Home Videos Photos
Home >> Sad Sad , Glee >> Glee Cast Gets Rolling Stone Cover!

Glee Cast Gets Rolling Stone Cover!

Filed under: Sad Sad > Glee

1hnc7.jpg

At least some of them do!

This week's cover of Rolling Stone features the stripped down cast of Glee.

Poor excluded cast members…

Who do U think should have been included?!

Tags:

    Posted: Mar 31, 2010 at 1:45 pm / Email this  »
    « Previous story
    OK No! Viral Sensation, Real-Life Failure
    Next story »
    Courtney Denies New Romance!!
    See All 68 Comments

    68 comments to “Glee Cast Gets Rolling Stone Cover!”



    1. 1

      Lame! Everyone who is on the show should have been on the cover



    2. 2

      I think Rolling Stone shouldn't have put anyone from that shit show on the cover. Shame on you Rolling Stone for encouraging terrible television.



    3. 3

      PUCK!



    4. 4

      The girl in the middle (lea michelle or ?) has some real star status… she always looks hella good at all the award shows!



    5. 5

      i'm fine with who they put on the cover. if the whole cast was there then there would be no room for words! maybe they could have included mark salling though…without a shirt on….cause that would have been HOT :)



    6. 6

      How about everyone that ISN'T white?! WTF



    7. 7

      It's a stupid, painful to watch TV show.
      But if Rolling Stone is so lame and they chose them, those who aren't on the cover???? Who gives a sh!t?
      Life isn't fair. You are on a TV show. 99.9999% of us are not.
      The Rolling Stone will be lining the kitty litter box by the end of the week.
      AND BTW
      No one reads rolilng stone anymore. It's a dinosaur



    8. 8

      hot, too bad kurt is missing and Finn shouldn't be on the back, also what is that dog doing there?



    9. 9

      omg. rolling stones is just stupid for putting Glee on the cover.



    10. 10

      They should've done at least a spread with all of the cast ( maybe they did? idk) but I think the cover is fitting. Btw, Lea Michelle is flashing that ass!



    11. 11

      another white-washed cover with a hypersexualized image of women. what else is new?



    12. 12

      Gay Guy, Black Girl, Paraplegic Guy, Asian Girl are missing. WTF?



    13. 13

      wheres puck :(



    14. 14

      the butt thing: a could be cute idea, creepy here



    15. 15

      Mercedes and Kurt and Puck!



    16. 16

      Mark Salling!



    17. 17

      WOW now just being white is not PC. Even minorities don't watch shows geared towards them so suck it.

      It should be all the ladies in schoolgirl outfits anyway.



    18. 18

      What gets me is why they have to have that one girl's underwear showing in the middle. Thanks, Rolling Stone, for being sexist douchebags.



    19. 19

      That show SUCKS, i don't how can people watch it, is the lamest show ever



    20. 20

      It would have been nice everyone was included but the 5 they have on there are the main characters, so i'm fine with it!



    21. 21

      Re: kenyasmom – Agreed. Its so obvious that only the straight white students were allowed. And the funny thing is, my favorite Glee characters are the ones missing.



    22. 22

      Hey where the hell is the hot jew with the mohawk, he should def be there, hotter than the other two dorks

    23. Heh says – reply to this


      23

      I have watched two episodes of this show and the only reason to watch this show at all is the young gay kid, I dont know what his name is but he is one of the excluded ones, in my opinion he should have been on the cover all by himself because he is without question the star of the show.



    24. 24

      Rolling Stone is crap now anyways I couldn't believe it when they put the Jonas Brothers on their cover and then feature you in it that is the moment that magazine died for me.



    25. 25

      Poor Chris :(



    26. 26

      I totally love Glee, but.. i'm not feeling this cover at ALL…
      why is that stupid dog there? they could have better put one of the other kids on the cover.. like Puck….
      its weird to see "Rachel's" ass all out and open and.. desturbing.. really.. lol
      and they all have kind of weird face expressions.. mehhh



    27. 27

      How about someone not white?



    28. 28

      It's a huge cast so they can't include everybody!

    29. rpt23 says – reply to this


      29

      Re: pink_pants – because they wanted a nice cover.. not ugly people. its just the way it is.. deal with it



    30. 30

      where is the rest of the cast?



    31. 31

      PUCK! Puck is way better than Finn! Puck should be on the cover as well!!



    32. 32

      Re: teamcarlisle85 – it could have been a foldout cover



    33. 33

      Re: savebrittany – please don't make general statements you have no facts to back up. i'm african american and i have watched every episode.



    34. 34

      Apparantly the show isn't that good if that chick had to show her ass to sell mags.



    35. 35

      Re: pitseleh8 – right.. she looks slutty, honestly..



    36. 36

      Re: rpt23 – if they wanted a 'nice' cover why is everyone making stupid faces? This whole thing is just weird..



    37. 37

      United they stand.

      Together they GLEE



    38. 38

      so WRONG! why so WHITE?! where's the DIVERSITY??? as they say vanilla's nothing compared to 31 FLAVORS!



    39. 39

      Maybe the rest are on a fold out. But who cares who is on the cover. But they certainly prefer white people. Maybe Jet mag will do all the black cast mates on the cover. Lea's underwear is an interesting shot.



    40. 40

      Puck and Kurt!
      i would have been soooo great!
      xoxo



    41. 41

      the panty shot is so pedo gross here
      yay RS way to be sexist and racist
      not to mention just plain stupid



    42. 42

      I actuallly get a kick out of Glee, it's fun. And the kids can really sing, unlike Justin Bieber , Miley Cyrus, etc. I'm not sure why a girl as talented as Leah (or whatever her name is) has to flash her ass like a common whore, but whatever.



    43. 43

      that's pretty slutty looking with her skirt up like that. isn't it like a kids show?



    44. 44

      How about Amber (the big girl), and the gay one (damn what's his name?). I mean what ever happened to multi-culturalism?

      A whole bunch of skinny white people on a cover, big shake up of the status quo for magazine covers.



    45. 45

      why does Rolling Stone have them on the cover? .. I think the shoot looks great though with who's on it!



    46. 46

      hmmmm…all the white peeps on the cover…interesting.



    47. 47

      Re: a3maniac – right on sistah! brothah! inbetween-uh!



    48. 48

      I don't get it. What do wheels and underwear have to do with anything? They should have ditched the kitsch and included more of the cast members… several of them who are more talented than some featured.



    49. 49

      where is the little fruit?



    50. 50

      mattco firstly i agree with you and secondly is it totally neccessary for both girls to have their arses out? why not one of the guys. god some people are so desperate.



    51. 51

      Re: brunette87 – you took the words out of my mouth



    52. 52

      Re: Fathom – it's an excuse to show someone in a schoolgirl skirt flashing their knickers. i love your under stated version of sexy RS. lea is quite the pouty famewhore so they had no trouble gettin her to take centre stage i would think. also a cheerleader with a bike's handlebars up her nether regions doesn't really scream subtle either. nice try though. the whole things vulgar.



    53. 53

      Damn, Rolling Stone! Why are there only WHITE cast members shown?



    54. 54

      well that is a very white, non gay, non disabled cover.

      How… stupid.

      I'm with those who said that shit show shouldn't even be on the cover.



    55. 55

      Re: TerrificallySane – Fold out cover is a great idea for situations like these. Did they have to show her butt?!



    56. 56

      Everyone should be there



    57. 57

      WOW THEY PULLED A STEREOTYPE BIAS RACIST. NO ASIAN GIRL, NO BLACK GIRL (BIG-BONED TOO), AND NO GAY GUY.



    58. 58

      PUCK!! duh



    59. 59

      INTERESTING NONE OF THE MINORITIES/ETHNIC CAST MEMBERS MADE THE COVER !



    60. 60

      I hate that they didn't put Jenna on the cover.
      SUCKERS!



    61. 61

      i think it looks an awful lot like the "friends" rolling stones cover. they couldn't get a new idea?



    62. 62

      Jayma Mays as Emma Pillsbury…. she is my absolute favorite



    63. 63

      PUCK!!! Hello!!! He's way hotter than Finn!



    64. 64

      Everyone! We watch the show for the entire cast! Why shouldn't the entire cast be on the cover!



    65. 65

      need 2 get rid of the pregnant one and put on the diva and the gay boy. and lose the bicycle and put the one in a wheelchair on instead.



    66. 66

      Re: imcoolsilly – Ummm…what does hockey have to do with any of this? puck: a. black disk of vulcanized rubber that is to be hit into the goal. At least phonics should tell you that puck and puke don't even sound close. But I guess reading before submitting is a little beyond your sharp wit.



    67. 67

      it looks like a norman rockwell painting



    68. 68

      Jessalyn Gilsig (Terri Schuester) shes sooooo awesome !