Jennifer Lopez Stars In Overboard Remake

wenn5447009.jpg

We're SO over these remakes!

Jennifer Lopez is set to star in the remake of the 1987 flick Overboard. The original was directed by Garry Marshall and starred Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russell.

If you recall, the flick centered on a spoiled woman who falls off her yacht and is taken to the hospital by a local carpenter. She wakes up with amnesia and he convinces her that she's his wife and gets her to take care of his home and four boys.

As for the remake, Will Smith is producing with Overbrook partner James Lassiter.

Not a good idea to remake this classic we think.

And why cast JLo? Why not Kate Hudson? Or at least a good actress?

Would U pay to see this?

[Image via WENN.]

Tags: , ,

    Posted: Mar 19, 2010 at 12:30 pm / Email this  »

    124 comments to “Jennifer Lopez Stars In Overboard Remake”

    More comments: [1] 2 »



    1. 1

      Way to ruin another good movie from the 80's. Terrible!



    2. 2

      oh man, this movie is one of my faves. I swear to g-d if they f*ck it up I'm going to be so pissed.



    3. 3

      there's no need to remake that film! and especially with Jennifer lopez… o_O barf.

    4. nanex says – reply to this


      4

      i freaking loved that film!!!!!!
      i completely agree.. gotta be kate hudson to do it.. not just because the mother daughter thing but because she is perfect for the part. J LO cant act she is hot latino lovely though ..



    5. 5

      Hasn't this project been gestating for a long time? And Why JLO? I'm sure with Will Smith attached he could have landed Resse Witherspoon or Katherine Heigle.

      Check Out GenerationGossip.com

    6. zella says – reply to this


      6

      nope.not worth my money



    7. 7

      I love Will Smith, but I wouldn't watch this because of JLo - she sucks as an actress….. I hope this remake doesn't happen - the original is so cute.



    8. 8

      *FIRST*
      I think j.L0 is PERFECT for this role. She's proven how comedic she is and very believable. What will make this film successful is to cast the right leading male to counter her and keep up with her, but not upstage her. that's the question here, what male actor to cast.



    9. 9

      Jennifer Lopez is a good actress jack ass!



    10. 10

      Lopez is soooo yesterday. Poor choice for a remake and star. cough



    11. 11

      This would be a travesty! Overboard is my favorite movie of all time! J-Lo, is a sweetie, but she sure can eff up a movie!

    12. Scrib says – reply to this


      12

      Goldie Hawn is a brilliant comedy actress and noone can outdo her. JLo is nothing.



    13. 13

      Jlo can't act!! Kate hudson is a much better choice, or Reese Witherspoon.



    14. 14

      I am devastated!!!!!! That is one of my very favorites! J-lo sucks at acting!!! I agree with Perez…we need Kate Hudson!! That would be ideal.



    15. 15

      Oh No, I'll keep watching the original!!!



    16. 16

      NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!! Will Smith will pay for this AND The Karate Kid. Fuck you Fresh Prince. Stupid Michael Bay effect. Who started the huge remake bonanza?! Michael Bay. Who starred in a couple Michael Bay movies? Will Smith. STOP RAPING MY CHILDHOOD YOU FUCKS.



    17. 17

      Classic? Hardly. It only grossed 26 Million. The studio actually was putting all of it's push behind it but when it was failing to perform they pulled it and released another movie in it's place. A little film called "Moonstruck."



    18. 18

      nOOO!! Why not Christina Applegate?? She is GREAT at comedy… Kate Hudson would be an obvious choice… even tho she is great.



    19. 19

      …i would watch a remake but not with Jlo…..sorry Will Smith, but not even you can jump start her movie career again….



    20. 20

      JLO does romantic comedies well.

    21. losky says – reply to this


      21

      heres where i think most people will agree with you perezo. its like people dont know how to create original enticing movies anymore. why fuck up a good thing? and noteven that but remake it and downgrade the actress. jlo is cool and all, but cmpared to goldie hawn it will be terrible. there has to be some story that has never been done b4



    22. 22

      LEAVE THIS MOVIE ALONE DON'T REMAKE. I LOVED THIS MOVIE AND YOU CAN'T REPLACE GOLDIE WITH JLO…REALLY



    23. 23

      I dont know why so many people say shes a bad actress?? Some of the movies she did as Gigli-Maid in Manhattan were really bad-but it wasnt her doing. think she did some really good work in Selena-Angel Eyes & An Unfinished Life.



    24. 24

      First off the orig movie SUCKED balls second they really should have Kate H. do it.. seeing as how her mom made the first one it would be kind of cool for Kate to do it.



    25. 25

      Jennifer Lopez will be just fine for a roll like that which is just a cute love history not the big deal production at all. If you don't want to watch it just don't simple like that and don't make the big fuzz about it !



    26. 26

      Yeah, the first Overboard was great. Jennifer has made some really good movies i.e. "Monster In-Law", "Maid in Manhattan", "The Wedding Planner". Yes, Kate would be a good choice too but would really seem to much like the original. Wonder who the guy will be? That would determine if I would pay to see it. Also, how the trailers look.



    27. 27

      This is as bad as redoing The Wizard of Oz..yeah heard that one the other day….WTF!!! Come up with new ideas people!!!



    28. 28

      I'm sooo sick of Hollywood not coming up with original ideas!!!!! If they want to remake movies, why don't they start with the ones that sucked and try to make them better. I love the original Overboard movie and will not be going to see the remake, especially if J-ELLO is going to be in it.



    29. 29

      absolutely, pisitively no WAY should they re-make this movie, too cute of a movie to ruin especially with Jlo, kate is cute but no way compares to Goldie!



    30. 30

      big fucking mistake!
      that movie is classic… once again a remake ruining the original



    31. 31

      Perez, it's a remake of Overboard, not Casablanca. I don't think a good actress is necessarily required.



    32. 32

      O M G, why in the world would they cast LOPEZ in that role? So she can shove her huge bikini ASS into the camera? I guess guys who like bubble asses will see it.



    33. 33

      NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

      Why are they ruining this movie!?!?!? With J.LO!?!?!

      …. I am very upset right now.



    34. 34

      One of my favorite movies, and they're RUINING by casting "JLO" … WHAT A MISTAKE! Love Will Smith, but I bet it doesn't do well. JLO needs a different role…she's too DIVA for this part.



    35. 35

      Casting Kate would be like casting her mother all over again, just a younger version of Goldie. JLo would make it totally fresh!



    36. 36

      Read more comments…I don't even think Kate would be the best person for this role, but still better than JLO. She hasn't made a good movie since Selena. She's too fake to be good for this role.



    37. 37

      Why would I pay a cent or give up a second of my life for this scientology project? F'em!



    38. 38

      The ONLY reason Overboard worked was because of Kurt Russell and Goldie Hawn. It is a bad movie but it's the difference when you have good actors in a bad movie and mediocre actors in a bad movie, which only makes it worst. I've seen her "comedy" work and I got laughs from the supporting cast not her, Maid in Manhattan I loved Natasha Richardson, Monster in law, it was Jane Fonda and Wanda Sykes I laughed at, Lopez and Vartan were like watching paint dry. ANd hell I didn't even see those in the movies I caught them on cable. I'll definitely be keeping my $10 bucks, damn Will, you are falling off my friend.



    39. 39

      It was a cute movie, but hardly a "classic" and certainly not a movie that should be remade - Are hollywood writers so unoriginal and without talent that they can't think of new premise? or is it that studios are unwilling to shell out money on innovative ideas? little of both perhaps…



    40. 40

      LOVE HER ! SHE A GOOD ACTRESS !



    41. 41

      Why JLo? Because she is in with the Scientologists, just like Will Smith!! JLo's dad has been one for decades, and I think she and Marc are, as well. We all know Will Smith has been an undercover Scientologist for years.



    42. 42

      i would rather watch this movie starring Cinnabun the dog than J.Lo…Cinnabun is more popular right now and has more fans!!!!



    43. 43

      I think her and Mathew Macaunahay would be awesome together in the remake of such a great movie!



    44. 44

      I adore the original. Me and my mom used to watch it together all the time when I was little.
      They are going to ruin the movie, its obvious. I think Kate Hudson is a GREAT idea and maybe Bradly Cooper play Kurt Russels role. The guy needs to be rugged and handsome. What the hell are they thinking? All her movies are crap! She hasnt done anything decent since, Money Train & Selena (even those were bad acting on her part). Give it a rest JLO, stick to making outfits the average person cant afford with your logo plastered all over them.

    45. Puke says – reply to this


      45

      Pukkkkkkeeee!! Leave that movie alone. J.Lo really?? No thanks. I personally feel it hard to watch anything that she is in. *Sighs* another movie ruined! Thanks Hollywood!

      LEAVE THE GOOD CLASSICS ALOOOOONNEEEE!



    46. 46

      the movie sucked the first time why waste money on a remake?



    47. 47

      Yeah if you were to remake it — and I'm not sayin' they should— I can see Kate Hudson and Matthew McCohaughey :) Sorry J Lo…but NO!



    48. 48

      SHE MUST BE PREGNANT BECAUSE SHE IS LOOKING VERY FULL IN THE FACE…



    49. 49

      Please just leave the classics alone!!! They are classics for a reason…DUH! Also, you guys are obviously running out of your OWN ideas so you have to go back and start re-making all these great classics! STOP!!! Oh and can we please stop casting Jennifer Lopez for anything, I mean honestly she really can't act or sing…just be famous Jen, that's really what you do best!!

    50. Puke says – reply to this


      50

      I am wondering if lame actors become Scientologists just so they can get movie parts? I mean get in good with them and at best every couple years your guaranteed to be in something….. hmmmm…..



    51. 51

      ok please perez she is a good actress come on!!! hello…
      give credit where credit is due



    52. 52

      Also, this is 2010 - are we still really making put-a-woman-in-her-place movies? Right now it's The Bounty Hunter, and soon it will be this sure-to-be-awful remake. WHY?



    53. 53

      Re: metrecht
      "Classic? Hardly. It only grossed 26 Million. The studio actually was putting all of it's push behind it but when it was failing to perform they pulled it and released another movie in it's place. A little film called "Moonstruck."
      -
      -
      Actually, you have that backwards. MGM had no faith in Moonstruck and didn't put it in any theaters until Overboard ran its course - and 26 million in those days (if that's what it was) was not a bomb..



    54. 54

      I love the movie Overboard…please don't remake this movie! They will totally ruin it!

    55. naima says – reply to this


      55

      Overboard is one of my favorite movies of all time and i never get tired watching it over and over. I love J-Lo and her movies and no offense but i dont think she can match up to Goldie Hawn's role in that movie. Some movies just arent made for remakes and honestly Overboard is one of them.



    56. 56

      Dangerous for her to try a Goldie hawn movie. Hawn is an academy award winning actress with flawless comic timing….not sure Lopez is up to this.



    57. 57

      Not an original idea left in Hollywood and Jennifer Lopez couldn't act her way out of a paper bag.



    58. 58

      Perez your a dumb ass! Jennifer Lopez is a great actress so shut the fuck up!



    59. 59

      no :( as if!!! such a good movie…they are going to ruin it!



    60. 60

      "Overboard" is far, far from being a 'classic'. However, J. Lo is far, far from being an 'actress'. It all evens out in the end.



    61. 61

      Jennifer IS a great actress!



    62. 62

      The original is perfect, there is no need to redo it! I still watch it a few times a year and laugh. I don't think you could compare Jlo to Goldie anyway



    63. 63

      The only thing she can do is shake that giant rice and beans @$$ around. Her music is ear rape and every movie she is in takes a huge steaming dump. Stick to killing cute animals to swathe your fat hips in and out of the movies and recording studio.



    64. 64

      Yes, I'd pay to watch it!!!



    65. 65

      J Lo = the Latina Paris Hilton



    66. 66

      PREDICITON: major major major major flop.
      The original is a classic. Don't mess with perfection.
      What hit movie has JLo had?



    67. 67

      No, no, no! Can't they come up with something original for a change?



    68. 68

      i refuse to watch that garbage. goldie is legend in that role.



    69. 69

      You gotta give to JLO for still trying to revive her career. Poor thing…someone needs to tell her she is a HAS BEEN…



    70. 70

      Too soon to do this one.



    71. 71

      NoOOooOOO!!!!! WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY WHYYYYYYYYYYYYY!??!?!?!?! i love this movie!! it should be left the fuck alone! ugh and jlo of all ppl to play Holdie's part!??! oh hell to the NO. Yea like "nano80" "way to ruin another good movie from the 80's.



    72. 72

      AH BOOOOOOOOO!!!! Come onnnn!!! Why re-make just to ruin it!?



    73. 73

      NO….NO….NO…..



    74. 74

      Kate Hudson SUCKS DONKEY FUCKING BALLS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      She can't act to save her fucking life and ALL her movies bomb!



    75. 75

      Nobody could ever come close to the performance Goldie & Kurt gave in this movie so remaking it with JLo is a waste of time and $. To answer your question Perez - NO - I wouldn't pay $ to go see it. With the economy as bad as it is right now, nobody else should either.



    76. 76

      Oh jeez. Okay, I would think an Overboard remake is stupid anyway. The original was amazing. Its not my type of movie but I watched it with my mum once and I loved it. It was a seriously good movie. Its one thing to re-make a movie you will never beat, but to re-make it and put Jennifer fucking Lopez as th star? Are these people retards? She can't act. I don't hate her, but she just can't act, she's terrible. Why would they hire her!? It makes no logical sense. Get a GOOD actor and maybe, just maybe, the re-make won't be SO terrible.



    77. 77

      j lo is a waste of space talentless money whore and this is just going to ruin one of my fave movies



    78. 78

      this is so not cool. effin f**k tards…come up with something new and quit ruining awesome ass movies.



    79. 79

      J lo you're a HAS BEEN! Face it very few are interested in seeing you perform whether it be singing or acting. I loved the original of Overboard and if you were to do the remake it would totally suck.



    80. 80

      overboard is my favorite movie then and now! why ruin it!? i love jlo and all but come on! movies SUCK now a days. stupid stupid stupid!!



    81. 81

      Will Smith is USUALLY MUCH smarter than this!



    82. 82

      NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO



    83. 83

      NO NO NO!!!! THIS IS A MOVIE YOU SHOULD NOT REMAKE!!!! THIS, TEEN WITCH, HAIRSPRAY??!! THEY BETTER NOT FCKN TOUCH CRY BABY!!! TOO SOON TO REMAKE THESE MOVIES WHICH END UP SHITTY! JUST SAY NO! DAMN, WHO ARE THESE FILMMAKERS WHO CAN'T COME UP WITH INVENTIVE IDEAS! SUCKS FOR THIS GENERATION OF KIDS…SHT JUST AINT THE SAME



    84. 84

      i refuse to see this movie and if i ever meet jlo i will punt her in the vag for this.



    85. 85

      I want to cry…



    86. 86

      KATE HUDSON!!!!!!



    87. 87

      Goldie Hawn isn't taken to the hospital by the carpenter, she is picked up by a garbage boat. Kurt Russell (the carpenter) only 'claims her' when he sees her on TV appeal and works out that she can pay him back money she owes him through housekeeping and tricking her she is his kid's mam. Then they fall in love. Maybe you should watch the original before you commenting on it?!

    88. RPORC says – reply to this


      88

      No way in hell! Her career is over. She's just a pest and just trying to reinvent herself a million times for what??? So film and record producers keep losing their investments! I think she should just stay home and take care of her ugly twins. She could play a Mom in a couple of years or so - maybe, his so called fans would take pity on her and watch it.



    89. 89

      If Kate Hudson starred, I would be roughly 7000000 x more likely to see the film - it has always been one of my favorite movies (thanks to my parents, its my dad's fave flick) so to remake it is A) a travesty to begin with but B) if Kate Hudson did it, literally I think half of America would be sooooo behind it!!!



    90. 90

      Who plays the male lead?



    91. 91

      I can't believe they are going to mess up my classic with jennifer lopez. Come on Will, you know better than this.



    92. 92

      Ive ALWAYS LOVED THIS MOVIE , AND HOW DARE THEY CHOOSE JLO, WHAT A FUCKING MISTAKE THAT WILL BE!!!



    93. 93

      I think Kate Hudson would have been a better choice. First off, she Goldie Hawn's daughter. It would have been cute to see her play that role. Perfect Kurt, how bout Matthew Mc. I could totally see that. Jlo is okay, but i dont think she's that funny.



    94. 94

      Oh God NO! The original movie is great as it is! And whats up with Will Smith making remakes, first Karate Kid…now this?!? Lol what a joke.
      And Jlo?!? Really?!? Lol she has the 'diva' wannabe spoiled brat thing down but her acting is SO Mediocre. Just Scrap this movie!



    95. 95

      It WAS never a classic: It IS Sunday afternoon piece-of-shit fare on loser cable TV stations. Fewer than five minutes of this "classic" borders on torture.



    96. 96

      Re: funnyone – you are definitely right! Jlo has been lucky to have stretched her 'career' for as long as she can. She could be famous for her behind but Not for her work.



    97. 97

      GAD DAMN THEM SONS OF BITCHES……I loved this movie…Please Don't use JHoe …..We the people of America Hate her….Fuck use that Kate chick…We hate her too but shes better than JHoe….



    98. 98

      NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
      NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
      NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooo

      PLEASE NOOOOOOoooooo………..



    99. 99

      they cannot touch this film! part of why it was so great is because goldie hawn and kurt russell were a couple off screen! they have amazing onscreen chemistry. jlo would make this film into a cliche, something to laugh at, even when you aren't meant to. she'd be absolutely ridiculous in this role. i do like her films, but this is not for her.



    100. 100

      i do agree that kate hudson should do it. maybe her and matthew mcconaughey? i think they're really great together, like in how to lose a guy in ten days.

    More comments: [1] 2 »