Home Videos Photos Shop
PerezHilton CocoPerez Khloé Selena G. Meghan Markle T. Swift PerezTV

Roman Polanski, DENIED!

| Filed under: Icky Icky PooLegal Matters


Sorry, it's not gonna happen!

A California court has nixed Roman Polanski's plea to be given special counsel or be sentenced in absentia regarding the 1977 statutory rape case he's been fleeing for over 30 years.

Polanski is currently under house arrest in Switzerland. Once the evil douchebag is extradiated back to the States, he could face up to two years in prison.

He deserves EXACTLY what's coming to him!

[Image via WENN.]

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Celebrities Who've Been Accused Of Homophobia!
The Teen Mom Franchise: A Mugshot Collection!
Too Many Trump Scandals To Follow? Get The Breakdowns HERE!
Biggest Teen Mom Scandals!
Consent In Film: Classic Movies That Are WAY Disturbing In Retrospect!
Trump's 10 Worst Tweets Of 2017!

104 comments to “Roman Polanski, DENIED!”

More comments: [1] 2 »

  1. 1

    i hate him

  2. 2

    Haha Perez Hilton, the new spokesperson for morality. You seem to have a fondness for the young yourself and yet you are rather judgemental. The truth is no one expect the two people involved know what happened.

  3. 3

    He drugged up a child and sodomized her. He confessed and has been running away from justice for too long. He is such a slime.

  4. 4

    There was never any sodomy. Check you facts.

  5. 5

    Your "Kick-Ass" ads are sign enough of who's the douchebag Mario. Roman's made a couple of Hollywood's Best and lived the most facinating life of his peers, yet you think you're right about an incident 34 years ago. The "victim" seduced Roman and she admits it. Lolitas exists, accept it. The prosecutors are the real fame whores here. The State should really call off these dogs.

  6. 6

    The time has come to put this scumbag in jail for his crime. I hate how he feels he is above the law! He deserves more than 2 years for fleeing the Country to avoid his sentence and if he does go to prison he should not get any special treatment.

  7. 7

    Roman Polanski, you nasty!

  8. 8

    Re: Curious Yellow – It's still illegal to have sex with a child. It's called statutory rape. But then, that's probably something you do all the time.

  9. 9

    Re: Curious Yellow – First of all the ads have nothing to do with this. It's a way for Perez to make money, obviously.
    Secondly, it doesn't matter what someone does in their career. I don't understand how people use this as an excuse for what he has done. If he was a super-intelligent mathematician that had been deemed a genius, he would not have gotten away with it. I don't understand why a famed director gets special treatment.
    Lastly, that is not what she claimed. Where is your source on that?

  10. 10

    Yes-let this pedophile scumbag serve the same time as anyone else.2 years is not enough but better than nothing.Would love to see him in the general pop in San Quentin-where child rapists are considered(rightfully) the lowest of the low-maybe a little karmic payback??

  11. 11

    "A child" seduced the old letch - OMG you have got to be kidding me. I don't care of the kid stood in front of the creep totally naked HE was supposed to be the adult and keep his nasty hands to himself. Sick, depraved and he needs to do way more then a mere two years. He should do two years for every year he has been hiding away

  12. 12

    I hate celebrities who think they are above the law. Go to jail and serve your time for the crime!!!!!

  13. 13

    The irony here is that had he fled the country before is arrest the Statue of Limitations would have run out on this crime years ago. Polanski legal troubles are a result of pleading guilty and running out before his sentencing.
    He needs to come back to CA. and deal with his crimes.

  14. 14

    Re: honeybee57

    I used to have sex with people when I was 13 years old. I used to have sex with people who were a lot older than me. I wasn't a victim of anything. Not everyone reaches sexual maturity at the same time.

  15. 15

    i hope he gets sodomized in a US prison for 34 more years.

  16. 16

    He would most likely only serve half of his term so he needs to suck it up and get it over with

  17. zooby says – reply to this


    How the hell can anyone defend him? His wife was murdered, yes, but that does not justify his actions. He is a perverted, nasty, POS, and to anyone who defends him - I hope if you have a daughter what happened to the girl does not happen to your own. Then you won't be sticking up for someone like that. I hope he rots in jail with all of those defending him.

  18. 18

    Anyone who defends this prick must obviously not have a child of their own. Forget about the fact that he fed her champagne, but he dropped some ludes in it as well! He took naked pics of her and anally sodomized her amongst other things even after she said she didn't want to do it!

    He admits to all this and then runs like the little bitch he is. I don't give a fukk how brilliant he is as a director he is still a slime ball. Most people can agree that Hitler was a genius and brilliant orator but that doesn't change the fact that he was a disgusting, vile human being as well!

  19. 19

    Re: Gigi14 – Yes G-well said.There was a petition in Hollywood saying he should get off because hes a good director.The person that started it was that moral compass & fellow pedophile Woody Allen. Cur yllow is talking out his ass.The victim didnt say that-and a 13 year old cant consent legally_duh

  20. 20

    just 2 years?

    fleeing for 30 years doesn't make it worse?

  21. 21

    Re: S(a)int

    The point is that there is a law that states an ADULT is not to engage in such acts w/ anyone under the age of legal consent. Polanski ADMITTED to breaking this law. On top of it all, he drugged the chick w/ champagne and a quaalude so she was obviously not in a clear state! He admits to all this and instead of taking his punishment, the punk-ass flees, making him a fugitive on top of a rapist!

    Anyone u had sex w/ when u were 13, that was over the age of 18 would be considered, by the state, a statutory rapist. If you ever have a daughter trust, even though u may have felt the way you said about yourself not being a victim, you may feel a hell of a lot differently about the situation if/when u have a daughter and it comes to your own child.

  22. 22

    I am part Jewish. The only people advocating for Roman Polanski are Jewish. Unfortunately some Jews have the unfortunate thought they they are outside the law, and this shames me. Roman also made the typical Holocaust film to pander to people he thought would support him, and they took the bait. Polanski just wants to come to Hollywood to cash in and make a lot of money.

  23. 23

    Curious Yellow, you need to overcome the igbnorance and backwardness your mother put into your head. If Roman Polanski were a redneck, you'd be screaming for his blood and calling him what he is, a child rapist. Please don't make a mockery of Moses.

  24. 24

    People are very quick to judge without knowing ALL of the facts of this case.

  25. 25

    Re: Godess115

    Yeah like I said, everyone is different. But you lot are able to make judgements based mostly on what you have read in the news. You dont actually know exactly what happened.

  26. 26

    first of alll.. you are always critizicing bad motherhood, in those days there was nooo doubt about partyings and activities….. I beleive is the mothers fault plus she was not a kid with no clue of whats going on… She wanted to be a model and be an artist otherwise she wouldnt have been there… so you all blame polanski but its easy cuz shes a minor,, im a girl and i was a minor not long ago and I knew even when i was raised really conservative the difference… idont buy that naive shit that i didnt know what happened…plus its wrong about polanski runnin away but come on not being able to come back and live like that is not peace of mind….and perez judging about moral values with you i believe is depending on who you like !!! Im sure if it was kstew with 16 years you would have been like se totally deserves it !! so sweety stop the bad propaganda

  27. 27

    I love Polanski's work, find it utterly horrifying what happened to his wife and baby, and I was also (in my day) first-class jailbait, but lemme tellya: ANYONE who has seen photos he took THAT DAY of the 'Lolita' in question, cannot have any doubt in their mind that she looked exactly like what she was: A LITTLE KID. I saw the documentary, "Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired", about how they just don't think it's a big deal in Europe, and the US should just leave him alone, and I shared the same sentiment…..until I saw the photos of the kid. What a SICK FUCKER he is! She wasn't tarted up, she just looked like any little girl you'd see anywhere. Whatever corruption was involved with the case aside, he DID IT. Talent doesn't excuse culpability. Unless he pleads PTSD from what the Mansons did to him, he's done for.

  28. 28

    hes a pervert and two years isnt enough but he got away with it for this long, so whatever…uck

  29. 29

    He should have taken the deal that was offered in 1977. Social mores have changed quite a bit in 30 years, his sentence will likely be much harsher now, as it should be!

  30. 30

    Re: S(a)int – Roman Polanski pled GUILTY!

  31. 31

    GOD you are so stupid…read the facts before you of all people start judging someone…as if this man has not dealt with this rediculous story enough. We read your posts for entertainment not for your insight!

  32. 32

    Re: lopezfanyeah – What on earth are you talking about? You're NOT part Jewish!

  33. 33

    Re: S(a)int – It's not about sexual maturity. I was a 12 year old with C cups and a very womanly body. But I was not EMOTIONALLY ready for an ADULT SEXUAL RELATIONSHIP.

  34. 34

    Re: S(a)int – It's not about SEXUAL maturity. I was a 12 year old with cup breasts and a very adult body but I wasn't EMOTIONALLY ready for an ADULT SEXUAL RELATIONSHIP.

  35. 35

    POLANSKI IS GREAT. digging up the case is a ridiculous use of CALIFORNIA'S already scarce money and is PUBLICITY FOR self serving PROSECUTORS.
    what a SHAM. leave him alone 2 make brill films. he cannot even return to the USA.
    why hate on him?????

  36. 36

    I saw the naked pictures he took of the little girl (after giving her Qualudes) and the girl was SO young and undeveloped she didn't even have tits! He's a pedophile!

  37. 37

    Re: Curious Yellow – How could you say the victim seduced the perpetrator! That is sick! That is exactly what pedophiles say! They blame the child victim…he gave her Qualudes, he gave her booze..and anyway, READ THE LAW sex with a minor, no matter under what circumstances IS A CRIME.

  38. 38

    Re: Curious Yellow – And, the victim NOW cannot be trusted in anything she says. Polanski paid her off when he was lobbying to win the Oscar for the Piano. It is not the prosecutor's job to listen to the paid-off victim 34 years later. It is the governments job to uphold the law, no matter how long the perpetrator has been on the run, and how many people he's paid off.

  39. 39

    Re: S(a)int – Your experience is not the same experience this girl had at 13. She was told she was going to be photographed. She was not physically mature (as you say, people mature at different times). Polanski was her father's age. He gave her Qualudes, and alcohol and she made statements right after it happened that it had been against her will. I accept your experiences as valid and true, but the story the girl tearfully and drugged told after the incident sounds nothing like your experiences.

  40. 40

    Why is he upset about doing time in jail? This man will write a best seller whcih will go straight to the top of the best sellers list in america… this is the way of the anti hero the states are so fond of.

  41. 41

    Re: Susie-Q – Since when is a 13 year old person a "child" ?

  42. 42

    Re: S(a)int – Hey, this is not judgments based on what's read in the media. Polanski made the admissions in court and it is a public document available in L.A. County Court.

  43. 43

    Re: Lawrence of Arabia – A 13 year old person is a child under the law. They are a "juvenile" "minor" or "child" if they are under 18.

  44. 44

    Two Years? you think that is all he deserves?

    Rape in all forms steals the soul, and that is for life!

    This country doesn't know justice, because it doesn't know what it is like to be the victim.

    This douchebag deserves more than just a "maxium" of two year, give him at least 20!

  45. 45

    At first I thought two years was weak. But then I remembered how that's a lot of time for payback sodomization.

  46. 46

    Wow, 2 whole years?

  47. 47

    This is so pathetically stupid. Perez, you of all should be either supportive or just shut up. Remember, you are a gay wimp!
    I am a European girl and we do have sex before we are 18 all the time.
    Any girl out there to say otherwise is a liar or simply to ugly.
    She wanted to go to Polanski's house… enough said!

  48. 48

    Re: zooby
    The mother delivered her to him? Why not start ranting at her? This was not her first time at the rodeo. It was the 70s, and she new exactly what she was doing.

  49. 49

    yez! effen douche bag!!!

  50. 50

    Re: Indigo – The law is generalizing too much. A 17-year-old is a minor but not a child, therefore I think it's bullshit that if someone of that age had consensual sex with a 20-year-old it would be considered any type of rape. It happens way too often even though the minor said s/he wanted it. Biology also says you stop being a child by definition when you get your period - that doesn't mean you should go and have sex right away. I'm NOT defending what Polanski did, if all the allegations are true. Also, people plead guilty for many reasons, that doesn't mean they are guilty. The victim didn't speak up for 33 years. Why?

  51. 51

    Re: L.A.Maedchen – She said "No, No" while he sodomized her..even though she was drugged…this was not consensual…read the court files in L.A. County Court.

  52. 52

    Re: Ze German – You have no idea what you are saying. The victim spoke up immediately after the incident, back 34 years ago! And, it was not consensual sex, he drugged and rapped her, even while she kept saying "No". And, have you seen the pictures he took of her that night? She was A LITTLE GIRL, no make-up, NO TITS…any adult man who gets it up for someone who's 13 and looks like a little girl is sick.

  53. 53

    Re: Ze German – If Roman Polanski's victim is "over It" that's great. But this was never consensual and it could never be consensual because of her age. Her forgiveness may have been a part of the healing process, but it's irrelevant in terms of how he is sentenced. The man is a brilliant filmmaker, but bottom line- he's not above the law.

  54. 54

    Only two years?

  55. 55

    I wanna be rich and famous in my next life…

    Imagine living in a world where you can sodomize a child, wine them underage, flee a country where you are a wanted man for 30 years…and only get two years in prison…

    Lol, repeat offender weed dealers get in more trouble than this guy is…

  56. 56

    Re: gimlet123 – "People are very quick to judge without knowing ALL of the facts of this case."

    Very quick? LOL

  57. 57

    Re: KalexiS – Not only get just two years in prison..but convince the Academy Award members to give you an Oscar for The Piano while you're a fugitive of the law…those academy members who voted for him, and gave him a standing ovation are scum…I don't buy their argument about separating "artistic abilities" from his criminal acts. I bet if he were a black guy director on the lam, he would have never gotten an Academy Award, no matter how great the movie.

  58. 58

    He's gonna get sodomized all two years in jail..pedos are the bottom of the totem pole in there…lol…karma is a bitch…haaaa

  59. 59

    Re: jeezlol – And, he'll be getting butt-fucked WITHOUT the Qualudes he gave the little chic…ouch.

  60. 60

    2 years? are you kidding me?

  61. 61

    Re: S(a)int – First, you spelled "except" wrong. Second, if you hate Perez so much why are you even on his website? You have a user name so obviously you're a frequent visitor.

    And Polanski confessed to raping that girl, so obviously now more than two people know what happened.

  62. 62

    Re: Curious Yellow – Even if she "seduced" Roman he still willingly had sex with a child, although apparently that's ok in your book. He's a sick bastard and should get a lot more than two years.

  63. 63

    Re: S(a)intRe: donnatrope – b\because you raped a little girl you moron. If you had a daughter and a celebrity raped her, would you say its ok because they make good movies?

  64. 64

    Re: L.A.Maedchen – God, what is wrong you?

    "they are a liar or simply too ugly" yeah.. or just not a slut..

    Are you serious?

  65. 65

    Re: lilymariaRe: Indigo – I NEVER once claimed it was consensual. Don't put words in my mouth to support your point. I ws answering to somebody who said "according to the law, everybody under 18 is a child". That was it. And no, lilymaria, I did not see her pictures, and I don't want to. I'm sure it doesn't make her feel any better if millions of people see them. Glad you were curious enough to take a look, good for you.

  66. 66

    How is this just getting so much press??? Yeah it sucks and is sick.. But where was everyone in thee uh- seventies???

  67. 67

    What Polanski did was no doubt disgusting by today's standards. Hell, even by the standards then. But My God it was over 30 years ago. the victim has come forward on his behalf. What kind of culture are we if we can't forgive and forget. I'm well aware this was scandalous, but it was a lifetime ago, let's let it go

  68. 68

    Re: Curious Yellow – You're a douchebag. First of all, she did NOT seduce him. I have no idea where you got that, but that's completely wrong. And, in any case, Lolitas are little girls. If a little girl is coming onto you, you fix the situation. You do NOT EVER take advantage of messed up children. Honestly, it's people like you that just make me believe that humans are, as a collective, vermin. Thanks.

  69. 69

    Re: L.A.Maedchen – Just beacsue you're a slut, doesn't mean everyone else is. NOT every girl has sex before 18. And, as for the girl actually wanting to go to Polanski's house (and, by the way, they were at Jack Nicholson's place, not Roman's!), her mother had actually met Roman at a party or something, and had mentioned that she had a daughter and she wanted her daughter to be an actress or model or whatever, and he said to bring her over. The girl was actually really reluctant about it all. She had one of those pushy stage mothers like Kris Kardashian or Dina Lohan.
    You're a horrid excuse for a human being, and should keep your mouth shut!

  70. 70

    Two words: Child. Rapist.

    Two more words: No. Forgiveness.

    One more word: Fugitive.

    More child rapists repeat their crimes than murderers. We don't have any policy for forgiveness for running from the law. Our legal system depends on following through with punishment once someone is convicted. That this has gone on for decades is no one's fault but Kinski's. He's an elite prick who thinks his art puts him above the law. Fortunately most people have enough sense to disagree with the people who think we should just let a little incident of child rape go. I'm sure he felt awful about what he did — his next date was 15. He ran from the law — he should be prosecuted for that alone. This story makes me spit up. Mario, don't listen to loonies who think child rape should be forgiven. Time to pay the piper, Kinski, you disgusting fuck.

  71. 71

    Perez, I love you, but you're on the wrong side of this one. "Age of consent" is an arbitrary number, used for social control (just like organized religion!), and has nothing to do with physical or emotional readiness for sex, regardless of the partner's age. Physical readiness for sex depends on the age of physical maturity, and emotional readiness for sex sometimes never happens even if a person lives to be 100.

    Suppose, my dear, that when you were, say, 16, and an attractive guy of say, 21, offered to, um, service you, would you have said yes? Would you have felt that this was a choice that you were capable of making? Even though this is a much smaller age difference than Polanski and the young woman, it represents "underage" and "over the age of consent" just the same — if 18 is the magic number, it shouldn't matter if the "underage" is 13 or 16, or if the "adult" is 21, 35, 45 or 80. If you said yes to that guy, would you then call it rape? Would you support his being jailed and defamed and demonized? Or would you just have a big smile on your face?

  72. 72

    Re: S(a)int – AMEN!! You're telling my story, right down to the age (13).

  73. 73

    Re: tkwalx43

    Oh well if I spelled except wrong then my opinion must not be valid. I come to this sight because I like some of the things that are posted here. In fact there is no need to explain that to you because its none of your fucking business.

    Re: CherryMalice

    Just because someone has sex at an early age it doesn't mean that they are fucked up. It means that they are ready for sex at an early age. I don't know if thats what happened here or not, but the point is neither do any of you. People lie, and children lie quite frequently.

  74. 74

    Re: Alex 4400 – I don't believe there were ever any subsequent accusations about Polanski and "underaged" girls, and Polanski has been remarried to a woman for many years now who was an adult when they met, so I think "pedophile" is a pretty extreme and unfair word to apply to him. When I was a young teen, I was fully capable of saying yes or no to a joint, a drink, a quaalude, or sex. "Age of consent" is a fixed number that in no way can apply to every person. It wasn't rape, and "statutory rape" is nothing but legal B.S. based on the meaningless "age of consent." People should have sex when they are physically mature and feel ready, and with whom they choose. But I guess you drank the "morality" Kool-Aid.

  75. 75

    Re: backstreetboysarethebest – You hate Polanski and like the Backstreet Boys? Are you from Bizzarro World? Too busy listening to boy bands to appreciate a truly brilliant filmmaker?

  76. 76

    Re: goddamnjesus – Yeah, I guess having Charles Manson murder your pregnant wife isn't quite enough suffering for one lifetime.

  77. 77

    Re: CherryMalice

    Fuck off you idiot. Did you just call someone a slut because they had sex under 18? I thought that "children" weren't able to be sluts? That is what you are suggesting LA MADCHEN is. It is quite possible that a 13 year old can be a slut. Last input to this conversation. Most of you are incredibly stupid.

  78. 78

    Re: lopezfanyeah – You bigot. Does your gentile half bash your Jewish half on a daily basis?

  79. 79

    Re: Ze German – Thanks for your sensible comment.

  80. 80

    What's the difference between rape and sex?

    Answer: Salesmanship.

    — Neil Fifer

  81. 81

    He's going to get everything he needs in prison..he likes rape,so he's gonna get what he wants (and needs).

  82. 82

    Re: S(a)int – *site

  83. 83

    Re: JBklynRe: JBklyn – Ok you two: Polanski pled guilty and then he fled. ANYONE who pleads guilty and then goes on the lam, no matter what for, is on the "WANTED" list. It's simple law, in every country. There's no statute of limitations for being on the lam, there's no "oh let's forgive"…it's just the law. You plead guilty to a crime, you run…you get hunted down, no matter how long it takes. It's the law in every land. Period.

  84. 84

    Isn't he supposed to get extra years for running after pleading guilty? I thought fleeing was a separate offense. If he were some poor guy they'd pile on all sorts of other law violations on top after going on the lam.

  85. 85

    Re: JBklyn – Holy shit! There are people on this site defending this pedo??!!! Are you guys on his payroll, or are you fellow pedos? (like Woody Allen..lol)

  86. 86

    Re: JBklyn – And, you say you don't believe he had sex with minors after that…lol…he went right on to do "Tess of the D'Urbevilles" (or some such name) with a 14 year old Natasha Kinski and it was known he did her..lol..the story was about an old guy fucking 14 year old Natasha..I'd say he was a little obsessed with the little girl topic..lol..lol..

  87. 87

    Re: Ze German – Believe me, I didn't want to see those pictures, either. I was living in Europe YEARS AGO and buying magazines to help my language learning process, and I picked up, I think it was a French magazine (could have been Italian), and I came across an article on the Polanski topic that included really explicit pictures he'd taken of the little girl the night he admitted to having raped her (including anally, according to the article). My American sensibilities were shocked that a mainstream European magazine would publish such pictures, but after living there a while you get to realize the Europeans are like that. But, I DID NOT seek out those pictures. They were creepy and I was sickened. The mag went immediately into the trash, where it belonged.

  88. lizaM says – reply to this


    Re: luck777 – Your post is too hilarious! Without the Qualudes! He will never be able to sit again…yeah, pay back is a bitch…and a bitch is exactly what he'll be in the slammer…

  89. lizaM says – reply to this


    You know what I find really interesting about all this talk that includes Woody Allen: no one ever talks about the fact he lost all visitation rights to the daughter he had with Mia Farrow. It could be the legal records were sealed. But, some of my New York lawyer friends were on motion hearings across the hallway from the Mia Farrow-Woody Allen trial (they were both in the courtroom, and she took the stand, too interesting)…and Mia attested, and the judge agreed that Woody sexually molested their own 4-year-old daughter! And, the judge decided Woody could never see her again. My lawyer friends sat in for the proceedings… was this never made public? Judges do tend to seal family law matters pertaining to minors.

  90. 90

    Re: lilymaria – I'm European and not easily shocked. But I don't think publishing nude pictures of a rape victim is appropriate at all. But then there's of course the question of who released those photos in the first place. Could have been the victim to support her case, I don't know. Does anybody know?
    Regarding the "undevelopped, no tits" thing: I have a 28-year-old friend who naked looks like a 13-year-old boy. No boobs, no hips, totally unattractive in my eyes. My friends and I jokingly sometimes say that guys who want to do her must be pedophiles. lol She thinks she's hot but is sooo not. Still love her to death though. Anyway, that just reminded me of her so I wanted to throw that in. I do think it's pretty sickening that a guy in his 40's would be sexually attracted to a 13-year-old. I had a fling with a 28-year-old when I was 16 and that was totally different. That's why I don't like the term "statutory rape".
    Anyway, there's no excuse for what Polanski did to that girl. And then I also wonder: what responsible parent would leave their child unsupervised in the "care" of anybody in Hollywood??

  91. 91

    Re: Ze German – Agree that it is not statutory rape for a male of sixteen to have sex with an older woman..and, get this: American law agrees with you! It is one of the very few areas of the law in the U.S. where males and females are treated differently! 16 year old guys are not deemed "under-age" for sexual relations and thus there's no statutory rape there! Great for us "older" women…lol…As for the issue of your older friend with no breast..yeah, some women are like that, and some guys find that attractive, some don't, that's cool…but, the victim in this case later matured to a full-bodied woman, so the fact that the photos showed a totally undeveloped body shows that she was not yet physically developed, and thus by most medical/social standards considered not ready for sexual intercourse. Although, as someone pointed out above, even a full-bodied 13 year old may not be emotionally prepared. But, really, she looked like a little girl in those pics he took. As to who put out those picture, I don't know. If they are part of the evidence in the L.A. Courthouse, then they were considered public records and possibly available to media at that time (rape victims' right to privacy have evolved a lot in the last three decades, now it would not be public record). As for the girl being left un-supervised by her parents, that is not true. Angelica Huston was at the house and was supposed to be the chaperon.

  92. 92

    Does anyone care that the alleged victim has said she was not raped by him and tried to drop the case but a 'famewhoring' hollywood judge was the one who kept the trial going for his own benefit?

  93. lizaM says – reply to this


    Ok, I Googled the topic of Woody Allen losing all access to his daughter with Mia, and this is what I got: Court records are sealed, but there were reporters in the courtroom (along with my lawyer friends). The daughter's name was Dylan (Mia later changed it) she was seven years old during the trial, and Mia said Woody had been molesting her. Woody wanted custody of the girl, but the judge felt he had SO MUCH evidence of the molestation that he didn't even grant him supervised visitation. And, Woody had one of the best lawyers in the U.S., Alan Dershowitz, prof at Harvard Law. And, get this, Woody appealed and he LOST the appeal, too. So, evidence of him molesting his own little girl must have been slam-dunk, family law judges almost NEVER sever all ties, even supervised visitation. Poor girl. Woody Allen is such a creep — he fought to the end to get full custody of her! He wanted to keep it going, but had to settle for sun-yee, or whatever her name is. Now, they have little girls together. May God protect them…cause their mother can't..she was in special-ed classes…all so creepy and sad for the girls.

  94. 94

    Why in the world does he expect special treatment?! What he did was so terribly wrong, and he should definately pay! 2 years that he could possibly get, seems far from enough. He should be locked up for the rest of his life. He's gotten away with this for so long! I hope if and when he gets locked up, he gets what he deserves on the inside!!!

  95. 95

    Re: trudylou – The victim settled a civil lawsuit against him, once she was already an adult and got tons of undisclosed amounts of cash from him. From that time on, and then later, when he paid her for lobbying for his Oscar, she has been making statements. Basically, as an adult she was paid off (big cash) to say things. That has NOTHING to do with the criminal case, which was decided when she testified as a child. The criminal law process requires that a person who said he was guilty and then fled be apprehended. Basically, the "Wanted" sign for a runaway criminal is not taken down by the authorities because the victim settled a civil lawsuit. By the way, the victim has never said (even after getting paid off) that he didn't rape her, she just says she'd rather let it go. These statements from her were probably required by the settlement agreement she arrived at to get her cash (the agreement was kept secret). If she were to say he never raped her she would be charged with perjury, because that would contradict her statements in the initial criminal case.

  96. 96

    Re: trudylou – By the way, this "fame-whoring" trial judge you're talking about has been dead for SO LONG he is way not an issue. And, no matter how "fame-whoring" a judge, at the time he was the judge, the victim DID NOT DROP THE CASE, and Polanski plead guilty.

  97. 97

    Re: lilymaria – Really? Wow, she did a shitty job then, to put it politely. I would still have insisted on being there myself or the photoshoot wouldn't have happened.

  98. 98

    Re: Ze German – Yep, shitty job indeed by Angelica Huston. I agree the poor girl should not have been out of her mother's sight, but I think things were different 36 years ago that way in the U.S. Kids used to play alone in the streets until all hours of the night; parents used 12 year olds as baby-sitters. My friend was telling me he and his little sisters would go out to play after school and so did all their friends, and mothers didn't see them until dinner time, and no one worried. Society has changed a lot in these 36 years. Parents are much more aware of dangers facing kids. You never see kids playing alone running around neighborhoods anymore, but that was the norm back then. More trusting era — over-trusting in this case.

  99. lmlol says – reply to this


    I agree with the post that if he were a black director on the run from the law, the Academy would have never given him an Oscar. I'd say the moment when all the Academy Awards audience members got up and gave a standing ovation when he won the Oscar was the lowest moment in all the years of Oscar hand-outs. Scummy people all round.

  100. 100

    Wow, Martha Stewart did her time, got out, and now she's merrily going on with her life like nothing happened. But Roman drags out this negative publicity and stress FOREVER. However, he certainly hasn't aged much. He's ALWAYS looked old, but he doesn't look OLDER than he did decades ago. I guess he's hoping that he'll die b4 he ends up in the slammer!

More comments: [1] 2 »