Polanski Victim Wants Case Dropped
Filed under: Legal Matters > Oprah Winfrey
There's just something odd about the whole case surrounding director Roman Polanski.
Polanski was drugging and raping 13-year-old Samantha Geimer during a modeling shoot back in 1977 and was then indicted on six felony counts to which he plead guilty but later fled the country the night before he was scheduled to be sentenced.
Years later in 1988, Geimer sued Polanski for $500,000. Money helps, but it doesn't heal emotional scars. But does time heal all wounds?
It seems that Geimer wants to drop the lawsuit against Polanski and wants it dropped now!
In fact, her attorney Lawrence Silver is asking a California appeals court to dismiss the criminal case against Polanski. For reals!
According to Silver, Geimer is suffering due to all the recent media attention, claiming she's received almost 500 calls seeking comment since Polanski's arrest last month.
Silver adds that Geimer is being stalked by journalists from different international news outlets and has even received interview requests from big shots like Oprah Winfrey! She turned down Oprah?
The suit claims that "The pursuit has caused her to have health-related issues. The pursuit has caused her performance at her job to be interfered with and has caused the understandable displeasure of her employer and the real possibility that Samantha could lose her job." Adding at the end, "Leave her alone."
It's a tough one. We understand Geimer doesn't want to be in the spotlight and we're sure the media hounding her isn't helping any, but what message does it send to release a rapist without any punishment?
What do U think? Should Polanski be set free or brought back to the US to face sentencing?
[Image via WENN.]
yeah,for 500 million.
It shouldn't matter if she wants to drop the charges or not. When someone commits a crime they should be punished for it rather the victim thinks so or not. Think of all the other young girls he could of raped by now being free all these years? it's just sickening to think about.
NO THE CASE SHOULD NOT BE DROPPED. If Polanski is set free then it shows other rich famous people that they can essentially rape a 15 year old child and walk away from it. The victim needs to stand up for other future victims! OTHER VICTIMS MIGHT NOT GET BIG SETTLEMENT CASES.
I can understand why she wants the case dropped. But by doing so, she is sending the message that what happened to her is ok, and its not. People like Polanski think they are above the law, they think they can get away with anything because they are rich and powerful!! It is not fair to all those people out there who were raped or molested and never got any justice (not even half a million dollars). At this point, im sorry, but it is no longer about her. Its about setting an example that if you take advantage of children you will be punished. He needs to face justice, even if it is painful for everyone involved. And Oprah is a hag, I would turn her down too. I think the media needs to be more sensitive, but of course, journalists have no soul and will do anything to get their story!
I think she can ask for the charges to be dropped all she wants. But it doesn't matter. The state can/will still pursue it. That's why it's The State vs So and So…It isn't up to her.
I sympathize with Ms. Geimer's situation, but the fact of the matter is Roman Polanski committed a crime, then fled the country. He should be prosecuted. I wish people would leave her alone and let her try to live her life in peace.
He should be sentenced. She does not have the right to decide whether or not he is prosecuted. That is up to the government, not her. He is a pig and deserves to spend the rest of his life in prison.
The case should not be dropped.
This isn't just about the previous victim, but all possible futur victims. Also, if you commit a crime, you should be punished for it; regardless who you are.
So fucking typical in these cases. The victim gets punished more than the criminal. Time to leave her alone and get on with the business of throwing this old pervos wrinkly saggy ass in jail where it should have gone 30 years ago.
i feel bad for the victim, however, had polanski not gone on the lam, this matter would have been done with 30 years ago. we cannot allow pedophiles to escape justice because the victims are hounded by oprah winfrey. file restraining orders against the press, however, the victim cannot have a criminal case brought by the state thrown out, just as a wife cannot have the state drop charges of battery once her husband has been charged. whether she forgives him or not. finally, from a practical sense, if she's wanting media attention to die, letting polanski off the hook will NOT solve that problem.
It isn't about the victim. Just like with spousal abuse, the State is the one who presses charges. The criminal committed a crime that broke the state and country's laws, it doesn't really matter what the vicitm thinks. For the sake of children who are 13 now, this needs to be prosecuted. The woman is being very selfish. Perhaps she is also being paid more.
Sorry but as a litigator, this case is no longer about him raping her, but rather the act of rape against a minor child and whether or not we tolerate that in the States, which btw we do not. Plus she holds no water in this one, this isn't a civil case, it's a criminal case at this point. This is a state matter not a personal matter, and she's already resolved the personal matter by taking money to silence the ordeal…
First he plead guilty to 1 count not six second there is strong evedince of misconduct by the judge in the case do that charged should be dropped probably will be dropped due to that how ever he needs to be charged and due time for unlawful flight
SENTENCED.
I don't care if it was yesterday or 30 years ago - he raped a 13 year old girl and this needs to go to trail. He is a pedophile.
Re: MKC –
exactly. Anyone who has been to law school or taken a class in law would know this….
That's a very serious crime. Polanski needs to be held accountable, famous or not.
Re: jham – You said it best sister! (or mister
where is the justice in that?
who cares. He is a criminal and needs justice. Hollywood should not get special treatment!!
I don't care if it was yesterday or 30 years ago - he raped a 13 year old girl and this needs to go to trail. He is a pedophile. it doesn't matter what she wants at this point, she only wants it dropped because she got paid off by him a few years ago.
I think the case SHOULD BE DROPPED! If you dig deeper Perez, Polanski did serve 3 months in prison under a plea agreement made between his lawyers and the Judge at the time. It turns out the Judge got so much media attention, he backed out of the plea deal leaving polanski high and dry which led to him fleeing the country on TOP of paying the monetary settlement to the victim. This case has holes in it, left and right and I blame the California Judicial system!
hmmmmm….let's think about that? He drugged, raped and sodomized a 13 year old girl….no way.
She has been saying that for years. But he did something that he should not have done and should be punished for it. What a horrible message it would send to all the other evil doers out there. All rapist should be tortured and executed. We go to easy on these scum bags. But maybe if they make a good movie once every 10 years or so they should be let off.
I think the *victim's* wishes should be respected. Rapists and even murders go free in CA and even here on the East Coast.
Roman Polanski should be PUNISHED, he's a child rapist!!!
The People of California think he needs to be in jail.
Wow,I wonder how much money she got or if she was threatened.This case has nothing to do with her.It's between the pedophile and the state.He was a runaway coward and he commited a crime. She should shut the fuck up.
Re: StickyBunz – Oh, he served THREE WHOLE MONTHS for doing nothing more than drugging and having sex with a 13 year old girl? Well that changes EVERYTHING doesn't it? POOR, POOR ROMAN!
What an idiot.
I'm sorry, but the time element here really bugs me. If The State waits 40 years to prosecute I think that can (and should) negate the State's case. Calif. vs. has turned a criminal case into a constiutional law case. It's the right to a Speedy Trial thing that bugs me. They've known his location the whole time.
Re: StickyBunz –
No I blame people like you who take things like a grown man, drugging and anally raping a teenage girl lightly and believe a few months in jail is enough punishment. As a lawyer, I can tell you that although the DA can draw up a plea bargin the judge is never required to go along with it or follow through with it. If someone anally raped you I think you would see this very differently. Maybe perez will rape you?
I'm sorry but I don't give a shit what the "victim" wants. The real victim was a 13 year old girl, not the 40-year-old woman she grew up to be. He raped a child and he deserves to be in jail for it. Period.
It's obvious it was consensual.
Re: Curious Yellow –
Please do us all a favor and don't speak about things you have no knowledge of, such as the law. Roman fled the country to a country that not only condones what he did, but would not extradite him to the U.S., and unfortunately that is out of there jurisdiction. They couldn't just go to France and get him you dim wit. Actually listening to you has made everyone on this forum/blog dumber. He had the right to a speedy trial. He fled and you are a worthless idiot.
curious yellow–the "time element" has to do with him splitting, chickening out, noot appearing for sentencing, not a delay by the court. duh.
chris brown showed up so did Michael tyson, and michael vick. these guys have HONOR that polanski and his followers simply do not get. they stood up like men and took it LIKE MEN.
cut off his cock and drop the case, we all win
The sicko should be brought back! Even if he gets time served-just fleeing the country to hide is enough alone for charges. So yes, him being allowed to go free would make it easy for high power men with money & mental headed celebrities backing them up to go and do sick stuff like what Polanski did.
of course he should be punished! samantha needs to suck it up and make a stand against this man, and the others like him, she has an opportunity to be a role model and to stand up for the rights of not only herself, but women everywhere. Everytime a woman lets a man off the hook for any kind of abuse, she is seriously disappointing and undermining her gender. rape trials are NOT fun, but its something that must be done. she'll be a better, stronger person for it.
Lock his ass up so he can have a boyfriend named Bubba!!!
The media should leave her alone. People should not be publishing her name or trying to talk to her. The case should definitely go ahead but he's already plead guilty so now they just need to sentence him and possibly charge him for going on the run. She doesn't need to do give evidence or convince a jury again, just let her get on with her life.
Oh, and saying there is something odd about the case is not on. It makes it sound like because she doesn't want him charged he is not guilty, which is wrong.
He committed a crime, and probably is still committing them. I'm sorry the attention is bothering her, and I'm also surprised she never changed her name. Dropping the charges will not erase the past.
it's just like with domestic abuse– (EXAMPLE
) when a husband beats on his wife and she doesn't want to press charges— and then the cops haul him away regardless… i feel bad but damn, this man needs to be prosecuted- seriously
Rape is a crime last I heard. Rape of a little girl is unforgivable. He has become a hero in some countries. WTF
its all political. why is california making such a big deal? well, polanski, bieng a foriegner, probably stiffed some in law enforcement, and this is there way teaching the french man not to run without paying. plus, switzerland is kissing the USA's ass because now their paying restitution for helping amercians in tax evasion. they're showing they can be a friend. switzerland used to be the last country in the world that would enter into extradition agreements. they're supposed to be neutral. i doubt its has anything to do with polanski raping a 13 yo.
She's probably stressed because of all the idiots like Deborah Winger who think that someone who rapes children should walk free. I think that's what would bother me most.
Please find time to watch the documentary Roman Polansky: Wanted and Desired. You may change your opinion about this situation. Things are not always as they seem to be.
I am so proud of you guys and teddy's daddy. I was conflicted because of the monstrous nazi and manson events but you young ones are much sharper than me.
You made me think what I would say if my son (who was adopted at 2 from a Bulgarian orphanage) used his background as an excuse. You have clear minds and good hearts….no cheap excuses.
Roman Polanski WAS sentenced and WAS in jail. He spent 90 days and at the time the judge commuted his sentence to time spent. The judge LATER changed his mind and tried to RESENTENCE the man. THis was gross misconduct on the part of the judge. Did Polanski get the Correct sentence for the crime committed? No. But you can't go back later and change that-it is like being tried TWICE for the same crime-can't be done.
Sorry. She has no say in whether the case is pursued or not. We can't have people who've fled the country go unpunished. Yes, she probably had a resolution to the case that suits her. I'm happy for her being able to move on, and I sympathize that she's being bothered now. However, in the name of justice we as a society cannot let people run away from the law that way. If Mr. Polanski were a MAN, he'd come back to the U.S. and face his charges, once and for all. I think it's shameful that a person who was the victim of a violent act could basically thumb his nose at the laws and prolong this case the way he has. Shame on him.
I think he should be sentenced. The poor girl needs to be left alone so she can keep fighting, or the state should fight for her. No one wants to have this type of attention on themselves. It is probably one of the reasons why many victims are scared to go forward in the first place, because of the unwanted attention. No one would want to go out there and tell such a painful story to every media outlet.
If she wanted him castrated and then killed by shoving his dick down his throat, would people be demanding her wishes be respected?
Re: Queen mab – He was not sentenced. You have your facts wrong. He was observed in a mental facility prior to sentencing, he negotiated a plea agreement, he fled before sentencing.
Re: Curious Yellow – Knowing his location and being able to extradite him from that country are two separate things. And, once the criminal complaint was filed against him the statute of limitations stopped running, so until the case was tried and a final judgment entered, and that sentence (if there was one) was fully served, the state can continue to pursue the defendant. If he has new defenses, including misconduct of the judge, he can present those at trial. He should not be rewarded for hiding out in sympathetic countries for the past 30 odd years.
Now what I am about to say is not an endorsement of Polanski and his actions. But Perez failed The judge and prosecutor made a deal and told Polanski he was to serve time in a mental hospital in jail and once complete, it will end the case. Polanski agreed and was locked up for almost 2 months. Grant it, for a crime like raping a child, 60 days is not enough. Either way, a deal was struck and all [parties agreed. Once he completed his time, the judge had a change of heart. Mainly, he wanted the publicity to continue, so he decided he was goin to change the deal and make Polanski do time. It was after some discussion and the realization that they were going to back out of the original deal after he did the time agreed upon is when he fled.. Again, I do not condone perverted pigs who abuse children, but we have a justice system in this country that if you do the time agreed upon, you do no go back and change the deal. it is called double jeorpardy. being punished for the same crime twice. I would have cut his balls off, but he did his time. It could be you or me who is tried, convicted and agree to a deal, we keep our part and all of a sudden the judge and prosecutor decide they want to change it. just giving you a look at the other side of teh story.
this is hardly news - the woman has been saying this for years now - she was involved in a bid to have the charges against him dropped recently. normally i would say that the victims wishes should come first but in this case the guy is a danger to children. he should be in prison for a very long time.
Oh by the way, he was never charged with rape. Can't people read in the US of A ?
The whole thing was invented by the mother.
The girl got 500K $ for something Polanski never did!
Re: kabaughmur – What does your son have to do with this? That's an argument meant solely to persuade us with irrelevant emotional heartstring tugging. What if your son is raped by a 42 year old man when he is 13? What if that 42 year old man turns out to be the victim of some other brutal crime? Where is your sarcasm then?
Which crimes do previous victims get the free pass for? I was raped. Which crimes do I get to commit? Is that worth say, a liquor store robbery? I've also been the victim of theft. Do I get like two free speeding ticket passes for that?
Being a victim does not give us rights to supersede the legal system.
Your sarcasm and condescension is misplaced.
P.S. I'm probably older than you are. So I should make rude remarks about your youth?
Re: shandorra – Or maybe you could read the transcripts, which were left out of the marketing film you speak of. A lot of movies get made as propaganda. Most people have the ability to discern which ones those are before they post remarks citing said propaganda as compelling story telling.
He needs to be sentenced for the crime he plead guilty to and then the government should also do whatever it needs to to keep this jackass in prison for fleeing. What scum.
Re: Rican31 – Judges and prosecutors do NOT make deals in plea agreements. Defense attorneys and prosecutors make deals. Those are presented to the judge. Judge NEVER is required to accept the deal.
I wish people would stop watching that film and thinking it's not propaganda.
And if he doesn't serve his time then at the very least he should not be listed on the sex offender lists, required to follow all rules that other pedophiles do. Something tells me he will wind up making money on this deal and not have to abide by the same rules as everyone else simply because he is part of Hollywood. I hope I am wrong. I hope he gets what he deserves.
Poor thing is getting raped again.
Re: curiousred – He was charged with rape, but he pleaded guilty to a lesser charge You can read the court transcripts, he states explicitly that he had sex with her against her will.
She made her name public during the civil trial. She needs to be a bigger person and think about other victims that could go through that same situation. Some rape victims may not be able to sue for millions. Use the same set of balls that made her reveal her name in 1988 so she could file the civil suit against him and the attitude when she cashed the check, to tell the reports to F*** OFF.
And Justice for All….?
How dare you? This is not your case. You are not the victim here. If Roman Polanski were not a celebrity, nobody would give a fuck that a case the victim didn't want to come up was being dropped. This poor woman has had to deal with it her entire life and as she moves on and begins to create a normal life, she becomes a media circus? It's not a tough one. Nobody should be FORCED to relive trauma and evil if they can't.
Yeea only problem now is that most of the people who have replied here are idiots who dont know ANYTHING about this highly controversial case. Roman Polansky HAS indeed served time for this crime. Polanksky made a deal with the Judge and it was okayed by the prosocution, after he was released early from his 90-day sentence (not a sufficient sentence obviously but that was the deal madein the chamber), the media bashed the judge in question (who requested the case and was known to have a major infatuation with hollywood stars and young women himself).
The judge then went back on his word and the defense and PROSECUTING attorney were going to start a case against him, because he was vilating so many laws. Polansky fled hours before he was due back in court bc he kept up his end with the judge, and the judge was not to be trusted, the prosicuting attorney even says in a documentary, "I would have fled as well." Nothing makes this situation right, but it just goes to show you how fucked up and corrupt out justice system is. The nother of that girl should be in prison along with Polanksy for allowing her daughter, 13 and already a fan of qualudes, alone with a dark brooding unstable man who had a repuation for dating much younger women and whose wife was brutally murdered along with her fetus(can you say unstable?) to be alone with such a person. It's not all black and white, and people who dont know the entire story should do some research before they start blah blah all the fucking time!
It doesn't matter if she wants it dropped. Yes it happened to her, yes she's said she's forgiven him. So what, he still broke the crime and needs to be punished for it.
It sucks that the media is harassing her, but letting him walk free like he's been doing all of these years isn't the right thing to do.
And femalefilmmajor, do you really think her wanting the case dropped makes people think rape is OK!? Are you kidding me!? Wow, how many people here think rape is okay now because this woman wants to forget about the worst thing that has everhappened to her, its only been almost 30 years I mean what the hell do any of us know about how she feels!? When you get raped at 13 femalefilm, or a child or realtive of yours, then you can be the "Oh so Righteous" one to make an example out of them..what a ridiculous and outlandish thing to say! People like you need ot mind their own business! How insensitive of you!
Thank you sticky bunz and Russian one! There is no sense here!
When the prosecuting attorney of case teams up with the defense to bring the judge of that case on charges of malfeasance, well it's fair to say there is more to this case than meets the eye. And if oyu people are all so righteous and care so damn much, why dont you go volunteer or be Women's Rights figure! Everyone can sit here and tell some raped woman wha tthey think she ought to do, but none of you actually give a shit about this and sit on your asses!
Curious red, you are deluted. He did commit the crime, he openly says he had sex with this girl, and she was not unresponsive, and that he enjoyed it! Thats on the record sweetie! If he didnt do it, he could have easily tkaen that high powered attorneyt and fought the case, she obviously had proof, and I have seen the transcripts, maybe you should check all of that out beforemaking irresponsible statements?
The issue here is no longer the rape but that he PLEAD GUILTY and FLED the COUNTRY! The charges can't be "dropped" because he already plead guilty AND was sentenced.
Re: Curious Yellow – ..Time element bothers me too too Yellow, but I believe the US had a treay with France at the time, preventing them extradition..
SKREWwhat she wants today in her 40's. i'm in my 40's and at the age of 13, had i been raped, it would be a different story. she might be over it b/c of mental health healing - what he did was WRONG and he should be PUNISHED. he wasn't a 15 year old having sex with a 13 year old. he was a 40 year old MAN doing a 13 year old. he should be jailled like ANY OTHER PREV
I've never seen a case go this long. This is very odd! The man has made how many films since this happened? Shady?
join the MANSON FAMILY in jail sicko granted you didnt kill anyone but yo u might as well have for what you have done to that poor girl and her family.. asshole. what would ur wife and unborn child think of this?
She is the victim here and should be thought of first. They need to take both issues into account–Why not just have the trial and have her testimony there w/o her having to be there. This can't be the first case that they can arrange something different. he needs to go to jail for it-its wrong and money shouldnt let you get away with that…but i cant imagine the mental damage u would have from being asked about that awful experience over and over
Re: StickyBunz – your facts are wrong
Re: sparkys nemesis – are you saying you agree that rapists and murderers should go free? think before you respond, seriously. is that what you're saying? if not, why the comparison?
Drugs, anal rape, admitting it, fleeing the country—why is this still going on? someone please just go over there, kidnap the raping bitch and let him get a taste of it in a call that he's escaped for years..3 months? thats really what we're saying is enough here?
Re: shandorra – enlighten us - what are we missing?
Re: Queen mab – your facts are wrong. the judge NEVER commuted his sentence, he was NEVER sentenced. it is alleged that the judge informally agreed to accept the recommendation of the prison evaluation. he was never legally bound to agree to that, by the way. after he found out polanski bribed the prison evaluation board, it is allged that the judge was annoyed by this (as well as a pic of rp in germany with underage girls) and threatened to renege on his previous agreement to adhere to the prison recommendation (agian his legal right to do so). we will never know whether the judge would or would not have reneged on his "deal" (which - again - he was legally entitled to do) b/c polansky fled BEFORE he was sentenced. there was NO TIME SERVED because there was NO sentence.
There is so much with this case so PLEASE research before you make unwarranted, uneducated opinions. It’s actually very interesting and sad. Polanski has served his time. In jail, in a psych ward and the court NEVER upheld their agreement that’s the only reason why he fled. There's also a really great movie that you can watch about it as well.
It’s also very interesting because this happened soon after Sharon Tate was murdered - - who was pregnant with Polanski’s child - -
Very high profile for the courts and this was during an election year – the Polanski trials (yes plural) not the Manson trial.
Always educate yourself.
Always be credible.
Thanks Perez for calling it what it is - "rape". He admits it. She admits it. It shouldn't matter how rich the perpetrator is, if the mom encouraged it, if there was a civil suit…it's still a crime against society. Shame on Woody Allen and the others supporting this rapist.
Bring this Hollywood Crybaby back and let him serve his 30 sentence. After that Obama can pardon him on his way out of office.
Re: down wit perez – Thank you! Thats all Im trying to say as well. Is three months enough, well, NO! But arent we all greatful that we live in a country where we are entitled to a FAIR trial. And not have our punishment handed out by a bunch of idiots who dont know what they are talking about? The deal was three months, its not enough, but that was the deal. And it just proves the he did not get a fair trial, regardless if he deserved one or not. I would never commit rape, but if I commited a crime where I served the time (regardless of being let out early), Iwould flee a country that it's judicial system failed me.
I really think he didn't know she was 13 when he fucked her. I think he thought she was much older because she liked to drink and smoke pot and her mother let her go alone to a house in the hollywood hills with this old guy. And she said she faked the symptoms for which he gave her that pill. Why would she swallow it? I think she knew he was a letch and she knew he'd expect to have sex with her and she just wanted to get it over with because she thought he would put her in a movie. He probably had sex with young girls all the time and this was no different. He should man up and face the charges in USA, but I think he already did his time when that judge locked him in a psyche ward for six weeks. Plus, he's in jail now too.
The justice system is a clusterfuck of contradictions and total crap. She wants the case dropped, then drop it. Besides, he did his time. I'm not condoning rape, not by any means but, get over it.. It happened ages ago, it's a bit late to all of the sudden decide to re-convict him.
why was her name published? why did she allow that back in the day or currently or whenever … i thought victims name stay unpublished unless they consent, and him being famous, i have little sympathy that she consented to her name being plastered all over the very media that is hounding her.
I do think he needs to pay the time for the crime. There are people out there that had consensual sex with a g/f or b/f a year or two younger than them and were convicted because one person was a minor, despite the consenting partner pleading and crying. Then you have this pedophile non-aggressive rap scenario and people want it dropped? wtf?!
What an ignoramis! Great just go ahead and tech boys and girls that it is OK to drug and rape someone and completely get away with it. He needs to pay.
I don't really give a shit who this guy is BUT he should do time for rape. He's a coward and it's time to face the music!
And now, for the actual facts of this story: Samantha Geimer's mother allowed her to spend the day with Roman Polanski, the mother's friend. 13 YO Samantha wanted to become an actress and Mr. Polanski had just finished a little movie called, "Chinatown." Whatever transpired took place at Jack Nicholson's home with Anjelica Huston also present in the home. Samantha's mother knew exactly where her daughter was and with whom. This was also 1977.
When statutory rape charges were pressed against him, Mr. Polanski spent two months in jail being evaluated for trial, etc. He then agreed to a plea bargain with the LA prosecutors' office to plead guilty in exchange for time already served. Mr. Polanski plead guilty and the plea bargin was reneged, so he left the USA. Most involved with the case agreed with Mr. Polanski's decision as the judge and many of the others involved were so corrupt. Mr. Polanski was a VERY famous movie direc tor, whose late wife, Sharon Tate, had been brutally murdered by the Charles Manson gang, also in LA a few years prior. The whole situation was extremely emotionally charged. BTW, Ms. Geimer has wanted these charges dropped for almost 20 years now.
Do watch last year's HBO documentary, "Wanted, Dead or Alive" about this story as it covers all of the actual facts. Dear, you might want to research the facts before you post these stories as so much of what you say is inaccurate.
RE: Bukowski #45 Polanski has become a hero in THIS country. At the Academy Awards, when he was nominated for best director and won for The Pianist, the ENTIRE hall stood for an ovation. EVERYONE stood in solidarity. Think about that for a while, folks. Some of you may write that they were standing up for his film and it is a good film, but it appeared more than that. The ovation went on and on (a point was being made and oddly, Mr. P wasn't there but I will bet you he smugly watched that and somehow felt vindicated). Check out Dame Angelica Huston's comment on the little girl so you can get an idea of how they stick together in H town.
Drop the case. Victim dont give a shit, why should anyone else. She moved on so should people. Peace.
Re: curiousred – Is something wrong with u? Angelica Houston even hear them in a bedroom at her house. That's right-at her and Jack Nicholson's home they had together at the time. And with Jack being a womanizer than I could see why Angelica is sticking up for Polanski. She feels it's her fault somewhat but blames the girl as well. Look it up before making statements when u dont' know what u talking bout!
Re: Jayhawks – Would u say this if it was ur daughter and she wanted to let it go to be done with? If so then u shouldn't have kids!