Home Videos Photos

Pamela Anderson Commercial Banned In Australia

| Filed under: AustraliasticADorationPamela Anderson

It IS a touch racy with the splashing milk!

Pamela Anderson is featured in a commercial for internet company Crazy Domains which eventually shows her in a bikini writhing around with another female.

Pretty standard Pam Anderson fare, but Australia's Advertising Standards Bureau received hundreds of complaint so they banned the commercial from airing. Bureau President Fiona Jolly says:

"It's meant to be a cheeky, over-the-top depiction, but in the bureau's view it did cross the line."

We can kinda see their point — check it out above!

What do U think?

Email this  »
Celebs Who Changed Their Name After Getting Married -- And Lived To Regret It!
The 5 Seconds Of Summer's Hottest Pics! From Shirtless To Full-On Naked!
Sexy Celebs Wearing Thongs!
Celebs' Drunkest Moments Caught On Camera!
Love Is In The Air -- 16 Celebrity Mile High Club Members!
More People Saw These Sex Tapes Than Sex Tape!

45 comments to “Pamela Anderson Commercial Banned In Australia”



  1. 1

    Considering two chicks in bikinis covered in cream has nothing to do with an internet company, yeah I'd say it crosses the line.



  2. 2

    Typical sexist garbage from the Aussies.



  3. 3

    i don't think it's crossed the line at all. I live in england and theres stuff like this on TV all the time. i mean even furthur. i think some people are wayyy to over cautious about sexual imagery. such as in england violence can't be shown until a certian time, but in other places violence is everywhere on tv.



  4. 4

    our whole fucking life is a wreck
    we're desperate
    get used to it
    we're desperate
    get used to it
    we're desperate
    get used to it
    it's kiss or kill



  5. 5

    Check out more Pam at her official site www.PamelaAnderson.com



  6. 6

    Looked fine to me…………………………



  7. 7

    Sexy! I'll have some of that, please.



  8. 8

    Really trashy…very close to porn.

  9. YUCK says – reply to this


    9

    oy poor pam the other girl is so much hotter and younger, pam is old enough to be her grandmother.



  10. 10

    yeahhh too trashy for TV. this makes the Paris Hilton one look tame as hell (which it was).
    Pam seriously needs to move on with her life…it's getting old.



  11. 11

    Hahaha her commercials always get banned =)



  12. 12

    Isn't Pammie a vegan? Why would she agree to have cream thrown at her if she was?



  13. 13

    She looks great!



  14. 14

    Considering it looks like jizz all over them yes I would say its too much. Funny how they hardly show Pam in the sexy shots and its mostly the other chick! bahahha



  15. 15

    I love it!



  16. 16

    To abiYEAH: Thanks for the perspective. I agree with you. I'm from Tennessee, USA.

    Why are we attempting to shield children from sex? Isn't it natural and normal?



  17. 17

    That was crypto-gay and pornographic. Unsuitable. Deserved to be banned.



  18. 18

    whatever, it's just stupid. Pam anderson should just give it up. her kids must be soooo embarassed



  19. 19

    Re: mrstptn450 – Yes, but it's not natural for two women to be writhing against each other covered in cream.



  20. 20

    Re: Moonflower26
    I doubt your mom was looking that good + hot when you were her kids' age…
    I love how everybody says she's getting old and isn't so hot, I mean seriously, she looks amazing for her age. (42)



  21. 21

    Yeah good call msmontreal. Yet another dip shit statement from the uneducated.



  22. 22

    Re: mrstptn450 – Well maybe you should be asking yourself whether this is a "normal" and "natural" depiction of sexuality, and whether being raunchy, complete with fake tits and eluding to being covered in sperm should be synonymous with sexual liberation.

    If you can't tell the difference might I suggest "Female chauvinist pigs" by Ariel Levy. Easy to read, non-preachy post-feminist text.



  23. 23

    Re: mrstptn450 – I think there is a definite need to shield children from sex! And violence too, but that is another issue…young kids don't understand sex and can get totally wrong and unhealthy ideas about it. They are not mature enough to understand it. Why should we sexualize them at young ages–isn't that a cause of a lot of sexual deviancy? And it your deviancy only affects yourself or your partner is into it too, fine, but what about other stuff–I know most people are not pedophiles or peeping toms or exhibitionists, but I bet most of those people were inappropriately exposed to sexuality at a young age. What's wrong with keeping kids innocent? And then they can learn about sex when they are older and ready and have healthy ideas about it instead of what so many adults carry?



  24. 24

    it's no different than those godaddy.com advertisements.

    i don't think it's a big deal.



  25. 25

    I've had it… same old sexist shit! enough about it already.



  26. 26

    It's pure Pam!



  27. 27

    Re: msmontreal
    Um…generalization much? That's like me saying "Lazy Frenchman from Montreal".



  28. 28

    it wasn't banned because it was too 'sexy' - it was banned because its a shit ad.



  29. 29

    What the fuck is the big deal!!! Ive seen worst !!



  30. 30

    Re: BITCH PLEASE!!! – close to Porn!! No one is naked!! what are you a fucking nun!!

  31. kukla says – reply to this


    31

    I think it was cute, sexy-yes, but yet classy, nothing nasty at all! They are just constipated, if they got laid at all/more often, it wouldn't be a such a big deal at all, they would just enjoy it! GET A LIFE ( or sex) PEOPLE!!!



  32. 32

    SHE LOOKS LIKE A CHEAP (GOLDEN CHOICE/ CINEMAX) PORN STAR



  33. 33

    Re: msmontreal – typical response from a faux Frenchman

  34. KBGD says – reply to this


    34

    I'm Australian and it doesn't bother me at all… but then not much does. But please don't say Typical sexist garbage from the Aussies, is it because you don't like us you would pull out a comment like that or what is it?



  35. 35

    the ozzies need to put a stubbyholder over their brains…i liked it hahaha…a bit fem unfriendly..but who cares..



  36. 36

    Let's see…MTV isn't raunchy..BET doesn't portray rappers exploiting women's bodies…RIGHT! But now as usual, America wants to be hypocritical about Pammie's commercial. Spare me the self-righteous MUMBO JUMBO about crossing the line. BTW, Pam looks hot for 42! I'm sure she has more men lusting after her at 42, then any of you at 22 or 23!



  37. 37

    So according to Perez, it's okay for Adam Lambert to simulate gay sex acts on TV but this ad is too hot for TV. Biased much?? The funny part about this ad is that it's a true representation about how a lot of guys' minds work. Hardly racy. As for Pammy, she's just a marginally talented gal whose losing her looks with age and is trying to grab all the money she can. Can't say I blame her.



  38. 38

    theres a lot of conservative rednecks over here



  39. 39

    We do need to shild our children from this sexist garbarge. What the hell is wrong with you people? Yes sex is natual, but is should be with whom you love not sleep with everyone like pam and angie jolie. I know for a fact if this was two men there is NO WAY this commerical would fly. Whats up with that? Some of you have NO morals at all my daughter is 7 years old. Commericals like that should played on porn channels for people that are into that nasty woman de-morelizing crap. Socicity has got so many of you brainworshed into thinking this is okay. Well, its NOT okay. You get rapeed at age 6 like me with a playboy tied to your head and then try to tell your kid oh its natual….its okay. Anyone who would suppport this type of behavior unless its on a "PORN" channel is sickl. I dont want to be there watching my daughter see this kind of stuff of tv. NO ITS NOT OKAY!!!!!!!!



  40. 40

    yeah your right he did. you know what else? he got ripped to shreds for it. so…its okay for women but not men? they have tv channel for everything else why dont they just add it on the PORN channel. have you ever been raped at 6 years old and had a magzine playbody tied to your head? well, when you do come back here say its okay for your chld to watch.



  41. 41

    i am not sure who u r commenting on i diagree with this and im far from a nun. you get raped at 6 with a playboy tied to your head and explain to 7 year old little girl sure …..its natual. go have sex get pregnant at 15. sex should be for certain times and places and regular tv is NOT the place for it. u can tear into me all you want……if one person goes away on this site with a different view then i have helped that one person. sex should be between two people that love each other. pam is nasty everyone knows that, she just uses her plastic boobs to make money and that means she has no real talent other then to fuc&*&*&*! so yeah she and this commerical should go on but it should be a porn channel.



  42. 42

    Oh for fuck's sake, what pure fucking trash. Sick of seeing these undeserving, fugly men exposed to stunning visions like that. Border porn I say. Get the fucking ad off TV everywhere! Pammie is stupid ho.

  43. @v@ says – reply to this


    43

    It's quite a leap from healthy running kids wearing a milk moustache to this, although there's nothing particularly shocking here. Milk has an image, and I guess they decided that this wasn't 'it.' If it were a good whiskey or beer, this could work…

  44. @v@ says – reply to this


    44

    Crazy Domains will have to try another kind of crazy. I wonder who would bother to complain about this? I would want to see those complaints if I were crazy domains. Maybe somebody is being too controlling.



  45. 45

    Music videos get shown almost 24-hours a day, yet some of the content is similar/worse than this ad! People are so over the top, it's crazy.