Pay For Your Own Fame Whoring Ventures, Debbie Rowe!

debbiewenn5328762.jpg

The nerve!

Debbie Rowe is looking for the Jackson estate to foot her legal bills from when she attempted to gain guardianship of her two children she shares with Michael Jackson.

Yesterday, Debbie filed legal documents with the Los Angeles Superior Court looking for the estate to award her legal team $101,562.50 in unpaid fees. A court date is set for April 8th to flush out the details.

Have you ever showed a bit of maternal love to those kids? Or are they only useful when you can suck money out of their father's fortune?

[Image via WENN.]

Tags: ,

    Posted: Mar 19, 2010 at 12:45 pm / Email this  »

    21 comments to “Pay For Your Own Fame Whoring Ventures, Debbie Rowe!”



    1. 1

      HASN'T SHE GOTTEN ENOUGH MONEY FROM THE JACKSONS?

      Go away, Debbie. Take your greedy fatass back to those ranches and horses you love more than your children. Jesus! Can't you leave Michael in peace?



    2. 2

      you ever stop to think that she really did want to stay in touch with her children? And being that Michael was whacked and had a TON of money he got what HE wanted through manipulation?
      *gasp* A person with lots of money getting what they want with no regard to others!? Noooooooooo wayyyyyyyyyy



    3. 3

      Re: LosTAngeles

      Shut up. She literally offered herself to Michael after Lisa Marie lied to him and didn't bear him any children. Debbie knew EXACTLY what she was getting into. Michael was still seeing Lisa Marie even when Debbie was with him.

      Debbie was always on the side and she KNEW IT. She was just after the money and that's the bottom line.



    4. 4

      she might be grubbin for a buck, but I dont think you can call her a fame whore if she's gonna wear that shirt



    5. 5

      Really LosTAngeles?!?!? She had those kids for the money that Michael Paid her. She signed a contract. SHE was just an egg donor and she knew that and now because Michael is dead she wants more. She never had visitation with those kids becasue they are not hers. I will be glad when the media stops showing her fugly face.



    6. 6

      If she was dumb enough to sign away her children in the first place,she shouldn't get anything. She had 2 not 1,but 2 kids by the King ,not duke, of POP and she let him have full custody of them! Really. Don't come out the box now asking for $. If i had one kid by Mike,i wud be getting no less the $100 grand month.Instead she gave her kids up to go live with Bubbles the chimp.



    7. 7

      Although I think it was very kind and loving of Debbie to offer herself as a surrogate mother for Michael's children (and let's face it - that's all she ever was to Michael…a friend willing to be a surrogate mother to his children…His marriage to Lisa was the only one where he was in love with his wife) I am not too sure that this entitles her to a constant supply og Michael's money…especially now that he is gone and that money now belongs to his children. However, none of us know what relationship, if any, she has with those three kids, nor do any of us know the details of any contracts agreed upon by Michael and Debbie, so for any of us to judge Debbie negatively, is wrong and mean. I think Debbie is a good person who tried to do something very loving for her friend Michael and whether or not we agree with it or how things are now, is none of our business. The only three it really concerns are Katherine, Prince and Paris (Debbie isn't Blanket's mother so I doubt if she has anything to do with that situation.)
      Michael was all about love and compassion…so let's show some to the mother of two of his three beautiful and broken hearted children.



    8. 8

      Re: Lola24

      Even though I dislike Debbie, I agree with you on a lot of points and that's a very sweet post.



    9. 9

      Re: neelamazing
      Thank you for your kind compliments and also for showing compassion to a woman who you might not agree with or like particularily…you are a perfect example of having an opinion but not being pushy or hateful in getting it across when it differs from other peoples' opinions.
      I hope you have a great weekend =)



    10. 10

      Re: Lola24
      I hope you do too! As Michael's fans, I think we can all learn from one another and respect each other's opinions. :] Like you said, Michael was all about the love.. L-O-V-E.



    11. 11

      Debbie Rowe? Who thinks anyone cares what she does or says?Shes a horrible human being who sold her kids & keeps trying to squeze more money out of the situation.If people would stop following these fake celebrities around-take pictures and quote them-maybe they would just go away!!



    12. 12

      Um, the estate was trying to corrall the kids away, she filed against them it is typical for the side that backed down or lost (The estate settled with her) to pay the legal costs. What she is doing is completely normal. What isn't normal is leaving those three kids with Kathrine Jackson who allowed all her own children to be beaten and who's crazy religeous beliefs are probably why Michael grew up so twisted and self hating and insecure.



    13. 13

      She sold her children. She's despicable! Did she ever wonder how this would make her children feel one day?



    14. 14

      It's "fleshing" out,. not flushing out…



    15. 15

      Debbie should pay for her own legal bills…this is NOT MJ's responsibility! Plain and simple!



    16. 16

      She IS the mother of those children, and they should be living with HER. They do not need to be with the Jackson Family. That family messed up every single child they had. The are all crazy and have problems, since she is their mother, they should live with her. It's ridiculous anyone thinks that a child should live with some old, old grandparents rather than their own mother. The Jackson's were even more eager than she was to get Michael's money, and she is probably only trying to pay for attorneys to get HER OWN CHILDREN BACK WITH HER WHERE THEY BELONG!



    17. 17

      And those nasty jackson parents have been living off their kids' money FOR YEARS! Do you think THEY are keeping every single penny Michael left in a trust fund for those kids? No WAY! They are spending it as fast as they can, and using the kids as an excuse to do so. Besides, The sister who allegedly "takes care" of michaels children has never even had a job!



    18. 18

      The nerve. Millions of people in this country expect hard working taxpayers to pay their bills. It has been going on since 1965 when Lyndon Johnson created the Great Society welfare programs and I don't hear you complaining about that! Anyone else here disgusted by generational welfare?



    19. 19

      I actually can't believe the legal fees are that high! I also seriously cant see the resemblance between her and Prince and Paris. Prince and Paris are so good looking.



    20. 20

      hmmm im not sure what to think about this… i actually like debbie rowe. she clearly loved michael and supported him when he needed his friends to support him but im not sure i agree with the estate paying her legal fees… im not sure how the legal system works in the USA… but im pretty sure she would have enough money to pay her own bills… i dont know..



    21. 21

      money hungry whore…