Twi-Hards, We Think They Are Taking This Too Far!

twi3dwenn5379931.jpg

Look, we get it. Everyone wants to see Taylor Lautner's precious abs up-close and in their face, but that doesn't mean they should put the final installment in of Twilight in 3-D!

Should they?

Sources are suggesting that while Summit Entertainment has yet to make a decision on whether Breaking Dawn will be one film or two (and seriously, you guys have had more than enough time to make that decision), another topic on the table for the execs is if the flick should be made in 3D. The technology has worked well for other blockbusters like Transformers and Avatar, so why shouldn't it do well with Twilight?

One word: OVERKILL!

Sure, there is more money to be made by banking on a the trend, but does anyone really need to see Kristen Stewart biting her lip that close to their retinas?! Isn't bad enough that Taylor and Robert Pattinson have to do it!

But here is some good news for your Twilighters: by the end of the month, all your questions should be answered! Sources say that Summit has till the end of February to make all the decisions regarding Breaking Dawn if they have any chance of getting production underway before R-Patz starts to get wrinkles.

So by March you should know if they are making four Twilight movies or five, if it will be available in 3D, and if you can honestly say it was worth waiting all this time for the news.

But back to the point: Do U think that Breaking Dawn should be in 3D?

[Image via WENN.]

    Posted: Feb 12, 2010 at 5:30 pm / Email this  »

    126 comments to “Twi-Hards, We Think They Are Taking This Too Far!”

    More comments: [1] 2 »



    1. 1

      Yes! Although if I look at that Taylor boy one more time I might puke! Just give me Rob and the rest of the cast and I´ll survive. This is the movie where the most un expected things happen ( I am serious) So Summit better not screw up this movie!



    2. 2

      Of course it should be … why not??



    3. 3

      No!! I wouldn't pay the the money, ticket prices go up for 3-D. And it would not be worth it.



    4. 4

      hell yes



    5. 5

      3d doesnt work for me cos my eyes are pretty bad. just as long as they dont forget to release a 2d version il be happy.



    6. 6

      NO!!



    7. 7

      i dont see movies in 3-D but its always nice to have as an option, whats the difference.



    8. 8

      nonono and no. that would be lamer than lame. Just give me a well written and acted performance. besides for all of us who read the book, NOTHING exciting happens. it builds and builds and there is NO action (my husband hates this book for that reason). what would it be, a 3d scene of the edited birthing scene - a 3d sex scene might be nice, BUT summit will pansy off and make it not hot. so anyway, no no no. not 3d.



    9. 9

      Why not?? Every other movie has been crappy and a total disgrace to the books, so why not put it in 3D so it's even dumber!! It's not gonna be any good anyways as long as Kristen Stewart is in it. Is it just me or does she looks like she holding in a poop every time she bites her lip???



    10. 10

      a 3D birth? no thanks



    11. 11

      This is late, they've already made the decision to split it into two. They said it yesterday.



    12. 12

      MY GUT SEZ NOOOOO!!!! BUT IT MIGHT BE INTERESTING—A ROMANCE IN 3D–WOULDN'T THAT BE A FIRST??



    13. 13

      I do like the idea of doing the 2nd one (if there is one) in 3D. Would be a good way to show the change in Bella when she becomes a vampire



    14. 14

      They have to do it in 3D from when she *SPOILER*
      *
      *
      *
      *
      *
      Wakes up. Because her vision is discribed in the book as being more powerfull than before. 3D would lend itself very well to that. Plus the running through the forest when hunting and the final fight scenes will have much more impact. YES TO THE 3D, AND YES TO 2 FILMS (The second being from when she wakes up) They would be stupid not to and it would be a wasted opportunity for the fans.

    15. LxMxO says – reply to this


      15

      If it's in 3D, I'll refuse to see it. It cost extra money that is pointless. 3D isn't that great. I don't like people popping out at me when I'm trying to follow a story on the screen.



    16. 16

      unnecessary! does everythi have to be 3-d
      only films lik avatr are gud in 3-d otherwise its just unneeded headache



    17. 17

      No No No No NO!!! That would ruin it. I think it should stay in regular.



    18. 18

      How about they make the final part of the movie 3D? The part where Bella has changed over.



    19. 19

      Actually…. there are a lot of elements that would looks amazing in 3D in the final book… especially Bella's power…. not to mention Jane and Alec's… I know… some people hate Twilight… I get it and you have every right to your opinion…. but… I'm excited to see what it comes out looking like…



    20. 20

      i would love 2 c it..YESS
      *
      1st kill Bella, replace it with Elena (vamp Diaries) and give that shittie book a twist with Katherine…(VAMP DIAR..)..i dnt want 2 c Bella or hear the fucking vomiting ridiculous screams of her….PLEASE save TWILIGHT….Replace Bella with Nina Duprey……



    21. 21

      Does it NEED to be 3D? No. I don't see how it would make it any better. True twihards have their own imagination of how the story is anyway, so I don't see why a 3D image would make that much difference. Still, I will still be spending all of my student loan watching it numerous times in the same day none the less!



    22. 22

      nah… Summit don't do it in 3-D and keep it to a 4-movie epic. The last book is kind of the weakest and has some hinky moments. Not worthy of 5 movies. Overkill.



    23. 23

      oh hell no i hate 3d it's fucking annoying to wear those glasses when u trying to watch a movie ..lol



    24. 24

      no i think it would ruin it to be honest. Fair enough avatar was released in 3-d but when you have a sequel that previously isn't in 3-d then suddenly is, it kind of side tracks away from it. Much like harry potter, the fact the last one will be 3-D makes it crap.



    25. 25

      No, because it is such an over kill. I mean why even bother making "Breaking Dawn" 3-D if the ones before it were regular? It doesn't make sense. I read the books and when i saw "Twilight" i was dissapointed, because it was so short and they skipped alot of stuff , I thought, was important. Let's spend that extra money and time on trying to make the movie relate to the book as much as possible, instead of vampires jumping out at you.



    26. 26

      no no no no



    27. 27

      Umm… it doesn't really matter…i dont think they should it anyway… why should they? 3D is just stupid.. its no different… u just put on some fancy ass glasses and everything just has some dimension… i dont see the difference..



    28. 28

      WTF!!!! harry potter makes say the last book will be split into two. few months later, the twilight say there thinking of splitting the next one into two. harry potter says they will make a 3d version aswell as a normal one, twilight say were making it 3d. stop trying to rip the harry potter series, they are in a league of there own. plus emma watson is so much better than k-stew



    29. 29

      PLEASE NO



    30. 30

      I don't know how they are going to do the birth scene…but I don't know if I would want to see that in 3D.



    31. 31

      Uhm Breaking Dawn doesnt even have any action in it? and if they do show Bella having her baby, that would be really weird to watch through 3-D glasses!!

      I think out of all of the books, Eclipse would have been a better choice for a 3-D movie, since there is an actual FIGHTING scene.



    32. 32

      nooooo. definite overkill



    33. 33

      YES! That would make it even better! When I was watching Avatar I was thinking how cool it would be if Twilight was in 3D also. Look how much money that movie made! DO IT!!!



    34. 34

      NO. my eyes are fine thankyou



    35. 35

      NO! This isn't Avatar or any other film, this is BREAKING DAWN! No go 3D, I mean, what's there to 3D for? Muscles (it would be awesome with some more shirtless tough)? Concentrate about THE MOVIE, not the monitas



    36. 36

      Breaking Dawn shouldn't even be a movie, much less in 3-D. I choose to pretend that Breaking Dawn doesn't exist.



    37. 37

      YES!

    38. kmel says – reply to this


      38

      NO NO NO NO TO 3-D.
      i'd still go see it.
      but i'd prefer it not to be in 3-D.



    39. 39

      NO, there is absolutely no reason why we should have to see Bella give birth in 3D. All in all it should be a love story, not a technological achievement like Avatar. playing it at the IMAX is fine, but no to 3D-there's just no reason for it. They need to make it right and that means dark, very dark, and rated R. Though that will never happen because R rated movies don't make enough money.



    40. 40

      I feel like now-a-days every movie that can be made in 3D is made in 3D.



    41. 41

      3D would be neat It doesn't really matter too much. I'll see it no matter which way they want to feed it to us. RPatz in 3D may be too hot to handle, though, you may have girls fainting left and right.



    42. 42

      NO, NO, NO! i don't want to see what could be my fav movie in 3D

    43. bl@b says – reply to this


      43

      ROBERT PATTINSON COMMING OUT OF THE SCREEN? HELL YES.



    44. 44

      off course!!! if i cant have edward this is the closest i can be from him!! so yeaaaah!! pleaase??



    45. 45

      Oh Please…Scummit makes me sick. I will not pay money to see this movie in 3D. Scummit is really just trying to cash in on the fans. It really is a shame.



    46. 46

      ew no! who wants to see a baby breaking out of kristen in 3d? its just wrong!



    47. 47

      Bella having the baby would be like Alien and the stomach blaster - so easy to do! But they should only make it 3D from when Bella wakes up. So only the final film will be 3D. The story is said from her point of view the majority of the time, so we will be viewing her new abilities through her eyes. Much better via 3D.



    48. 48

      only if they slap some glitter lotion on roberto jr. and have him whip down his pants.



    49. 49

      omg enough with Twlight all together lol



    50. 50

      for serious, though, fuck summit! I love twilight, but you totally did the franchise all cheap ass. Why don't you work on making shizz look decent in 2-D before getting all adventurous with 3-D! Holy crap, you know the only reason we tolerate your hack movies is for Robert's pretty.



    51. 51

      Breaking Dawn should be in 3D?
      ————–
      NOOOOOOOOOOOO



    52. 52

      laaaaame..



    53. 53

      Absolutely. It would make the imagery of the book come to life. I can think of SEVERAL scenes where this would be good. For instance when Bella transforms, and when the Volturi come to fight and the honeymoon. ( for the scenery and the first time ) Why not? If it weren't thought, it wouldn't break my heart. But I think there will have to be 5 films or the last one will have to break the 3 hour limit and probably be 4 hours long.



    54. 54

      3d is not like your even there



    55. 55

      hahha they should make it in 3d so we can see some hot body(:



    56. 56

      no no no no a million times NOOO!!



    57. 57

      Wooo, vampire placentas, manipulative marriages and fanged C-sections in 3D. My kind of movie.
      NOT.



    58. 58

      I am with you Perez. I L-O-V-E twilight and I will go see every movie but 3D is really milking the cow. The longer they take the more upset people are going to get to. I just think it is plain silly to put this movie in 3D.

      PS. Summit make the f-ing decision already and get to making Breaking Dawn you bunch of money suckers.



    59. 59

      it was announced yesterday that breaking dawn will be two movies. it doesn't need to be in freaking 3d though.



    60. 60

      Please god NOOOOOO!!! It is already bad enough that I am 25 and have to sit in the theater with a bunch of 15-somethings…but can they please hold off on a 25 yr old having to watch this in 3D on top of that????? PLEASE????!!!



    61. 61

      Fucking SUmmit is so greedy. They make these movies on the cheap, and then milk fans loyalty for all its worth. They need to realize they are testing our patience–and understand robert's in other movies now, they don't have us by the ovaries like they did with twilight and new moon!



    62. 62

      and fuck off perez ghost writers(who don't even try to sound like perez, they write long paragraphs that are boring and humorless). Kristen and billy burke are the main talents when it comes to acting with this franchise. I love robert, but he's still learning how to act.



    63. 63

      I'll go see it if they have Kristen bend over in 3-D in a g-string.



    64. 64

      it should NOT be 3-D it will be wayyy to cheesy. and they should make it two movies!! if u think about it the book has 2 main conflicts. One, when bella is pregnant, and two when bella becomes a vampire and the volturi are coming..



    65. 65

      No! For someone you can't see 3-D in the first place it's a waste of money for me. It would upset me greatly actually. Seeing as I possibly can't see Alice in Wonderland as it is…..to not be able to see breaking dawn in theatres would be outrageous! I say NO! 3 D is being over done too much……it shouldn't be done.



    66. 66

      Twilight Saga 3D? Why? D:
      Nono, those movies are crap already in 2D



    67. 67

      WTF! its bad enough theyre breaking into 2 movies, but making it into 3D is just ridiculous



    68. 68

      NO!!!!! can't we have NORMAL movies? 3D gives me a headache.



    69. 69

      NO WAY that's the dumbest thing I've ever heard 3D is great in some movies but not this one.



    70. 70

      No! Breaking Dawn is a HORRIBLE book so I doubt the movie will be much better. I think the movie will be even worse due to the fact that Kristen Stewart can't act worth a damn and I can't see her acting out the things that Bella does in the book, it will be a nightmare! It will be her worst acting to date and that is saying something!



    71. 71

      they are making it into two movies and the only point is to to make more money. there's no point to it at all. all that happens is they get married, screw around a bit, have a baby, bella becomes a vampire, and they screw around some more. that's it. nothing. that would take about two hours on the big screen.

      also, if they put kristen stewarts face into a 3D movie i think i just might vomit.



    72. 72

      NO 3D!!!!!!!!



    73. 73

      Not a fan of a Spider-Man style Twilight. Let's keep it girly…please.



    74. 74

      I say yes and no because either way I will be seeing it



    75. 75

      NOOOO!! Breaking Dawn is such a good book, don't ruin it with fucking 3D!! I LOVE Twilight, but I will be sooo pissed off if Breaking Dawn is in 3D

      I think Breaking Dawn should be 2 movies, so I can see more R-Patz and KStew!!!! :)



    76. 76

      That would be so dumb! What parts, exactly, are they going to make 3d? Like when he fights the wolf and wood flies in front of our face? Wow… so cool. I hate this whole 3d hype… Can we get passed it please?



    77. 77

      I used to like Twilight, but ever since the first movie the whole Saga has been shoved down people's throats. The overkill has already begun. They killed a respectable series of novels. As for the idea of putting the final movie in 3-D? HELL NO.



    78. 78

      I'm still on the fence about if I'd actually want to watch it… but if they make it in 3D the I REFUSE to see it. These movies are cheesy enough. The last thing I need is 3D cheese.



    79. 79

      Re: snt1593 – I feel the same way. I liked the books, but after the first movie the media saturation was disgusting. I didn't go see New Moon because there had been SO MANY clips and trailers and screen shots, that I was already sick of the movie without even seeing it. I'm still so overexposed to Twilight that I don't want to see Eclipse either.

    80. auds says – reply to this


      80

      UGH god i friggen HATE this series. i used to read the books and i liked the first three, but it's gotten to be SO over-hyped and so crappy! what exactly would they be making this 3-d for? there's NO action, just a big retarded build up and no climax! if anyone has read the books then they know meyer fucked it all up royally with a completely moronic ending to a less than amazing series. no thanks!



    81. 81

      hell no! there isn't enough action in the last one to even justify 3d. so blah!



    82. 82

      No No No!!! They can't do this! The world is becoming obsessed with 3D!! I've never liked it. By the time Breaking Dawn comes out every movie will be in 3D so if they want to stand out and be unique they should keep it 2D. I'm perfectly fine looking at Tay Tay in 2D :)



    83. 83

      it doesnt rly matter they cant act anyway….



    84. 84

      NO. NO 3D. I will send a freakin' letter to Summit, complaining if they do.



    85. 85

      Re: auds – I agree wholeheartedly. Although Ive always had a love/hate (learning more towards hate) relationship with those books. Im glad I sold them.



    86. 86

      YES PLEASE



    87. 87

      Hell no. Why are they trying to rip off Harry Potter? They decide to split the last book into two parts, Twilight does the same. Harry Potter goes 3D, Twilight does the same. Hate Twilight! What could they possibly put into 3D?



    88. 88

      nope it should DEFINATELY NOT b 3D. avatar n transformers were action movies it was ok or dem to b 3D. and breaking dawn BETTER b ONE movie. as long as eclipse is taking ill probaby die b4 i get to c da ending of breaking dawn…ugh



    89. 89

      Re: LxMxO – they dont fight… they just stand there wit bellas blanket over dem.



    90. 90

      Re: faredooz – they dont ight..they just stand there with bellas "blanket" over them



    91. 91

      I's love it actually. Rob and Tay in 3D HELLZ YEAH!

    92. LeniK says – reply to this


      92

      100% YES!!!!



    93. 93

      Oh, hell no. I hate 3-D.



    94. 94

      yea they are taking it too far the should just leave the way it is, 3D sucks!!!!



    95. 95

      Gay gay gay GAY!!!! It should NOT be split into 2 movies and it should DEFFINATLY NOT be in 3-D. That's the STUPIDEST thing i've EVER heard!!!! The only reason they're thinking about having it two movies in because HP 7: the Deathly Hallows is in two movies.



    96. 96

      hell no



    97. 97

      HELL YEAH! taylor close enough to touch (almost) ’nuff said! x



    98. 98

      god summit just wants to fuck up the the twilight series as much as possible



    99. 99

      Okay I am the biggest Twilighter and i think that there could never be too much of Taylor Lautner but I do think that the might be going just a bit to far. Irregardless of weather Breaking Dawn is in 3-D i will stay pay to go see it. I did like Avatar the effects are very nice because there is alot of action! I have read Breaking dawn a numerous amount of time and there is really not that much action, If Eclipse was in 3-D now that would make sense. But hey if they want to make a 3-D movie as long as they keep making the twilight maovie everything is alright with me. So Summit go ahead i don't think it will really matter.



    100. 100

      HELLZ YEAH TL UP CLOSEEE :)

    More comments: [1] 2 »