Nude Photo Of Polanski And Tate To Be Auctioned Off

Filed under: Icky Icky Poo

roman-polanski.jpg

Really?!

A nude photograph of the currently detained Roman Polanski and his late wife, Sharon Tate, will be sold at auction at Christie's in NYC on December 7th.

The photo, shot by David Bailey in 1969, was taken months before Tate's tragic murder.

"It's an important image," said Laura Paterson, vice president of Christie's auction house. "It certainly is provocative because of who the characters are. But it's also a touching naked shot of a happy couple. And Bailey does capture the anything goes flavor of that period."

Considering the circumstances, it's still pretty creepy!

Christie's believes that the photo may garner anywhere between $8,000 to $12,000, but it could go even high due to Polanski's recent stint in Swiss prison.

Yuck!

    Posted: Nov 25, 2009 at 3:15 pm / Email this  »

    48 comments to “Nude Photo Of Polanski And Tate To Be Auctioned Off”



    1. 1

      such a beautiful woman, tragic her lasts days



    2. 2

      Not sure why anyone would want a nude photo with him in it. He is pretty gross. Sharron Tate was hot but that does not out weigh the fact that he is in the photo.



    3. 3

      finally some originality :)



    4. 4

      and will the sale of this fund the childrapist's defense?



    5. 5

      Your such an ASS Perez!!! there is absolutly nothing creepy about a picture OF A MAN AND WIFE in a loving pose. Lennon and Yoko One did it. It happens to be a beautiful shot and its a sad reminder of what was lost and taken away by a sick and twisted mind. But its not creepy. You however are getting more so every day now.



    6. 6

      Murder memorabilia makes lots of money… it's sick but true, and anything related to Charles Manson will probably fetch a high price…

    7. ap076 says – reply to this


      7

      BREAKING NEWS: A swiss court has approved bail for Polanski, but will take 4.5 million dollars bail, he will be wearing an electronic monitoring device, and will be confined to "chalet arrest" at his Swiss chalet. This is not happening immediately and is still open to appeal by the Swiss govt.
      The Swiss are a fierce fighting force, with balls, in defense of the Pope. Let's hope the Swiss govt. can show similar balls.
      The picture is to creepy on too many levels for my tastes.



    8. 8

      She was such a beauty, these photos don't have all the photo shopping that is done today. If they could edit out the ugly perv that is with her that would be nice.

    9. fUkRD says – reply to this


      9

      Re: MyOpinionOnly – ummm,,….are you avare that Polansky is a child rapist? I am cause I read the court transcripts of the lil girl he raped,…her statement word by word,…he may not be convicted yet, but rest assured that he will be. He is a child rapist,…so sorry for Tate, but her husband is a RAPIST,…he intentinally planned, drugged and raped this poor child and he probably did it to countless others. Nothing beautiful in this picture at all.



    10. 10

      perez dont be a prude. sharon tate was gorgeous. she was also murdered. and this was taken before that same murder drove roman a little nutso



    11. 11

      She was a truly beautiful woman and a real victim. They weren't a happy couple. He was and is a pig who told her that he would be with other women and she had to accept it. She did because she loved him and even pregnant with his child, he loved his dick more. Rest in Peace Sharon and I hope you're soaked in True Love Always.



    12. 12

      Poor Sharon. :(

    13. Moron says – reply to this


      13

      There is nothing touching about a photo of a convicted pedophile and rapist.
      Whoever buys this photo should shred it to pieces.That fucking criminal should spend the rest of his life in prison,but I guess rich people are above the law.



    14. 14

      It will sell for much higher than projected…it's an iconic image and regardless of his sick perversion it will still fetch a lot.



    15. 15

      why was she with hm…? yuck…



    16. 16

      Re: fUkRD – I'm not talking about his trial, his accusations or what happened. I am talking about a photo that was taken BEFORE THAT INCIDENT and one that is with his wife. Everyone has a past that is true, but there is no need to take away from what was a beautiful portrait based on an incident that happened much later. If you are that biased….that's your problem, not mine.



    17. 17

      Re: jasonjkyle – HA! I'm sorry, Ive never heard of death of a "loved" (he was possibly the worst kind of spouse) one as a trigger for pedophilia.They must have forgotten to add that in the psychology text books.



    18. 18

      Yikes…Helter Skelter



    19. 19

      Ehh gross



    20. 20

      This is disgusting, MJ who was INNOCENT did not get threated this way.

    21. ap076 says – reply to this


      21

      Re: ap076 – Opps, my mistake this info was posted earlier on this site. Happy Thanksgiving to all.



    22. 22

      Am I the only one thinking that as horrific as Sharon's death was, to have had a child with Roman Polanski who is on record stating more or less that ALL adult males want to Fuck children would have been a living nightmare for that child [they would have had together] to the equivalent of what Manson and his disciples did to her? God only knows how many other children he's raped. Seeing this picture doesn't conjure anything "loving" to me.
      I see a beautiful woman with low self esteem [ a man who tells you that you should be privileged to be his wife and to accept and Expect that he will be fucking other people and you still marry him, means your shit is NOT together] She married a predator thinking she either A) could change him B) Being married to him secured her future in films OR C) All of the above



    23. 23

      Sharon was killed early in the 8th month of 1969. So, how exactly was this photo taken in 1969, 9 months before she died?



    24. 24

      how many telephone books is he standing on in order to tower over his wife????

    25. @v@ says – reply to this


      25

      This is so sixties.



    26. 26

      Sharon was at the end of her pregnancy when was killed, correct? For being one of the last images of her - she sure does not look pregnant. Very, very sad.



    27. 27

      Good gawd what did she ever see in that thing??He's even uglier now!



    28. 28

      Isn't she a bit old for him?
      *
      Apparently that marriage was hitting the rocks by that time, so don't know what they mean by it being a pic of a "happy married couple". Polanski doesn't look happy in that pic.



    29. 29

      Re: H.B.I.C*1973 – I didn't know that he said that to her. But you're right, apparently she was the "innocent little girl" type and had low self-esteem. Which is unfortunate b/c apparently she was quite a good person, had talent, and was very attractive.



    30. 30

      Re: H.B.I.C*1973 – Oh, and what he said is that ALL adult men want to fuck underage girls. Not all adults want to fuck children.



    31. 31

      EEEWWWW!!!!



    32. 32

      that dood is so fucking gross



    33. 33

      why would it be offensive? i think its beautiful. but then i never seem to agree with the hypnotized masses.

    34. syl says – reply to this


      34

      Perez, I am so extremely disappointed in your disrespectful commentary in this post. I follow your blog and agree with what you stand for, but to comment that way on someone as legendary as Roman (who was wrongly accused by a child who later admitted to her lies and her mother's fight to cover her daughter's underage ass) and someone who has passed away. I feel your heart should go out to sharon and that a level of respect is due. If you don't plan on buying it or you don't see the beauty in it, you're better off ignoring the whole concept.



    35. 35

      not yuck in the least bit, Charles Manson is disgusting and the fact he murdered a woman who was 8 1/2 months pregnant does not reflect on roman at all, he has had a tragic life truly we need to remember he has dealt with a lot and he made some mistakes and the girl DOES NOT WANT TO PRESS CHARGES! charles manson is the *ucker



    36. 36

      Re: fUkRD – screw you read some real news loser, find out what happened to him and his wife and get a grip loser



    37. 37

      this is not creepy, perez remeber their story and realize their love and what happened to them, it is truly tragic, what happened to him later does not concern the love of this photo



    38. 38

      Beautiful. If I had the $$ I'd buy it.



    39. 39

      It's creepy because of what has come out about this man since this picture was taken. He's beyond gross.



    40. 40

      She was a beautiful woman and her death, and that of her unborn child, was horrific and tragic to say the least. I disagree with "Yuck" because this photo depicts a woman who lived and loved in her life.



    41. 41

      Neat false nose he is wearing for this photo. Hmmmm…. Noddy and Big Ears NOT the flower-pot men.

      Anya Blah, blah, blah The Undead Again Zombie Mother of Blog-Doom

    42. tamam says – reply to this


      42

      i sorta agree that the trauma for polanski of aurviving/losing his mother in the holocaust fallowed by the brutal murder of his wife and unborn child may have fucked him up slightly? I read that Sharon begged the manson murderers to abduct her and wait 2 weeks so her baby to be born and then for them to kill her. Polanski said that this incident shattered any faith in God he had completely i do feel for him slightly as everyone is a product of their environment, but i feel more for the poor 13 year old girl x



    43. 43

      I hope Polanski dies a slow and painful death. He was cheating on her all the time too



    44. 44

      It's not creepy Perez, they were very much in love. I'd like to see you cheat death and watch the Nazis seal of your home in Krakow off, gas your family to death and then have the love of your life and your son butchered and then watch the butchers become pop culture icons. You disgust me Perez.



    45. 45

      yeah he sacrificed his unborn child and wife! why? he sold his soul to be some sort of hollywood director! he knew what was going on! the beatles had programmed songs in it which triggered the manson cult to go and kill him….later another beatles song was actually triggered to kill john lennon!

      this is frightening!



    46. 46

      a happy couple?? yeah right?! note how she is hanging on to him like some sort of controlled puppet….and her lost look in her eyes…and his soulless eyes…



    47. 47

      Re: MyOpinionOnly – lennon and yoko ono??? that was all fake too! he was later murdered by triggered words from one of his own songs! but yes this is both pretty similar



    48. 48

      Re: cupcakegaga – i dont think people realize the reality behind these murders…MK ultra programming was involved…