Home Videos Photos

Sandra Set To Return Her Razzie!

| Filed under: Oops!AwardzSandra Bullock

sandraap10030605219__optjb.jpg

The original Razzie is going home!

Sandra Bullock, who was cool enough to personally accept the Golden Raspberry - for her performance in the shiteous All About Steve - in person after winning an Academy Award, was embroiled in the middle of some mild dramz over the weekend when reports circulated that she had walked away with the original, prototype statuette and not the $5 knockoff that winners are intended to officially receive!

Razzie founder John Wilson has already claimed that he had reached out to Bullock with no intention for the issue to be made public, and now the actress's publicist, Cheryl Maisel, has released a statement:

"We were never contacted by them to return the Razzie. I contacted them yesterday to check the validity of the story and was only told then that we had been given the wrong award. We will be returning the Razzie to them shortly."

We hope this was just a legitimate miscommunication and that the Razzie founders weren't trying to take advantage of all the press the actress is receiving right now! She was trying to be a big person by even showing up to the event in the first place!

Thoughts??

[Image via AP Images.]

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

29 comments to “Sandra Set To Return Her Razzie!”



  1. 1

    Leave her alone already. WTF cares? Did this really warrant a post?



  2. 2

    you know this was totally a way for them to get their name in the press again. there was no way they contacted her "privately" and she didn't respond b/c she soooooo wanted even more press than she has been getting these past weeks. give me a break!



  3. 3

    lol looking to add insult to injury to sandra. which i guess is what the razzie's do best is she a joke now? i'd say if one person gets to keep the real award its the actress that got an oscar the next day.



  4. 4

    They should have just had a new one made. If it were anyone else, maybe ask for it back, but leave Sandra alone!



  5. 5

    They should donate it to a museum so this never happens again.

    They should just give them the award they are given in the first place so there is no confusion.



  6. 6

    Take that razzle and ….I call bullshit!



  7. 7

    The man is lying through his teeth!
    Don't give him another word of press- ever!



  8. 8

    Jesus, what kind of fucked up karma is visiting her right now–a deadbeat husband, an academy award, 24/7 media scrutiny, flack from the Razzies, scorn and adoration. And yet she remains poised, funny, charming and seemingly very grounded. Props to her.



  9. 9

    1.I have seen worse movies than ALL ABOUT STEVE. I know a bright nutsy gal like Sandra's part so it was funny to me.
    2. Razzie should not have told that story to the public. Razzie made the mistake and Sandra said she would return it next year if they watched the dvd she handed out.
    3. RAZZIE SUCKS FOR HURTING SANDRA AT THIS TIME.



  10. 10

    WHO THE FUCK CARESSS!!!!! OH, PEREZ DOES… NOT A SURPRISE.



  11. 11

    I don't believe them. Who does that to someone that is going through a personal tragedy? What assholes.



  12. 12

    Umm.. They outta let her keep it b/c of her actully showing up to receive it. They wanted some extra press. I am sure it's not near and dear to her heart aways.



  13. 13

    She's a Nazi sympathizer — what wife does not know about her husband's political beliefs? Come on, who are we kidding…husbands hide their adultery, they don't hide beliefs they have about politics and history. And, she never stumbled on to any of his Nazi paraphernalia collection? He wasn't exactly hiding it if it was on a surfboard…jeez..wise up people..actors play characters, it does not mean they ARE the characters they play…America's Sweetheart..yeah, ok..whatever…



  14. 14

    let her keep it dicks !



  15. 15

    jesus of course it was a mistake, its not like Sandra Bullock tried to steal a $5 freaking piece of junk, get real



  16. 16

    FAME WHORES…. That's so stupid



  17. 17

    of she is going to give it back she doesn't take things that don't belong to her!!



  18. 18

    'thoughts??'

    i really don't give a shit



  19. 19

    assholes



  20. 20

    if only that was the worst of her problems!



  21. 21

    Do they REALLY need it back so badly? And if so, did it need to be done publicly during such a difficult time for Sandra? Considering the enormous amount of publicity the stupid Razzies got from Sandra Bullock's attendance, the very least they could do is give her the effing award. Just for this, I won't watch the Razzies even if they are televised.



  22. 22

    Asswipe!!! She accepted the Razzie BEFORE she got the oscar. Like the day before, I believe. Get your shit right, but by now I shouldn't expect anything better, I guess.



  23. 23

    WAY TO KNOCK SOMEONE WHEN THEY ARE DOWN. DO THEY NEED THE PUBLICITY THAT BAD.



  24. 24

    They want their original $5.01 one back. Why the hell didn't they just give her the knock off in the first place?



  25. 25

    This dumb bitch is not MIA, btw, she is with Jessie.

  26. laz says – reply to this


    26

    A nice thing to do, would have been to just let her keep the damn thing. Isn't she going through enough? Why bring it up now, why not earlier? Pssh I'm sure you could've replaced the damn thing and let her keep the p.o.s.



  27. 27

    She deserves the one she received she gave them more free publicity than they could afford



  28. 28

    What is this geek week?



  29. 29

    Ok this has nothing to do with this article but I am so suprised perez doesn't have this up already, on the news this morning they announced Sandra filed for divorce agaisnt her lame husband and then the most shocking thing was they showed a cover of people magazine of her holding her adopted 3month old baby boy… they claimed she had adopted him before the oscars… woww