been around a while. though a lot websites had the respect to cut the baby out. this is just another attempt to get more hits and comments.
Re: Douche Hunter – pedophile
LOL Im waitting for the pics
I don't find deadbeat dads attractive!
Re: PerezTheBlogNazi – Re: cheesewiz77 – It is shown and proven by interviewing pedophiles that they will use ANY child nudity pictures–not just sexual ones–for their pleasure. When they have raided their computers–there are many pictures just of naked kids–not doing anything sexual. It stimulates them–just like Playboy's naked women can make guys horny.
Would you want someone like Perez posting naked pictures of your innocent kid on THIS website–alongside pictures of gay men fucking and crotch shots of stupid celebrities??? Why don't you send him a few of your own kids???
Re: perezishomophobic – Being a victim of sexual abuse during my childhood and trying to be a good mother you are DAMN RIGHT I noticed the baby not being covered up! This is ridiculous, and while you may not care, I will NOT look at your site anymore…how disrespectful can you be?!?
Re: PerezTheBlogNazi – Sorry–I didn't mean to include you in my prior post. I actually wanted to defend you from that fucking moronic POINDEXTER-IDIOT. HE/She seems to actually be Perez, or maybe someone blowing perez.
I really hope you do the right thing and take this picture down, or at least scribble to cover that baby up… as a soon-to-be mommy of a little boy I can't imagine the horror I'd feel seeing my baby naked on a site like this…. especially with the kind of story attached to it… really low..
Like it or not a lot of people who are homophobic are like that because they believe gay people are sexual deviants and pedophiles. While this is not true, Perez makes them think it is true because of the questionable postings of kids that Perez has no problem putting up here for the world to see. Just another way that Perez is setting back the gay agenda.
Re: Douche Hunter – YEAH, an infant, point taken..im sure he is dying to have his picture taken of his peen…gross COVER IT UP!!!!
Are you people kidding. DO YOU NOT SEE THE PHOTO IS FROM WHEN HES WAS IN GQ MAGAZINE. It is a published picture that appeared in GQ MONTHS ago. Wise up folks, its almost 2010, not 1950!!!
Oh and vote for the FRONT!!!
ALSO…mario usually shows the explict pic when you click on read the rest of this article; or see the uncensored pic…WHY NOT THIS ONE!!!!
Re: perezishomophobic – #25 For the record the person you call Perez is not homophobic, but is more of a heterophobe with a serious disgust for young girls and a penchant for young dick. Got that?
*
Now, to get on with it. If it were any other site people might call out the site owner to take down the pic of the exposed baby, and in fact other sites probably would not have posted that exposure in the first place. Mario, on the other hand, tends to run a bit on the pedophilic side and probably ruined his keyboard today when he was posting that picture, if you get my drift.
*
As for me being weird and an idiot, as you so eloquently described me, I suggest you quit staying home from middle school to browse these sites and get a modicum of education so you may end up with a more descriptive vocabulary.
TAKE THIS PHOTO DOWN– OR COVER UP THE PRIVATES OF THIS CHILD. DO YOU REALIZE HOW VULGAR IT IS TO HAVE THIS DISPLAYED ON THIS SITE—COUPLED WITH THE SEXUALLY SUGGESTIVE TYPE?? NICE WORK PEREZ—A NEW LOW
A tan might help.
You need to cover up that baby's bits before you get sued. Seriously, there are some sick people out there, it shouldn't be this way but it is, you need to cover that child up.
Looking forward to it!
Levi has already proven he has a good sense of humour!
Kathy saw it - she used the old Hollywood Casting Couch trap on Levi!
It is hysterical that the one person who can help bring down Sarah Palin is Levi Johnston!!
Kudos Levi!!
Keep doing what you are doing - the public likes you!
That is not an easy thing to accomplish!
Re: brainchild – Again..why are you associating it with something sexual. And where are these facts and case studies. With that I am assuming we should remove all pictures of children off the internet? The nirvana CD cover, works of art and various other innocent pictures because you assume some pedo is jerking off somewhere with it. Weirdo get off on just about anything. Im sure someone is turned on by Levi's belt, or the blanket the baby is laying on..should we ban those too?
Re: Aviddiva – Why are you sexualizing this child. The picture is innocent and cute. You are turning it into something sexual, seedy and peverted. Stop sexualizing children and get help.
confirmed Perez is a pervert
Yea you should cover that up you know damn well there are pervs out there and also on the internet. Be respectful of the child even if you dont give a shit about his family.
Re: Aviddiva – I just saw this. Victims of sexual abuse often become sexual predators themseleves, which explains why you sexualized this child that is in a completely innocent situation. No rash or normal person would ever connect a naked child into something sexual unless the child was purposely exploited in a sexual manner. Which again the picture is clearly not showing. Please seek help. I seriously mean that. If you are really are a mother seek help and therapy before you hurt one of your children with your sickness.
Oh and if you ever fall in love someday and decide to adopt maybe you will know what it feels like.
Re: cheesewiz77 – Re: cheesewiz77 – Its not something sexual its called privacy and I feel bad that this kids parents sell him out so short. The nirvana cover with the little baby swimming for money some things you just get away with does it even say who the hell that baby is. anyways
Perez owes us pics of his water pistola now
Re: cheesewiz77 – to say people are aggrivated by this because they feel a guilt trip of something they have done or have had done to them is ignorant. That doesnt go for EVERYONE. I would never fuck with a kid and I wasnt fucked with as a kid and if anyone fucks with my baby girl I promise I will run over the person several times for several hours myself.
This is just a standard safty precaution. Its looking out for hour innocent today because the parents they have are fucking fools. Like this babies parents…
Re: cheesewiz77 – Oh and your right its not porn Im sure the people know it isnt porn.. ITS CALLED SARCASM. Do you want to look that up in the dictionary as well since its obviously sitting in your fucking lap. Replace it with a dog plz…..
WTF? First you're drooling over underage Taylor Lautner and now infant genitalia? You're not doing a great job convincing people you're not a pedo-pervert… maybe you should stop judging Roman Polanski…
he's hot
Re: Spaznatic_female –
Please point me to any post from the hysterical mob that shows any sort of sarcasm…
sar⋅casm /ˈsɑrkæzəm/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [sahr-kaz-uhm] Show –noun 1. harsh or bitter derision or irony.
2. a sharply ironical taunt; sneering or cutting remark: a review full of sarcasms.
Sure you dont want to borrow that Dictionary from me.
OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG I can't believe you sick fuck would post that stuff on your site. What in the Hell is wrong with you? Nothing wrong with a naked baby pic but when you post that shit online with Pedi's like yourself to look at it then you outta have your head knocked off. Take that shit down!
maybe demi moore was right about you…..
And why in the hell is this posted under 'Gay Gay Gay'?? Are you saying gay people are pedophiles? If not then that is what you are construing!
Re: cheesewiz77 – Has nothing to do with the claims you are making. It's not right cuz there are sicko's out there! Would you like someone looking at your kids naked pics unless they were close trusted family & friends???
Re: cheesewiz77 – I challenge you then to put up a picture of your naked kid as your avatar, or a picture of yourself as a baby as your avatar. Bet you $1000 you won't because you're chickenshit asshole who won't defend the human rights of an innocent baby. Or you're a 17 year old idiot
oh lawd is dat some CP? enjoy your v&, mario
That's shameful. You should remove that image immediately. Sure, the visual itself is perfectly innocent but this site is chock full of pedophile visitors who are probably getting a chub from it. Over to you, Mario…
Re: cheesewiz77 – look at my first post - sarcasm. et voila.
Hi Perez, In this sad world we live in, someone, somewhere will be getting sexual satisfaction from seeing that baby's genitals. Please either Photoshop them (and obscure them) or take the image down.
OMG CANT WAIT!!!!!!!!!!!!
perez you fucktard take the pic down. i hope you rot in hell asswipe.
better watch out perez some baby mommy will sue you for putting her naked baby on your slutty web site.
Unfortunately, it's a dangerous & weird world. Barbara/Perez, you are fools.
I might just bother to care enough to buy the issue if there will be full frontal nudity. Otherwise, who cares? No point being in a nudie mag if you're not going to show the goods.
done w/ your site-a picture of a baby's genitals? i don't care if it's from GQ your pornographers for posting it
Nothing wrong with sharing your kids private parts with the world. When my girls are old enough they will be on the pole.
Alaskans aren't necessarily hicks, you know, in spite of some of the high profile representation coming out of there. Sometimes it's the most ambitious, and not the most intelligent that get noticed publicly; or the cutest.
Re: brainchild – Thanx girl! I aint bothered with him, I wasnt callin names to "gays" in general, I was just callin Leroy a f- a - g.
It is digusting that americans always thing about sex when they see nude people Even nude kids.
You are not even allowed to change yor kids (or your own) bathing suits on a public beach.
THAT IS SICK!
What is wrong with America?
You dont have to run around naked all the time, but nudity is normal. Also for a kid. And I don't know anyone in Europe who cencores children's genitals.
No one thinks about sex, when seeing kids nude. Maybe that#s some sick american stuff, we will never understant!
Re: Starlit –
the article is about playgirl. which many people consider a gay men's magazine.
Re: Amelizzle –
"No one thinks about sex, when seeing kids nude. Maybe that#s some sick american stuff,"
youre an idiot.
Re: Amelizzle – Scroll to the top of the screen you idiot—this is perez hilton—not some european beach.
Re: Douche Hunter –
ummmm read what people are posting IDIOT…normal people just see an infant, pedophiles love this shit those sick fucks! there shouldnt be a picture like this on here
I agree with most of the ppl in here…why the hell is a pic of his nude child on here. Thats decent.
Re: cheesewiz77 – Oh boy you really got me there;) Although I still look at it as a bit of taunting sarcasm.
Did you purchase that lap dog yet?
Bye sugar pie.