Rielle Hunter Repulsed By Sexy GQ Pics!
John Edwards' mistress Rielle Hunter was interviewed by GQ magazine accompanied with some racy photos which she finds "repulsive."
Barbara Walters revealed on The View that Rielle trusted the photographer Mark Seliger and just "went with the flow," but now she is upset about the photos that went into the magazine showing her in a collared shirt with no pants on.
Then WHY did you pose for them?!
Idiot!
What do U think of the photos in question? We think the one of her spreading her legs next to the stuffed animals is HIGHlarious!
[Image via GQ]
Tags: mistress, photo, rielle hunter
Sandra Bullock Almost Didn't Do The Blind Side!!
Gibson Making His Last Movie? Hopefully!
HIGHlarious!
What did she think they would look like??? SLUT!
I'm assuming this is her daughter's bed …How twisted & inappropriate that she's posing like this in a child's bedroom! What a skank!!
ME Too…. that photographer should be shot…they are just gross
I'm Reille Hunter and I'll sleep with a married man OR Dora the Explorer!
That said, ladies, if you're screwing a married guy, and they're getting divorced, you don't really need to bad mouth the soon-to-be-ex wife in print.
Really, she won the cheating SOB — couldn't she just leave it at that?
Here is a suggestion for all models. If you don't want to be photographed in an unbuttoned shirt and no pants, don't pose in an unbuttoned shirt and no pants. This is as idiotic as when Carrie Prejean claimed that her topless pics were because the wind blew her top off.
Dear Rielle:
When you pose without your pants, there is a good chance that a men's magazine will run pictures of that. And that said, you should actually be mad for these reasons, instead:
1. Not a very good photographer.
2. Stuffed animals are beyond cliche.
3. Your leg looks fat.
yayayayayaaay wtf, IQ 20
She looks like the mom from growing pains. Where are the touch up people, she looks like shyte.
I think she looks great. I also thinks she thought she would look hot too, but when she started catching flack for the pix, she changed her tune. Going with the flow is a BS excuse.
she knew what she was doing - and now she looks like even more of an idiot complaining about it.
If you're gonna be with Dora and Kermy in bed, you better put some damn pants on. Thank god Elmo was spared. Lol.
She is repulsive
Obviously she was clearly aware of what she was wearing…. honestly this is ridiculous.
She's a ugly, homewrecking pig! She shoulf be ashamed of herself!!!!!!!
We are all repulsed.
Seriously….she's the one that posed for them. Totally with you on this post. People don't think before they do things. Case and point.
i think she's a complete and total idiot. what did she think was going to happen when she was posing for pictures with her pants off?
Ok, your 10 minutes are up. Yes, Rielle, you DO look repulsive but YOU WILLINGLY POSED WITH NO PANTS ON! What the HELL did you expect??? Oh, and I'm sure your kid is going to enjoy the whispers, accusations, rumors and the total berating he'll receive when he enters school. So I'm sure he'll thank you for that some time in the future. Rielle, you are a total douche.
she looks pretty god to me. i'd totally bang that old lady…if i was a washed up politician.
i'd give her a "real" pearl necklace.
She's nasty, and a mudshark with all that freakin makeup.
Adding too much makeup to a already butter face is never the answer.
PANTS ON THE GROUND!!!
Seriously, just put on a shirt, pearls and no pants and i'm going to make you look like a . . . . . . nun. What did she expect? Sillyness
ha, the second picture! she's a tranny
Hmmm, I wonder if she found it "repulsive" to have an affair with a married man - not to mention his wife had cancer! I find Miss. Hunter repulsive!
Re: stellagranos – well noted…hideous photography. Why is everything the colour of old milk?
Wow, she does look like a tranny.
Ya gonna do it ur daughter's bed?…lol…psycho pretending she's been a bad girl and Jonny gonna come spank her and send her to bed without dessert.
Re: Scorpioleidy – I know hey!!!!!!! And I bet she doesn't see the stupidity and yuckyness behind posing with stuffed animals. Let's face it, that does scream 'little child'. What an idiot!!!!!!!!
rode hard and put away wet….skanky loser!
It is impossible to achieve a serious classy picture that can be taken seriously WITH YOUR PANTS OFF! These are all terrible.
So are we to believe she was having some kind of black out while these pictures were being taken? Usually, when one has no pants on, they know it!!!
Everyone should read the interview she gave GQ. She's desperate and big-time delusional. She actually called John Edwards "Johnny" throughout the entire interview. She's seriously mental..
–Almost reminded me of the film, "Fatal Attraction"…….
Lol this made my night.
What a dumb woman… Oh its a magazine shoot so I'll take my pants off… even though I dont want people to see pictures with my pants off…
Love the one with barney! Who is this photographer also? Horrible!
LMAO… She is posing with no pants next to a bunch of childrens charecters. Seriously?
Disgusting… I feel so sorry for her child. Words cannot even discribe it.
Also, she needs to shut up about hating the photos.
How about you DON'T choose GQ to shoot you? What do you excpect!?!?!
Homewrecker.
We just need to stop giving this woman the time of day..
She doesn't hold a candle next to Elizabeth… Looks, class, everything.
Sure she is!! What do you expect when you take your pants off!
Umm…she is a PHOTOGRAPHER!!!! She knew exactly what she was doing.
Someday her child is going to see all of this, including the fact that she could have very well ended up as an abortion. Her and Johnny deserve eachother. They both certainly know how to screw up their own, and other's lives.
These photos are just wrong, on so many levels.
Is she completely stupid.
I think she expected these shots to come out better than they did. She came face to face with her own hideousness, and that is what repulses her. I think the people at GQ knew what they were doing and wanted to show her in the worst possible light. These photos result in a mental connection - her/bed, which just screams low-life. I hope Elizabeth finds her way to the public commentary. If any solace can be found about being involuntarily linked to this kind of tainted gutter smut, may she find it in the harsh words of people who see that piece of trash for what she is.
These are not sexy at all. They look like shots from craigslist.
What a fugly old skank. Her nose looks like a baked potato.
OMG! she is so ugly I do not even know what the hell edwards was thinking!! my goodness! oh well it is always the ugly whores that are easy and sleep with married men! and damn it the pictures here do not help!
Re: fuckinglame – lol.
This is the same hypocrite that says she wasn't a home wrecker, because the home was wrecked prior to her entering into the picture? What a stupid bitch! I'm sure Elizabeth Edwards appreciated that comment…you stupid whorer. And to make it perfectly clear….you are a home wrecker. Don't enter a situation, regardless, until that person's divorced.
If she didn't like the photos…
WHY DID YOU POSE WITH NO PANTS ON THEN YOU FUCKING IDIOT!!!
Tasteless pictures, ugly subject…Posing without pants next to children's stuffed animals…did she just do it on her daughter's bed ? I just became nauseated. By the way, she has the sex appeal of Camila Parker Bowles. Home wrecker.
At least Barney and Kermit look like they are into this as well………….
It looks like Barney is keeling over from the smell of that snatch.
She looks like the mom from "Who's The Boss".
There is one pic of her in GQ where it looks like she pissed her pants
Right now, after hearing all this news today. I have no words really. The entire situation is really sad.
Though that second photo… OMG. My bf and I are still howling. Stuffed animals with a mans shirt and legs spread. hahahahaha!
Stupid. This chick makes me sick. If it weren't for her having a baby I would curse her to the bottom pits of HELL! That poor child.
She is an ugly skank - it's hard to believe that I was going to vote for "Johnny" - I love his wife Elizabeth - and he seemed so loyal and such a family man - his speeches used to bring tears to my eyes - he seemed so caring -their son died which was so horrible - you just don't get over that - and Elizabeth took fertility treatments to get pregnant after they lost their son when she was 50 ! For him ! That could have been what caused her breast cancer ! It was such a shock to me to find out what a phony he was - everything he said must have been a lie -what a complete disgusting failure of a human being he is — to go from running for President of the United States –and having a beautiful, wonderful wife that was loved by everyone and a wonderful family to having a baby with this piec of s–t !! He just makes me vomit ! Reille Hunter would have had sex with anyone who asked her ! ( and probably did !) I hope "Johnny" is happy now- I don't see how he can live with himself -
This totally screams Glenn close in Fatal Attraction
Just a question… "Why would someone pose for pictures, taken by a professional photographer, for a national magazine, along with giving an interview; NOT think (perhaps) they would be published?" …just asking
lol - pathetic
Beyond creepy!
Posing half nude on your child's bed with her stuffed animals?
That poor little girl. She's going to be raised by two amoral, narcissistic idiot pigs. She doesn't stand a chance.
Gross
I think the pics. says it all. Stupid!
Wow. The second pic really just makes her look worse since shes known for being a Homewrecker! Dumb move on her behalf! If she didnt want it inthe magazine, why pose that way?!? Lol shes a liar and a skank!
Not only does John Edwards have good taste in shit; now it sounds like he's got good taste in stoooopid shit!
how she goes about her life is a bad idea, Woman r u just waking up now??? pAlease
Ms. Hunter is a fake new age scary sick woman. She has been trying to get into show business for years. She is self obsessed and completely insensitive to Mrs. Edwards, who is fighting for her life. Go away!
maybe she was hypnotized and didnt know
"yeah I'm gonna be all classy and wear no pants for a mens magazine.. it'll be fine" Stupid.
stupid biatch!..
How can she claim that she had no idea that these inapropriatelly suggestive shots are part of what would result when she was a film producer? Maybe she was a very green film producer.
She's smiling because she just got eaten out by Kermit. He's a far better lover than John Edwards.
i don't know about 'repulsed', but those pics are just weird. I think Dora and Kermit should be more pissed off.
She's right. They are totally repulsive photos. The second one in the child's room is downright disturbing and creepy. I never want to see her face again.
These aren't good pictures. I'm sure that with other clothing/elements, she'd say: "Oh, I love my pictures!".
Rielle thinks her pictures are repulsive? I think she is repulsive and also John Edwards and Elizabeth. They are all very selfish people. The four children involved are the victims. I believe Rielle set up the sex tapes to hold over John's head, I think she purposely got pregnant to have a money bank and John deserves everything he is getting. He is a sorry person and Elizabeth is a selfish person. GOOD BYE to all of them!
Rielle may have Barbara Walters fooled buy not me. She has the IQ of about a 14 year old. She better use the body while she can, she is starting to age. Then what will she do? Why would you hold your child in a picture with your pants unzipped? GQ was in poor taste to do these pictures. I think it will hurt them more than help them.
Rielle is so unattractive I am sure they used a gallon of touch up paint on her!!!!
I see we have two men in the same catagory as John Edwards, commenting with the the body part that does their thinking. She wants you to screw her so hey, stand in line. I think she will take you up on it, especially if she does not get any money out of "Johnny" or Andrew Young. (take a hint who the two men are, tch—- and fuc—-la–). Have a good day boys, you apparently are not mature men and for sure not Gentlemen.
No wonder I'm gay. As for Barbara Walters, she would eat corn out of Hitlers shit if it kept her declining fame going. Mas triste!
Is she that freaking dumb that she didn't know she DIDN'T have pants on??? And why not demand to have final say in what is printed in the mag?? What a ditz!
This woman has the nerve to be repulsed-NOW!? After carring on an affair with a married man, an alleged sex tape, and then having his baby! Now she
turns her nose up in disapproval.Posing like "Oh..just touch me in the morning
and then just walk away." No shame whatsoever.
Yeah, because clearly those poses and background settings are ideal for head-shots. Bitch, please! You are trying to look sexy post-baby. Just own it!
What's repulsive is how any new mom would not find the whole idea of this shoot wholly disgusting! She's shown her true colors to the world!
She got pregnant by a married man and now she's repulsed?? Honey, you should have been repulsed years ago.
This woman is ridiculously repulsive. The third picture that's not seen here with her holding her child and wearing a shirt that shows her tummy is just as disturbing. She knows she loved those pictures but once everyone started talking about how skanky, gross, and just plain weird they were, she suddenly had a conscience. She had sex with a married man, she got pregnant by a married man, and she has a sex tape with him but only these pictures repulse her. She needs to get her morals in check cause she is a disturbing person.
She is scum, he is scum and so is Tiger Woods!!! Enough glorification of scum!!!!
HELLOOOO?? Rielle Hunter is a videographer & knows image making & photography, so for her to cry “foul” is ludicrous. She knew what she was doing and OK’d all the photos! Posing sexily on her daughter’s bed is not only inappropriate, but sick and perverted and in utter bad taste. As a mother of a 3-year-old son, I was appalled. Why didn’t this woman at least use her OWN bed instead of her daughter’s? And WHY pose sexily sans panties with children’s toys?? That’s VERY DISTURBING. And then posing with bare midriff, untied sweatpants and a “F___ Me” expression while HOLDING HER DAUGHTER? SICK! Now this piece of poop cries to Barbara Walters about photos SHE HERSELF APPROVED. What a idiot. She's gone from
Edward's Whore to Media Whore and maybe now STUFFED ANIMAL WHORE.
Let's see now: she has an affair with a married sleaze, has a baby with that married sleaze, makes a sex tape with that married sleaze, but then is repulsed by these pictures?? Wow, are her priorities skewed!
Her problem? She wants to seek out the media as a celebrity wannabe and sell her smarmy tale to the highest bidder. Only problem is when the public doesn't like her sleazy interview and disturbing skanky photographs, she cries foul and tries to blame the very media she courted in the first place. As a videographer, she knows about image creation and photography, so she can't feign ignorance. She knew exactly what these photos were going to be, and they were done with her approval.